Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

SB Nation NASCAR Opinion

Aftermath, Chicagoland: Stuck At Home, Our Writer Discovers Unwatchable TV Broadcast

It's not the quality of the racing that's making people tune out – it's the TV broadcasts themselves.

Jul 12, 2010 - To those inside the garage, NASCAR's television ratings decline has been somewhat of a mystery.

The ratings are nothing what they were at NASCAR's peak in 2005, and everyone has a different theory: Drivers didn't show enough personality. The racing wasn't as interesting. Fans were confused by non-standard start times. People have shorter attention spans these days.

But this season, nearly all those issues seem to have been addressed. Yet the ratings have still dropped in many races compared to last year.

Until Saturday night, I didn't really understand why.

Many fans have yelled and screamed and jumped up and down, insisting you knew the answer all along: The TV broadcasts are unwatchable.

I didn't believe you. I figured, "OK, there might be a lot of commercials and you might not like what some of the broadcasters say, but c'mon. It can't be that bad."

It is. Saturday night's broadcast was that bad.

I'm not sure the executives at NASCAR understand this. Like me, they're at the track nearly every week and don't rely on the TV broadcasts as their primary source of information. I didn't get it; they probably don't, either.

So to recap, what TNT gave the fans was basically this: Commercials, commercials, commercials, a few laps of racing, commercials, commercials, commercials. Then the broadcast would come back on, play-by-play man Adam Alexander would say, "While we were away..." and TNT would show us the important moment we missed.

From the replays, it looked like there were a few exciting moments. We just didn't get to see them until later.

Don't tell me it was a boring race so TNT had nothing to show. Whether it was boring or not, as a viewer I wanted to see the freaking race. But I don't feel like I really did.

If you're a fan, you may be reading this and smacking your forehead while saying, "DUH!" Apparently from the comments I see every week, it's like this all the time.

Well, I apologize. I didn't get it before. Now I do.

Unless you're truly hardcore about NASCAR, you can't just sit there and watch the race from start to finish. Casual or even semi-interested fans would be turned off by the broadcasts.

When I was only part-time on the NASCAR beat from 2004-06, I used to sit at home and watch every race. And I enjoyed them.

But as I sat there on Saturday night, I thought, "If I didn't have to watch this, I'd turn it off."

That was discouraging, because if I felt that way, I'd imagine many fans did, too. Except they probably did turn it off.

What's frustrating is all this time I've been thinking the declining ratings had much to do with the quality of the racing. It really doesn't. It's the quality of the broadcasts which are supposed to show the racing.

Look, I don't know anything about TV. I don't have any suggestions to improve camera angles or have ideas on how the analysts could be better.

All I know is that as a viewer, I didn't enjoy watching the race. The TV broadcast didn't make me want to come back next week, or even finish the race I was already watching.

It reminded me of a school cafeteria: There's only one option on the menu – and it's not good – but the lunch lady smirks and says, "You'll take what we give you – and you'll like it."

As I whined on Twitter about the quality of the broadcast, fans repeatedly tweeted, "Uh, it's like this every week. What are you so upset about?"

But some offered suggestions to improve my experience.

Jeff, have you checked out RaceBuddy? Do you have DirecTV HotPass? Have you used NASCAR.com's TrackPass?

I appreciated all the suggestions, but no. I just wanted to turn my TV to the channel the race was on and watch the friggin' cars go around the friggin' track. Is that too much to ask these days?

Believe it or not, I'm typically cautious about publicly griping about excessive commercial breaks, because TV is a business and they have to make money. Just like me and others in the media, they rely on advertising to do so.

But Saturday night's broadcast was just unbearable. It felt more like the racing was a break from the commercials than the commercials were a break from the race.

The TV people often say this: Well, we show about the same amount of commercials per hour as a primetime network drama or reality show.

That may be true, but the fact that it seems like way too much is evidence the current model is broken. It's absolutely broken.

In a year where ESPN shows World Cup soccer games commercial-free (some of which have outdrawn races in ratings, by the way) and IndyCar Series telecasts have "side-by-side" coverage during their events, it's perfectly fair to ask why NASCAR races can't be the same way.

There are some very brilliant and creative people in the TV world. So get on it.

The TV executives have repeatedly told us that side-by-side broadcasts won't work in NASCAR because advertisers spend big money and want the full screen to get value for their dollars.

Well at some point, some TV guy with a backbone is going to have to stand up and say, "You know what? We're doing side-by-side coverage to help make the sport more watchable – and improve our ratings. Advertisers, if you want to leave, go ahead."

And you know they won't leave. Call their bluff. Do you really believe Nationwide and Toyota and all those other advertisers who spend so many millions every week will say, "See ya! We're not going to pay for our message to go to NASCAR fans if it's only in a little box."

They may not like it, but they'll do it. And the fans will appreciate everyone for it.

Another option is for some company to brand a portion of the broadcast to make it commercial-free.

Personally, I think that would be wildly successful. Let's say Nationwide uses the money for all those "You and me both, Junior" ads and tells the network that it wants to sponsor the final 50 laps of the race to ensure they are commercial free for fans.

NASCAR fans, who are smarter about marketing than fans in any other sport, would say, "WOW! Nationwide is awesome! We will show our appreciation by signing up for their insurance!"

And even if they didn't, wouldn't you agree that branding a commercial-free portion of the broadcast would be a far more effective way of getting business than cramming Tony Eury Sr. down everyone's throat five times a race?

For those decision-makers from NASCAR or the TV networks who read this, you may be tempted to dismiss this column as the typical gripes you hear every week.

But I challenge you to do this: Sit down and watch a NASCAR TV broadcast from start to finish without fast-forwarding through the commercial breaks.

You may discover the same thing I did: As it turns out, fans don't just complain for the sake of complaining after all.

Do you like this story?

Gluck_medium

Jeff Gluck

Motorsports Editor

Motorsports Editor Jeff Gluck is in his eighth season covering NASCAR – his fifth on a full-time basis – and has attended more than 160 Sprint Cup races for various publications. Prior to his NASCAR... Read full bio


Comments

Display:

Dead On

Seriously the amount of commercials is ridiculous! I can’t watch a race from start to finish with out the following; my compter, cell phone (to tweet), headphones (so I do NOT have to listen to the TV announcers), TV (when they actually show some racing), Yahoo! to chat about the race.

I agree its not the racing its the broadcasting. I have a hard time staying interested when you see two laps followed by five minutes of commercials. If all I depended on was the TV to watch a race I wouldn’t be a fan, yes its that bad. Boring.

I will say that I like what they did last week when the showed racing during the commercials. The sounds from the race were muted but you could still watch what was going on and the commercials were small and located in a box at the bottom of your TV screen. That was great!

by AmandaLouWho on Jul 12, 2010 10:15 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I only find 1 flaw in your statement: You should be on the sbnation chat instead of yahoo! This place is kicking on race day :)

by jshaunburke on Jul 12, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

So is Yahoo

The Yahoo Chat is also kicking. We even made up some nicknames for the drivers including Smoke for Tony Stewart, which is his actual nickname anyhow, and Vader for Jimmie Johnson among others. Yes it is moderated, but the Jays will let you in even if it is for a quick mention at the end of the race. Other stuff that has developed as tradition over time is that either Jay honor a member of our military or veteran following the chat from overseas or on home soil, who has posted to the site, and the fact that the cones are real live beings.

by Jessy S on Jul 17, 2010 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

PREACH IT JEFF!!!

finally a voice from us besides us. Maybe if Helton and France HAD to watch the broadcast they would get it.

by SubmarineMike on Jul 12, 2010 10:27 AM EDT reply actions  

TV broadcasts

You Got It!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wish you could challange Brian France, Mike Helton and others to only see the race on TV one weekend – no cheating allowed. Falling asleep during the broadcast will not be tolerated. No race buddy or other crib notes. Now, who would stay glued to the TV for that??

by Ella Dean on Jul 12, 2010 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Welcome to our little world

I’m glad to see someone in the media experience what we go through week after week.

by Keith_KaGee on Jul 12, 2010 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Shame that this is what we have to suffer through. Most can’t afford the jacked up hotel prices to actually watch a race in person, or the bundled tickets that the tracks are trying to do (IE Chicago. And as I found out last week, Richmond. Did not want to go to the NNS race, just wanted to drive down Saturday for the cup race. But in order to get a seat (ONE SEAT!) out of row 1-10, I had to purchase a Nationwide ticket. A story for another day.) So we must sit at home at watch on tv. And what we have to sit through is horrible. If the people with the power to do something would actually watch the same broadcasts we do, they’d see the problem. They’d see why ratings are declining.

I have found that I can’t watch a race on TV without my computer opened to twitter and with headphones and the scanner pulled up. There are times I don’t even hear the announcers on TV. They never say anything relevant anyway. Never talk about any driver outside the scope of the select few. Even Kevin Harvick, the points leader, barely got a mention for going behind the wall. If it wasn’t for twitter and the scanner, I wouldn’t know half of what is happening in the race.

Commercials are a part of TV, everyone understands that. We know they have to “pay the bills” but damn, I thought TNT last night was providing extra toward the principle. Maybe getting a jump on next summer’s commercials. Or was last night the fallout from having Daytona ‘wide open’?

As for the advertisers, do they really want to know how many people turn during commercials? Take the dog out? Take a bathroom break? Replenish the chip bowl? Time it right, I can finish off supper during the right segment. And after the about the first 5 races, we are even tuned out to the NASCAR commercials for being overplayed and just plain stupid. Advertisers complain that we won’t notice the commercials in side-by-side? Heck, I caught myself numerous of times during Daytona watching the commercial versus the race. And I can bet a lot of people glanced to the commercials too.

Fix the broadcasts. Fix the people in the booth and please fix some of the idiot pit road reporters. Don’t try so hard to produce a show and just show us the race and you’ll probably find tv ratings going up.

by jr88freak on Jul 12, 2010 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

“Don’t try so hard to produce a show and just show us the race and you’ll probably find tv ratings going up.”

That is a great statement. FOX & TNT try way too hard to make the race a 4 hour comedy special. ESPN seems to have their act together. Maybe the FOX football people can take over the NASCAR telecast and set them straight!

by jshaunburke on Jul 12, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I haven’t watched a NASCAR race all the way from start to finish in years. With DVR, we tape the race and begin watching it an hour after it starts. Fast forwarding through commercials, we watch the end of the race live with everyone else after “catching up.”

When you fast forward through commercials, you realize just how much of the race you miss.

I’m not defending TNT, but you do have to give credit to the network for experimenting with their “Wide Open Coverage” they do every year at Daytona. It’s a great idea and don’t know why something like that – or something like the IndyCar series does with SideBySide – can’t be used at other tracks.

Now if we could only get rid of Kyle Petty…

by placer86 on Jul 12, 2010 10:44 AM EDT reply actions  

TV coverage

This is why I listen to the guys on Sirius 128 for the play by play. They do a great job painting a picture. I layer the sound with the NASCAR officials channel on the internet scanner channel loudest, the Serius channel is less and the TV is the lowest. If I see somthing on TV that I want to hear, the remote is close by. We do live timing and scoring from NASCAR as well

by Bill Gordon on Jul 12, 2010 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

C'mon Jeff

You can say it..“I was wrong, the fans were right”…and you thought we were all just little whiners!

by TStewart14SHR on Jul 12, 2010 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

TV Coverage

I now either DVR the races or pause the live race for about an hour and then start watching. Fast forward through commercials either way. The money is WASTED on me.

If they follow your sponsorship of x lap segments idea, I’d see EVERY advertiser’s message. As of now, I fast forward through ALL of them. Seems to me that any business person worth their salt would figure out that the current model is BROKEN.

Ratings are falling. People can DVR and skip commercials. Use NASCAR’s RaceView, Race Buddy, etc. Get updates via twitter, etc., etc., etc.

More commercials will only serve to DECREASE ratings and at a FASTER pace.

If your pool has a leak in it, you don’t try to patch it with a billboard advertisement, you fix the damn leak!!!

by 4xLeft on Jul 12, 2010 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

TV broadcasts

You are spot on, Jeff. You can not follow the race on TV alone. I have to subscribe to Trackpass to find the information I need. I am strapped to my computer with headphonesalso. I nearly destroyed my laptop when Jr. came from the pack to a 2nd place position at Daytona when I was jumping up and down cheering. Hmmm, guess that is why I have to buy so many headphones because the wires are detaching.
The TV broadcasters need to call the race instead of having a good ole boy chat during practices, qualifying and races. They need to listen to Dave Moody to see how it is done.
I hope those in a position to change things read this column and comments and change things… SOON

by cecee8288 on Jul 12, 2010 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

You're on target

Now you get it. Even with Trackpass, Hotpass, in-car audio, and Twitter, you still get bombarded with commercials and non-stop talking by analysts. Why do the guys in the booth feel we need them to talk every second of the race? WE’RE watching it for goodness sake. Then add in DW and Larry Mac with their own personal stories that make us want to gag, and you have more than you should have to listen to in order just to watch a race. One more important item. We don’t want to listen to the history of Jimmy Johnson or Kyle Busch 10 times a race. We are fed up with the overkill. Oh how much I miss men like Ned Jarrett. Races are the show…not the booth.

by factfinder on Jul 12, 2010 11:30 AM EDT reply actions  

TV broadcasts

Finally, finally, finally… someone with a voice GETS IT!! TNT coverage s…s big time! They are the worst. The others are pretty bad as well but at least they often will cover some of what is going on!! Yep… 2 laps of racing and 10 minutes of commercials, ye gads do something for us!!!

by Susan Morledge on Jul 12, 2010 11:32 AM EDT reply actions  

NASCAR Network

Why doesn’t NASCAR put together their own premium network like the NFL did? All of their teams are together for the same “game” every week. And even if they covered all 3 major series, they would have at most 3 broadcasts a week.

If they’re going to give TV contracts to cable networks anyway, why not make their own and keep more of the money? Or take less money and air less commercials? The whole season would be on the same channel.

And while they’re at it, they can hire analysts that just call the race…as opposed to the ones who feel the need to spend the whole broadcast educating, prognosticating, & playing amateur psychologist.

by 4xLeft on Jul 12, 2010 11:33 AM EDT reply actions  

I gotcha, but quit picking on Tony Sr. At least we love the man. And I sure as h*** rather hear from him than DW and LM.

by factfinder on Jul 12, 2010 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Spot on Jeff

Growing up as a kid in the late 80’s and early 90’s it seemed that Nascar cared about the broadcast then, and I guess so when they were trying to grow the sport. I can remember the line in Days of Thunder when Harry Hogg asks Cole what does he know about Nascar and Cole replies mostly from TV, ESPN the coverage is excellent. Sad to say that is no longer the case. Plus I DVR classic Nascar on ESPN classic and you know what it was great coverage back then with Bob Jenkins, Ned Jarrett and BP (rip). Also they had one pit reporter and it worked really well. Sure today I understand the climate, but not only are the talent in the broadcast are well not great, and how they present the race sucks. Its follow the leader or the top 5 or a crash in the back commercial. The only thing that makes the race tolerable is track pass. I have pit command and I can also open the scanner and have two driver feeds or the radio broadcast. Also the Sbnation chat (got your plug Jeff). Less is more with the TV broadcast, because the racing is the action, all of it the top 5 the guys in the middle of the pact and the guys in the back. Until this happens we are stuck with what we have now. I only watch because I am a die hard but its getting tougher to watch each year.

by Len_DiJoseph on Jul 12, 2010 11:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Amen!

Viewers already have to pay for cable/satellite to watch the majority of the races. In this economy, that’s a stretch for some people. A lot of people can’t afford to go to the tracks, so they want to watch the race at home. However, it’s hard watch the race with so many commercials and analysts who get tongue tied and blow hot air. Those who are hurting financially can’t afford Track Pass and Direct TV Hot Pass. I usually DVR the races and start watching them 30 – 45 minutes into the race and I can skip right through the commercials. The down-side of that is I have to stay off the computer during that time so I don’t read what’s happened that I haven’t caught up to yet.

If TNT can give us wide open coverage for the Daytona race, why can’t the other networks do it as well? As a consumer, I would be more inclined to support the advertisers who help make that possible. As it is now, I don’t watch the commercials, so their advertising dollars are wasted on me. With Wide Open Coverage or Side-By-Side, I would still see every commercial.

Thanks for a great article, hope some of the ones who need to see it the most do so and take it to heart!

by sgray on Jul 12, 2010 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Completely true!

Several years ago, I would watch every race from start to finish. I would be mad if I was going to be away from the TV and have to miss it. The last couple of years, I have been getting bored during the broadcasts. I now have to have something else to do so that I can just listen to the broadcast in the background. I too have now realized that it’s not the racing that is boring. (Well, all of it anyway). I guess it is the broadcast. You truly can get more information by being on Twitter than you can by watching the TV.

Thanks for the great article. Maybe this is the way to start a change.

by KevinHendrix on Jul 12, 2010 12:29 PM EDT reply actions  

TNT is the issue...

Hey Jeff- There are lots of races that are/have been just as boring as the other night. I do think though that TNT is to blame for this. I watch every single race from start to finish- I have to say that the “summer six pack” is the LOW point of the season. Everything about TNT is disappointing. Why do they still make us watch Wally Dallenbach? He has nothing of note to add. The trio that they have in the booth are constantly stumbling over their words, talking over themselves and incorrectly reporting facts. Even Kyle Petty does it- at the race in Daytona there were two laps to go and he was speaking with no urgency in his voice, like the race had just started. NASCAR really should look into their relationship. TNT is turning people off.

Now I may not be a fan of Digger, but give me FOX and Mike Joy any day! FOX knows how to do it right!

The guys who do it right are MRN/PRN. I look forward to being at the track and having them call the soundtrack.

And while I’m at it… could the advertisers please make more than two commercials for the season? The Kyle Busch pink firesuit is no longer funny to me!

by mandysuemccaul on Jul 12, 2010 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I usually don't complain about commercials..

But that broadcast was probably one of the worst I’ve ever seen. A commercial inside of 20 laps to go.. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I think the only one worse than that was when ESPN went to commercial with 15 laps go at BRISTOL for a Nationwide race LOL. Did they not know they run 15 second laps at Bristol? By the time they got back to the race there were maybe 3 laps left and then they had a power failure at the track and nobody saw the finish ROFLMAO!

by Dustin McGrew on Jul 12, 2010 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

i don't know . . .

whether to dope slap you, jeff, or give you a hug! i tried to tell you exactly this at the dover tweet-up a long time ago (when i told you JJ would win his 4th championship that season!) but I knew I was being dismissed, albeit very politely. and now, i’m having to restrain myself from saying “i TOLD you so!” (which, of course, i just said!)

for at least 3 years, i have contended that the racing isn’t the issue, that the broadcasts are and that those inside the sport are woefully off-base by dismissing the complaints of the fans. i also contend that fans are equally woefully off-base by dismissing the racing based on what we’re subjected to each week on tv.

the ONLY way this sport is going to re-gain even some of the fans is for the nascar media, executives, and network partners to sit and watch one entire broadcast, from green flag to checkers, with absolutely nothing but the broadcast: no twitter, no blogs, no chats, no scanners, no RaceBuddy, no radio. have each person pick a driver not in the top 12 or a fan favorite like earnhardt jr and see if said nascar person can understand where his/her driver is at any point in the race. watch it like a fan and then they’ll understand where the fan frustration is born and why we have become so very vocal about it.

there are a myriad of issues in our sport right but this disconnect that the fans feel is THE one that will impact the sport the most. we all have our personal gripes about nascar but we used to make certain we watched every race we could on tv. the abysmal state of race broadcasting on fox, tnt, and espn has now resulted in many of us just turning away and catching up with it later.

so, better late than never, jeff: welcome to our world!

by red8814 on Jul 12, 2010 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I Totally Agree

I too have to watch the race. I Tivo it and start an hour after green flag. I skip every commercial. This has me thinking how many other people do this. On the few occasions where we have had side by side I actually consume the commercial and look favorably upon the advertiser. Here’s the plan … pick one advertiser and let them do a side by side commercial whereby they say “we don’t want to interrupt your race but we would like you to consider our product.” Sales would jump the next day. Fans want to be respected.

I like the idea of uninterrupted lap sponsorship. Hell … add a crawl. I don’t care.

by Buck Fever on Jul 12, 2010 4:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank you!

Thank you for finally viewing a race like us race fans do every week and understanding that our gripes are real and not just complaining about anything and everything!

 I cant sit down and watch a race with out my laptop to chat here, facebook, and twitter as well as my phone to check twitter as well.

The announcers are trying way to hard. I remember when FOX first started and I loved the coverage, even DW! Now its like they are trying to hard to sell a sport that to me is easy to fall in love with. I have never liked TNT’s broadcast of the races and can’t stand ESPN’s Rusty Wallace and Brad D. I love when the comentators share stories of the past in racing and even current ones, but the not showing of live action happening on the track sucks. Thats what we are tunning into the race for, to watch the race cars on the race track!

Jeff, great ideas about how the tv model needs to be worked on. Have a great vacation!

by Jr88Countrygirl on Jul 12, 2010 5:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Chicagoland race

Jeff, I looked for your usual follow up with Jr. after the race, when I did not find it I thought you must be on vacation. :) It is OK. Speed Report gave his interview. :) Too bad you had to watch the race on TV. :)
   Marybeth

by 1123marybeth on Jul 12, 2010 6:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Here's a challenge for the powers that be

While they are sitting at the track watching the race, jot down what makes the races so interesting as they claim.

Then sit them down in front of what they cram down our throats and see how much of their list of interesting things made it on air.

I’m fortunate to be able to listen to the scanners and I heard a lot of two inside and even a few three inside. Never did find out which drivers were three and four wide. Apparently they all made it through okay with crashing but it would have been nice to see that ‘racing action’.

Instead we get to see the 48 leading lap after lap. I find watching paint dry more interesting than watching the same car lead lap after lap after lap.

I too was disappointed. Chicago is my closest track. But the greedy track owners insisted on selling tickets in packages only which I could not afford. So I’m STILL hoping to make it to my first race.

Great job Jeff…thanks for being our voice.

by Bobbie1231 on Jul 12, 2010 7:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Now if they will just listen

I want to add to your request to the powers that be. When watching the race they can not have seen it in person and watch a DVR version because they will fill in the blanks the rest of us are stuck with. Also no Trackpass, DirectTV or Racebuddy or even timing and scoring and see if they can figure out what is going on.

When I first started watching Nascar it was just the TV and I felt like I knew what was going on, I then added Pit Command because I got it free from Comcast and found I really liked being on the inside for at least 1 of my drivers. Now I use Twitter, Pit Command, timing and scoring and I find I look at my laptop more than the TV. Only exception the wide open coverage on TNT for Daytona.

by Newracefan on Jul 12, 2010 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Word! Word!

@4xLeft—folks have been talking about that since I started watching in 2K. Some folks even back then were concerned that people wouldn’t be able to afford the cost of it. But we’ve been screaming for some sort of dedicated channel so that folks didn’t have to upgrade to get channels they’d never watch to be able to watch the races.

It’s needed even more now with the College Football & how frustrating that is on any given Saturday. But also helps when a race is rain delayed, goes OT or finishes on time with 10 minutes in the TV window they leave as if folks will tune in 10 minutes early to watch a movie or the zillionth rerun of COPS!

We shouldn’t have to multi-task to watch a frickin’ race! We shouldn’t need Twitter to tell us WHY Joe Blow is “off” because he’s not a “name” so TV is ignoring him and 2 hours later in their “update” that’s when they bother to tell us what happened.

We should be able to sit down and enjoy the race not pull our hair out and have 50 things running to get educated on the race that the TV partners SHOULD be telling us/showing us. I know many who record the race and watch other things and then if they hear it was worth watch do otherwise it’s deleted unseen.

Thanks for finally seeing what we’ve been screaming about Gluck! Now for TPTB to be subjected to it and get something changed NOW!

by Gymmie on Jul 12, 2010 9:35 PM EDT reply actions  

thank you

for being home that nite and watching it on tv.. NOW u see the light!!!! let’s hope this gets noticed!!!

by Chris Chesnick on Jul 12, 2010 11:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank you

You were dead on – let’s hope someone starts really listening – it’s a fine line between advertising, money making and keeping the fans happy – but some one out there has to be smart enough to figure it out. the way to balance it all.

by Ceejaytravels on Jul 13, 2010 3:50 AM EDT reply actions  

this week when I get the fan council survey

I’m thinking of just providing a link to this story…enough said

by Bobbie1231 on Jul 13, 2010 8:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Someone actually gets it....

Thank you for writing this article, we can only hope the powers that be in NASCAR will take into consideration what you have reported on because you are absolutely correct. It is real sad that one can sit and watch the race and know when the darn commercials are coming before the announcers even say anything, you can almost time it to the second.

I thought NASCAR advertising was accomplished on the vehicles and the tracks themselves. I personally could care less about the advertisements that are shown on the TV. I watch the race to see a race, not a set of commercials where we see bits and pieces of a race or the commercial is interrupted because a caution just occurred, then we get to see a quick replay then back to commercials, back to the race, watch two laps then back to commercials.

I never used to be an F1 fan but at least their broadcasts are worth staying up until 4 or 5AM to watch their races. That’s right, we actually get to see their races.

I suggest NASCAR takes a real close look at how the F1 broadcasts are going, NASCAR could learn a lot from them.

by 88_JuneBug on Jul 13, 2010 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Unwatchable TV coverage

To add another voice to the chorus, yes, unfortunately the TV coverage is killing what interest there is left in NASCAR racing. The percentage of commercials (31.7% according to the website CawsnJaws) isn’t but approximately 10% more than a standard broadcast program but the flow of the race is destroyed.
The program director (who selects the camera to put on air) seems to be clueless as to what racing is about.
I would go with your speculation that NASCAR top management has little or no idea what this experience is like.

by prof_pi on Jul 13, 2010 3:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Jeff, Doug Demmons of al.com tortured himself today trying to figure out was wrong with Jr.‘s car this weeken. This is what I sent him:
 "Doug, Since your site won’t let me post a comment, I am sending it to you.
   You must not have seen the practice where the Speed/Fox announcers said that JJ & JG had the 2 new generation car. Jr. did not get one. I felt badly for Jr. when the Speed Report showed his post-race interview he said that he was just “confused”. I’ll bet he is! He is the one bringing in the greatest amount of money and all he runs are the r&d cars for the 24 & 48 with a cc whose job was washing the haulers during the week before he was made Jr.‘s cc. I am confused too.
   I have finally come to believe that Rick does not want Jr. in the top 12. I think he was bitterly disappointed at Daytona when Jr. won with and RCR car Friday night and then Sat. night, even with the piece of junk he had to drive, he managed to finish 4th and get in the top 12. :) He was going to make sure that that did not happen 2 weeks in a row.
     I was reading in the comments section of some blog a few weeks back that there is a story here, but the regular Nascar journalists/writers don’t dare touch it. Maybe we could get the National Enquirer to do another story on Jr., a good one, by looking into just what is going on here. Something is rotten. Maybe that guy who uncovered the John Edwards mess.
I can only hope & pray that Rick lets Jr. go and puts Kasey in the 88 car. The sooner the better.

by 1123marybeth on Jul 13, 2010 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Unwatchable TV coverage, the numbers

The Nielsen ratings for the race were just posted on Sports Media Watch (a blogspot) and Chicago had a 2.8, the lowest rating in 9 years of the race.
The racing which is on the track may be exciting (or not) but it is a cinch that the TV product is a total snoozer, and viewers turned it off or went elsewhere.
NASCAR will not get the $ for the new TV deal (negotiated in 2012 and 2013) to start in 2014 unless there is some sort miracle next season. And at this rate that has a real low probability.
If the current trend continues then in 2 years or less, two-thirds of NASCAR Cup races will have TV ratings lower than Indy at Watkins Glen.
NASCAR rose in TV coverage in part due to the CART – Indy split; in less than a decade NASCAR went from a marginal, regional series to major national coverage and trumping Indy racing,… it can also go in the other direction, just as quickly.

by prof_pi on Jul 13, 2010 9:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Perfect!

Thanks for the dead on post Jeff. Hopefully this blog post & others like it spread like wildfire so NASCAR and its broadcast partners can get a clue.

by Joelg88 on Jul 14, 2010 9:34 PM EDT reply actions  

...

I just wanted to say again, great article…

NASCAR seems to be heading towards the land of Soap Opera on TV which is really quite sad. As another mentioned above, just show the race and the ratings will return.

The broadcasts were way better back in the day, remember them? All you had was a little position meter in the corner of the screen and nothing but racing on the track.

Now look at it, the broadcasts are horrible.

by 88_JuneBug on Jul 15, 2010 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Fox, TNT, ESPN are all lousy

Jeff,

I won’t complain about the commercials because it’s a lot cheaper for me to watch the coverage for the price of my basic cable than go to a race.

But the coverage is just plain lousy. If your driver isn’t in the Chase, you don’t see any coverage of him unless he’s in a crash. I halfway think Robbie Gordon spins out every race just so his sponsors get some TV time.

All the networks use too many close-ups and in-car cameras. I know the in-cars are sponsored, so they’re necessary, but they don’t really show you anything unless it’s a replay of a crash or a pass. I think a few seconds of in-car is great to give us a greater sense of the speed of the cars, but there’s too much else going on to hold for more than a few seconds.

If someone has made up ten spots from the back of the field, I want to know about it, especially if they’re not in the Chase.

If there’s rain nearby, tell us. Don’t let us find out from Twitter. When there’s a debris caution, show us the debris.

Even if the networks don’t want to do side-by-side like Indy does, at least leave the positions crawl going so we can follow the race.

If I were the NASCAR TV czar, I’d make every network give at least 30 seconds worth of coverage to each of the cars. That would include updates on the team, etc. And I would mandate each car be shown for at least 15 seconds at some other time. This is a very tough economy and each team is fighting for sponsorship.

I would like to see more blimp shots and shots which show one car and then stay on the same spot on the track until the next car comes in. This would illustrate the intervals between cars. I would also like to see more of those skewer graphics which identify identify cars in a crowd.

Thanks for letting me vent. WCK

by WestCoastKenny on Jul 17, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Finally someone gets it

You know i even tweeted Kyle Petty about this very thing during a race. I said I’m a nascar die hard fan and i can barely sit through this crap yet i am in NO WAY a soccer fan yet was able to sit through the 120 minute USA game with double overtime and no not because i gave a shit about USA pride as i live in Spain half the year anyway. But the COMMENTARY made it INTERESTING. Kyle Petty’s response: If you don’t like it change the change the channel. Talk about taking what we give you and you’ll like it or else? While he probably thought i was just another Kyle Petty hater tweeting him to rile him up his response to a very good point i was making is not going to get people to turn on their TV’s to hear his “expert analysis” anytime soon.

by Kaxxxxxx on Jul 20, 2010 1:34 PM EDT reply actions  

No Rusty

The NASCAR ratings are down since a peak in 2005. Gee, Nascar is not the same without Rusty Wallace and the Chase format has turned away a lot of people.

by mactracker on Jul 28, 2010 7:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

gregvalentinetitle

Sports Cards For Insane People: Have A Happy, Creepy Valentine's Day!

Photo

The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Courtesy of Sports Illustrated

Kate Upton's Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Cover