Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Veterans Share Their Favorite Sports Memories

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Does Derrick Rose Really Prefer Joe Johnson To LeBron James?

There's been an assumption that Bulls star Derrick Rose would be totally cool playing second fiddle to LeBron James should James go to Chicago. Nevermind that the Bulls have been selling fans on the club being "Derrick Rose's team" since he arrived, or the Bulls letting Ben Gordon go for nothing because he took away Rose's touches. All that would be forgotten because of LeBron, right?

Well, maybe not. We haven't heard much from Rose all summer about LeBron, and maybe this is why. Via Brian Windhorst:

[LeBron] really likes Rose & Noah. But there's lack if shooters on roster. Also it doesn't sound like he's exactly being welcomed by Rose.    

Didn't say Rose was anti-LeBron. But the word is preference was Joe Johnson. They have same agent. That is what multiple people tell me.    

Star-divide

Wait a minute - Rose prefers Joe Johnson to LeBron, just because Rose and Johnson share the same agent? The same Joe Johnson that got a ridiculous max contract from the Hawks? It sounds ridiculous, especially if Rose really wants to win, and frankly, the agent thing seems like a red herring. But it also sort of makes sense, in a not-so-good way for Bulls fans.

 

As mentioned before, most of us have been assuming Rose wouldn't mind being a second-fiddle guy. But why? It sounds like one of those things that someone (cough Bill Simmons) throws out there and everyone runs with it because it sort of makes sense. Rose is quiet publicly, so we assume he'd be quiet privately once a guy like LeBron is brought in.

But there are also plenty of reasons for Rose to legitimately feel he doesn't need LeBron to win. Rose was a number one pick, after all, after being a highly-touted recruit that arrived to Memphis with a ton of fanfare. He's been given the keys to the Bulls from Day 1, and he's been the face of that franchise the whole time. So to expect him to just step aside and let LeBron take over the team - it's not exactly the easiest transition in the world, you know.

That, to me, explains this Joe Johnson stuff. They have the same agent, sure, but it seems hard to believe that connection would matter this much. More likely, Rose prefers Johnson because he realizes Johnson would have to tailor to him, and not vice versa. This isn't to say Rose is an egomaniac, it just makes him like most other great players in this league. If Chris Bosh can believe he's a "centerpiece," why can't Rose? (Rose did more with less than Bosh this season, after all).

And that's a shame if true. Rose is a very good player, but unless he makes a major leap, he isn't leading a team to a title without significant help. LeBron James, of course, is significant help. So it would be a real downer for everyone if Rose is indeed this concerned about sharing the spotlight. 

(HT: The Baseline).

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

All of these guys have egos.

Whether it’s a good or bad thing. I wouldn’t expect Rose to feel he wants to, or needs, to take a back seat. If I were a bulls fan, and this were true, I’d be happy that Rose has the belief in himself.

http://twitter.com/wondahbap

by wondahbap on Jul 6, 2010 2:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Rose may feel that way

But someone is trying to poison the well for the Bulls by putting this out there.

And why is this being presented as an either/or? Seems to me the Bulls can have both JJ and LBJ – with compensation to both the Cavs and the Hawks.

by laketd on Jul 6, 2010 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

And why is this being presented as an either/or? Seems to me the Bulls can have both JJ and LBJ – with compensation to both the Cavs and the Hawks.

1. JJ’s heading back to Atlanta.

2. Throwing out a sign-and-trade and actually putting together a sign and trade are two very different things. There’s a reason very few actually happen.

3. Windhorst presented it as an either-or – and he doesn’t just throw that kind of stuff out there with no merit.

by Mike Prada on Jul 6, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

JJ agreed in principle

but hasn’t signed yet.

Yes, sign and trades are difficult. But they are much more likely than just letting big talent go.

Word now is Suns and Knicks talking sign and trade with Amare and Lee. More evidence these “deals” are never final until signed the dotted line.

Am I the only person on the planet that thinks the Hawks offered JJ a max contract only because they didn’t want to end up with nothing? I think they want to sign and trade him, and all this talk about JJ wanting to stay in Atlanta is just cover in the case the Hawks can’t trade him. It is obvious JJ wants the money, but I’m sure he believes he can get both the max and a trade to the Bulls. Knicks, or Mavs. Even if he doesn’t get the trade he wants, he still wins.

by laketd on Jul 6, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

and

I didn’t mean to imply YOU presented it as an either/or. Sorry about my lack of clarity.

by laketd on Jul 6, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since when...

has Rose been a selfish player? This is the same guy who had features written about him in high school and college for being too UNSELFISH. I imagine this is an instance of a quote that was misinterpreted.

by oldenpolynice on Jul 6, 2010 5:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed