Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Turbulence in Tampa: USF's Jim Leavitt Accused of Hitting Player

(Update: SbB notes this report by Greg Auman of the St. Petersburg Times, which has the father of Joel Miller saying things wholly different from the quotes McMurphy has.)

I had my fun with an egg-on-the-face issue for the University of South Florida over the weekend. If what Brett McMurphy of FanHouse is reporting about coach Jim Leavitt striking walk-on Joel Miller is accurate, that's definitely the least of USF's problems.

According to the five witnesses -- USF players and staff members -- Leavitt was pacing in the Raymond James Stadium locker room at halftime when he walked about 10 feet to the locker where Miller was sitting without his helmet. Leavitt then grabbed Miller by the throat and hit him twice in the face with his hand.

"You do something like that [on the street], you put them in jail," Paul Miller, Joel's father and a former Tampa police officer, told FanHouse. "Somewhere [Leavitt] crossed the line."

"Crossed the line" would be a bit of an understatement for striking another person in the face.

Leavitt's fiery streak is well-documented, from a high-volume response to Nick Saban to taking "anger" from a loss to some harsh retribution for one of his coaches for interviewing for another job.

Oh, and then there was this report of Leavitt emerging from the locker room for a postgame press conference after the same November 21st game against Louisville with a bloody nose. Players said then that it was because he headbutted a helmeted player, and it was laughed off as a bit of Leavitt's legendary intensity. 

Combine that with the the allegations McMurphy raises in this piece -- multiple witnesses saying Leavitt said "Before you say anything, just know I am the most powerful man in this building" to Miller when he met with Leavitt after the incident, a player saying Leavitt "knew he could do something like that and Joel wouldn't fight back," and a witness holding that it was grounds for dismissal -- and it certainly seems a little starker, and certainly raises uncomfortable questions about what happened in that locker room. 

Did Leavitt headbutt one player after laying hands on another? Did no player think to mention this incident while being queried about Leavitt's bloody nose? Was there some sort of cover-up in play to transform a potentially explosive story into an anecdote about Leavitt's fire? 

And, most importantly, does this mean Leavitt's job is in jeopardy?

Leavitt's the only football coach USF has ever had, and his team has soared far further and faster than most had expected. His Bulls climbed to second in the BCS standings in 2007 and upset Florida State this season. His on-field bona fides, as the architect of a team that has mushroomed from nothing to perennial BCS conference contender in a little more than a decade, are about as unassailable as coaches' resumes get, relative to station.

But the darker side of Leavitt's tenure is his temper, and that is what produces ugly situations like this. If this is true, the fiefdom Leavitt has built in Tampa may soon be without a czar.

This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

Working for an **** is a part to life. Get use to it.

by 23Witness on Dec 14, 2009 5:22 PM EST reply actions  

No one should get use to it!
 
If this is true USF should terminate Leavitt. No decent organization in Sports or Business would put up with Leavitt’s actions.

by Big Daddy BT on Dec 14, 2009 7:12 PM EST reply actions  

i go with 23witness

only limpwrists want to say that a coach cannot yell at or lay hands on. communists, who want to weaken the usa, and its people.

by timpani25 on Dec 15, 2009 12:48 AM EST reply actions  

Coaches should be able to strike players freely… but the players should get to strike back, and whoever wins the fight wins the argument.

by L'etat, c'est moi on Dec 15, 2009 5:58 AM EST reply actions  

agreed, it’s ok to put your hands on me, only if you don’t mind me reciprocating the action in the heat of the battle. 

by sportsguru on Dec 15, 2009 11:52 AM EST reply actions  

He was just showing him how to rush the passer.LOL..the big boys can handle it from the coach

by anotherkevin29 on Dec 15, 2009 2:31 PM EST reply actions  

No idea if this is true. If it is the he should be fired no one in buisness world or other parts of life have a right to strike there employees or each other. that said how do whe know its true. Seems to me ever since boby knight u dont need proof to get a coach fired. a few digruntled players who never see the feild come up with a story and fact or not a coach gets fired. Just look at kansas and mark mangino. Players today expect to start and be coddled and when it doesnt happen they get bitter and eventually some of them make up stuff to try to get coahc fired. It happens u know it does. If its not true the players should be kicked off team and have scholarships revoked.

by redsoxfan32 on Dec 15, 2009 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

If it’s true, he should unquestionably be fired…there are boundaries even in sports and striking one of your players crosses that boundary; no one should be subjected to that. Secondly, I dispute the assertion that Leavitt’s job is "unassailable"; yes, he certainly built the program, but the past two seasons the team has taken a major nosedive in the second half, and that rests squarely on the coaches shoulders IMO.

by deacon96 on Dec 15, 2009 10:20 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed