Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

A Closer Look at the Marlins Early Success

The Marlins are off to an 11-2 start, a fact you’re likely familiar with assuming ESPN isn’t your only source of baseball information. This is only a 13 game sample, or the equivalent of eight percent of the season, so it’s too early to draw many conclusions about the validity of Florida.

But, nevertheless, some sports writers are getting excited about the Marlins, a statement that The Fightins explain in more ... ahem ... “adult” terms. Essentially, The Fightins argue that hopping on the Fish bandwagon this early in the season is the same as calling the Bengals contenders after a 1-0 start. That's a fair point, and one with which I agree. But The Fightins ignore the most glaring argument against anointing Florida this early: Six of its 13 games have been played against the Nationals.

Here are the numbers from the Marlins six games vs. Washington compared to their seven games against others (three against the Mets and Braves; one against the Pirates):

Vs. Nationals (6-0): 57 innings played, 45 runs scored, 25 runs allowed, .79 runs scored per inning, .44 runs allowed per inning.

Vs. others (5-2): 63 innings played, 32 runs scored, 28 runs allowed, .51 runs scored per inning, .44 runs allowed per inning.

So, basically, their pitching has been quality regardless of the opponent, but their offense has been considerably more potent against the Nationals, whose team ERA is 6.01, bad enough for second to last in the N.L. After its series in Pittsburgh, the Marlins host Philly, then go to N.Y. to play the Mets followed by a series at the Cubs. That should be a much more telling stretch then the 13 games they’ve played thus far.

Oh, and also: They have a slump busting can of tobacco as a secret weapon, something I did not factor into the above statistics.

This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

  hmm … so they’re not AS dominant against a better opponent … ?

 And if they play really well against sub-par teams and .714 ball

 against "better" teams , they might have a chance ?

by Toof Chippah on Apr 21, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Right. They’re a good team, but not 11-2 good. if the Nats had any bullpen, they’d be 8-5.

by cmottram on Apr 21, 2009 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I picked them to win the NL East.

So naturally they’ll do this and get me excited, and then find a way to screw it up.

by npcPronk29 on Apr 21, 2009 2:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Go Gnats!

by Raisin' up off the cot on Apr 21, 2009 5:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Anybody remember when the Yankees had said publicly how they were using a thong to get out of their slumps?  Disturbing stuff.

But anyway, coming from a Phillies fan, the Marlins are dangerous, now even moreso than they have been in the past few years.  Don’t forget they did almost take the division last year.  I really don’t know why they keep signing Wes Helms though, the guy’s a bum, but hey whatever, I’d much rather have a guy like him on a division rival than a good player.

by kaneball96 on Apr 22, 2009 12:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed