2013 UTSA Football's 10 things to know: Taking the fast track

The Alamodome - Wikipedia Commons

UTSA has played 22 games in its existence, and it has already climbed a couple of rungs in the realignment ladder. Larry Coker's Roadrunners begin life in Conference USA with an interesting, experienced offense and a defense that needed a lot of help from JUCO recruiting.

Confused? Check out the glossary here.

1. Kids aren't dummies

Two years ago, UTSA had yet to play a football game. The Roadrunners had a coach, a stadium, and some pretty impressive ambition, but everything was on paper. Now, after 22 games -- 12 wins, 10 losses -- here they are in what I called Double-A ball on Monday.

I spoke with UTSA head coach Larry Coker last month, and I asked him just how in the heck you go about building a program with no track record. "The big thing about it is trying to set the culture," he said. "You don't have the older players to lead. Our coaches have to set that culture -- what we expect and how we expect it. Not every player buys in, and you have a lot of turnover for a while."

Coker said he spoke with former South Florida head coach Jim Leavitt, who underwent the same building-from-scratch-and-moving-up-quickly process a decade and a half ago, and he said the same thing.

"Kids aren't dummies," Coker says. "If they see things that work, it makes them more receptive."

That makes it difficult when your program quite literally hasn't won before. That said, things could be going a lot worse for UTSA. Again, in their first 20 games in existence, the Roadrunners have won 12 times. They played eight FBS teams last year and beat four of them. Yes, they were holding their own in the weakest overall FBS conference, the WAC, and yes, their wins came against New Mexico State (123rd out of 124 in the 2012 F/+ rankings), Idaho (120th), South Alabama (118th), and Texas State (99th). Yes, they were 0-4 versus bowl teams (average score: Opponent 46.2, UTSA 20.5). Yes, there was some luck involved (UTSA was 4-0 in one-possession games). And yes, they finished 116th in the F/+ rankings. But they immediately found themselves ahead of the game against teams that, well, had been around for more than two years. Coker has made up some serious ground on the rest of the football-playing world, and at this stage, he doesn't need to worry about that "no older players to lead" thing. A vast majority of last year's squad returns in 2013

2012 Schedule & Results

Record: 8-4 | Adj. Record: 2-8* | Final F/+ Rk: 116
Date Opponent Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L
1-Sep at South Alabama 33-31 W 28.9 - 36.2 L
8-Sep Texas A&M-Commerce 27-16 W N/A N/A
15-Sep at Georgia State 38-14 W 23.4 - 46.4 L
22-Sep NW Oklahoma State 56-3 W N/A N/A
29-Sep at New Mexico State 35-14 W 26.4 - 27.3 L
13-Oct at Rice 14-34 L 18.2 - 35.0 L
20-Oct San Jose State 24-52 L 35.0 - 29.2 W
27-Oct Utah State 17-48 L 29.3 - 32.0 L
3-Nov at Louisiana Tech 27-51 L 24.9 - 30.3 L
10-Nov McNeese State 31-24 W 17.6 - 54.9 L
17-Nov at Idaho 34-27 W 24.6 - 49.0 L
24-Nov Texas State 38-31 W 34.0 - 26.8 W
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
Points Per Game 29.1 62 32.6 96
Adj. Points Per Game 26.2 82 36.7 120

* The two games versus Division II teams were not counted as part of the Adj. W-L record, nor were they counted in the rankings or the rushing and receiving stats you find below. They were, for all statistical intents and purposes, exhibitions.

2. Lots of good, lots of bad

Again, we probably shouldn't think too hard about this. In its provisional FBS season, UTSA ripped off a five-game winning streak to start the season (yes, only two were against FBS teams) and finished with a three-game winning streak. That's impressive. And by all accounts, the offense was perfectly decent. The Roadrunners were held under 24 points twice all season, and Utah State's defense was so good that scoring 17 points against the Aggies was impressive in its own right. Eric Soza is a legitimately solid quarterback, and he had a pretty good junior season.

On the other hand, there was the defense. Against FBS offenses, UTSA allowed a seemingly solid 32.3 points per game; against good FBS offenses, however (Utah State, Louisiana Tech, San Jose State), UTSA allowed 50.3. The Roadrunners desperately needed an athletic advantage for their 4-2-5 defense to take hold, and when they didn't have it, they didn't have a prayer.

Offense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 70 109 95 112
RUSHING 73 110 96 111
PASSING 54 88 89 90
Standard Downs 118 100 121
Passing Downs 73 69 75
Redzone 102 115 84
Q1 Rk 96 1st Down Rk 113
Q2 Rk 109 2nd Down Rk 95
Q3 Rk 96 3rd Down Rk 55
Q4 Rk 90

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2013 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards Comp
Rate
TD INT Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Eric Soza 6'0, 205 Sr. NR 166 282 2,085 58.9% 20 3 12 1.1% 7.3
Ryan Polite


46 75 604 61.3% 3 3 9 5.1% 7.4
Tucker Carter 6'3, 225 Jr. ** (5.2)








3. Eric Soza is unique

He is an impressive (and selective) runner, and he is infinitely more prone to throw the ball away instead of throwing picks. Plus, he appeared to raise his game on passing downs. He has started almost every UTSA game -- he missed the SJSU and Utah State games last season -- and his high points in 2012 were ultra high. He was 17-for-24 for 206 yards and two touchdowns and rushed for 51 yards against Georgia State, he was 23-for-41 for 314 yards and four touchdowns against Louisiana Tech, and against Idaho, he was 23-for-36 for 232 yards and rushed for 89 yards and three scores.

Oh yeah, and he doesn't take sacks. Like, almost none. His 1.1 percent sack rate was infinitesimal; the stereotypical dual-threat quarterback is more likely to scramble and throw the ball away instead of stepping into the pocket and forcing a throw, and while incompletions are not good, they're better than turnovers and sacks. Soza was one of the FBS' best quarterbacks when it comes to avoiding catastrophic mistakes, and with an experienced supporting cast, there's no reason to expect something different in 2013, though he will be facing a few more decent defenses.

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
TD Adj.
POE
David Glasco II RB 5'10, 200 Jr. NR 94 410 4.4 5.1 5 -16.6
Evans Okotcha RB 5'9, 215 Sr. NR 88 359 4.1 3.5 8 -15.8
Eric Soza QB 6'0, 205 Sr. NR 55 339 6.2 6.5 6 +5.0
Brandon Armstrong RB 5'6, 160 Jr. ** (5.0) 25 85 3.4 2.2 0 -6.0
Kam Jones WR 5'11, 190 Jr. NR 24 136 5.7 6.6 0 +0.7
Ryan Polite QB 21 91 4.3 4.8 1 -0.3
CheRod Simpson RB 5'10, 200 Sr. NR 10 35 3.5 1.7 0 -3.0
Brian Vaughn RB 5'6, 185 So. ** (5.2) 8 72 9.0 7.8 0 +2.0

Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Yds/
Target
Target
Rate
%SD Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Kam Jones WR 5'11, 190 Jr. NR 35 19 260 54.3% 7.4 11.1% 57.1% 7.4 33.6
Earon Holmes WR 6'4, 190 Jr. NR 34 18 226 52.9% 6.6 10.8% 67.6% 7.4 29.2
Evans Okotcha RB 5'9, 215 Sr. NR 31 23 333 74.2% 10.7 9.8% 51.6% 10.9 43.1
Cole Hicks WR 6'1, 190 Sr. NR 24 12 144 50.0% 6.0 7.6% 58.3% 6.0 18.6
Aaron Grubb SLOT 5'8, 170 So. NR 23 10 134 43.5% 5.8 7.3% 56.5% 5.9 17.3
Kenny Bias WR 6'1, 175 So. ** (5.3) 22 11 210 50.0% 9.5 7.0% 63.6% 9.4 27.2
Marcellus Mack WR 6'0, 200 Jr. NR 22 17 155 77.3% 7.0 7.0% 63.6% 7.0 20.0
Kenny Harrison WR 5'9, 165 Jr. NR 20 17 116 85.0% 5.8 6.3% 45.0% 5.8 15.0
Cole Hubble TE 6'2, 245 Jr. ** (5.1) 19 13 246 68.4% 12.9 6.0% 63.2% 12.7 31.8
Brandon Armstrong RB 5'6, 160 Jr. ** (5.0) 18 12 83 66.7% 4.6 5.7% 66.7% 5.1 10.7
Jeremiah Moeller TE 6'2, 240 Sr. NR 15 10 145 66.7% 9.7 4.8% 60.0% 9.7 18.7
Brandon Freeman WR 5'10, 170 Jr. NR 14 6 121 42.9% 8.6 4.4% 42.9% 7.8 15.6
David Glasco II RB 5'10, 200 Jr. NR 14 10 71 71.4% 5.1 4.4% 35.7% 6.9 9.2
Josiah Monroe SLOT 5'6, 170 Jr. ** (5.4) 11 6 52 54.5% 4.7 3.5% 63.6% 4.6 6.7
Nate Shaw HB 5'11, 250 Jr. NR 5 5 28 100.0% 5.6 1.6% 80.0% 6.7 3.6
Aron Taylor WR 6'2, 195 Fr. ** (5.4)








4. Evans Okotcha: also unique

Soza was also more than willing to dump to his running back to keep the ball moving forward. And when Evans Okotcha was in the backfield, that was a particularly useful option. Okotcha split carries with David Glasco II in 2012 -- they combined for about 15 carries per game -- and saw about three targets (and two catches) per game as well. And in his 119 intended touches (carries and targets), he averaged a lovely 5.8 yards. Okotcha and the other backs and tight ends gave Soza some efficiency options (combined catch rate: 78 percent), which made up for a rather inefficient set of receivers. Players like Kam Jones and Kenny Bias were able to get downfield at times, but the catch rate for the receivers will need to improve. Faster defenses will track down Okotcha and the backfield options better, and at some point, UTSA will need to actually strike downfield.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 81.1 2.76 2.48 38.4% 63.3% 24.7% 361.0 1.4% 0.8%
Rank 120 91 113 71 89 116 3 5 2
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Career Starts/Honors/Notes
Scott Inskeep LG 6'4, 300 Jr. NR 21 career starts; 2012 2nd All-WAC
Nate Leonard C 6'0, 290 Jr. NR 22 career starts
Cody Harris RG 6'5, 300 Jr. NR 20 career starts
Patrick Hoog LT 14 career starts
Josh Walker LT 6'3, 290 Jr. NR 12 career starts
Payton Rion RG 6'3, 280 Jr. NR 7 career starts
Zach Hester RT 6'4, 315 So. ** (5.2) 1 career start
Michael Roberson LT 6'3, 300 So. NR
William Cavanaugh C 6'1, 295 So. ** (5.2)
Jordan Gray RT 6'2, 260 So. ** (5.2)
Cody Cole LG 6'5, 295 RSFr. ** (5.2)

5. Stockpiling the experience

Soza's own ability to avoid sacks certainly played a large role in UTSA ranking third in the country in Adj. Sack Rate. There is no doubting that. And UTSA's line certainly proved lacking when it comes to opening holes for its backs. Defenders were pretty consistently able to slice through the line and stop backs for losses. Still, you have to like where this line is headed.

Growing pains were expected -- as you see above, the six returning players with starting experience were all sophomores or younger last year -- but the experience is piling up. UTSA enters 2013 with three two-year starters, and barring attrition or injury, it could enter 2014 with three three-year starters. The line is headed in the right direction, and it will get further help from Soza this fall.

Defense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 79 122 124 117
RUSHING 20 100 118 71
PASSING 120 123 123 123
Standard Downs 104 112 96
Passing Downs 124 124 123
Redzone 53 75 42
Q1 Rk 123 1st Down Rk 118
Q2 Rk 86 2nd Down Rk 92
Q3 Rk 119 3rd Down Rk 124
Q4 Rk 110

6. The Roadrunners needed an athletic edge ... badly

Coker brought on small school veteran Neal Nethery to install his intended 4-2-5 defense two years ago; the move made sense considering the defense's emphasis on speed (and the emphasis on passing among so many Sun Belt and Conference USA teams). But we'll just politely say the installation is still in process. UTSA had the worst passing downs defense in the country, generating a mediocre pass rush and offering no resistance whatsoever in the secondary. UTSA was able to swarm to ball-carriers and limit big plays on the ground for the most part, but the Roadrunners were simply unable to get off the field when they created opportunities to do so.

They were also unable to do any damage whatsoever if they didn't have a speed advantage. Their defensive Covariance -- a measure intended to figure out who played their best games against good competition and who played their best against their worst opponents -- was on the far "Best Against Worst" end. They allowed just 167 yards to NW Oklahoma State, 209 to Texas A&M-Commerce, 307 to Georgia State, 308 to South Alabama, and 350 to New Mexico State. Not bad. They picked off nine passes in those games and allowed an average of 61.2 rushing yards per game against those teams. But then the real games started. UTSA allowed 483 yards to Rice, 522 to Utah State and 537 to Louisiana Tech, picking off just four passes the rest of the way. Facing real opponents didn't treat the Roadrunners very well.

In theory, experience could help with that. Becoming more aware and adept in your roles with this unique defense could help, especially in the passing game. But one has to question the overall talent level of the defense; lord knows Coker and his staff did: They brought in 10 defensive backs in their 2013 recruiting class.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 93.6 2.64 3.95 37.6% 73.2% 16.1% 66.9 3.4% 5.0%
Rank 87 22 120 48 94 101 110 100 90
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Cody Rogers DE 6'0, 245 Jr. NR 10 24.5 3.9% 4.5 2.5 0 0 0 0
Franky Anaya DT 12 24.0 3.8% 6 2.5 1 0 0 1
Richard Burge DT 6'3, 280 Jr. NR 12 20.0 3.2% 5 1 0 0 0 0
Will Ritter DE 6'1, 235 Sr. NR 11 18.0 2.8% 4 3.5 0 1 1 1
Jarron Harris DE 6'3, 245 Sr. NR 12 16.5 2.6% 3.5 3 0 1 1 0
Ashaad Mabry DT 6'3, 315 Jr. NR 12 14.0 2.2% 0.5 0 0 0 0 0
Ferrington Macon DT 5'11, 295 Jr. ** (5.2) 12 12.5 2.0% 1 0 0 0 0 1
Dan Winter DE 12 10.5 1.7% 2 0 0 0 0 1
Jason Neill DE 6'2, 270 Jr. NR 10 9.5 1.5% 2 1 0 2 0 0
Lekenwic Haynes DE 11 2.0 0.3% 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0
John Roper DE 5'9, 195 Jr. NR 2 1.0 0.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robert Singletary DE 6'2, 250 Jr. ** (5.4)
Brendon Brinkmann DE 6'7, 255 RSFr. ** (5.2)

Codie Brooks DE 6'1, 260 RSFr. NR
Justyn Eddins DE 6'4, 240 Jr. ** (5.4)
Brian Price DT 6'4, 315 So. ** (5.2)

7. Falling victim to the counterpunch

You'll rarely see a team so good agains the run on standard downs (22nd in Standard Downs line yards per carry) and so awful on passing downs (120th). Knowing what we know about the pass defense, that tells me UTSA felt the need to over-pursue on passing downs, desperately trying to get to the quarterback before he could pick them apart. That leaves you vulnerable to both draw plays and quarterback scrambles, and the numbers suggest that this decimated the Roadrunners. They couldn't even get away with a bend-don't-break approach to pass defense, and aggression hurt them just as much. With the top three ends returning, along with three of the top four tackles, the experience level should help, as should the addition of two junior college transfers, including enormous tackle Brian Price. I don't know how good this line will be, but it should at least improve slightly from last year, and a little help from an improved secondary couldn't hurt.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Brandon Reeves MIKE 12 64.0 10.1% 3 1.5 0 2 1 2
Steven Kurfehs HAWK 6'2, 230 Sr. NR 12 56.0 8.8% 5.5 4.5 0 1 0 1
Blake Terry MIKE 5'11, 230 Jr. *** (5.5) 12 49.0 7.7% 3 1 0 0 1 0
Drew Douglas MIKE 6'1, 230 So. NR 6 12.0 1.9% 1.5 0 0 0 0 0
Dalton Miller LB 5'11, 220 So. NR 9 3.5 0.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jens Jeters HAWK 6'1, 245 So. ** (5.2)
Brandon Guerrero MIKE 6'1, 235 Sr. ** (5.4)
Kenneth O'Neal LB 6'1, 212 Fr. ** (5.4)






Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Triston Wade FS 5'11, 165 Jr. NR 12 59.5 9.4% 1 0 4 7 4 2
Nic Johnston SS 6'2, 200 Jr. NR 11 59.0 9.3% 5 1 1 4 4 0
Darrien Starling CB 5'9, 195 Jr. NR 11 30.0 4.7% 0 0 0 2 0 1
Erik Brown CB 11 30.0 4.7% 1 0 4 12 1 0
Brian King ROV 6'1, 190 Jr. ** (5.2) 12 26.5 4.2% 0 0 1 1 0 1
Mauricio Sanchez ROV 6'0, 195 Jr. NR 9 24.0 3.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cody Berry ROV 5'11, 205 Sr. ** (5.4) 7 19.5 3.1% 1 0 0 1 2 1
Crosby Adams CB 5'9, 180 Jr. *** (5.5) 12 13.0 2.1% 0 0 2 1 0 0
Charles Wort SS 6'1, 205 So. *** (5.5) 12 5.0 0.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bennett Okotcha CB 6'0, 195 So. *** (5.6)

Tevin Broussard FS 6'0, 190 Jr. *** (5.5)
Andre Brown CB 5'11, 175 Jr. ** (5.3)

Trevor Baker DB 6'3, 185 Jr. ** (5.2)
Kevin Adams DB 6'1, 185 Jr. ** (5.2)

Aneas Hendricks DB 6'0, 168 Fr. ** (5.4)
Jarveon Williams DB 5'10, 185 Fr. ** (5.4)

8. A blood transfusion in the secondary

A full 40 percent of Coker's 2013 recruiting class will the defensive backfield this fall. Coker signed four junior college transfers, including three-star safety Tevin Broussard. Oklahoma transfer Bennett Okotcha also enters the mix. UTSA's roster now features five former three-star recruits, and four live in the secondary.

None of this guarantees improvement, mind you. But it does point to the simple fact that UTSA knew what its biggest weakness was last year and took drastic steps to improve it. If players like Broussard and Okotcha can make an immediate impact alongside players like safeties Triston Wade and Nic Johnston, and if the remaining recruits can offer some level of depth at cornerback -- UTSA just had none whatsoever last year -- then improvement should follow. And if that leads to less desperation up front, then the overall defense could improve by quite a few spots in the rankings. It can't really go any lower.

9. Triston Wade is a keeper

Despite the secondary's general incompetence, Wade still earned second-team all-WAC honors in 2012, and not only because he logged a lot of tackles. Tackle totals can fool you sometimes -- you cannot immediately tell whether those tackles were of the play-making variety or of the "my defense sucks, and somebody has to bring the guy down" variety -- but Wade showed solid play-making ability, defensing 11 passes (four picks, seven passes broken up) and forcing four fumbles. Nic Johnston wasn't so bad himself. Again, the biggest issue was at cornerback, where Okotcha could help immensely if he is ready to roll.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Josh Ward 5'10, 220 Jr. 28 33.7 1 6 5 39.3%
Kristian Stern 5'11, 185 Jr. 23 39.7 2 6 4 43.5%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB TB%
Josh Ward 5'10, 220 Jr. 29 58.0 8 27.6%
Sean Ianno 6'3, 205 Jr. 22 61.3 7 31.8%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Sean Ianno 6'3, 205 Jr. 21-21 7-8 87.5% 3-5 60.0%
Kristian Stern 5'11, 185 Jr. 24-24 4-5 80.0% 1-1 100.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Kenny Harrison KR 5'9, 165 Jr. 14 23.3 0
Brandon Armstrong KR 5'6, 160 Jr. 10 16.4 0
Charles Wort KR 6'1, 205 So. 5 18.0 0
Kenny Harrison PR 5'9, 165 Jr. 12 17.3 1
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 57
Net Punting 122
Net Kickoffs 93
Touchback Pct 84
Field Goal Pct 42
Kick Returns Avg 111
Punt Returns Avg 29

2013 Schedule & Projection Factors

2012 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
31-Aug at New Mexico 122
7-Sep Oklahoma State 6
14-Sep at Arizona 30
21-Sep at UTEP 108
28-Sep Houston 57
5-Oct at Marshall 79
12-Oct Rice 92
26-Oct UAB 105
2-Nov at Tulsa 56
9-Nov Tulane 111
23-Nov at North Texas 112
30-Nov Louisiana Tech 89
Five-Year F/+ Rk 116
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 120
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* +12 / +9.7
TO Luck/Game +1.2
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 19 (10, 9)
Yds/Pt Margin** +0.6

10. This is quite a jump

UTSA has played eight FBS opponents in its history. In 2013, the Roadrunners will play 12, including seven projected in the Top 92 of the preseason F/+ rankings and four in the Top 60. Coker's team is almost guaranteed to improve -- teams that return 19 starters almost have no choice, especially considering what returns from the two-deep -- and with home games versus Rice, UAB and Tulane and winnable trips to New Mexico, UTEP, and North Texas, the win total could remain reasonably nice. But the defense probably hasn't sealed all of its cracks, and the receiving corps probably still won't be able to help out Eric Soza as much as he needs it to. UTSA is a work in progress, but of course it is. The Roadrunners are going to struggle in 2013, but they are ahead of schedule, and they should be able to hold their own for at least a good portion of the season.

In This Article

Teams
Players
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.