Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
by Andy Hutchins • Jun 27, 2010 10:55 AM EDT
This is a goal. It wasn't called one. That's a travesty.
Sure, it's fun to talk about the karma involved in an England-Germany match—England had a controversial goal counted in the 1966 World Cup final that many Germans still maintain never crossed the line—but the fact is that Frank Lampard scored a goal here. It just doesn't count. (Unless you made a bet with British bookmakers William Hill, who are paying out to bettors who had Lampard scoring.)
Lampard's lofted strike came as a shock, happening no more than a minute after a Matthew Upson header cut the German lead in half, but the surprise of it won't work as an excuse for poor refereeing to Three Lions supporters if England loses. It won't fly for proponents of fairness at all, especially because the technology to prevent errors like this exists and has been repeatedly dismissed by FIFA.

This is a goal. It just doesn't count as one. And as every soccer pundit will be right to say, that is a monstrous disgrace.
Another video after the jump, because FIFA gets grabby with these.This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
6 comments
Next Post: Who Should Join Ron Artest At His Queensbridge Victory Parade?
Previous Post: The Wizards' Arena Has Walls, Yes, Yes, I Get It
Read More: frank lampard, 2010 world cup, sportingblog
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
Scoreboard data copyright © 2012 by STATS LLC. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC is strictly prohibited.
OpenCalais - Powered by Thomson Reuters
•
Odds Shark
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.

Comments
As terrible as the non-call was, it is hardly surprising in one of the most poorly officiated sports in all the world. Here is a list of what they need, and I am not really even much of a soccer fan:1. More officials on the field. One man is not enough.2. Goals judges, like they have in hockey. I was stunned to find out that they didn’t have any.3. Instant replay. There is no excuse for this lacking, considering the money involved in the World Cup.4. An actual timekeeper. The fact that they still let someone just say we are adding x amount of minutes to the game is insane. Then to let the referee just decide when the game is complete is just asking for corruption. Just run a clock like every other sport in the world. Now, Germany is ahead 4-1 and people will say that it wouldn’t have mattered anyway. It would have. England would have played a different game tied 2-2. This non-goal is a travesty.
by Sexy Pete on Jun 27, 2010 11:28 AM EDT reply actions
At the time it was a huge goal, but if the second halves would’ve been played the same, it wouldn’t have mattered. The Germans were the better side throughout and this whole tourney England played with next to no heart. And they deserved the beating they took.
by AzzurriGunner on Jun 27, 2010 12:18 PM EDT reply actions
Leave soccer just the way it is, with continual play and no need for any technology. It is the most human sport in many ways and it should stay that way or it will lose its beaty – just like the NBA has according to John Wooden, and the use of technology has undoubtedly contributed to this.
The limited use of technology is actually a disaster. It gives officiating a credibility it doesn’t deserve. The reversal of every single call at the end of one of the playoff
games just shows how bad it is. Instant replays are heavily censored now in the NBA to hide how pathetic the situation has become. Many players just accept it now. The alternative is to let et officiating the officials become as big as the sport itself.
In soccer and basketball, it is amazing how officials can’t seem to detect deflections.
by sportsFan on Jun 27, 2010 12:33 PM EDT reply actions
Say what you want, but England tied the game in the first half. You can’t tell me that instant replay wouldn’t have been beneficial.And Azzuri, I, too, thought Germany was better, but you and I both know that England would use a different strategy tied than they would trying to come from behind. For a tournament this big, they have to get it right.
by Sexy Pete on Jun 27, 2010 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
Brazil and Protugal — with some of the best players in the world — played to a nil-nil tie the other day. Some guy with 5 goals represents the leading goal scorer in the history of the World Cup for an entire freaking continent. Goals in soccer are huge. If they can’t get that call right, just call the whole thing off. What’s the point?
by heel9091 on Jun 27, 2010 12:44 PM EDT reply actions
At least the ref has the option of moving to the USA, where nobody gives a **** and won’t hassle him over it. You got shot dead in the streets like a dog for it if you settle in Colombia, though… so be sure to be very clear with that travel agent first, big man.
by L'etat, c'est moi on Jun 27, 2010 11:39 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed