Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
MLB announced the winners of the Gold Glove for the American League yesterday and once again, the awards prove that in a sport like baseball – where numbers mean everything – that the numbers, really, mean nothing.
It's easy to take fielding percentage, the number of errors, put outs and assists to figure out who is the best fielder, but that's the equivalent of taking a player's batting average to determine who the best overall hitter is. There are just so many better ways to determine these things now, and for Gold Gloves, I'll take my chances with the UZR – Ultimate Zone Rating -- for each position.
For those unfamiliar with stats like UZR – let's call them the anti-VORP crowd – it's basically the best way to determine now just how good a fielder is with balls hit right to him, but how good that fielder is in his entire area of defensive coverage. Let's just say the numbers don't add up for some of these awards. At some point, people are going to realize that baseball has an award called the Silver Slugger and stop giving the Gold Glove to good offensive seasons. Why then, do we insist on giving the Gold Glove to players who have good seasons overall? Power at the plate should not determine the fielding awards. Granted, this year doesn't have Rafael Palmiero winning the award as a DH, but some aren't even close.
First Base
Mark Teixeira won the award with a -3.7 UZR, which is the forth-worst of anyone at the position with more than 50 games played. Sure he had only four errors in 152 games and his fielding percentage was .997, but he had just 49 assists and a Range Factor that is lower than Kendry Morales, Miguel Cabrera, Paul Kornerko or Justin Morneau. By the numbers, Morales had the highest UZR at 4.9 with Cabrera second at 2.8. This one isn't even close.
Second Base
This one was right on, as Placido Polanco won the award he rightfully deserved. His UZR was 11.4, which is far better than the second best at the position, Dustin Pedroia who had a 9.8. Polanco had just two errors and 429 assists and had a stellar .997 fielding percentage while helping to turn 100 double plays.
Shortstop
Derek Jeter had probably the best defensive season of his long, storied career. It's tough, because he probably did deserve the award based on what people expected of Jeter at the position and what he was able to do for the Yankees. Add the fact that his numbers at the plate were so good and there was no doubt Jeter would the award. But should he have? Well, he had a 6.6 UZR, which is fifth-best in the American League. He did have only eight errors in 150 games, which is a better percentage than anyone else in the league, and his fielding percentage is best in the league despite a range factor that is the worst of all eligible players at the position. A case can be made for Cesar Izturis with a UZR of 10.8 or Elvis Andrus with 10.7. But come on, it's Captain Yankee, so making a case for anyone else is writing to read myself write.
Third Base
Another position that was right on, with Evan Longoria winning the award with a 18.5 UZR, better than Chone Figgins and Adrian Beltre. Longoria did have 13 errors, but had one of the best fielding percentages (.970) in the American League.
Catcher
There is no UZR for catchers – this thing is ruined!!!! – but Joe Mauer, who is an adept fielder and caller of the game, had the fewest assists (31) of any eligible player. He had fewer assists than Jason Varitek. Gerald Laird, for example, had 78 assists in 26 more games.
Pitchers
There is no UZR for pitchers – ruined again! – but Mark Buehrle won the award, and based on the numbers – 41 assists to one error and a .982 fielding percentage – he's as worthy a candidate as anyone.
Outfield
Adam Jones, Ichiro and Torii Hunter won the award this year, which based on UZR, seems completely and utterly arbitrary. Torii Hunter's UZR is -1.4, which was lower than Nick Swisher. Adam Jones had a -4.7, which is easily the most definitive disparity between empirical data and 'the eye test.' Ichiro's 10.5 is at least in the top 10 in the AL. Franklin Gutierrez and his 29.1 have grounds to complain, but he did have seven errors and only six assists with a fielding percentage of .985.
But these three? They can complain: Ryan Sweeney had 11 assists and a UZR of 24.0. Carl Crawford had a 17.6 UZR and just four errors. David DeJesus had a UZR of 15.1 and a perfect fielding percentage, committing zero errors with 13 putouts.
Sure, Jason Bay also had no errors and 15 putouts, but his UZR is -13.0 and he played half his games in Fenway. I suppose even numbers tell a different story sometimes.
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
Comments
oh god stop it already with these imaginary fielding measurements. watch the games for christ’s sake. you can go to lunch with bill james and john hollinger…and discuss why the three of you are nerds…and have no idea what you’re talking about. Vorp…PER…get outta here with all of this garbage.
by lordhlatts on Nov 11, 2009 2:09 PM EST reply actions
I completely agree, lordhlatts. If this UZR is so great, then give us the formula. This is as annoying as people who read Moneyball and all of the sudden think they know everything about baseball. When you ask them, "why hasnt oakland won a WS since 1989", they blame the Yankees.
by fubario on Nov 11, 2009 3:13 PM EST reply actions
Lord,
you are right. there is way too much analyzing of numbers any more. all that matters is the fielder makes the plays when it counts. tex saved at least 40 errors by the yankee infield this year. is there a stat for digging the throws out of the dirt? or keeping your foot on the base? just watch the game and enjoy the beauty of hunter tracking down a fly ball or even ichiro’s arm. you watch the game and not the numbers. enjoy the beauty of baseball.
by mikiede15 on Nov 11, 2009 3:15 PM EST reply actions
What the hell is a UZR?
by Sayitaintsosa23 on Nov 11, 2009 3:46 PM EST reply actions
Give me a break with this UZR hooey and stop baggin on Jeter.And if you can’t figure out that Tex deserves the award you need to stop watching baseball cause you don’t know your * from a hole in the ground
by mikeydbluesman on Nov 11, 2009 4:37 PM EST reply actions
I generally don’t care about Gold Gloves (and, Mark Beuhrle aside, no one else does) but I don’t want to know anything about an award for defensive excellence that does not include Carl Crawford.
by ChiAdam on Nov 11, 2009 4:55 PM EST reply actions
Anyone who disputes Tex winning a Gold Glove clearly didn’t watch the playoffs.
He didn’t let a single ball get by him.
by DuckedOut on Nov 11, 2009 9:10 PM EST reply actions
agreed, who cares what a players range is or as the writer really want to say NERD RATING. all I care about is does he field his position when the ball is hit to him. All this other BS is just somebody trying to create a formula that MLB will buy or use so they can get there name in the paper.
by sportsguru on Nov 11, 2009 11:44 PM EST reply actions
I can’t believe all this crap. While I don’t understand this UZR, don’t tell me range and arm strength have nothing to do with it. What made the wizard the best defensive s.s. ever wasn’t just because he made the simple plays. Of course you have to make the simple plays, but thats why these guys are paid millions. I’m not saying Tex didn’t deserve the award. I’m just saying it’s moronic to say the only thing that matters is making the plays right to you. My son does that in pee wee league. Should we consider him for gold glove?
by greenmachinemike on Nov 12, 2009 11:21 AM EST reply actions
"What the hell is a UZR?"
It has the potential to be the stat that is the difference between a fielder getting signed or remaining on the market, that’s all.
I’ll assume that anyone who took the time to comment on this article is a fan of baseball, in which case you should all be embarassed for asking questions like the one above. You like to think that sports writers are the only ones who give a sh*t about these stats, and the "Gods" like Torre, Manuel, Cox, etc. still use only their eyes to size up a player. Like it or not, baseball today is more about numbers than it ever has been. They aren’t the end-all-be-all, but there’s a reason Scott Boras has a massive server in his office that does nothing but crunch every number ever recorded in the history of the game.
Also, numbers allow you to see trends and signs that you otherwise wouldn’t be able to notice by simply sitting on your couch watching every single game. Having the fourth-worst UZR at your position is by no means grounds for a GG.
by cjbassett on Nov 12, 2009 11:37 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed