Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Steelers Impose Own Salary Cap, Which Changes Almost Nothing About Their Offseason

The Pittsburgh Steelers announced on Friday that they will abide by their self-imposed salary cap during the 2010 season, while the rest of the league will presumably go wild and throw money unreservedly at a fairly middling free agent class.

The team's GM/director of football operation/other jargony NFL title for team executive Kevin Colbert said the move is a preventative measure, one to keep the team from hurting itself by overspending on players only to find itself undoing that spending if a deal is made on the labor situation and a salary cap is reinstituted (even if that is unlikely to happen before next season starts).

Others have mused that perhaps this puts Pittsburgh at a competitive disadvantage for the next season. Perhaps if a league-wide salary cap still doesn't exist five years down the road, the team's cap does. But thinking it hurts the Steelers in 2010 ignores the fact that Pittsburgh seldom ever makes a splash in the free agent market. Throughout the free agency era, the team has made its bones through the draft. What was the biggest free agent signing the Steelers have made the last decade? An oft-injured Duce Staley at a relatively cheap price in 2004. The 2002 signing of James Farrior has been the exception, not the rule. Of their starting lineup last season, safety Ryan Clark and center Justin Hartwig were the most prominent players acquired through free agency. Solid contributors, but hardly anchors of the team.

As many teams did, the Steelers prepared for an uncapped season by locking up key players to long-term deals last year. That leaves the team with a meager 2010 free agent class that is highlighted by Clark, kicker Jeff Reed and nose tackle Casey Hampton. Hampton may command a hefty contract, but the guy is 33 years old and, despite being named to his fifth Pro Bowl in 2009, on the decline as a player. Clark is decent but replaceable, as is Reed. Most likely, the team wouldn't bust whatever figure they come up with as a cap to retain two or even all three of them.

If anything, the move is meant as a signal to the player's union that at least one owner has confidence that a labor contract will be made in the foreseeable future. Compared to the doom and gloom being aired by the NFLPA during Super Bowl week, it's the rare positive sign to fans that there is still hope for an NFL season in 2011.

This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

In related news, Osama bin Laden announced that he won’t be joining B’nai B’rith in 2010.

by L'etat, c'est moi on Feb 15, 2010 12:36 PM EST reply actions  

I see it as a positive thing. In all these ‘labor disputes’ (NFLPA vs. owners, UAW vs. automakers, etc.) all sides are represented except for the (vastly) most numerous one… the customer, who winds up paying for every ‘settlement’.

by Radatz on Feb 15, 2010 1:11 PM EST reply actions  

its just more of the same old steeler cheapness.  no playoff revenue for a cupla years in  a row is gunna hurt.

by scurds on Feb 15, 2010 3:08 PM EST reply actions  

I’ve never thought the Rooneys to be cheap, despite the label. They have always built talent through the draft, building team unity, and paid their guys when they weren’t lured into getting over paid by the market. Name one owner who has bought a championship in the free agent era. Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder are losers primarily because they don’t get it. 

by dstruzzi on Feb 15, 2010 10:00 PM EST reply actions  

They have never played much in the free agency market anyways, yet there the most successful team in the league. No news here, but love to watch the haters cry…Funny stuff!!!

by steelcrazy2 on Feb 15, 2010 10:11 PM EST reply actions  

Scurds, what’s deal?  Of all the teams in the NFL to hate and you chose the Steelers?  What is there to hate about the Steelers?  You’re not a Baltimore, Cleveland or Cincinnati fan.  No, you’re a St. Louis Ram fan (Pause for a moment to let the irony wash over you).  The Rams?  Seriously?  You must love the beat down Steeler fans put on you every time you dog their team.  How would you like your beat down this time?  From a statistical or organizational standpoint?Oh, never mind, why bother?Come on, Scurds, hate the Cowboys like the rest of us non-Cowboy fans.  They’re really fun to hate.  There is so much about the Cowboys to pick apart and talk trash about.  But the Steelers?  Not really.  

by paddy-o-furniture on Feb 21, 2010 3:39 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed