Jun 05 10:43p by Matt O'Brien
Don't mess with Texas. Or, at least, don't invite three out of four of the Big 12 teams that hail from the state and leave Baylor out in the cold, if the latest report from Chip Brown is true. According to Brown -- who first broke the Pac-10 expansion mega-story -- the Texas legislature is moving to demand that the Pac-10 take Baylor instead of Colorado should the Pac-10 indeed invite six Big 12 schools to join a new super-conference. Per Brown:
"If you're going to have an exported commodity involved in this, do you think we're going to allow a school from outside the state of Texas to replace one of our schools in the Big 12 South? I don't think so. We're already at work on this," said a high-ranking member of the Texas Legislature who asked not to be identified.
"If the Pac-10 wants Texas, and we know they do, they may have to take all of our Texas schools," the source said, adding that Texas Tech has also benefited from political inclusion on the invite list.
Colorado's struggles on the gridiron and the hardcourt the past few years certainly make passing on the Buffs much more palatable for the Pac-10, even if would mean missing out on the potentially lucrative Denver television market. And, of course, the real issue, as the Texas legislators amply realize, is that UT is the big prize here, and the Pac-10 isn't likely to let Colorado hold up landing the Longhorns.
The Pac-10 has reportedly considered four possible options during its weekend meetings, and has whittled its options down to just a pair. Among the quartet of moves the Pac-10 might make are 1) keeping the status quo, 2) A full-on merger with the Big 12, 3) Inviting six Big 12 teams to join a new 16-team conference, and 4) Inviting Colorado and Utah to join a 12-team conference that would then be eligible for a lucrative conference title game. Brown reports that the league has narrowed its options down to either going forward with just its current ten teams, or adding six more from the Big 12.
Given that, the Texas legislature's apparent resolve to make sure Baylor is included on the list of the six invited teams would leave Kansas, Kansas State, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa State and Missouri in a bind, perhaps leaving the Big Ten (and possibly the MWC?) to pick up the pieces of a broken Big 12.
9 comments
Report: Texas Legislature Pushing For Baylor To Replace Colorado In Possible Pac-10 Expansion
Report: Texas Legislature Pushing For Baylor To Replace Colorado In Possible Pac-10 Expansion
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.






Comments
Not believable
Baylor lost that kind of support after Ann Richards retired. The PAC 10 schools are vehemtly opposed to taking in religious institutions. There is no way the PAC 10 is going to trade Waco for Denver. The PAC 10 will tell the politicos to take a hike. Kiss all those research dollars and the jobs that come with it goodbye.
by bayonnefran on Jun 6, 2010 1:02 AM EDT reply actions
Ann Richards
Forced Baylor over BYU back when the Big XII was being formed. The TX legislature is brutal, but not sure how they can stop Texas or the others leaving, I don’t think they can vote on something like that?
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
by Jeremy Mauss on Jun 6, 2010 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions
They can't vote, its worse...
They can threaten the TX Universities with cutting their funding…
by Pudger on Jun 7, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
And if I'm the Pac-10
I tell the Texas Legislature “adios mofos” and take Colorado anyway. The Pac-10 is already doing them a solid by offering to take Texas Tech – they’re out in the middle of nowhere in Lubbock and don’t offer the league very much (assuming the football team slips back to merely decent with Tuberville in charge). Whereas Baylor gives them absolutely nothing.
Voodoo Five - South Florida Bulls SBN Blog
The Toughest Blog in America
by Jamie DeVriend on Jun 6, 2010 5:42 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Totally agree
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
by Jeremy Mauss on Jun 6, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
But then no Texas
you get that right. No Baylor, no Texas or A&M and probably no OU. Methinks that the viewership UT, OU and A&M gives them easily compensate for the average 2.0 TV rating the buffs give.
by meatybob on Jun 6, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Not a chance
Let’s say this out loud: Baylor – Conservative relgious school with no TV market vs. Colorado – Flagship State University located in Boulder (which is way more like the West Coast) and would bring in the Denver TV market.
Sorry Texas Legislator, you might be able to trick your kids into reading faux-history books but you’re not getting Baylor an invite.
Anyone can be cool but being awesome takes practice
by moatman on Jun 7, 2010 8:05 AM EDT reply actions
its religious, btw
The Pac 10 will bend over backwards for get UT, so Buffs, better hope Neb. stays.
by meatybob on Jun 7, 2010 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed. But the TX Legislature controls funding $$ for the TX schools
Agreed. But the TX Legislature controls funding $$ for the TX schools. Thats a pretty big influence on weather or not the TX schools will be able to go to the PAC-10… Unfortunately, w/o Baylor going to PAC-10, the whole thing may not happen and the Big 12 may get a lifeline… from Baylor of all schools!
by Pudger on Jun 7, 2010 11:30 AM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed