Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
Except, no. It can't be, because even if there is great in-fighting in the Vikings organization, they don't know what "schism" means. How can there be a schism if they don't know what it is. There can't! QED.
There you have it, folks. The 2009 Vikings: A bunch of dumb squabbling guys who aren't getting laid. This year sounds fun.
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
8 comments
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
Scoreboard data copyright © 2012 by STATS LLC. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC is strictly prohibited.
OpenCalais - Powered by Thomson Reuters
•
Odds Shark 
Comments
We all knew Jared Allen was a box of rocks. Just look at him. But the entire team is stupid? Pretty impressive.
by ChiAdam on Aug 28, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
I look to the Sporting News for important updates on the new NFL season that is just around the corner . This type of article is no help , just a waste of everyones time . The Vikings aren’t getting laid and are stupid ? Wrong . This article is stupid . Thanks for nothing .
by riverv on Aug 28, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions
You know this is more of an entertainment and opinion blog and not necessarily a place for reported stories and analysis like The Trenches blog, right? And it’s only a waste of time if you read it and comment on it. Which you did. So, I guess that would make you stupid. Thanks for that, though.
by nonamejones on Aug 28, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions
Please, riverv, take it a little more seriously. It’s Friday, loosen up.
by littmann.tsn on Aug 28, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions
I’d like to know who the reporter talked to in the lockerroom.
I believe most of the stuff that’s written is all in the mind of the writer that has run out of ideas. It’s not just this site…but a lot of them. I think writers get bored and write stuff just to see if it gets a reaction.
So please…report on facts…not crap.
by nancyjw on Aug 28, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions
Wow if this is what Sporting news is coming too for what they call credible Journalism? That’s something I would expect from espn not this site, even though this has been the trend with these so called SPORT’S journalist who don’t seem to have contacts for real news but they have unnamed sources to report tabloid "Schism".
As by other reports out there with live interviews from named sources and live interviews Favre has the backing from the offensive players and the defense. Oh well what can you expect from these reporters who look like a little wet behind the ears, look 19 and know what the word "Schism" means so you know they have never been laid. Hopefully that was loose enough for you Littlemann.tsn cause its Friday ya know
by HawkeyeNationHere on Aug 28, 2009 6:36 PM EDT reply actions
Will any of this matter in the long run? Can we not talk about Favre until after Monday night? Kudos for Sports Illustrated for putting out a “100% Favre-fee Edition” this week.
by Scarlet Deceiver on Aug 28, 2009 6:44 PM EDT reply actions
Where there’s smoke…
by NikkiFree on Aug 29, 2009 2:34 AM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed