Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White: Carlos Condit Accepts Rematch With Nick Diaz

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Mark McGwire Did Steroids, Now Let the Cheaters in the Hall of Fame

Stop the presses. This just in. Breaking news. Pete Rose admitted he bet on baseball.

Wait, wait. It's not that. Oh, here it is. Shoeless Joe Jackson conspired to fix the 1919 World Series.

Nah, not that one either. Oh, here we go. Per the AP, Mark McGwire admits to using steroids 'off and on' for nearly a decade. Now can we let all three of them into the Hall of Fame?

Wait, before we get to that, let's parse this statement from McGwire.

"I wish I had never touched steroids. It was foolish and it was a mistake. I truly apologize. Looking back, I wish I had never played during the steroid era."
So the era made you do it, eh Mark? Why not just come out and say it was Jose Canseco's fault? Just say that Jose held you down in the locker room and shot you full of horse drugs until you morphed into the homerun king we came to love? And let's not forget, America loved McGwire. The guy saved baseball. Okay, saved is a strong word, but he sure as heck brought it back to relevancy in American sports. People always suspected he was on something and when he 'refused to talk about the past' that was as much an admission of guilt as this brief statement put out to the Associated Press today.

What rubs me the wrong way is that he "truly" apologizes. Like living a lie for the last two decades can be forgiven with one line that you're now "truly" sorry about things. The fact of the matter is, nobody should find this is shocking in any way. Sure it's huge news, but does anyone really care that McGwire is getting out in front of the barrage of media that undoubtedly were prepared to swarm upon spring training for St. Louis this year? It's so hard to imagine any players not being on something at this point that an admission after the fact really doesn't change much.

Well, except the fact that McGwire should be in the Hall of Fame.

And no, I am not one who believes that an admission of guilt is the final act of Hall of Fame contrition and he can be absolved by simply saying four Hail Mary's – wait that's football. Maybe a few sacrifice flies?

I digress. McGwire should be in the Hall of Fame. So should Rose and Shoeless Joe and anyone who ever played the game and made enough of an impact to warrant discussion this long after their careers ended. Could you imagine a Hall of Fame without McGwire or Barry Bonds or Roger Clemens? Add in most of their contemporaries and we are really looking at a time in the next ten years where nobody is going to get voted into the Hall of Fame. So let them all in and make this terrible era in baseball – the same era that made McGwire famous and the same era he's now blaming for making him so good at mashing the baseball over a fence – where it belongs in baseball history. We're so caught up on the purity of the game and rewarding 'the right people' to get elected each year. Guess what, the more closely we look any of these guys, the more warts we can find. Nobody is perfect. And nobody has to be. Baseball is America's pastime, after all.

Now, should we laud McGwire for coming forward now? Absolutely not. The guy is a coward who had ample chances, including that famous time in front of (hello!) Congress, to admit this. Maybe he has a book coming out. Maybe Tony La Russa made this a part of the deal for him to come back into the Cardinals organization. Or maybe he thinks the voters will forgive him in a few years and he can get the clock started ticking toward Cooperstown.

At any rate, this is news, and this is huge. But it's not surprising in the least. And it shouldn't really change anything, other than maybe now McGwire can look himself in the face every morning. So good for you, Mark, you got a 20-year-old monkey off your back. Let's just hope the monkey wasn't shooting up too, because that'd be one huge monkey.

This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

I agree Shoeless Joe Jackson and Pete Rose (especially) should be in the Hall of Fame, but I completely disagree when you talk about steroid users being inducted. What message is that sending to young athletes? The reason for steroids is to perform at a greater level, which in turn earns them more fame and a larger contract. If you can use steroids, gain popularity and wealth, and still get into the Hall of Fame, what message is that sending the youth? Whatever it takes. Steroids are illegal, and therefore, steroid users should be punished for their actions. They should be banned from the Hall of Fame.

by aj#25 on Jan 11, 2010 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

Ban these Roid heads. Send the message that they will not be tolerated.

by MRCUTLASS on Jan 11, 2010 9:58 PM EST reply actions  

would you ban the players from the 70’s who used ampehtemines, or how about these hyocritcal baseball writers, who vote in a admitted cheater, gaylord perry, who bragged about throwing a spit ball, or how about dennis eckersley, who used to be a drunk, his own admission, or how about early writers who voted in ty cobb, who was a known racsit.  These writers never seemed to have a problem with morals, and or only now coming around to it, and oh by the way when mcgwire played, steroids and androsteindione were legal in baseball, and they weren’t banned until 2002

by bball301 on Jan 11, 2010 10:58 PM EST reply actions  

 Let them in… but they should have to perform a great feat of strength at the presentation ceremony. The goal here is to get it so that the players have to do several cycles of the chronic steroids before attending. Then, as they take the stage with no shirt, they have to rip a New York City phone book in half or bite through a junkyard dog chain.

If they can do the trick, they get in… no questions asked. If they fail, they have to walk out of Cooperstown while people throw garbage at them.

They cheated to get up to the Hall… they should have to EARN getting in.

by L'etat, c'est moi on Jan 11, 2010 11:10 PM EST reply actions  

No…it is NOT time to let cheaters into the HOF…not now, not ever!

The cheaters got their reward with the tons of money that they were paid as a result of their cheating…the applause of the crowds…the multi-million endorsements…and all that goes with these things.

They took the quick and easy way to make the big bucks and win the acclaim of the crowds…and that is all that they deserve.

They do not deserve to be inducted into the HOF with those who earned their way in as a result of their hard work and accomplishments.

by BradKT on Jan 12, 2010 2:01 AM EST reply actions  

Both he and Harry Reid are ’truly sorry" on the very same day. oh ok, lets just forget everything. Sorry they got caught, not sorry they did it or said it. Thats what sorry means today.

by GreatBlueHeron on Jan 12, 2010 4:32 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t know if this is what Dan Levy is trying to say or not, but nothing is sacred in baseball anymore.  Maybe what he’s trying to say is that now that we know so many players were juiced, but, since we don’t know for sure which ones, that we should just assume that most players have been cheating all this time.  The real point here is that records in baseball don’t even matter anymore.I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again….it took a player 30 years to break Ruth’s home run record and the 30 more for McGwire to do it.   However; it wasn’t just McGwire.  It was Sosa and Bonds.  A record that stood for years was suddenly being broke year after year.  It was obvious something changed and now that I know what it was, I simply don’t care anymore.  It’s only a matter of time before every record is broken by a juiced player.  So, yeah, give them the record and the hall because neither of them mean anything to me anymore.

by Sirpoins on Jan 12, 2010 4:35 AM EST reply actions  

          The HOF is for people that will be remembered far after they finish playing game.So they should let Mcgwire,Rose,Shoeless Joe and anyone else that is still talked about after their playing days.But on their plaque should be noted that they cheated or gambled on the sport or whatever they did wrong. That way fans years from know will know what type of people theses scumbags really were in life.

by snappingturtles on Jan 12, 2010 6:09 AM EST reply actions  

I think you have to have standards and you can’t keep backsliding. These players did things that damage the game and in no way should we keep lowering the standard. They knew what they did was wrong and they made the choice to do what they did anyway. Forgiving these players doesn’t mean we throw out the standards.

by yankeepride61 on Jan 12, 2010 6:55 AM EST reply actions  

Let them in, but built a separate wing to the Hall and name it "those whose put up gaudy stats and whose integrity some have and may deem "questionable". Too much? OK then. KEEP THEM OUT!

by imzhamez on Jan 12, 2010 7:01 AM EST reply actions  

pete rose should be in and we all know it for a fact.

by scurds on Jan 12, 2010 7:07 AM EST reply actions  

Anyone who followed Mcgwires career while he was in Oakland knew he was doing something. Look at his rookie card and then fast forward 10 years, the change was dramatic and no amount of weight lifting/diet could have brought that kind of change. At the time the media and baseball didn’t care as long as they got what they wanted: A good story to bring the public back after the BS strike that alienated quite a few fans. They didn’t care when he was bashing HR’s and breaking records and they have no right to care now.

by appalachian slang on Jan 12, 2010 7:50 AM EST reply actions  

Who cares baseball sucks. 

Barry Bonds was twice the player McGuire ever was….

by SailorGabe on Jan 12, 2010 9:36 AM EST reply actions  

In my opinion McGwire should be in the hall of fame. Let’s remember that as a rookie in 1987 he hit 49 homeruns, so the steroids helped but he had the power or talent to hit them. Also when this guys used steroids it wasn’t a banned substance by MLB, by this i’m not saying steroids are good because i’m against them in every way and i’m glad they’re suspending players that uses them and hope they continue with this policy, BUT still it wasn’t illegal at the time so technically what they did wasn’t illegal.

by pabgar on Jan 12, 2010 10:43 AM EST reply actions  

The Hall of Fame is a museum.  McGwire, Pete, Shoeless Joe, Bonds, Clemens…they all belong in Cooperstown.  They were all huge historical figures in their respective eras.  If you want a holy shrine, go to the Vatican or Mecca.

by Tileking59 on Jan 12, 2010 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

If Big Head Bonds is allowed in the Hall of Fame then McGwire should get in there. However, in my opinion, neither of them belong there.  Both are cheaters….but at least McGwire finally had the courage to admit it.

And, for the record, the Home Run King is Hank Aaron and the single season home run record holder is Roger Maris.  Until a ’roid free player beats the records of Aaron and Maris they should be considered the record holders. 

by MountainCatFan on Jan 12, 2010 11:00 AM EST reply actions  

Steroids or not, Mc Gwire is not a HOFer.  He hit a bunch of homers, but that is it.  He has about as many strikeouts as hits, and he was a below average fielder.  The HOF is supposed to be a special place for special players.  Mcgwire’s career just does not add up. 

by LSUSMCR on Jan 12, 2010 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

LSUSMCR is right.  The only special thing about McGwire’s career is that few years when he hit so many home runs.  Otherwise he was a good, but not great player who probably would be a marginla HOF candidate at best.  So to put him in would be purely rewarding him for taking roids.

by tedchinook on Jan 12, 2010 11:48 AM EST reply actions  

McGwire nor Clemens nor Bonds should be allowed anywhere near the HOF….  ..and in the next ten yrs… elect Griffey.. he’s the only current power hitter who belongs..  In fact Griffey should be celebrated to the max for his accomplishments.. esp in light of his injuries he suffered.. (see McGwire)

by steelheadr on Jan 12, 2010 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

Hey PABGAR, steroids were illegal to use and possess in the US without a prescription so that they weren’t banned by baseball is irrelevent. McGwire doesn’t belong in the HOF, he has one number that stands out, 583 HRs and that number is tainted. His .263 average and good but not great runs and RBI totals (also tainted) don’t measure up.

by Jambone40 on Jan 12, 2010 1:15 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with the comments about Perry who was very boastful about cheating. I know that’s inside the lines and that’s different. Still they’ve banned greenies in the alst couple of eyars and EVERY single player before then was taking them. Steriods weren’t against against MLB rules anyway so it’s not like he was breaking any baseball rules. Then if we use their illegiality in the real world we’d have to then kick out every player who used coke all the time in the 80’s (read: everyone).

by epar on Jan 12, 2010 6:37 PM EST reply actions  

How about this: remove all HOF inductees from the last 30 years and replace them all with one person:  Dr. John Ziegler.

by Black17 on Jan 12, 2010 8:23 PM EST reply actions  

steelheadr, there were a couple others who aren’t looked at as ‘roiders.  Along with Griffey, Frank Thomas and Jim Thome pass the "eye" test.  I’m not a White Sox fan, just those two are the first to come to mind. 

by daapeman1977 on Jan 16, 2010 5:23 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed