College Football Recruiting: Why So Many Early 2013 Commitments?

ANN ARBOR MI - JANUARY 12: New University of Michigan head football coach Brady Hoke talks during his introductory press confrence at the Junge Family Champions Center on January 12 2011 in Ann Arbor Michigan. (Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)

For whatever reason, the early commitment is the new Signing Day announcement for many of the nation's top 2013 college football recruits.

The 2013 recruiting year is not even three months old, yet more than half of the nation's top 100 recruits (according to Rivals) have already committed. And it's not just the top kids, as schools across the country are loading up ahead of time.

Is this unusual? Oh, yes. Over the past three years, the nation's top 75 recruiting teams have averaged about three commitments at this point in the year, though that doesn't include decommitments. Right now, they're averaging more than five.

The good news for those who like excitement: This could all lead to some major February drama. The two biggest events in recruiting are announcements and decommits, and in most cases you can't have the latter without early commits. Coaches will preach loyalty, but hooray, mayhem!

Here's a look at the 50 schools with the most commitments so far. according to Rivals and 247 Sports, along with their numbers over the past three years to this point:

Team 2010 Commits Thru April 30 2011 Commits Thru April 30 2012 Commits Thru April 30 2013 Commits Thru April 30

Michigan 9 3 6 17

Georgia 3 7 3 15

Texas A&M 16 3 8 15

Florida 9 1 8 15

Texas 19 19 15 13

Ohio State 5 9 5 13

Notre Dame 2 8 3 12

Alabama 9 8 9 11

Virginia Tech 3 2 8 10

Florida State 2 10 7 9

LSU 5 9 7 9

Missouri 3 6 2 9

North Carolina 1 4 2 9

Auburn 3 3 3 8

Penn State 2 0 3 8

Michigan State 1 6 3 7

Baylor 2 5 5 7

Clemson 4 4 3 7

South Carolina 2 2 3 7

Iowa 3 1 1 7

Vanderbilt 1 0 0 7

Duke 2 3 0 6

Ole Miss 1 0 3 6

UCLA 0 0 0 6

Virginia 1 6 2 5

Louisville 1 5 2 5

Nebraska 2 5 1 5

Washington 6 4 1 5

Wisconsin 2 2 3 5

Illinois 1 1 0 5

Tennessee 1 1 0 5

Miami 3 0 5 5

BYU 6 7 4 4

Oklahoma 6 7 4 4

USC 4 2 2 4

East Carolina 0 2 2 4

Cal 4 2 1 4

Arizona 2 1 2 4

Pitt 2 1 0 4

Texas Tech 3 6 3 3

Stanford 1 6 1 3

Colorado 0 0 2 3

Boise State 0 0 0 3

Oklahoma State 6 9 2 2

Maryland 3 7 3 2

Kansas State 2 7 3 2

Utah 2 5 0 2

Houston 6 4 6 2

The Texas Longhorns have long gotten their upcoming class largely filled up a year ahead of time, then added names judiciously along the way. Big 12 teams, and other Texas teams like the TCU Horned Frogs and Houston Cougars, tend to grab more early commitments than those elsewhere around the country, perhaps due to the extensive evaluations players get at Texas 7-on-7 camps and so forth.

West coast and Big Ten teams have been more likely to take their time, while the SEC is one big arms race all year long. Most years, Nick Saban's Alabama Crimson Tide have lined up about half to a third of their class by the time spring ball ends, while the Florida Gators, Georgia Bulldogs and LSU Tigers always look to have a handful of commits by the end of spring.

Schools with unique recruiting bases like the BYU Cougars and Notre Dame Fighting Irish are often able to take advantage with early commitments, likewise those who exploit specific strategies more often than others do (like the Kansas St. Wildcats' Juco thing).

But this year, it seems like every school is looking to get way out in front of things. The big story is the Michigan Wolverines, whose 17 commits make for more than they've had in any combined two years of the Rivals era, and, thus, probably ever. It's noteworthy that Brady Hoke was the Big Ten coach most supportive of Urban Meyer back during Recruit-TakingGate. But almost across the board, schools are getting more and more early commitments.

Look at the UCLA Bruins, who've been especially California in recent years, rarely landing commits until summer. But Jim Mora's new staff, which includes former Texas recruiting star Adriam Klemm from the SMU Mustangs, has brought in an entire class' worth of 2012 and 2013 players since taking over in December. Maybe everybody's just getting a little more Texas overall.

So this is happening. But why?

Nobody really knows. Stakes are going up all the time, so coaches apply more and more pressure. Many recruits see an early commit as the chance to do some recruiting of their own. Maybe having established, consensus top recruits -- as 2013 has in Robert Nkemdiche and Reuben Foster -- makes other players less likely to extend the process. It could just be a fad -- maybe next year nobody will commit until October.

Teens make decisions that seem strange to non-teens. And, as with any recruiting discussion, that's the key takeaway.

What do you think?

While we’re here, let’s watch some college football videos from SB Nation’s new YouTube channel together:

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.