Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Bobby Bonilla Will Be On The Mets' Payroll When He Is 72 Years Old

In 1992, the New York Mets added Bobby Bonilla to their payroll. He was a disappointment. In 1999, they added Bonilla to their payroll again. He was a major disappointment. And in 2011, Bonilla, who will be both 47 years old and retired for a decade, will find himself on the Mets' payroll again, and he will stay there for twenty-five years. From the Wall Street Journal:

[...] Bobby Bonilla will remain on the franchise's payroll for 25 years, collecting an annual salary of $1,193,248.20. Those are the terms the Mets agreed to Jan. 3, 2000, when they bought out the final year of Mr. Bonilla's contract.

This arrangement has been public knowledge for a while, but now that it's resurfacing, we really need to address it. Consider this: the Mets decided that they would rather pay nearly $30 million in the future than pay $5.9 million in 2000. What's their rationale? A few possibilities are listed after the jump.

Star-divide

- The Mets figured that the dollar would be worth nothing in the coming decades. Hundred-dollar bills would be used to fuel bonfires, over which Americans would heat dinners consisting of Ramen noodles and canned beans -- the new forms of currency. It's money you can eat! Neato!

- The Mets figured the world would end in 2012 anyway.

- The Mets hold an understanding of time similar to those of barnyard animals. 2011? 2025? 2034? What are these? Years? They don't believe in any element they can't measure with a yardstick or a scale, and so the concept of time means nothing to them. This could actually explain a lot.

- The Mets are planning on starting Bonilla every year as a sort of Minnie Minoso-style novelty appearance, because the fans will love it (the fans will not love it)!

There has to be a satisfying answer. Maybe they'll come up with one over at our Mets blog, Amazin' Avenue.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

I dont ever post on baseball...

but that is simply insane! WORST.GM-MOVE.EVER.

Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford

by NorCal BillsFan on Jul 2, 2010 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

They believed he was a poison to the team

and wanted to get him out asap. I dont understand how they reached an agreement worth more than 5 times what they owed him.

Perhaps he milked the mets for all they were worth because he understood the degree to which the organization and the fans hated him. after all, if he was such a poison to the team- and the mets were pushing for the pennant in 2000, then they agreed to his demands out of desperation.

i’ve been trying to figure this out for years, that’s the best i got.

by Kevin.O'Hanlon on Jul 2, 2010 8:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I love how the MSM recycle these stories and try to find something new…

But there isn’t anything new. It’s old news, just making the rounds again.

24th of April, 2010 – cnn.com (Mental Floss)

27th of April, 2010 – nymag.com

11th of May, 2010 – mopupduty.com

and so on…

by nelsonc on Jul 2, 2010 8:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Correct.

I made sure to note in the post that this isn’t a new development or anything. I decided to spend a few paragraphs on it anyway, because it’s still news to a lot of people, and because, well… it’s absurd.

Weekend Editor, SB Nation

by Jon Bois on Jul 2, 2010 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed