The ACC should add Louisville, not UConn, now that Maryland has left

Andy Lyons

Will it be UConn or Louisville for the ACC, now that the Big Ten has swiped Maryland? UConn's reportedly in line, but is that the right call?

In response to Maryland's exit for the Big Ten, the ACC is likely about to do what the ACC does: pluck a school from the Big East. It's the default ACC response to pretty much every source of external stress. When John Swofford has stomach disquiet, he takes a school from the Big East. They do not dissolve quickly.

Its choices, if it wants to remain somewhat geographically congruent, are UConn, Louisville, Cincinnati, and then all the new guys and non-football members. UConn and Louisville are the clear front-runners.

I think the ACC would be foolish to pick the Huskies, as it reportedly will.

The conference's northern expansion has impressed nobody, and the Big Ten's now also cut off its uppermost reaches from its geographic heart. Abandon the frontier and refortify. Give Notre Dame a nearby potential rival, since you're courting them anyway -- Kentucky borders both Virginia and Indiana.

Louisville is the far superior football program with better recruiting grounds, and for the immediate future UConn's basketball peer as well. Adding the Cards would mean the ACC has an unquestionably better football program in at least one SEC state, something it can very rarely claim. And Louisville as an athletic department is far more profitable than UConn is.

The ACC needs urgent football help more than it needs anything else -- the Cardinals would be the only ACC team besides Florida State and Clemson in the BCS rankings right now. The only way the ACC can show FSU and Clemson, which could also leave, that it's committed to football is to bring on a school that's proved it can supplement their bowl winnings -- that school is not UConn. Louisville has a legitimate BCS bowl win in the past decade, and could add another this year -- UConn's best team ever also might have been the worst BCS bowl team ever.

UConn has better academics and is closer to a metropolis. Banking on these things will not keep Florida State and Clemson around.

I really don't see how there's any debate here, unless if viewed through the ACC's basketball-colored (you know, that color basketballs have) glasses and swayed by Swofford's quest to plant the flag of Clemson and FSU football in New York City.

Here's where the news on the matter stands right now:

Look through SB Nation's many excellent college football blogs to find your team's community.

Check out the SB Nation Channel on YouTube

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.