Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

NASCAR's Rainout Qualifying Procedure Needs Tweaking

NASCAR has made a host of rules changes to benefit the fans in the last year.

Now it's time to make an obvious one that benefits those who make the sport what it is: The drivers.

On Friday, 13 hopefuls who arrived in Daytona with the dream of a new season and the biggest race of the year went home after being denied the chance to qualify for Saturday's Nationwide Series race.

Eight of those teams left with nothing; five likely had some money from Paul Menard's team in their pockets as they drove back to North Carolina.

Nine drivers literally qualified on the luck of the draw (plus Menard, who made it by buying his way in).

How did this happen? Here's a quick review:

The top 30 in owner points from last year were locked into the field. So was anyone who won a race last year (two drivers) plus any past champions (one driver), which left 10 remaining spots for 23 hopefuls.

And how were those 10 spots filled?

Lottery balls.

NASCAR's procedure called for the highest cars in the qualifying order draw - which is conducted with lottery balls pinging around in a machine - to get into the field. That meant the cars that drew 35th-44th got in, plus Menard, who was 49th but apparently bought out five teams in front of him to make the show (five teams who would have made it suddenly "withdrew" from the race).

That's racin? Hardly.

NASCAR spokesman Ramsey Poston was careful to point out that the situation is "unfortunate, but not unfair." And after all, NASCAR can't control the weather.

But NASCAR can control its rainout qualifying procedures, which are long overdue for a tune-up. There's got to be a better way than to send people home based on a random draw.

For example: There will be some time Saturday morning before Sprint Cup practice, which begins at 10:30 a.m. Why couldn't NASCAR just hold a special qualifying session for those go-or-go-home cars to at least give them a fighting chance after coming down to Florida and spending money on tires, crew salaries and travel expenses such as a three-night hotel stay for crew members?

NASCAR's explanation is that it would be inconsistent to allow such a thing; there are some races during the season where there would be no "tomorrow" situation due to a schedule conflict or simply because it's a one-day event.

Poston said in that case, fans and media would be asking why NASCAR made an exception for Daytona (or wherever this may occur in the future) but not for other races. NASCAR would rather do the same thing every time, even if it is "unfortunate."

What about relying on practice speeds? In the IndyCar Series, officials use practice speeds as a fallback in the event of a qualifying rainout.

That would have been a good solution at Daytona, where Shelby Howard was second-fastest of the go-or-go-home cars in the final practice.

Instead, Howard will not participate in the highest-paying race of the year, thanks to a bad bounce.

Using practice speeds would be fairer than lottery balls; at least it would provide some backup for faster, more deserving cars.

But Poston said NASCAR's view is that relying on practice speeds in the event of a qualifying rainout would alter the purpose of practice. Teams would be trying to lay down fast qualifying-type laps instead of working on their cars for the race, he said, which is the real reason for such sessions.

Still, I'd rather leave that up to the teams than NASCAR discretion. The teams' fates should be put in their own hands by letting them decide how much to focus on putting a fast practice lap together, rather than leaving something to chance that could affect people's livelihoods.

Jason Keller, who has made the most starts in Nationwide Series history, joined a new team this year - TriStar Motorsports. But its No. 35 car didn't have owner points, and so despite the team wanting to be a part of the series and become regular competitors, NASCAR was forced to send it home when its qualifying draw didn't make the cut.

Unfortunate, but not unfair? It appears to be some of both.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

What happened to last year's owners points

Used to be that for the first 5 races you used past champs, last year winners (drivers and cars) then went to the owners points from last year. There were more than 30 cars in this field that attempted every race last year – and a bunch that attempted at least some of the races. They have supported the series and deserve the start more than the brand new teams – even the new teams that “bought” their guaranteed spots in the top 30.

by dianeinla on Feb 12, 2010 7:55 PM EST reply actions  

They still do

The rainout rules are for the first 5 races:

- Top 30 in owners’ points from the previous year
- Race winners from the previous year
- Past drivers’ series champions
- Those in the top 30 in owners’ points this year if not already in
- This year’s attempts, with ties broken by this year’s owners’ points
- Qualifying order

The problem is, since there neither attempts nor owners’ points for 2010, once Jeff Green got slotted in at 33rd, it went straight to qualifying order.

by steveegg on Feb 13, 2010 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

That should be "race winners from previous or current year"

I really should have proofread that. Still, since there were no races this year before this afternoon, that error wouldn’t have mattered.

by steveegg on Feb 13, 2010 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

My comments

I think lining up by practice speeds is the best idea. The go or go home teams are already using practice to make sure they can lay down a good lap in qualifying, so I’m not exactly sure what that would change.

by Brinton Hester on Feb 12, 2010 8:36 PM EST reply actions  

How bout this idea?

How bout if we eliminate all the full-time Cup drivers?

Not only would this level the playing field to drivers with less experience but it also might give us a champion who doesnt run doube-duty.

Either that or make the policy that if a team shows up ready to race and qualifying is rained out, everyone races. Maybe the start and parks would stop showing up just to collect the last place points giving us a full field for the race.

by Bobbie1231 on Feb 12, 2010 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

My Thought

Well.. since teams can buy their way in ….

Well.. since teams can buy their way in ….Why don’t we just get rid of the Top 30 rule? Also get rid of the previous champ’s spot.
Since so many are wanting to race, let them race their way in. You’re either fast or you go home.
This in turn would force NASCAR to hold qualifying rounds.
Also if the Cup guy isn’t fast, maybe a Nationwide regular will get in the race.

by TBayFinn on Feb 13, 2010 3:09 AM EST reply actions  

Using "consistency" as an excuse? NASCAR? Consistent?

“NASCAR’s explanation is that it would be inconsistent to allow such a thing; there are some races during the season where there would be no “tomorrow” situation due to a schedule conflict or simply because it’s a one-day event."

Right. Because being consistent is clearly important to NASCAR. All of the races have the same rules, and they never get changed at the last minute (or even mid-race).

Obviously, that’s BS. I think both the drivers and the fans would prefer that the go-or-go-homers get a fair shot to drive their way in as often as possible.

by JenJ on Feb 13, 2010 8:21 AM EST reply actions  

The question is, which practice speed?

While at most tracks, the fast practice speed is usually indicative of who will qualify well, the draft speeds at Daytona and Talledega are significantly faster than single-car speeds, and are as much dependent on who one is out there with as anything else. Look at the damaged cars that hung onto the lead draft until it became every car for itself, or compare the fast-lap speed to the average-lap speed in the Cup Happy Hour.

As for the claim that some teams would just go out there in qualifying trim in practice, that’s been happening since NASCAR went to the top-30/35 guarantee.

That said, there is no real reason why qualifying couldn’t have been held this morning, even full-field qualifying. Just like NASCAR makes every effort to get the race in, they could make every effort to get the 2 hours of qualifying in, even if it means moving qualifying to a different day. Of course, that would mean that NASCAR would have to admit you were right a couple years ago.

by steveegg on Feb 13, 2010 8:22 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

0 updates with 0 comments

Like to see major updates on this story in Facebook.

memorial day memories

Hugs, High-Fives, And Tears: Veterans Share Their Favorite Sports Memories

ryan clark cos

'Give It Your Heart, Give It Your All': Ryan Clark Exemplifies Marine Corps' Honor

145370615_extra_large_small

Spurctacular Start: San Antonio Takes Game 1