Serge Ibaka, Blake Griffin and the NBA's need for transparent discipline

Doug Pensinger

If the NBA is going to levy heavier punishment on players with longer disciplinary records, Stu Jackson and David Stern should lay that out. Because the lack of transparency allows conspiracy theories to flourish.

On Tuesday, the NBA announced that Serge Ibaka's flagrant foul against Blake Griffin on Sunday -- an indefensible shot to the groin while jockeying for rebound position -- would be upgraded to a Flagrant-2, and would draw a fine for the Thunderbolt.* What the announcement didn't include was a suspension for Ibaka ... which drew quite a bit of ire, including from Griffin, Griffin's groin and LeBron James.

* See a recent discussion on what to call players from teams like the Thunder.

LeBron's beef: Dwyane Wade notched a one-game suspension earlier this season for a groin altercation. (Best phrase ever.) So did DeMarcus Cousins. And Ibaka's was no less egregious. I don't mean to be mean, but if you're looking at this and finding innocence, you're kinda crazy.

Certainly, if you make a case that was incidental, you'd make the same case for the Wade and Cousins shots. And certainly, by upgrading the foul and issuing a fine, the NBA's disciplinary arm led by Stu Jackson isn't making a case that contact between Ibaka's hand and Griffin's groin was incidental. The NBA is telling us straight up that after review officials believe it was indeed intentional.

But they didn't suspend him.

We don't have any official reasons why, but the easy answer as to why a player like Cousins would get suspended while Ibaka would not comes down to reputation. When Cousins got O.J. Mayo, it came after two other Boogie suspensions: one by the team for arguing with his coach, one from the league for barking at Spurs TV analyst Sean Elliott after a game. And Cousins had a relatively short leash with NBA officials due to a mouth that never stops moving.

And Wade? Wade's rep is nothing like that of Cousins. And that's what is so flummoxing about this case. Wade's was a kick to Ramon Sessions' groin; it was obvious and egregious. Just as was Ibaka's punch to Griffin's groin. Neither has a place in the NBA or in life. The scourge of nut shots must end, and suspension is the best deterrence. The NBA knows this: any rule the league cares about is enforced with suspensions. Take the stay-on-the-bench rule that may have cost the Phoenix Suns a title: the league wanted to keep players on the bench out of fracases after Malice, so they made coming onto the court during a fight a suspendable offense. Earlier this season, the precedent for nut shots seemed to be suspension. And now that's gone.

This is not a new complaint, that the league's disciplinary system lacks benchmarks and transparency. It's a remarkable guessing game whenever a major offense (like Metta World Peace's elbow to James Harden's dome) comes up, because we have no idea what Stu will rule. The only real suspension standards are for cumulative technicals, the bench rule and drug offenses. Even DUIs draw differing game counts.

More on why Ibaka's suspension proves life isn't fair.

I'm not arguing that previous disciplinary actions shouldn't be taken into account when Jackson hands down punishment. Our justice system relies pretty heavily on escalating discipline, and the practice is plainly a part of the league's drug program. But make it clear! When you suspend Cousins for a game for hitting O.J. Mayo in the crotch, explain that it's not a mandatory one-game suspension for such a violation, but that Cousins' recent altercations merit such a punishment. That way fans, players and everyone else won't get so upset when the next nut-puncher doesn't get punished.

Because when those people get upset, that old tack in the NBA's cushion -- the conspiracy theory -- comes back into play. Ibaka's Thunder were scheduled to play the L.A. Lakers on national TV in the game in which Ibaka would have been suspended. When people don't quite understand why a decision is made, they'll latch on to the first explanation that makes sense and has some support among others. The theory that the league didn't suspend Ibaka to protect ratings on Tuesday immediately got buy-in from players, fans and media.

Of course it's totally absurd: is a lack of Serge Ibaka, awesome as he is, really going to keep anyone away from Thunder-Lakers? "I was totally going to watch that game, but man, no Ibaka? I'm out. What channel is Keeping Up with the Kardashians on?" Give me a break. But because the NBA has a history of inconsistency in discipline and a pervasive belief that cash rules everything, this stuff is said. As illogical as it sounds.

The NBA may never solve that, the image that it's one step up from WWE. But by being more transparent in its disciplinary program it can revoke a lot of that which fuels the conspiracies. They say sunshine is the best disinfectant. That applies to both sides. Be open about the decision-making process and the suspicious will have to dig deeper into the crazy to find something at which to shake their fists. And that's a win for the league.

More in the NBA:

Dennis Rodman: The unwitting diplomat

GIFs! The Week in Worst: Hope you like air balls

Dwight Howard: "Orlando was a team full of people nobody wanted"

3 reasons why the playoffs are better with the Lakers

How LeBron shut down Carmelo

Ziller: Andrew Bynum, Derrick Rose and what little we actually know

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.