Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Big Ten Making Run At Texas

So you’re saying there’s a chance: Texas has allegedly been approached by the Big Ten in the very preliminary, extremely premature, and altogether exploratory gestures towards expansion. This makes no sense geographically, none historically, and every bit of sense in terms of what the Big Ten wants in the one expansion team it needs to get to twelve teams. (Remember: Big Ten, the major conference most prone to academic tubthumping, equals “Big Eleven” in number.)

Texas has excellent academics. Texas is the flagship university of a very large state with many, many televisions often tuned to sports. It not only has football, but championship caliber athletics down the line that would make for fine viewing for the Big Ten network. In every sense but the geographical they are an outstanding fit for a conference looking for a new member.

The only limitation is geography, but that’s what planes are for in theory. The rest of the cases against are sentimental: the ditching of most of their historical rivalries, the oddity of being a Texan team in a historically Midwestern league, and seeing Bevo standing on the grass amidst the occasional tear gas clouds rolling through the horseshoe. (Never fear: if it gets rowdy in Columbus, gas masks for cows do exist.)

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

I like it

I actually love this idea if they are somehow able to pull it off. However, I’m guessing the fan base won’t go for it. For one, why would Texas want to leave the Big 12 when it is already perceived as surpassing the Big Ten in terms of better teams. The Big Ten outside of Big Ten country is seen as the 4th best conference these days behind the SEC, PAC 10 and Big 12, and that’s coming from a Michiganian, so I can only imagine what somebody from outside of the Big Ten states would think.
But this would definitely be welcome for Big Ten fans and the rest of true college football fans as it would do a big service for us all in an age when the BCS STILL does not utilize a playoff system in which a champion is decided on the battlefield because it would allow a perennial powerhouse with TONS of history and rivalries to go head on against what has traditionally been considered the black and blue conference of college football. It would for sure be interesting to see if Texas would run through the Big Ten like many would assume, or if they would succumb to the physical play of the Big Ten and lose a couple conference games, especially to borderline teams like MSU and Northwestern, as have the UofMs and OSUs of the conference have on occassion over the years.
Let’s hope as true fans something like this CAN happen, for the sake of helping us get a playoff if nothing else.
Bottom line: I think if Texas joins and loses 1 or 2 games, especially to anyone aside from OSU or maybe Penn St., it proves there’s WAY to much guess work in using strictly a point system to decide a champion. Instead use a 8 or 12 team (top 4 seeds would get a bye first week, keeping the regular season valuable) playoff system in which the BCS is still used to determine the 8 or 12 teams. This year would have been perfect for either, having 5 undefeated teams in or near the top 8.

JF
Louis Delmas, Eric Berry and Kyle Wilson - 313 Missile Squadron - Seek and Destroy!

by Lions Rant Artist on Feb 11, 2010 12:02 PM EST reply actions  

People who want to see a playoff

True champions are decided on the field, not in some political think-tank operation. True college football fans are those who support a playoff system.

JF
Louis Delmas, Eric Berry and Kyle Wilson - 313 Missile Squadron - Seek and Destroy!
Best article/comments on the Lions' Draft Philosophy - READ

by Lions Rant Artist on Feb 11, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

It does make geographical sense

If the Big Ten is actually trying to become the Big 16 or 18 and not the Big Twelve or something. If they add Missouri, and Texas A&M, and Pitt … then it starts to make a lot more sense.

by Jeff Nusser on Feb 11, 2010 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

I just don't see Big Ten expanding to 3 teams though

I’m supposed to believe a conference that has talked of expansion 3 separate times and not pulled the trigger is now going to add not 1, but 3, teams.

That being said, Texas to the Big Ten is a huge power play for the conference. Texas is probably #2 on the Big Ten wishlist behind Notre Dame. If any school has the financial resources to move to the Big Ten, it’s Texas.

BC Interruption, a Boston College sports blog

by Brian Favat on Feb 11, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Not quite buddy...

Over 2,000 miles doesn’t compare to about 800 miles. And does it matter in today’s world? Jets can get from NY to LA in what 3-4 hours?

JF
Louis Delmas, Eric Berry and Kyle Wilson - 313 Missile Squadron - Seek and Destroy!
Best article/comments on the Lions' Draft Philosophy - READ

by Lions Rant Artist on Feb 11, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

don't know

if you’ve noticed, but schools are cutting costs, not adding them. while Texas may be able to afford jets, not everyone else in the Big 10 would want those costs.

It would destroy Texas college baseball program, one of the best in the country. And it would force Texas to play in the North in the cold.

It ain’t happening.

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Feb 12, 2010 12:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Distance-wise

It’s about 850 miles from Austin to the closest Big Ten cities, Champaign and Iowa City. That would make Texas in the Big Ten geographically comparable to LA Tech in the WAC, with the shortest distance from Ruston to another WAC city (Las Cruces, NM) 820 miles.

Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog

by Year2 on Feb 11, 2010 12:55 PM EST reply actions  

Why not UC?

That is a team that would generate some real interest. The Ohio State vs UC game would rival OSU/Michigan in fervor.

" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran

by JUNGLEJOHN on Feb 11, 2010 1:35 PM EST reply actions  

Over Ohio State's dead body

No way they approve adding UC. Not when they have a football monopoly in Ohio.

BC Interruption, a Boston College sports blog

by Brian Favat on Feb 11, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

LAUGHABLE AT BEST!

Are you trying to compare one of the top 3 football rivalries in the history of the game to some Homer, BS dream matchup you have? and who is UC? Cincinnati? CAlifornia? Connecticut?

JF
Louis Delmas, Eric Berry and Kyle Wilson - 313 Missile Squadron - Seek and Destroy!
Best article/comments on the Lions' Draft Philosophy - READ

by Lions Rant Artist on Feb 11, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Relax Lions Rant. I am an OSU graduate

I am just tired of hearing UC (Cincinnati) fans talking big when they visit for two years the area of the rankings where OSU lives and talking about how they are THE college football team in Ohio. I do give them credit for playing well recently but their fans really got a bit out of hand. It would however into a great rivalry over time but in no way would it come close to the biggest rivalry in the history of sports which is OSU and that team up north.(not just my opinion it is ESPN’s opinion as well. Look it up) UC-OSU probably would be the #2 game in terms of local excitement though. Over 10 games in a decade OSU would win 8 or maybe 10. They will never be able to keep a top college coach in their conference. My post was really sort of tongue in cheek. BTW OSU would not take a back seat to UC in academics.

" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran

by JUNGLEJOHN on Feb 11, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed