Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
by Michael Tunison • Dec 9, 2009 3:51 PM EST
Even though the Supreme Court declined to rule on a challenge on whether the Washington Redskins name was offensive to Native Americans, the amount of Indian-themed names in sports (college, at least) has steadily declined over the last decade.
About 20 colleges have been urged by the NCAA to drop names considered disrespectful to Native Americans. One of the last holdouts is the University of North Dakota, which is locked in bitter squabbling between those willing to change the mascot from the Fighting Sioux to the alumni resistant to change.
Also unhappy about the change, some of the state's Sioux population.
Except that some members of the Spirit Lake Tribe, one of two groups of Sioux in the state, say they consider the nickname an honor and worry that abandoning it would send them one step closer to obscurity.“When you hear them announce the name at the start of a hockey game, it gives you goose bumps,” said Frank Black Cloud, a tribal member. “They are putting us up on a pinnacle.”
And so, in a legal standoff that has turned some preconceptions upside down, North Dakota’s top state lawyers will be in court on Wednesday to oppose members of the Spirit Lake Tribe who have sued to preserve the Fighting Sioux name and logo, an image of an Indian in profile, feathers draping down.
No one ever claimed there was monolithic support for these changes from the Native American population. Every time a name is changed, the group opposed to it will usually trot out a dissident or two to argue in favor of the original name. This would change the dynamic significantly, except the university claims other schools may be shying away from playing them because of their contentious name. Meaning the Sioux image cuts into the bottom dollar, and that's really going to get administrators moving more than concern about offending or honoring anyone.
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
3 comments
Next Post: Sixers Lose 11th Straight
Previous Post: Tyreke, The Chili Cheese Fries Burrito
Read More: north dakota fighting sioux, sportingblog
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
Scoreboard data copyright © 2012 by STATS LLC. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC is strictly prohibited.
OpenCalais - Powered by Thomson Reuters
•
Odds Shark
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.

Comments
Next year, they’ll be the North Dakota Really Friendly Sioux.
by L'etat, c'est moi on Dec 10, 2009 12:39 AM EST reply actions
So these attorneys think they know better about what is right for the Spirit Lake Tribe than what the tribe feels is right for themselves?
This is what we get these days. All I can say is watch out for your own personal freedom of speech. They are clearly trying to remove it.
by Bassntx on Dec 10, 2009 8:25 AM EST reply actions
If the Sioux had the right attorneys back in 1890, they’d own fu*king both Dakotas right now.
by L'etat, c'est moi on Dec 10, 2009 10:34 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed