NCAA 'Division 4' split unlikely, according to Big Ten's Jim Delany


Division I could still be saved.

After a two-day summit to discuss potential changes to the NCAA's structure, comments made by Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany indicated that there may not need to be a Division IV after all.

A solution could be found to preserve the NCAA as it is:

"We've at least preliminarily concluded we don't want to leave the NCAA, and we don't need a Division IV," Delany said. "We can be in a big tent if we can get the appropriate matter of political redistribution. We can have an (NCAA men's basketball) tournament, everyone can be in it. We can do revenue sharing. We can all brand together. We can all be Division I together. We can all have a big tent.

A large motivator around the restructuring talks is because the Big 5 conferences -- the ACC, Big Ten, Big XII, Pac-12 and SEC -- have the means to cover things like full cost-of-attendance, which other schools are not in a financially feasible position to do.

Delany -- who has always been one of the first to sound off on new ideas -- said that in order for the NCAA to exist as is, those schools that can afford the full cost-of-attendance must be allowed to do so, without forcing those same requirements onto smaller ones:

"...the conditions for [retaining Division I] are that we need the political autonomy and the political authority to address things we must address on behalf of our student-athletes, on behalf of our universities. We have the resources to do it, and we need the authority to do it. How that happens, we'll work that out over the next weeks and months. ...

"We don't want to draw lines and put certain people in and certain people out."

Still, an actual plan is not in place yet, although the proposal currently being floated involves a two-tiered sort of system, with the Big 5 conferences holding more control in the decision-making process and smaller conferences being free to enact rules if they are able. Implementing this system would require agreement and a vote from both presidents and athletic directors of those smaller schools.

A subcommittee of seven Board of Directors will reportedly continue working on a new governance structure over the next few months, which will also need to address things beyond student-athlete compensation, such as academic standards across the NCAA, and third party contact.

The debate around this restructuring has gone on for months. A statement from Division I ADs ripped the idea of pay-for-play reform back in September, and the Division I Leadership Council is strongly against splitting up Division I at all.

Based on Delany's comments, they may not have to.

More from SB Nation college football:

Full Week 10 college football TV schedule guide

Why Florida State should destroy Miami

And why Florida State would be favored to beat Oregon

FAU coaches gone due to smoking marijuana, apparently

• Long reads: Chip Kelly’s New Hampshire laboratory | Why we love college football

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.