Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
The Opening Pitch: If there was one clear loser in this year's edition of the BCS mess, it was the critics who hate the BCS.
Another year, another round of griping -- but few fans will be paying attention to the noisy harpies.
The record-setting number of fans who watched Alabama suck the soul out of Florida will all agree that Bama is the best team in the country and deserves a shot in the national-title game.
And while Texas merely survived -- barely -- they are a big enough brand name that most fans will be content to see them take on Alabama for the national title (even if, like me, they figure UT is going to get clobbered, not unlike the way the Big 12 lost to the SEC a year ago).
So as far as the national-title game goes, you won't hear many complaints -- same as last year ... and the year before that ... and the year before that ... and, in fact, every year of the BCS except the two-year cluster-blunder in '03 and '04. Even those years: Most fans just couldn't rise to the level of outrage, accepting the result and moving on to the NFL playoffs. As for 2009's non-title BCS bowls:
Most fans will be more intrigued by the matchup of TCU and Boise State -- the first time two non-BCS teams have been paired in a BCS-level bowl -- than they would if TCU crushed uninspiring Iowa and Boise State obviously beat Georgia Tech, out of the sorry ACC. (See next item.)
The Sugar Bowl gets the biggest brand-name in college football -- Tim Tebow and the defending champs -- against an unbeaten Cincy. The Rose Bowl remains provincial, insulated from caring about national interest, anyway. The only dog is the Orange -- but that's typical.
Critics howl, but while most fans would love to see a playoff, they aren't going to dwell on it. They simply want to see a title game that passes the eye (and the smell) test. Alabama and Texas will deliver, whether BCS critics like it or not.
Of all people, I should be ticked: If I had ultimate say, I would have picked Alabama and TCU as 1-2, playing for the national title. But the reality -- not the perennial playoff fantasy -- is that fans will be satisfied. It's not as good as a playoff, but that's not the point.
The Cinderella Bowl: TCU vs. Boise St. Like I just argued, I totally disagree with the cynics who think that the BCS shunted non-BCS upstarts TCU and Boise into the Fiesta Bowl. For starters, the Fiesta has its own vested interest in creating its best matchup possible. Second, fan attendance matters -- and Boise fans have proven ready to go to Arizona.
Third, the matchup has obvious appeal: It's a "Cinderella Bowl." Elitist critics of the Fiesta's picks forget that most college football fans actually will think this is a neat idea. And it's history: Beyond the first-ever BCS-level bowl pairing with two non-BCS teams, it's the first time a bowl other than the national title game has had two unbeatens, and it's the first.
Lastly, would you really have wanted to see TCU thump Iowa and Boise thwack Georgia Tech? What would that have proven? Sure, it would have been fun to see TCU play Cincy or Florida, but -- frankly -- I wanted to see TCU play Alabama, so the next-most compelling thing for me (and most fans) is to see them play another non-BCS upstart.
Don't blame the Fiesta Bowl -- blame the human pollsters, who could have (and should have) uniformly voted TCU ahead of Texas into the No. 2 spot to play Alabama. That's the real failure here.
Coaches Ballot: Kudos to Brian Kelly for giving his 1st-place vote to his own team. I like that. And I like that Gary Patterson voted his TCU No. 2, behind Bama (so did I).
Naturally, the only other coaches to agree with him were five voters from outside BCS power conferences. Mostly, the Coaches' ballot revealed biases and log-rolling that run so deep that it proves they should have no business being part of the process.
NFL Weekend Wrap:
• Saints escape: Given the crazy plays, the extreme conditions and -- of course -- the near-loss, you would be forgiven for applying "Team of Destiny" to the Saints. Others might say: "Well, if they almost lost to the Redskins, how good could the Saints really be?"
• Vick cheered in Atlanta homecoming: 2 TDs, one rushing and one passing, in the most anticipated homecoming of the season. Vick couldn't have picked a better moment to thrive -- have the Eagles suddenly become the team to beat in the NFC East?
(Or would that be the Giants? I would argue that by beating Dallas, New York merely kept themselves from oblivion, rather than affirmatively staking their claim as the best team in the division.)
• What's wrong with the Patriots? Let's try Occam's Razor: Contrary to their preseason rep, they're just not an elite team this year. Our expectations and assumptions have been faulty, from the start. That they can't put teams away with their defense has to be most troubling to Pats fans. (Stat of the Game: 52 pass attempts for Chad Henne?)
• Colts still unbeaten: No Saints-like problems for Indy, which not only rolls along but derails the Titans/VY bandwagon -- not entirely unexpected, of course, and Tennessee can still finish with 9 wins.
• Result to prove you know NOTHING about the NFL: Raiders over Steelers in Pittsburgh. Did that just end the Steelers' season? (Runner-up: Cards over Vikings.)
• Unexpected Fantasy Studs: QB Bruce Gradkowski, RB Jonathan Stewart, WR Devin Thomas.
College Football Hangover
• Alabama destroys Florida: I have never seen a very good team beat another very good team so decisively on both sides of the ball. This was no Florida pounding an overmatched Ohio State; Bama shredded the Gators' best-in-nation D and neutered Florida's solid offense.
• Tebow's Tears: Was it a signature moment for the most competitive player in college football history? Or merely fodder for haters to mock? Both. The most fascinating detail of Saturday: Tebow's eye-black "John 16:33" was the No. 1 most-searched term in Google ... until it was bumped to No. 2 by "Tim Tebow crying." What a symbol of Tebow's ultimate influence, like no other college football player ever.
• USChadenfreude: 6th-place finish in the Pac-10. Humiliating season-ending loss to Arizona, bookending the humiliating season-starting loss to Washington. Pete Carroll's private life being mocked by Charlie Weis, of all people. Enjoy it while it lasts.
• My final regular-season BlogPoll ballot: (1) Alabama, (2) TCU. And, frankly, that's all that matters. I think that, like Utah a year ago, the unbeaten MWC champ is playing as well as any team in the country. (Certainly better than Texas -- TCU with a better resume, too.)
• Heisman Watch: He isn't going to be a finalist, let alone win, but you can't have watched the Big 12 title game and not come away realizing that Ndamukong Suh is the best player in the country. My (fake) ballot: (1) Mark Ingram, (2) Ndamukong Suh, (3) CJ Spiller.
• Notre Dame Coaching Search: Nothing yet. Have they called Brian Kelly? If not, why not? The fact that ND doesn't have a coach in place today suggests that the search isn't going to go nearly as smoothly as it should if it was being run correctly.
BCS vs. Congress: Let's clarify this week's Congressional priority -- it's not to make the BCS illegal; it's to keep the BCS from calling itself a "championship." Fine: I had already advised the BCS to re-brand itself. (Again: Doesn't Congress have better things to do?)
NBA Talking Points: Greg Oden is the NBA's hardest-luck player since Shaun Livingston (or maybe Randy Livingston). Oden should be a franchise-changing talent; now it's a question whether he'll ever really contribute. (Real villain in all this: NBA's age limit.)
The Suns are a nice surprise, but the Lakers showed them how far they have to go to be a real contender in the West.
CBB Weekend Mania: Did you happen to catch John Wall's nationally televised coming-out appearance on Saturday in Kentucky's win over UNC? He is clearly the best player in the country, and arguably the most exciting guard in college basketball since Allen Iverson. (Or is that since Derrick Rose?)
World Cup Draw: The flip side to the U.S.'s favorable draw is clear -- anything less than a trip to the knock-out round should be considered a massive failure.
MLB Hot Stove: Will Chone Figgins' signing with the Mariners open up the signing season ... or simply prove to be this year's big-money deal that ultimately fails to deliver?
Tiger Woods Scandal Watch: Are we up to 6 or 7 mistresses? More? The only good thing is that, at some point, the numbers all run together into something like "Geez, that seems like a lot." One or two were titillating; half-a-dozen is boring.
Meanwhile, which interviewer will "get" Tiger? If he was smart, he would do Oprah. The story is too mainstream for ESPN, and the Golf Channel would be too deferential to its cash cow. With Oprah, Tiger will get the smack-around we all want to see, but gently.
The Last Word: "BCS! That's why they make that call! -- Nebraska coach Bo Pelini, on the refs' decision to put one last second on the clock after Colt McCoy threw the ball out of bounds on Texas' last -- then second-to-last -- play.
Dan Shanoff writes The Wake-Up Call every weekday morning for SportingNews.com and blogs daily at DanShanoff.com. Got any comments, questions or feedback? Email Dan at shanofftsn-[at]-gmail-[dot]-com. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/danshanoff.
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
Comments
The 2nd and 3rd ranked teams in the BCS needed to score in the last 30 seconds of the conference championship games in order to win them by 1 point. The system is broke.
by nettistyle on Dec 7, 2009 8:52 AM EST reply actions
Shanoff — it took Florida 41 days from firing Zook to hiring Meyer in 2004. Do you wish they made their decision more quickly?
Chill: the average coaching search in D-I from 2004-2009 took 18 days to complete. ND is currently in day 8.
by CorrND on Dec 7, 2009 9:39 AM EST reply actions
Mr. Shanoff:
Thanks for being in the back pocket of the BCS. There is everything to dislike about the BCS bowl matchups, beginning with the fact that TCU, Boise State, and Cincinnati are all excluded. Is the BCS paying you to write the crap that you spew forth here? Why don’t you get a job with the BCS. Your content is inappropriate for this site.
by Tony77019 on Dec 7, 2009 10:55 AM EST reply actions
I like all the bowl match-ups, but don’t call anyone a National Champion.
The BCS system is dishonest.
Shouldn’t our education system promote Honesty and Integrity?
There will be 2 undefeated teams at the end of the year, most likely 3.
Any of those teams has the right to say they are the best in the nation.
If you haven’t been beat who is better than you?
It shouldn’t take an act of congress to make college football honest.
by Craterlake on Dec 7, 2009 11:44 AM EST reply actions
My biggest problem with the way the BCS bowls are set up is the 2 on-big-six teams are playing against each other. Isn’t the point of allowing them to play in the BCS bowls to give them a shot to take down a top tier opponent? This season is going to emerge with at least 2 unbeaten tems, both of whom beat another unbeaten in the process. How does thzat produce a champion?
by jkmiami on Dec 7, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions
You are such a tebow/florida d-bag homer you can’t even see it. 39-13 isn’t much different than 42-14. You just can’t admit that Tebow can’t play against a real pro style defense, and if anything this game should cost him the heisman and a first day NFL pick. He’s a fullback or H-back at the next level, real defenses that can hit him and chase him will kill him. I had more pleasure watching him cry than anything else that has happened in sports for the last 5 years.
by bkweeks55 on Dec 7, 2009 1:04 PM EST reply actions
John Wall Stats:
18.1 PPG
7.7 APG
4.1 RPG
2.6 SPG
.548 FG%
Evan Turner, omitting a "game" where he only played seven minutes before being injured:
20.6 PPG
6.6 APG
12.9 RPG
1.7 SPG
.618 FG%
CLEARLY not the best player in the country. Should check a bit further north, where Evan Turner has better stats playing with a less talented (though still quite good) supporting cast.
by walkerm on Dec 7, 2009 1:29 PM EST reply actions
"Bama shredded the Gators’ best-in-nation D" I think it is pretty clear that the Florida defense isn’t the best-in-nation. They were over-rated just like Ohio was in 06.
"Real villain in all this: NBA’s age limit." The one year Oden spent at Ohio State didn’t cause his body to break down. I don’t necessarily agree with the limit but Oden’s injuries result from his awkward size. Get over yourself and stop trying to connect everything to the age limit. It didn’t even prevent him from getting money he didn’t deserve which is your other argument that doesn’t hold water.
by misodare on Dec 7, 2009 1:34 PM EST reply actions
I can’t tell if you are serious about the BCS working and how most fans will be "intrigued" by the Boise-TCU game or if you are being sarcastic.Any system that prevents 3 unbeaten teamfrom participating in a quest for a "championship" is flawed,period.As for fan "intrigue" re the TCU-Boise read the comments on this or any other thread on the web.How can such a cool guy be that blind?
by goblueman on Dec 7, 2009 1:56 PM EST reply actions
Oh come on tebow crying doesnt prove anything except he loves to play to media. From his so called speaches made to u not his teammates. to his crying its all pr. Im pretty sure colt mccoy wants to win every game he plays also. this greated leader and competitor crap is idiotic. 2 No system gets it right when texas should of been in national title game and big 12 champ game last year gets left out or 3 13-0 teams dont even get a shot to prove there as good as the 2 teams playing for title. Does texas and bama deserve to be there yes but cinncy and boise and tcu all deserve a shot also. So to say bcs got it right is idiotic. Hell last year the top 2 teams were texas and usc and neither got to play for national title in my opinion. until there is a playoff bcs is best u can hope for but don’t say it got it right. No system gets to leave 3 unbeaten teams out and have defenders say they get it right . thats an idiotic argument.
by redsoxfan32 on Dec 7, 2009 2:00 PM EST reply actions
Enjoy your boy while you can, Shanoff. If Tebow is so competitive, then Alabama must just be a hell of a lot better. Now go put on your UF cheerleader outfit and cry like your fallen hero. No second Heisman, no championship, no more Tebow for you. Unless you like seeing him hold a clipboard and cry. Or signal in plays to a real NFL quarterback and cry. Or try to bootleg in garbage time of some random blowout, get his head taken off, and cry. So he finished with one Heisman and ONE title (the first one was Leak’s, not Tebow’s) just like a lot of other great players did. Big deal.
by ChiAdam on Dec 7, 2009 2:17 PM EST reply actions
And way to fetch slippers for the BCS crooks. Good doggy.
by ChiAdam on Dec 7, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions
BCS is garbage. Shanoff is a freaking sellout.True Americans settle championships on the field.
by SailorGabe on Dec 7, 2009 2:22 PM EST reply actions
Shanoff you must be kidding. Whose lining your pocket?
by quilberry on Dec 7, 2009 2:26 PM EST reply actions
The BCS worked? You’re being sarcastic right……..right?
by Hippi-Kat on Dec 7, 2009 3:32 PM EST reply actions
Looks like we have a new shill for the BCS. How much did you get paid to write this load of horse ****? The BCS being the completely retarded douche bags that they are, took the easy way out and put Boise and TCU in a game together to protect their little babies in the big conferences. After the Boise win over OK, and Utahs run, the BCS isnt going to let a little guy punch the allegedly better team get its rear end kicked again. By the way, how much toothpaste and moutwash did it take you to get the taste of BCS official penis out of your mouth?
by kpart70 on Dec 7, 2009 3:37 PM EST reply actions
The BCS teams won’t schedule Boise and TCU so OF COURSE they avoid them in the bowls. I hate to say it, but my favorite sport is starting to disgust me as much as MLB and its uneven playing field. Horrible.
by SteadyEddie33 on Dec 7, 2009 8:50 PM EST reply actions
Honestly, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the Fiesta committee took some cash from the BCS point men to pair Boise and TCU. Give them enough to make up for the money they’ll lose in attendance and ratings, and prevent the underdogs from taking Florida or ‘Bama back behind the woodshed again. Boy, wouldn’t it be great if that actually happened and it could be proven? That’d get rid of the BCS for sure.
by tm33_08 on Dec 8, 2009 1:14 AM EST reply actions
This is the best article written on why a playoff would be more financially viable and more fair.http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news;_ylt=Amfa261joMPXbVfqWAjOsokcvrYF?slug=dw-ncaafplayoff120709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
by SailorGabe on Dec 8, 2009 9:42 AM EST reply actions
Dan Shanoff is on the BCS payroll. HA HA.
by secoverrated on Dec 8, 2009 10:25 AM EST reply actions
Ive got an Idea instead of calling it the national championship game call it the BCS championship game. It’s not the national championship. Only BCS members are involved in the contest.
by secoverrated on Dec 8, 2009 10:28 AM EST reply actions
Dan Shanoff’s favorite sport no dought is figure skating.
by secoverrated on Dec 8, 2009 10:29 AM EST reply actions
No, I didn’t read the "article". The title was enough of a joke by itself. The nightmare scenario is in no way "working".
by corona79 on Dec 8, 2009 11:05 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed