Jun 16 10:01a by Andrew Sharp
Over at SB Nation's Lakers blog, Silver Screen and Roll, the spirits are understandably high after Tuesday's night blowout victory. The Lakers were fantastic on offense, but even more so, their defense is what won it for them. Again, we go to Silver Screen's Dexter Fishmore:
That's how you play an elimination game. Faced with a win-or-go-golfing scenario for the first time in over a year, the Los Angeles Lakers came up with a defensive performance for the ages. They harassed the Celtics for 48 glorious minutes with length, hustle and a rediscovered ferocity that had gone missing in Boston. The result was an 89 to 67 bludgeoning that evens the NBA Finals at three victories a piece. Game Seven, for all the tacos, is Thursday night.
If you'd forgotten that the Lakers were capable of choking an opponent out with world-class defense, that's understandable. As recently as early March, they led the NBA in defensive efficiency, but a late-season fade, plus points allowed in bunches in playoff series against the Utah Jazz and Phoenix Suns, took some of the gleam off the Lakers' defensive rep. Tonight that great Laker D came roaring back, and not a moment too soon. They allowed the Celtics to score a pathetically low 0.78 points per possession. That's not just the lowest efficiency mark by a Laker opponent in these playoffs. It's the lowest mark of an opponent all season long. To put it in further perspective, at no point in these playoffs or the regular season had the Celtic offense been held below 0.83 points per trip.
Did the Lakers pick the right time for one of the greatest defensive performances in NBA Finals history? Yes. Yes, I'd say they did.
Now, I don't mean to rain on L.A.'s parade here, but let's not go too crazy.
Last night's defense was good, but it was helped by an anemic, impotent, and downright half-assed performance from the Celtics for most of the game. Here's my recap of last night's game: "Both teams traded blows back-and-forth until it was 12-12, then Kobe hit a couple tough shots, it was 18-12, Kendrick Perkins got hurt, and the Celtics mailed it in from there."
Midway through the second quarter it was over. We talked about this yesterday:
Three things that beg consideration in advance of Game 6...
- The Celtics are old.
- The Celtics have been fighting nagging injuries throughout the playoffs.
- The Celtics have a tendency to get complacent.
After a cross-country flight on Monday, on just a day's rest, and comfortable in knowing they've got two shots to beat L.A. this week, it's not inconceivable to think the Celtics could come out flat tonight, get down by double digits early, and pack things in by the middle of the third quarter.
It doesn't mean that the Celtics deserve a free pass for their effort last night, or the Lakers' defensive excellence means nothing. But within the larger narrative of this series, last night made sense, and was even a little predictable. The Celtics looked like crap, because that's been their M.O. all season when they've gotten a chance to get comfortable. The Lakers looked great on offense and defense, because... When not getting hounded by Boston defense, they're still the Lakers.
But don't let last night's statistics fool you. L.A. was good, but not that good. Boston did it to themselves, too. And coming into the game, we knew they might.
Now? Game 7 is here, we know Boston'll show up because that's what they've done all series, and all postseason. And we know the Lakers just put together their most complete game of the playoffs, have Kobe Bryant on their team, and will be playing at home with the winningest coach in NBA History on their side.
Um, are you excited yet?
9 comments
Lakers-Celtics, Game 6: The L.A. Defense Was Good, But Not That Good
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.






Comments
Bravo Sharp!
Another well written masterpiece! A must read!
Queensbridge. Littlerock.
"Derek Fisher shouldn't be allowed to shoot unless theres fewer than one second on the shot clock" - Kelly Dwyer
by bluexfalcon on Jun 16, 2010 5:33 PM EDT reply actions
When Kobe dropped 81 on the Raptors
it wasn’t just because Kobe is one of the best scorers of all time. It was also because those Raptors were terrible defensively.
The point is – historical performances always take both ends into account. You can’t put up the best defensive performance in history just by playing really good defense, your opponent has to kind of have an off night as well. Similarly, you can’t set records on the offensive end without playing against a relatively crappy defense. Even if the Celtics had made a few more of those wide open layups or jumpers this would still be a tremendous defensive outing from the Lakers worth writing about.
The Celtics mailed it in because the Lakers didn’t allow them back in the game. This isn’t time to go “woah one of our starters got injured, guess this game is over”. This is the NBA finals. The Celtics have come back from double digit deficits before in this series. Last night, the Lakers just wouldn’t let them.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
by Justin N. on Jun 16, 2010 5:34 PM EDT reply actions
Hindsight is better than 20/20
"This is not a game for boys. This is a game for men." - Phil Jackson
by Gil Meriken on Jun 16, 2010 5:51 PM EDT reply actions
Saying Boston did it to themselves is a complete cop out
WHY did Boston look so bad on offense? It couldn’t possibly have been the Lakers forcing them into contested shots and turnovers. The Lakers D was good but not that good? The numbers don’t back up your statement. If the roles were reversed your whole article would have been about how great the Celtics defense played and completely shut the Lakers down.
You don’t want to rain on our parade, but you made it a point to highlight a post on SS&R and try to downplay the Lakers performance.
What is your reasoning behind that? Are you that anti-Laker? Or do you still hold a lil resentment towards a writer at SS&R for calling you out and ripping apart your previous post about Kobe? Not a good look Mr. Sharp. It doesn’t make your opinion any more worthwhile. It just makes you look like a bitter writer trying to get a jab in any way you can get it.
Look on the bright side! You gave the SS&R community a nice lil shoutout, which will probably direct a few more Lakers fans to the best Laker Blog out there. Appreciate it! We owe you one!
I only need 2 words for my sig now....."BUCK FOSTON"
by EmmCeee on Jun 16, 2010 7:11 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Hahahaha...
The ONLY time Sharp gets traffic is when he does something like this.
The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic living in Japan...
by With Malice on Jun 16, 2010 8:02 PM EDT reply actions
Probably why he keeps doing it...
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure."
http://www.silverscreenandroll.com/ - Visit, and be loved. Troll, and die a painful death. =]]
Questions? Queries? Comments? Concerns? Expletive-filled inflammatory trolling? Contact me at saurav.a.das.1994@gmail.com
by Saurav A. Das on Jun 17, 2010 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Hmmm....
“Here’s my recap of last night’s game: “Both teams traded blows back-and-forth until it was 12-12, then Kobe hit a couple tough shots, it was 18-12, Kendrick Perkins got hurt, and the Celtics mailed it in from there.”".
- So, no true justification based on in-game events. No use of examples, no evidence given whatsoever to back up your statement asides from you quoting your own prediction about the Celtics coming out flat in this game, which is a highly subjective opinion and not admissible evidence as it is not fact.
In essence, your entire article, all three hundred and forty-five words of it (excluding quotes), simply states your opinion while presenting it as fact, tells Laker fans ‘to not get too excited here’ in a condescending tone, and reminds everyone that yes, a Game Seven will be played.
Was there even any point in writing it, asides from desperately trying to gather page views?
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure."
http://www.silverscreenandroll.com/ - Visit, and be loved. Troll, and die a painful death. =]]
Questions? Queries? Comments? Concerns? Expletive-filled inflammatory trolling? Contact me at saurav.a.das.1994@gmail.com
by Saurav A. Das on Jun 17, 2010 3:18 AM EDT reply actions
*310 words, not 345
My apologies.
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure."
http://www.silverscreenandroll.com/ - Visit, and be loved. Troll, and die a painful death. =]]
Questions? Queries? Comments? Concerns? Expletive-filled inflammatory trolling? Contact me at saurav.a.das.1994@gmail.com
by Saurav A. Das on Jun 17, 2010 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Mr. Sharp, please step away from your dealer
His stuff is making you delusional.
by Datuca on Jun 17, 2010 12:27 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed