Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
by Brandon Worley • Nov 8, 2009 1:04 PM EST
On last night’s HNIC Hotstove, former New York Islanders GM Mike Milbury made some interesting claims regarding head injuries and changes to players’ helmets.
Pierre LeBrun was introducing a idea for a helmet that would make it safer for when players fought; the outer shell and visor come off leaving a smaller, protective helmet behind to protect the player’s head during the fight. When the idea for the new helmet was scoffed at, LeBrun brought up the latest string of concussions and big hits and the dangers of dying on the ice. Here is Milbury’s response:
“Someone dies everyday, it doesn’t matter. If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t play the game, don’t play it! Every day we talk about how to make it safer, the equipment’s better, everything’s better. Guys have been playing this game at high speeds for a long time and that’s when it’s fun; when these guys after each other and play physically, that’s when it’s fun. It’s getting to the point of nauseaum, everytime we talk about it, every week.”
Milbury would go on to say that the players that are victims of these brutal and dangerous hits should get part of the blame as well, and that someone needs to teach them how to “slow down, and absorb a hit.”
4 comments
Next Post: Albert Haynesworth's Gameface
Previous Post: Bernard Pollard Prefers To Be Treated As A Grown Man
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
Scoreboard data copyright © 2012 by STATS LLC. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC is strictly prohibited.
OpenCalais - Powered by Thomson Reuters
•
Odds Shark
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.

Comments
Ugh.
I was absolutely appalled by Milbury during that segment.
Silver Seven: the Daniel Alfredsson of Ottawa Senators blogs.
by DarrenM on Nov 8, 2009 1:24 PM EST reply actions
Yeah, that was quite the amazing comment.
LeBrun’s “helmet” was laughable, but I thought Milbury was out of his mind. The game has changed so much in the past…..years, it’s remarkable.
The writer from Toronto pointed out that essentialy, today’s players are as fast as ‘guided missles’ and the collisions are more violent than ever.
Milbury laughed that off — but I’ve been following the game (and have played) since the 1970’s as a kid in Chicago.
Let’s just take one other item — goalies are now sitting ducks. At least once a game, a goalie is taken out by as a winger crashes the net. This, I find unaccepable. But, usually, the play ends and no penalties are called.
Every one of these rushes – (well, when I played, they would have been) could be tagged as ‘charging’ or at least ‘goaltender interference.’ But – since the nets are no longer fastened to the ice by magnets, rather than the old ‘piping,’ it’s OK to crash the net. The forwards assume nobody’s going to get hurt, I’m not going to get a penalty…
Changing the fastening “format” of the goals is actually leading to more problems. Players back in the past knew the nets wouldn’t give, so they wouldn’t take these chances as today’s players do.
That bothers me just as much as the other violent crashes we are seeing — which could be tempered, but there are too many people like Milbury, who apparently would just shrug his shoulders if somebody dies, right there — on the ice, after violently thrown, head first — into the boards.
If we wonder why the game still isn’t accepted by large segments of America, it’s because of people like Milbury. Gee, we wouldn’t want to take the FUN out of the game, would we? I assume Milbury is still upset that goalies wear helmets and masks.
So many people find this game ‘too violent.’ Amazingly enough, these same people shrug at football’s violence. I’ve never been able to determine why one game’s ‘violence’ is worse than the others — but, I can only assume it’s hockey’s tacit approval of fighting. If players fight in the NFL — they are almost always ejected. In the NHL — it’s 5 minutes in the box, with round 2 just ahead.
And, American TV would rather run fight replays rather than game action, so that’s what the image which is always left in people who do not follow pro hockey.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Nov 8, 2009 3:03 PM EST reply actions
I think MM thinks he has a shot at “Coach’s Corner” when Grapes decides to hang it up.
To design a helmet that comes apart for the purpose of fighting LeBrun deserved to be ridiculed but Milbury was over the the top. But let’s have MM suit up in his vintage gear and take a few shots from some of the smaller NHL players and see how he does.
Were I on that show I’d bring up a ridiculous idea each week just to get MM would up.
But Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes.
by hotdog88gt on Nov 8, 2009 6:30 PM EST reply actions
So Milbury thinks the game was this fast and bodies this big when he was playing? As with all of his observations, he could stand to watch a little video before commenting.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik Jansky on Nov 9, 2009 11:39 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed