If there's one thing March Madness needs more of, it's gambling. Pardon me: what it needs more of is "fun-loving games of chance which one would definitely not put money on, nope, no sir." Therefore, we bring you March Madness Viewing Bingo, your home companion game for March Madness. Just take your Dick Vitale-shaped inkstamp, turn on the television, and play along. Whatever you do, please don't put any money on the game. That would be against the spirit of the entire season, now wouldn't it?
Click image to see
the larger, more printer friendly version:
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
9 comments
Comments
Three Duke slights, one of them twice..
jerk!
by npcPronk29 on Mar 18, 2009 5:54 PM EDT reply actions
This game reminds me of the game you play on cross country road trips looking for license plates from different states. It’s good to keep your attention during the slow parts of the trip. I highly recommend this quirky college basketball game for people with short attention spans or weird senses of humor.
by asdfsdafsd on Mar 18, 2009 10:11 PM EDT reply actions
I clicked on this link expecting some cheerleader pics! :)
by gold&blueinAL on Mar 18, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions
How long did this take, five minutes? Put some thought into it next time.
by EMajorwitz on Mar 19, 2009 6:40 AM EDT reply actions
Where’s the eye candy for the women on this bingo board? How about Jay Wright?
by ahord.tsn on Mar 19, 2009 7:54 AM EDT reply actions
"How long did this take, five minutes? Put some thought into it next time."
Ahhh, love our commenters. Always coming with the positive feedback we long for. It actually took the better part of the afternoon. I’d love to see you put together that Photoshop in five minutes, even if I gave you all the info for all 25 boxes.
by cmottram on Mar 19, 2009 9:21 AM EDT reply actions
Well it’s obvious you don’t think much of the Big Ten conference, though it’s the SEC that deserves to be ripped this year.
by rbdonovan on Mar 19, 2009 3:40 PM EDT reply actions
No one said the SEC was better than the Big Ten this year. There’s a reason they only got 3 bids. But the Big Ten wasn’t much better than the SEC, and certainly didn’t deserve seven bids.
by cmottram on Mar 19, 2009 3:53 PM EDT reply actions
Agreed, no way should 7 teams have made it in, least of all Wisconsin. However, I do believe the Big Ten will make a little more noise this year in the tourney than last year, though that’s not saying much.
Still, with as weak as the SEC is this year, I was hoping that fact would derail comments towards the Big Ten. But alas, it’s not to be.
by rbdonovan on Mar 19, 2009 4:42 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed