Martin Perez, still a Ranger

Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports

And on Monday, he's the most important Ranger.

It's tough to be the team with everything. That is, a team with a full rotation, lineup, and farm system. It makes trading tough. When you're the White Sox, say, it's a little less painful to talk yourself into a blockbuster.

Kenny Williams: You know what, I don't think any of our prospects are off the table if we're going to get Stanton.

Marlins: Yeah, except we're looking at this list our scouts gave us of your best prospects … and #3 is Curt Bloom?

Williams: Oh, yeah. Up-and-comer. You know, he's probably off the table.

Marlins: He's the broadcaster for your Double-A team.

Williams: Heckuva prospect, though. Really well-respected, great guy.

Marlins: Your #4 prospect is Tim E. Gator, and from what we can tell, it's a man in a costume.

Williams: Ah. The Intimidator. Another solid prospect. Thought about bringing him up all year.

It's not that easy when you're dealing from a position of depth. Take the Rangers, who have had a productive farm system for the last few years. They've also had a full lineup and rotation, for the most part, which means a lot of prospects in the wings, waiting patiently. So when it came time to talk trade, the other teams had an are-you-gonna-eat-that? mentality.

You're not using Mike Olt. C'mon, you're not even using him. Just give him to us. You already have Adrian Beltre. Now you're just hoarding. Just give him to us.

For years, this was also the category Martin Perez fell under. The starter for Monday's 163rd game was usually the top pitching prospect in a system that had more than a few young pitchers. With Derek Holland, Yu Darvish, Matt Harrison, Alexi Ogando, Neftali Feliz, Justin Grimm, and Nick Tepesch hanging around at one time or another, Perez was that rare commodity: a top prospect who just might move in a big trade.

He was "untouchable" in 2010 when the Rangers wanted Cliff Lee, but as Perez advanced through the minors with good-not-great performances, he started becoming a more realistic target for other teams. In 2011, the Rangers were balking at including him in a trade instead of taking him off the table completely.

And in 2012, he was on the table. The Rangers were tepidly putting him on the table, and they were keeping a hand on his ankle so they could rip him away at any time. But they were at least listening. Zack Greinke had just a half-season of team control left, but the price was high, and if the Rangers were going to beat the Angels' offer, they were going to do it with Perez. The Rangers balked. The Angels swooped in.

After the 2013 season, Perez wasn't just on the table. He was the centerpiece. The Rangers were eager to get Justin Upton, and they knew that if they were going to do it without Profar, that Perez had to be one of the guys going the other way. But the Diamondbacks were already dripping with young pitching, and they preferred the Braves' combo of majors-ready help and youth.

Perez ran the prospect spectrum, then. He went from untouchable, to slightly touchable, to reluctantly touchable, to bait. Along the way, the deal was never exactly right for the Rangers. They could get Cliff Lee without giving up Perez, so they held on to him. They couldn't get James Shields without Perez, so they ignored James Shields. They hoped they could get Justin Upton with Perez, but they couldn't. Every year, every trading deadline, the Rangers maneuvered and navigated in a way that always left them with Martin Perez.

They could have had Carlos Beltran, Edwin Jackson, Roy Oswalt, Dan Haren, Michael Bourn, Ubaldo Jimenez, Doug Fister, Hunter Pence, Zack Greinke, Hanley Ramirez, and Anibal Sanchez over the last couple trade deadlines. They didn't bother. They weren't worth six years of Perez, in the Rangers' estimation.

And what they were thinking was a situation like this. Maybe not a do-or-die game like this so soon, but eventually. The Rangers would think, no, we can't trade Perez for four months of Grienke or Sanchez, because eventually we'll use him as a big-game pitcher for years.

It's here. After 162 games, the Rangers might go home even sooner than they did last year. The Rangers don't want to go from the pennant to the Wild Card to an honorable-mention ribbon. That's ... a discouraging trend. The Rangers need Perez to justify their faith. He's not Justin Upton, and he's not Zack Greinke. The Rangers are hoping he's the right guy at the right time, just like they've been hoping and projecting all along.

For more on the Rangers and GAME 163,
please visit the nervous folks at Lone Star Ball

More from Baseball Nation:

Brisbee’s Weekend Recap!

Henderson Alvarez and a Baseball Miracle

The baseball people you don’t want to be stuck in an elevator with

A Mariano Rivera retrospective

The 10 greatest baseball comedy bits

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.