Larry French - Getty Images
Two weeks ago the 49ers were the consensus top pick in the power rankings, and quickly fell to the Vikings. The Texans are this week's consensus top team. Will they suffer a similar fate?
This is a crazy year in the NFL. Once you think you know which teams are great and which aren't, they go and surprise you the next week. The NFC West -- the league's laughingstock a year ago -- has become the powerhouse division, with the emergence of the Arizona Cardinals and Seahawks. The AFC West is barely holding on as not the worst division in the league, but they aren't far off.
The story this week appears to be the Minnesota Vikings, again. In the last two weeks, they've risen nearly 13 spots in the rankings, including another 4.6 spots again this week.
More: Von Miller has Brady on his mind | NFL picks for Week 5 | SB Nation's Week 5 power rankings
One reason I like to compare the Subjective and Objective rankings: the objective rankings tend to be slow to react to a team’s performance, and the Subjective Rankings tend to react quicker. So say a team is doing really well (or poorly), the Subjective Rankings tend to move quicker than the Objective. This can lead to peaks and valleys in a team's subjective rankings that the objective rankings tend to even out.
Other times, however, you’ll have subjective rankings that are way off base because of whatever pre-conceived notions or hope pundits may have about a team. Sometimes you’ll get teams that pundits love to pile on (the Dolphins or Browns come to mind this year), so any time they lose, pundits like to say “well we were right about them being terrible!” The inverse can be true too where pundits want a particular team to do well so badly that any time they win, “we were right, this team is great!” (the Cowboys come to mind, as do the Rams and Steelers). For whatever reason, there has been so much hope for St. Louis coming from the various media outlets that they'll hang on to every win.
Division Averages
| Division | Avg Ranking |
|---|---|
| NFC West | 11.7778 |
| NFC North | 12.7917 |
| NFC East | 14.0139 |
| AFC North | 15.5278 |
| AFC East | 17.9167 |
| NFC South | 19.1806 |
| AFC West | 20.1389 |
| AFC South | 20.6528 |
Stock Rising
| Team | Week 4 Average | Week 5 Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 26.364 | 19.364 | 7.000 |
| MIN | 19.000 | 14.364 | 4.636 |
| WAS | 21.909 | 18.364 | 3.545 |
| PHI | 11.273 | 7.909 | 3.364 |
| SDG | 14.455 | 11.636 | 2.819 |
Stock Falling
| Team | Week 4 Average | Week 5 Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 10.364 | 15.636 | -5.272 |
| NYJ | 17.273 | 22.455 | -5.182 |
| SEA | 11.818 | 16.909 | -5.091 |
| NYG | 5.546 | 10.091 | -4.545 |
| OAK | 25.727 | 28.909 | -3.182 |
Subjective Average
One thing I should point out about the subjective rankings this week: I'm not including SportingNews in the rankings until they change their format. They used to be like every other website out there and list their rankings as one nice long page. Not this week. This week they've decided to turn their power rankings into a 34-page slideshow. Awful, right? As soon as they go back to the old format that doesn't require 34 mouse clicks (literally), then I'll include them again.
| Subjective | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Texans | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.091
|
||
| Falcons | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.091 | -0.091
|
||
| 49ers | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.364 | 0.454
|
||
| Ravens | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.727 | -0.454
|
||
| Cardinals | 5 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5.636 | 1.091
|
||
| Patriots | 6 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 6.455 | 1.818
|
||
| Eagles | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 7.909 | 3.364
|
||
| Packers | 8 | 10 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8.000 | -0.636
|
||
| Bears | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 8.546 | 1.272
|
||
| Giants | 10 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 10.091 | -4.545
|
||
| Chargers | 11 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 11.636 | 2.819
|
||
| Bengals | 12 | 8 | 6 | 16 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 10 | 13 | 12 | 11.636 | 1.910
|
||
| Broncos | 13 | 13 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 12 | 13 | 13.000 | 2.091
|
||
| Vikings | 14 | 14 | 13 | 21 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 11 | 16 | 14 | 14.364 | 4.636
|
||
| Steelers | 16 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 14.636 | -0.909
|
||
| Cowboys | 15 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 17 | 15 | 16 | 15.636 | -5.272
|
||
| Seahawks | 17 | 19 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 18 | 17 | 16.909 | -5.091
|
||
| Redskins | 18 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 18 | 18.364 | 3.545
|
||
| Rams | 19 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 19 | 19.364 | 7.000
|
||
| Bills | 21 | 20 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 17 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 19.909 | -1.636
|
||
| Lions | 20 | 21 | 24 | 15 | 22 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 21 | 20.818 | -2.000
|
||
| Jets | 23 | 27 | 22 | 23 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 24 | 23 | 22.455 | -5.182
|
||
| Buccaneers | 22 | 22 | 26 | 25 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 24 | 23.273 | -1.000
|
||
| Panthers | 24 | 23 | 29 | 19 | 24 | 21 | 24 | 24 | 26 | 22 | 22 | 23.455 | 1.000
|
||
| Titans | 25 | 25 | 23 | 27 | 30 | 24 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 26.182 | -1.818
|
||
| Dolphins | 26 | 26 | 30 | 26 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 26.364 | 2.636
|
||
| Saints | 28 | 24 | 31 | 17 | 27 | 28 | 26 | 28 | 28 | 29 | 26 | 26.546 | 0.363
|
||
| Chiefs | 27 | 28 | 25 | 28 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 27 | 27.091 | -2.636
|
||
| Raiders | 29 | 30 | 21 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 29 | 29 | 31 | 28 | 28 | 28.909 | -3.182
|
||
| Colts | 31 | 29 | 28 | 30 | 29 | 26 | 30 | 31 | 24 | 31 | 31 | 29.091 | 0.727
|
||
| Jaguars | 30 | 31 | 27 | 32 | 28 | 29 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 29.818 | -0.454
|
||
| Browns | 32 | 32 | 32 | 29 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 31.727 | 0.091
|
||
Observations:
- What wasn't a unanimous consensus last week has become just that: the Houston Texans are your (subjectively) unanimous number-one team.
- Amusing to me that the Steelers dropped an average of one whole spot, on their bye week. Guess they had to make room for a better team.
- For the most part, NFL.com and AP are the closest to the overall consensus. That makes sense though, seeing as how both of their rankings are made up by a consensus vote.
- Oh hey, look at the Dolphins getting a little respect. Even though they lost this week, it was a close loss, to the top-5 Cardinals, so of course the rise in the rankings.
- USA Today has the Saints at No. 17. As you'll see shortly, that's ridiculous.
- Neat, an exact tie! The Chargers and Bengals are tied at 11.636. Kind of impressive that 11 sources end up giving the same average.
Subjective Standard Deviation
| Subjective | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Texans | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.000 | -0.288
|
||
| Falcons | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.288 | -0.138
|
||
| Ravens | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0.617 | -0.133
|
||
| 49ers | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0.643 | 0.257
|
||
| Browns | 32 | 32 | 32 | 29 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0.862 | 0.287
|
||
| Redskins | 18 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 18 | 0.979 | -0.104
|
||
| Chiefs | 27 | 28 | 25 | 28 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 27 | 1.083 | -0.642
|
||
| Seahawks | 17 | 19 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 18 | 17 | 1.083 | -1.707
|
||
| Buccaneers | 22 | 22 | 26 | 25 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 24 | 1.213 | -0.497
|
||
| Bills | 21 | 20 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 17 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 1.240 | -0.523
|
||
| Eagles | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 1.240 | -1.286
|
||
| Patriots | 6 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 1.305 | -0.115
|
||
| Jaguars | 30 | 31 | 27 | 32 | 28 | 29 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 1.336 | -0.096
|
||
| Chargers | 11 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 1.432 | -0.956
|
||
| Broncos | 13 | 13 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 12 | 13 | 1.477 | -0.544
|
||
| Bears | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 1.499 | -0.028
|
||
| Giants | 10 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 1.676 | 0.785
|
||
| Cowboys | 15 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 17 | 15 | 16 | 1.772 | -0.455
|
||
| Dolphins | 26 | 26 | 30 | 26 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 1.823 | 0.409
|
||
| Jets | 23 | 27 | 22 | 23 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 24 | 23 | 1.827 | 0.344
|
||
| Cardinals | 5 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 1.920 | -0.496
|
||
| Titans | 25 | 25 | 23 | 27 | 30 | 24 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 1.992 | 0.169
|
||
| Packers | 8 | 10 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 2.174 | -0.695
|
||
| Colts | 31 | 29 | 28 | 30 | 29 | 26 | 30 | 31 | 24 | 31 | 31 | 2.193 | 0.112
|
||
| Steelers | 16 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 2.307 | 0.493
|
||
| Panthers | 24 | 23 | 29 | 19 | 24 | 21 | 24 | 24 | 26 | 22 | 22 | 2.500 | -0.209
|
||
| Lions | 20 | 21 | 24 | 15 | 22 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 21 | 2.516 | -0.463
|
||
| Bengals | 12 | 8 | 6 | 16 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 10 | 13 | 12 | 2.638 | 0.490
|
||
| Vikings | 14 | 14 | 13 | 21 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 11 | 16 | 14 | 2.739 | 0.042
|
||
| Raiders | 29 | 30 | 21 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 29 | 29 | 31 | 28 | 28 | 2.745 | -0.273
|
||
| Rams | 19 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 19 | 2.805 | 0.838
|
||
| Saints | 28 | 24 | 31 | 17 | 27 | 28 | 26 | 28 | 28 | 29 | 26 | 3.474 | -0.398
|
||
Observations:
- No surprise here that the five lowest Standard Deviation are the five teams closest to the top and bottom. It's a flaw with using just straight Standard Deviation and not normalizing it at all.
- On the whole, the overall Standard Deviation dropped this week, teams are settling in more and more and a consensus across the board is slowly developing.
- Even though the Chargers and Bengals were exactly tied in the Subjective Average at 11.636, the Bengals are in the bottom five as far as ranking consistency. Their ranking swings anywhere from sixth to 16th!
- USA Today is throwing a wrench in the rankings for the Rams, Saints and Vikings. Take USA Today out of the Saints' rankings and their Standard Deviation drops to 1.9.
Objective Average
| Objective | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Texans | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2.143 | 3.107
|
||
| Falcons | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3.571 | -1.071
|
||
| Ravens | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4.286 | -0.536
|
||
| Patriots | 1 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 5.000 | 1.500
|
||
| 49ers | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5.714 | 2.786
|
||
| Bears | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 7.714 | 5.286
|
||
| Cardinals | 22 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8.000 | -0.250
|
||
| Broncos | 7 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 8.857 | 5.393
|
||
| Vikings | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 9.571 | 4.679
|
||
| Eagles | 12 | 6 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 10.000 | 0.250
|
||
| Packers | 3 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 11.143 | -0.893
|
||
| Giants | 9 | 10 | 17 | 9 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 12.143 | -3.393
|
||
| Chargers | 17 | 16 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 16 | 13 | 13.429 | 0.821
|
||
| Seahawks | 11 | 26 | 13 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 14 | 13.857 | -5.857
|
||
| Bengals | 20 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 14.000 | 4.250
|
||
| Dolphins | 13 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 14 | 20 | 17.143 | 3.107
|
||
| Cowboys | 21 | 14 | 20 | 18 | 12 | 21 | 23 | 18.429 | -6.679
|
||
| Steelers | 14 | 25 | 23 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 17 | 18.714 | -2.714
|
||
| Bills | 19 | 20 | 24 | 21 | 22 | 27 | 19 | 21.714 | -8.214
|
||
| Lions | 18 | 18 | 26 | 22 | 25 | 20 | 24 | 21.857 | -0.107
|
||
| Redskins | 23 | 30 | 21 | 17 | 28 | 18 | 16 | 21.857 | 3.143
|
||
| Jets | 24 | 24 | 18 | 23 | 14 | 25 | 28 | 22.286 | -10.786
|
||
| Rams | 31 | 23 | 16 | 29 | 26 | 17 | 15 | 22.429 | 8.321
|
||
| Panthers | 16 | 4 | 31 | 28 | 31 | 28 | 21 | 22.714 | 3.786
|
||
| Colts | 26 | 29 | 19 | 25 | 17 | 26 | 27 | 24.143 | 3.357
|
||
| Jaguars | 29 | 28 | 15 | 30 | 23 | 24 | 29 | 25.429 | -1.679
|
||
| Titans | 28 | 19 | 25 | 27 | 19 | 30 | 30 | 25.429 | -0.179
|
||
| Browns | 27 | 21 | 28 | 26 | 29 | 23 | 26 | 25.714 | 4.536
|
||
| Buccaneers | 25 | 31 | 30 | 24 | 30 | 22 | 22 | 26.286 | -2.036
|
||
| Saints | 15 | 32 | 32 | 19 | 32 | 29 | 25 | 26.286 | -1.536
|
||
| Raiders | 30 | 22 | 27 | 32 | 24 | 31 | 31 | 28.143 | -3.143
|
||
| Chiefs | 32 | 27 | 29 | 31 | 27 | 32 | 32 | 30.000 | -5.250
|
||
Observations:
- You'll notice I've added a few more objective sites. Making a return this week is Team Efficiency. New this week are: Pro Football Reference and Cold Hard Football Facts.
- Because the sources have changed again this week, comparing to last week's rankings isn't the most accurate yet.
- When using objective rankings like this, it's helpful to look at the outliers. Look at Football Outsiders and Team Efficiency ranking the Cardinals. Or Team Efficiency's ranking for the Panthers. Interesting.
- Sharp delineation from the Bengals on down.
- Jets and Bills are plummeting.
- The bottom 4 of this list consists of 2 teams each from the AFC West and NFC South.
Objective Standard Deviation
| Objective | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Ravens | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0.700 | -1.465
|
||
| Bears | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 1.278 | -3.570
|
||
| Falcons | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1.591 | 0.473
|
||
| 49ers | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 1.750 | 0.092
|
||
| Texans | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1.884 | -0.977
|
||
| Chiefs | 32 | 27 | 29 | 31 | 27 | 32 | 32 | 2.138 | -1.629
|
||
| Browns | 27 | 21 | 28 | 26 | 29 | 23 | 26 | 2.603 | 1.124
|
||
| Bills | 19 | 20 | 24 | 21 | 22 | 27 | 19 | 2.711 | -0.643
|
||
| Chargers | 17 | 16 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 16 | 13 | 2.770 | -1.993
|
||
| Lions | 18 | 18 | 26 | 22 | 25 | 20 | 24 | 3.044 | -1.613
|
||
| Vikings | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 3.156 | -2.942
|
||
| Patriots | 1 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3.381 | -1.934
|
||
| Broncos | 7 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 3.482 | -0.285
|
||
| Giants | 9 | 10 | 17 | 9 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 3.482 | 0.994
|
||
| Raiders | 30 | 22 | 27 | 32 | 24 | 31 | 31 | 3.603 | 1.053
|
||
| Buccaneers | 25 | 31 | 30 | 24 | 30 | 22 | 22 | 3.653 | 2.354
|
||
| Cowboys | 21 | 14 | 20 | 18 | 12 | 21 | 23 | 3.736 | 0.391
|
||
| Dolphins | 13 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 14 | 20 | 4.015 | 2.925
|
||
| Colts | 26 | 29 | 19 | 25 | 17 | 26 | 27 | 4.086 | 2.586
|
||
| Packers | 3 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 4.223 | 0.077
|
||
| Bengals | 20 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 4.243 | -0.874
|
||
| Steelers | 14 | 25 | 23 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 17 | 4.366 | -0.377
|
||
| Jets | 24 | 24 | 18 | 23 | 14 | 25 | 28 | 4.366 | 3.866
|
||
| Titans | 28 | 19 | 25 | 27 | 19 | 30 | 30 | 4.371 | 2.451
|
||
| Eagles | 12 | 6 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 4.504 | -0.465
|
||
| Jaguars | 29 | 28 | 15 | 30 | 23 | 24 | 29 | 4.924 | 0.901
|
||
| Redskins | 23 | 30 | 21 | 17 | 28 | 18 | 16 | 5.055 | 0.812
|
||
| Seahawks | 11 | 26 | 13 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 14 | 5.276 | -1.243
|
||
| Rams | 31 | 23 | 16 | 29 | 26 | 17 | 15 | 6.044 | 4.745
|
||
| Saints | 15 | 32 | 32 | 19 | 32 | 29 | 25 | 6.408 | -1.970
|
||
| Cardinals | 22 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7.540 | -1.983
|
||
| Panthers | 16 | 4 | 31 | 28 | 31 | 28 | 21 | 9.192 | 4.167
|
||
Observations:
- The Ravens have the lowest Standard Deviation on the Objective graphs, and I'll show you why that's noteworthy in a moment.
- The Chiefs are not only at the bottom of the list, but they're there consistently. Even though they beat the Saints, they've not played well at all this year. Because each objective ranking uses a different model to come up with its rankings, usually when a consensus develops, it's pretty spot-on.
- Again, the NFC is the more difficult to rank conference as they account for seven of the eight least-consistently-ranked teams.
Overall Average
| Subj vs Obj | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Texans | 1.000 | 2.143 | 1.571 | 1.599
|
||
| Falcons | 2.091 | 3.571 | 2.831 | -0.581
|
||
| Ravens | 3.727 | 4.286 | 4.007 | -0.496
|
||
| 49ers | 3.364 | 5.714 | 4.539 | 1.620
|
||
| Patriots | 6.455 | 5.000 | 5.727 | 1.659
|
||
| Cardinals | 5.636 | 8.000 | 6.818 | 0.421
|
||
| Bears | 8.546 | 7.714 | 8.130 | 3.279
|
||
| Eagles | 7.909 | 10.000 | 8.955 | 1.806
|
||
| Packers | 8.000 | 11.143 | 9.571 | -0.764
|
||
| Broncos | 13.000 | 8.857 | 10.929 | 3.741
|
||
| Giants | 10.091 | 12.143 | 11.117 | -3.969
|
||
| Vikings | 14.364 | 9.571 | 11.968 | 4.657
|
||
| Chargers | 11.636 | 13.429 | 12.533 | 1.819
|
||
| Bengals | 11.636 | 14.000 | 12.818 | 3.080
|
||
| Seahawks | 16.909 | 13.857 | 15.383 | -5.474
|
||
| Steelers | 14.636 | 18.714 | 16.675 | -1.811
|
||
| Cowboys | 15.636 | 18.429 | 17.033 | -5.976
|
||
| Redskins | 18.364 | 21.857 | 20.110 | 3.345
|
||
| Bills | 19.909 | 21.714 | 20.812 | -4.926
|
||
| Rams | 19.364 | 22.429 | 20.896 | 7.661
|
||
| Lions | 20.818 | 21.857 | 21.338 | -1.054
|
||
| Dolphins | 26.364 | 17.143 | 21.753 | 2.872
|
||
| Jets | 22.455 | 22.286 | 22.370 | -7.984
|
||
| Panthers | 23.455 | 22.714 | 23.084 | 2.393
|
||
| Buccaneers | 23.273 | 26.286 | 24.779 | -1.518
|
||
| Titans | 26.182 | 25.429 | 25.805 | -0.998
|
||
| Saints | 26.546 | 26.286 | 26.416 | -0.586
|
||
| Colts | 29.091 | 24.143 | 26.617 | 2.042
|
||
| Jaguars | 29.818 | 25.429 | 27.623 | -1.066
|
||
| Raiders | 28.909 | 28.143 | 28.526 | -3.162
|
||
| Chiefs | 27.091 | 30.000 | 28.545 | -3.943
|
||
| Browns | 31.727 | 25.714 | 28.721 | 2.313
|
||
Observations:
- Once you factor in both sets of sources, the Texans are still far-and-away the best team in the NFL right now.
- All the hope and hype in Dallas and New York (Jets) this year is quickly dying.
- The Seahawks are kind of on their own little island in the middle of the rankings, with the Steelers and Cowboys kind of nearby, but then everyone else is either well above or well below them.
- Again this week are distinct clusters of teams. 1-6, 8-12, 20-23, and so-on.
Overall Standard Deviation
| Subj vs Obj | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Ravens | 3.727 | 4.286 | 0.705 | -0.601
|
||
| Falcons | 2.091 | 3.571 | 1.247 | 0.529
|
||
| Texans | 1.000 | 2.143 | 1.301 | -1.071
|
||
| Bears | 8.546 | 7.714 | 1.474 | -1.681
|
||
| 49ers | 3.364 | 5.714 | 1.660 | -0.605
|
||
| Chiefs | 27.091 | 30.000 | 2.123 | -0.323
|
||
| Bills | 19.909 | 21.714 | 2.138 | -0.982
|
||
| Chargers | 11.636 | 13.429 | 2.236 | -0.964
|
||
| Patriots | 6.455 | 5.000 | 2.447 | -0.656
|
||
| Giants | 10.091 | 12.143 | 2.726 | 0.667
|
||
| Lions | 20.818 | 21.857 | 2.780 | -0.958
|
||
| Buccaneers | 23.273 | 26.286 | 2.872 | 1.039
|
||
| Cowboys | 15.636 | 18.429 | 3.033 | 0.388
|
||
| Jets | 22.455 | 22.286 | 3.076 | 0.213
|
||
| Raiders | 28.909 | 28.143 | 3.129 | 0.211
|
||
| Eagles | 7.909 | 10.000 | 3.141 | -0.245
|
||
| Titans | 26.182 | 25.429 | 3.160 | 1.270
|
||
| Broncos | 13.000 | 8.857 | 3.182 | 0.552
|
||
| Browns | 31.727 | 25.714 | 3.418 | 2.275
|
||
| Packers | 8.000 | 11.143 | 3.489 | -0.011
|
||
| Bengals | 11.636 | 14.000 | 3.547 | -0.286
|
||
| Redskins | 18.364 | 21.857 | 3.664 | 0.920
|
||
| Seahawks | 16.909 | 13.857 | 3.709 | -0.751
|
||
| Vikings | 14.364 | 9.571 | 3.731 | -0.703
|
||
| Steelers | 14.636 | 18.714 | 3.823 | 0.753
|
||
| Jaguars | 29.818 | 25.429 | 3.886 | 0.424
|
||
| Colts | 29.091 | 24.143 | 3.905 | 1.708
|
||
| Rams | 19.364 | 22.429 | 4.609 | 1.954
|
||
| Saints | 26.546 | 26.286 | 4.833 | -0.701
|
||
| Cardinals | 5.636 | 8.000 | 5.069 | -0.285
|
||
| Dolphins | 26.364 | 17.143 | 5.339 | 1.246
|
||
| Panthers | 23.455 | 22.714 | 6.067 | 2.471
|
||
Observations:
- The Ravens are again the most consistently-ranked team, overall. Significantly more consistent than the Falcons or Texans.
- Overall, things are a bit more balanced as far as conference is concerned. Now the NFC and AFC each have four of the eight least-consistent rankings.
- Even though their average Subjective and Objective rankings are rather similar, the Panthers rankings are all over the board. Similar case with Arizona.
Difference in Averages
| Subj vs Obj | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|||
| Steelers | 14.636 | 18.714 | 4.078 | -1.805
|
||
| Redskins | 18.364 | 21.857 | 3.494 | -0.403
|
||
| Packers | 8.000 | 11.143 | 3.143 | -0.257
|
||
| Rams | 19.364 | 22.429 | 3.065 | 1.321
|
||
| Buccaneers | 23.273 | 26.286 | 3.013 | -1.036
|
||
| Chiefs | 27.091 | 30.000 | 2.909 | -2.613
|
||
| Cowboys | 15.636 | 18.429 | 2.792 | -1.406
|
||
| Bengals | 11.636 | 14.000 | 2.364 | 2.341
|
||
| Cardinals | 5.636 | 8.000 | 2.364 | -1.341
|
||
| 49ers | 3.364 | 5.714 | 2.351 | 2.331
|
||
| Eagles | 7.909 | 10.000 | 2.091 | -3.114
|
||
| Giants | 10.091 | 12.143 | 2.052 | 1.153
|
||
| Bills | 19.909 | 21.714 | 1.805 | -6.578
|
||
| Chargers | 11.636 | 13.429 | 1.792 | -1.997
|
||
| Falcons | 2.091 | 3.571 | 1.481 | -0.981
|
||
| Texans | 1.000 | 2.143 | 1.143 | 3.016
|
||
| Lions | 20.818 | 21.857 | 1.039 | 1.893
|
||
| Ravens | 3.727 | 4.286 | 0.558 | -0.081
|
||
| Jets | 22.455 | 22.286 | -0.169 | -5.604
|
||
| Saints | 26.546 | 26.286 | -0.260 | -1.899
|
||
| Panthers | 23.455 | 22.714 | -0.740 | 2.786
|
||
| Titans | 26.182 | 25.429 | -0.753 | 1.639
|
||
| Raiders | 28.909 | 28.143 | -0.766 | 0.039
|
||
| Bears | 8.546 | 7.714 | -0.831 | 4.013
|
||
| Patriots | 6.455 | 5.000 | -1.455 | -0.318
|
||
| Seahawks | 16.909 | 13.857 | -3.052 | -0.766
|
||
| Broncos | 13.000 | 8.857 | -4.143 | 3.302
|
||
| Jaguars | 29.818 | 25.429 | -4.390 | -1.224
|
||
| Vikings | 14.364 | 9.571 | -4.792 | 0.042
|
||
| Colts | 29.091 | 24.143 | -4.948 | 2.630
|
||
| Browns | 31.727 | 25.714 | -6.013 | 4.445
|
||
| Dolphins | 26.364 | 17.143 | -9.221 | 0.471
|
||
Observations:
- Pittsburgh Steelers: not as good as people hope apparently. Or maybe they're actually better than they've been playing?
- The RGIII excitement is still keeping the Redskins buoyed.
- Remember me pointing out the Ravens' Standard Deviation being the lowest? Well look at their difference in averages. They're spot-on as a No. 4 team in the NFL across the board, they're that good and nearly everyone is in agreement.
- Even thought the Chiefs are ranked in the bottom-five subjectively, it seems to still be a bit too high.
- Ahh the Dolphins, everyone's favorite whipping-boy this year. Still can't get any respect.
- The Browns are actually playing much better than people want to believe.
Best Match-Up for Week 4
In the previous two weeks, we had teams playing each other that had rankings within 1 spot of each other. This week, not so much. There seems to be a little less parity this week and we'll see if it comes back next week.
| Opponents (Ranking) | Game Time | Ranking Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Denver (10.929) at New England (5.727) | Sun, Oct. 7 4:25PM EDT | 5.202 |
Worst Match-Ups for Week 5
I'm going to stop calling it "Biggest Blowout Potential" and just go with "Worst Match-ups" now
| Opponents (Ranking) | Game Time | Ranking Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Baltimore (4.007) at Kansas City (28.545) | Sat, Oct. 7 1:00PM EDT | 24.538 |
| Houston (1.571) at NY Jets (22.370) | Mon, Oct. 8 8:30PM EDT | 20.799 |
| Chicago (8.130) at Jacksonville (27.623) | Sun, Oct. 7 4:05PM EDT | 19.493 |
Sources
- ESPN
- Fox
- CBS
- USA Today
- Sports Illustrated
- ProFootballTalk
- NFL.com
- Pro Football Weekly
- SB Nation
- Associated Press
- Football Outsiders
- Team Efficiency
- Team Rankings
- Sagarin
- BeatGraphs
- Pro Football Reference
- Cold Hard Football Facts




























There are 7 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.