Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
by Matt O'Brien • Jan 5, 2010 2:31 PM EST
Back in October, former Mavericks stat guru Wayne Winston set off a minor firestorm in the NBA blogosphere with his...ahem, controversial claim that Thunder forward Kevin Durant just wasn't that good. What was the basis for such a crazy contentious assertion? Adjusted plus-minus, a stat Durant didn't do well in. As you can imagine, people didn't take too well to this apostasy.
Now Winston is back with another set of semi-coherent/half-loony assertions (Luol Deng as an MVP candidate? Really? No seriously, really?). Among his latest talking points, Winston does offer this mea culpa (of sorts), saying that Durant has made:
Most amazing improvement I have ever seen. Currently his adjusted plus/minus is plus-16.5.. He should make 1st or 2nd team all NBA.
Here's another possibility: Winston has simply been wrong all along, and he's demonstrated the foolishness of only using a single stat to judge a player without providing any context. But other than that, his analysis is spot on!
0 comments
Next Post: Mike Brown, Head Coach, Doesn't Draw Up Plays
Previous Post: Landon Donovan's Mexican Lottery Ad Is Muy Divertido
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.





