Starling Marte, symbol of the Pirates' renaissance

Jamie Sabau

The Pirates weren't supposed to be this good. Here's a little something on one of the reasons they are.

Starling Marte has been a five-win player for the Pirates this year.

Starling Marte has been a four-win player for the Pirates this year.

Okay, so the reason you're reading this is because Marte had a brutal, game-losing error in the ninth inning of Tuesday's Pirates/Cardinals game. Not only did it allow the Cardinals to tie the game, but it forced the Pirates to grind through their bullpen in the beginning of a series against a good offensive team. It was a 14-inning loss, and extra-innings games have been the metaphorical castor oil for the Pirates in each of the last two seasons. They went 19-43 after a 19-inning game in 2011, and they went 13-29 after a 19-inning game last year. Yarrr.

But those are factoids, not trends. If you really think the Curse of Extra Innings means something, you don't need to watch the rest of the season. Horoscopes will tell you how it all turns out. And we come here today not to bury Starling Marte, but to praise him. The Pirates are good; the Pirates are in first place; Marte has been one of the better surprises of the season. Those are all related.

No matter how this season turns out for the Pirates, there will be all sorts of postmortems on how they turned the franchise around. They took gambles on undervalued pitchers like A.J. Burnett and Francisco Liriano, they turned Nate McLouth into more viable major leaguers than they received in the 10 deadline deals before that trade. They spent a little money on an underrated catcher, and they finally had some first-round picks work out at the same time. There's no ah-ha! moment with the roster of the 2013 Pirates.

There are a lot of ways to say, "The 2003 Pirates would have screwed that up," though. Gerrit Cole would have been Bubba Starling, and A.J. Burnett would have been Matt Morris. Russell Martin would have been Jason Kendall, but the Kendall who hung around Kansas City for a few years. This season hasn't necessarily been about the Pirates' good fortune so much as it's been the absence of bad fortune. Top-10 picks should provide value. The occasional free-agent excursions should work out every few years. Deadline deals for rebuilding teams should pan out every so often. Now it's all happening at once. And that's just swell.

But nothing makes me think about the old Pirates more than Starling Marte. What follows is complete supposition, and there's nothing to quantify it, so feel free to ignore it. But the old Pirates would have screwed Starling Marte into the ground. I have no idea how. Swing more, swing less, stop swinging, hit for power, focus on hitting the ball on the ground to use your speed, have you thought about bunting more?, here's how you hit behind the runner with fewer than two outs, don't hit for power, up from Indianapolis, down to Indianapolis, up from Indianapolis, down to Indianapolis …

Whatever they would have told him, it would have messed him up. Because as a reminder, Marte was a blank prospect canvas:

2007 18 Pirates FRk 156 1 16 2 10 29 .220 .307 .288 .595
2008 19 Pirates FRk 293 9 20 8 16 53 .296 .367 .455 .822
2009 20 3 Teams A-Rk-A+ 256 3 24 7 12 56 .309 .371 .430 .802
2010 21 2 Teams A+-Rk 281 2 26 9 13 65 .319 .387 .460 .847
2011 22 Altoona AA 572 12 24 12 22 100 .332 .370 .500 .870
2012 23 2 Teams AAA-A- 436 12 21 12 28 94 .282 .343 .494 .837

He was tools and performance, but the performance was only impressive because the tools hinted at more. That's a high-risk prospect, though. Look at the strikeout-to-walk ratio. The averages were pretty, but the approach was dreadful. He was Jeff Francoeur, except Marte got to face weaker competition in the minors. And his debut with the Pirates went about as expected. Some ups, some downs, and some hacking that limited the kind of ceiling his tools could build.

He struggled at times last year, but the Pirates never budged. They pencilled him in to start the season, and never considered doing anything different.

The old Pirates would have ... I don't know, traded him for Michael Young or something. Or traded for Young to play in left, blocking Marte. Or even better, put the left field spot up for grabs in a spring-training battle with the modern-day Tike Redman. After 30 sub-par Grapefruit League at-bats, the Pirates would have done the wrong thing. Six years later, he would have emerged from the organizational swamp and turned into Jose Bautista.

Marte is having a great season, but don't expect him to do so consistently. Not until he learns his balls from strikes. Still, he's one of the more exciting young players in the league, and he's a big reason for the Pirates' success in 2013. I can't tell you how, and I can't tell you why, but I just feel it in my bones that he's the one the Pirates from '93 through '10 would have screwed into the ground. He did make an unfortunate error on Tuesday. But that just means it's a better time to celebrate that he exists on the Pirates at all.

More from Baseball Nation:

Is there anything left to watch in the NL?

Word association, baseball-style

Jose Iglesias and the AL rookies

The Next Yasiel Puig (not really)

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.