Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
Late in the fourth quarter of a blowout between the Giants and Redskins Monday Night, Jon Gruden dropped a small nugget of information about his coaching future. Well, sort of ...
"You guys ask me when I was ever going to coach again? I'm gonna come back when Eli or Peyton Manning have twins sons and they get to be about 19 years old. And I'm gonna coach for 30 years. I wanna coach a Manning before I cash it in. Those guys are just better than everybody else. They just know how to play the position. You know this, as an Iron Man yourself, Ron (Jaworski), the greatest attribute those guys have – those Manning brothers – is that they never miss a game."It's interesting that Gruden put Eli into the same category as Peyton. To be fair, Gruden may have only made the comment as a teaser for the graphic ESPN showed, depicting the Iron Man-nature of the Manning brothers (and Brett Favre). But Gruden did say that 'those guys' are better than everybody else, which would include Tom Brady, I suppose. Now, Brady did the Patriots no good last season, so to Gruden's point of being healthy, Eli Manning has Brady beat there. But Drew Brees is a pretty good quarterback as well, and while injured at times in his career, has missed just one game since the end of the 2003 season. I'd love to have Gruden in my fantasy league next year.
Or chalk it up to overselling the product that's in front of you. It's a tactic most car salesmen use – whatever is on the lot is the best on the market – until next week when the Favre model enters the showroom. Then he'll be the best. Gruden was overselling a few other times last night, like when he ended the third quarter with, "Who are these running backs? You gotta really give the Redskin guys credit. This is four or five different running backs that I've seen play for these guys this year."
Four or five different backs, who, by all statistical measures, are mediocre to poor at their position. Washington doesn't have one back over 500 yards rushing and as a team ranks 25th in the league in yards per game. Add to that the fact that the MNF booth spent half the game lauding the hiring of Bruce Allen as new GM of the Redskins, but Gruden wants to give credit to the 'Redskin guys' – aka Vinny Cerrato and Dan Snyder – for bringing in this crop of backs ... who are terrible and/or always hurt.
Well, at least Gruden didn’t think any of the Washington running backs were Jewish. What's that you say? He didn't think Giants DE Osi Umenyiora was Jewish, he just thought his last name was pronounced "you-menorah." Ah ... well, it was just Hanukkah, so I can see how he'd be confused.
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
Comments
Gruden loves Eli Manning. Give Eli another couple of years, and people won’t be writing stupid stuff like this questioning the mere mention of Eli in the same breath as Peyton—Eli keeps ascending and improving. His benchmark aren’t his peers. It’s Peyton. The Giants are a bunch of lucky SOB’s and Gruden knows it. Maybe Gruden could talk some sense into Steve Young too. For a guy with a law degree, Young is just clueless.
by cincybr4523 on Dec 22, 2009 12:37 PM EST reply actions
GIMME THE MIKE! GIMME THE **** MIKE! GRUDEN IS ALMOST AS BAD AS KORNO.
by scurds on Dec 22, 2009 12:38 PM EST reply actions
Scurds, you are back to rambling. I haven’t heard Chucky use one tennis analogy. Gruden belongs behinfd the mike because he actually knows how the game is played and brings incitful commentary. Nuff said.
by Bucspasm on Dec 22, 2009 3:33 PM EST reply actions
so far, Eli Manning has been an average NFL quarterback. Last year his rating was over 77 for the first time (86) and this year it’s at 96, which is 9th in the NFL. He’s getting better, but he’s definitely not in the same category as Peyton, or any of the elite quarterbacks. There’s Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, and Tom Brady, and then there’s everyone else. Rivers, Rodgers, Schaub, Favre, Warner, Rothlisberger, and Romo are better or roughly equal to Eli at this point. He’s got the potential, but to say that he’s even in the conversation of ‘best NFL QB’ is ridiculous. He’s never even had a QB rating over 100.
by theophilus166 on Dec 22, 2009 3:59 PM EST reply actions
your right except you kinda dissed warner and rivers a little
by scurds on Dec 22, 2009 4:02 PM EST reply actions
I place Roethlisberger in the same class as Manning and Brady (Brees? We’ll see.) because… why? Maybe 2 Super Bowls? Maybe performances like the one against the Pack? He may not pile up huge numbers normally, but he’s got the best pinpoint arm in the clutch that I’ve seen recently, and it’s usually while dodging pressure or getting hit. Eli isn’t even in the discussion. I love Drew Brees but so far he’s the ‘immortal du jour’ for this season, not an all-time great. Favre is the Cal Ripken of football, but would you want Cal at short for the Ultimate Game over Ozzie Smith or Honus Wagner or Tony Lazzeri or….
by Radatz on Dec 22, 2009 4:21 PM EST reply actions
Why is it that the pundits and coaches keep leaving Ben Roethlisberger out of the top 3 or 4 in the league..? The las time I checked, he has 2 Super Bowl rings. The Manning brothers combined have 2. He also happens to be like Peyton when it come s to being clutch towards the end of a game. How about some respect.
by pittphan0812 on Dec 22, 2009 6:58 PM EST reply actions
Why is it that the pundits and coaches keep leaving Ben Roethlisberger out of the top 3 or 4 in the league..? The last time I checked, he has 2 Super Bowl rings. The Manning brothers combined have 2. He also happens to be like Peyton when it comes to being clutch towards the end of a game. How about some respect.
by pittphan0812 on Dec 22, 2009 6:59 PM EST reply actions
Would I want Cal at short? Hell yea! Given that he revolutionized the position as one of offensive potential. Look at the wizards stats at the plate…light hitting at best. Cal has 2 MVP’s, gold golves, and is mr. dependable. The reason you don’t see Cal having Jeter-esq spactular plays is that a) he had much better range, and b) was so in tuned with the game, that he was in position to make plays that most have to dive for, look routine. Would I take Cal over any other shortstop? Hell yea!
by erson83 on Dec 22, 2009 7:08 PM EST reply actions
why does he get left out? his team is just barely .500 and there are some guys named brees manning rivers warner mcnabb taking up those spots.
by scurds on Dec 22, 2009 7:21 PM EST reply actions
Ben gets a spot at the top. That’s that. Earned it. Continues to.
W/r/t Ripken, he’s yours, erson. I take Honus Wagner, who could hit a mush ball harder than Cal could hit a rabbit ball. I’ll take Jeter even, and I’m a Red Sox fan!
by Radatz on Dec 22, 2009 8:05 PM EST reply actions
Eli is becoming more and more like his brother with every game.
Now I see Eli carrying his team instead of being carried by it, this is a huge change from how it used to be, as recently as last year.
In the meantime he still hasn’t lost his knack for clutch play.
I remember calling for Eli’s head in 2006. Since then he’s won a Superbowl and grown into a top-ten NFL QB. His future is very bright.
by thisismyusername on Dec 23, 2009 4:44 AM EST reply actions
I seem to recall Manning having his ass handed to him for about half a decade by the Patriots. A discouraged Peyton Manning walking off a snowy field is actually considered by many New England farmers to be an omen signalling the onset of true winter. Gruden would be able to stand about 2 of those scenes, and then he’d take a job in Florida somewhere… thus missing out when Peyton finally gets his Super Bowl win over a how-did-THEY-get-here Bears team.
by L'etat, c'est moi on Dec 23, 2009 7:59 AM EST reply actions
I wouldn’t put Brady in the top tier. He’s an average quarterback. He doesn’t call his own plays…actually Peyton is the only one that does that. Brady has to read his wristband to actually call any play. What would he do if he lost audio transmission? A Super Bowl win is a team win, but his Brady’s case it was by cheating. Haven’t won a Super Bowl since they were caught cheating. Brady is overrated.
by BlueShoe on Dec 23, 2009 11:44 AM EST reply actions
The ‘cheating’ thing is a losers’ argument. After they were ‘caught cheating’ (which entailed, btw, using a videocam on the sidelines when it was perfectly legit to use one from the endzone or from the stands) they only went 18-0 before losing the SB in the last seconds to a team that knew their playbook from week 17. And prior, they had won 3 SBs in 6 years. What happened to the other 3? Not cheating enough perhaps?
So can this stupid argument. 31 other teams heard of digital videocams too, and used them prolifically. They simply either didn’t get ratted out by an ex-coach or used them from the stands or the coach’s boxes. To assume they didn’t, especially when there was no specific rule against it, is inane.
As for Brady, I don’t put him in Manning’s category as a playcaller either, but besides more wristbands than Manning, he also has 2 more rings. The Patriots do it with ‘team’. That said, Brady is far from average. Who else out there has more rings than Manning? Just Ben, another ‘average’ qb.
by Radatz on Dec 23, 2009 12:07 PM EST reply actions
Tom doesn’t throw the ball as well as Manning… the extra Super Bowl rings get in the way.
by L'etat, c'est moi on Dec 23, 2009 12:30 PM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed