2013 Alabama football's 10 things to know: Tide still on a different level

A common sight each January. - Steve Mitchell-USA TODAY Sports

It takes luck to win a national title. And lord knows it takes quite a bit of luck to win three in four years. But in terms of recruiting, development, and strategy, Nick Saban and Alabama are playing a different game than everybody else in college football. With just a little bit more luck, the Tide might accomplish what has never been done before. For more Alabama, visit Tide site Roll Bama Roll.

Confused? Check out the glossary here.

1. Playing a different game

Over the last eight seasons, 961 teams have played FBS football. If you ranked all of them according to their F/+ rankings, Alabama's last four teams have ranked sixth, 13th, first, and second, respectively. Only seven teams have finished with an F/+ rating better than plus-40.0 percent. Alabama has three of them. Only two have finished with an F/+ rating better than plus-50.0 percent: Alabama in each of the last two years.

Or, to put that in chart form, here's what Alabama's F/+ progression chart looks like using a scale that works for every other team in the country:

(Here's a prettier, more properly scaled version.)

Alabama's Def. F/+ rating improved to seventh in 2008 to sixth in 2009 and fifth in 2010, and it has been a distant first in both 2011 and 2012. In fact, the 2011 defense was much, much better than any other defense in the F/+ era:

Best Def .F/+ Ratings
1. 2011 Alabama (+37.1%)
2. 2012 Alabama (+27.8%)
3. 2011 LSU (+27.8%)
4. 2010 Boise State (+25.9%)
5. 2008 USC (+25.9%)

Plus, get this: The offense has been in the Off. F/+ top five for each of the last four years.

Indeed, Nick Saban has gamed the system. To win in college football, it takes talent acquisition, talent development, and tactical prowess, probably in that order. Saban is not only college football's best recruiter, but he might also be its best developer of the talent he acquires, and while not incredibly innovative, his strategies and tactics perfectly fit the talent on hand. He is indeed playing a different game than the rest of the coaches in college football.

And despite living in an era of scholarship limitations and attempted parity, he has a chance to do something never before achieved in college football: win four AP national titles in five years.

Nebraska won three in four years from 1994-97. Miami won four in nine years from 1983-91. Alabama won three in five from 1961-65 (and will always somewhat justifiably claim to have been screwed out of a fourth in six in 1966). Notre Dame won three in four from 1946-49. But four in five? Never happened. As we prepare for a new era in college football -- the College Football Playoff that begins in 2014 might take the "mythical" out of "Mythical National Champion" -- the old era might close with an unprecedented accomplishment.

Alabama enters 2013 just as it entered (and left) 2012, as the team most well-positioned for a national title run. But here's the deal: The Tide will still need help.

2. You still need luck

I still think Quinn Sharp's field goal was good. The Oklahoma State junior lined up for a 37-yard field goal in Ames, Iowa, with 1:21 left in a tie game on the evening of November 18, 2011, and if he did miss it, it was by about a centimeter. It was ruled no good, and Oklahoma State eventually lost to Iowa State in overtime. Sure, if he made it, Iowa State would have still had about 75 seconds to tie or win the game in regulation. And sure, we could have seen some crazy butterfly effect in which, if OSU beats Iowa State, suddenly the Cowboys don't completely and totally destroy Oklahoma in Stillwater a week later. But the odds are pretty good that, if Sharp's kick is ruled good, then Alabama, which lost to LSU via its own missed field goals, doesn't go to the 2011 BCS title game.

And if Oregon's Alejandro Maldanado doesn't miss two field goals against Stanford on November 17, 2012, Alabama, with its home loss to Texas A&M, potentially doesn't go to the 2012 BCS title game either.

And hell, if Colt McCoy doesn't get hurt on Texas' opening series in the 2009 BCS title game, we've got an entirely different ballgame there, too. (Remember, Alabama-Texas was a three-point game late in the fourth quarter before the Tide erupted and put the game away.)

Alabama has been by far the best team in college football over the last four years. By far. But each of its three national titles still required luck. Titles always do; separating yourself from a field of 120 teams in just 12 to 14 games in a sport played with a pointy, moody ball demands a dose of good fortune. What was potentially the best team of all time didn't win a national title. Hell, two of the five best teams in the F/+ era (2008 USC, 2011 LSU) didn't win titles -- USC didn't even play for the title in 2008. There's a reason the four-titles-in-five-years trick hasn't been done before.

The presence of luck means that, even with Alabama possessing the most ridiculously talented team in the country, one with a lot of experience to boot, it's still smarter to bet on the field than on one team. Teams not named Alabama still have a better chance of raising the final BCS crystal ball than teams named Alabama.

But damn, are the Tide going to be good again this year.

2012 Schedule & Results

Record: 13-1 | Adj. Record: 14-0 | Final F/+ Rk: 1
Date Opponent Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L
1-Sep vs. Michigan 41-14 W 47.7 - 16.2 W
8-Sep Western Kentucky 35-0 W 36.6 - 9.0 W
15-Sep at Arkansas 52-0 W 39.2 - 4.1 W
22-Sep Florida Atlantic 40-7 W 38.4 - 5.3 W
29-Sep Ole Miss 33-14 W 23.8 - 16.2 W
13-Oct at Missouri 42-10 W 46.3 - 2.8 W
20-Oct at Tennessee 44-13 W 40.0 - 15.2 W
27-Oct Mississippi State 38-7 W 40.4 - 20.1 W
3-Nov at LSU 21-17 W 45.8 - 21.9 W
10-Nov Texas A&M 24-29 L 37.7 - 21.7 W
17-Nov Western Carolina 49-0 W 38.6 - 19.9 W
24-Nov Auburn 49-0 W 39.3 - 7.6 W
1-Dec vs. Georgia 32-28 W 43.8 - 22.9 W
7-Jan vs. Notre Dame 42-14 W 53.6 - 22.2 W
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
Points Per Game 38.7 13 10.9 1
Adj. Points Per Game 40.8 1 14.6 1

3. Amazing, then only excellent

The Alabama of the first seven games of 2012 might have been Peak Alabama. Despite a young defense that had to replace quite a few stars from the untouchable 2011 unit, the Tide defense seemed as good as ever through most of October. It allowed a damn strong Michigan offense (16th in Off. F/+) just 269 yards. It allowed 137 to Arkansas, 110 to Florida Atlantic, 218 to Ole Miss, and 129 to Missouri. Yes, quarterback injuries helped -- both Arkansas' Tyler Wilson and Missouri's James Franklin were out when their teams played Alabama -- but those yardage totals are just ridiculous.

The Alabama of the second half of the season was a bit of a different team, however.

Adj. Points Per Game (first 7 games): Alabama 38.9, Opponent 9.8 (plus-29.1)
Adj. Points Per Game (last 7 games): Alabama 42.7, Opponent 19.5 (plus-23.2)

The national scoring average was around 28 points per game in 2012, so we can see that the Alabama defense of the second half of the year was still almost nine points better than average, but it was worse. Key players got a bit banged up, and slowly but surely, opponents began to figure out how to move the ball a little bit, mostly through the air. LSU's Zach Mettenberger, Texas A&M's Johnny Manziel, and Georgia's Aaron Murray combined to complete 68 of 101 passes for 830 yards, four touchdowns and a pick; the glitches cost the Tide the A&M game and damn near cost them against LSU and Georgia, too.

Alabama's offense, improving every week, was able to overcome these lapses; and again, this was still, on average, a wonderful defense. But while greatness is hard enough, perfection is impossible to maintain.

(And yes, you can probably expect a "What were opponents doing differently late in the year?" post at some point soon at Football Study Hall.)

Offense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 31 4 6 3
RUSHING 16 4 3 5
PASSING 76 6 23 4
Standard Downs 9 10 10
Passing Downs 3 4 2
Redzone 4 4 6
Q1 Rk 6 1st Down Rk 6
Q2 Rk 5 2nd Down Rk 3
Q3 Rk 27 3rd Down Rk 6
Q4 Rk 3

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2013 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards Comp
Rate
TD INT Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
A.J. McCarron 6'4, 214 Sr. **** (5.9) 211 314 2,933 67.2% 30 3 22 6.5% 8.3
Blake Sims 6'0, 202 Jr. **** (5.8) 5 10 77 50.0% 0 0 1 9.1% 5.5
Phillip Ely


3 4 42 75.0% 1 0 0 0.0% 10.5
Cooper Bateman 6'3, 215 Fr. **** (5.8)






Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
TD Adj.
POE
Eddie Lacy RB 204 1,322 6.5 5.3 17 +25.0
T.J. Yeldon RB 6'2, 218 So. ***** (6.1) 175 1,108 6.3 4.4 12 +20.3
Kenyan Drake RB 6'1, 201 So. **** (5.8) 42 281 6.7 5.8 5 +7.6
Blake Sims QB 6'0, 202 Jr. **** (5.8) 29 203 7.0 6.0 2 +4.7
AJ McCarron QB 6'4, 214 Sr. **** (5.9) 27 158 5.9 5.5 1 +2.6
Dee Hart RB 5'9, 187 So. ***** (6.1) 21 88 4.2 1.9 0 -0.7
Jalston Fowler RB 6'1, 250 Jr. **** (5.8) 11 85 7.7 3.7 0 +2.4
Altee Tenpenny RB 6'0, 212 Fr. **** (6.0)





Tyren Jones RB 5'9, 215 Fr. **** (6.0)





Alvin Kamara RB 5'10, 197 Fr. **** (6.0)





4. Sell out against the run, pray against the pass

It's not a coincidence that in two of Alabama's three close calls (LSU, A&M, Georgia), the Crimson Tide posted two of their three lowest rushing totals of the year. They gained just 122 yards on the ground against Texas A&M and 166 against LSU, and they underwent lengthy (for them) offensive droughts in each game. With last year's top three receivers returning, including the ridiculous Amari Cooper, the Alabama passing attack is terrifying. But in 2012, at least, the running game was even scarier.

At least the passing game was occasionally inefficient; the run game was as strong as almost any in the country. To have any chance of beating Alabama, you had to either sell out to stop the run (and allow for the possibility of getting picked apart by the pass), or you needed to take the Georgia route: dominate in special teams and gain most of your offensive yardage in about three drives.

Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Yds/
Target
Target
Rate
%SD Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Amari Cooper WR-X 6'1, 202 So. **** (6.0) 76 58 999 76.3% 13.1 24.2% 63.2% 13.1 193.6
Kevin Norwood WR-Z 6'2, 195 Sr. **** (5.9) 42 29 461 69.0% 11.0 13.4% 81.0% 10.0 89.3
Christion Jones WR-H 5'11, 185 Jr. NR 40 27 368 67.5% 9.2 12.7% 57.5% 9.2 71.3
Michael Williams TE 31 24 183 77.4% 5.9 9.9% 83.9% 6.4 35.5
Eddie Lacy RB 30 22 189 73.3% 6.3 9.6% 43.3% 5.7 36.6
Kenny Bell WR 6'1, 180 Sr. **** (5.8) 26 17 431 65.4% 16.6 8.3% 53.8% 16.6 83.5
T.J. Yeldon RB 6'2, 218 So. ***** (6.1) 15 11 131 73.3% 8.7 4.8% 60.0% 8.7 25.4
DeAndrew White WR 6'0, 190 Jr. **** (5.9) 12 8 105 66.7% 8.8 3.8% 66.7% 8.1 20.3
Marvin Shinn WR-X 11 6 42 54.5% 3.8 3.5% 27.3% 4.1 8.1
Cyrus Jones WR-H 5'10, 196 So. **** (5.9) 10 5 52 50.0% 5.2 3.2% 70.0% 4.7 10.1
Brian Vogler TE 6'7, 260 Jr. **** (5.8) 4 2 21 50.0% 5.3 1.3% 75.0% 5.2 4.1
Harrison Jones TE 6'4, 241 Jr. *** (5.7)








Malcolm Faciane TE 6'5, 267 So. **** (5.8)








Chris Black WR 5'11, 182 RSFr. **** (6.0)








O.J. Howard TE 6'6, 237 Fr. ***** (6.1)








ArDarius Stewart WR 6'1, 190 Fr. **** (6.0)








Robert Foster WR 6'3, 187 Fr. **** (6.0)








Raheem Falkins WR 6'4, 195 Fr. **** (5.8)








5. Amari Cooper is just unfair

Amari Cooper was the No. 6 wide receiver in the 2012 freshman class according to Rivals.com. Here are the stats produced by the five players above him in 2012:

  1. Dorial Green-Beckham, Missouri: 43 targets, 27 catches, 386 yards (9.0 per target)
  2. Stefon Diggs, Maryland: 80 targets, 54 catches, 848 yards (10.6 per target)
  3. Nelson Agholor, USC: 31 targets, 19 catches, 340 yards (11.0 per target)
  4. Thomas Johnson, Texas A&M: 38 targets, 30 catches, 339 yards (8.9 per target)
  5. Cayleb Jones, Texas: 5 targets, 2 catches, 35 yards (7.0 per target)

Jones was a non-factor, and Johnson pulled a strange disappearing act, then left A&M. But the top three players on the list were perfectly acceptable for true freshmen, and in Diggs' case, considering he was the only weapon on an offense that lost its starting quarterback seemingly every week of the season (it was so bad that a backup linebacker was starting at the end of the season, and the rumor was that Diggs himself would move to QB), he was just plain awesome. But unless you give Diggs quite a few degree-of-difficulty points (which would be justified), Amari Cooper was the most productive of the bunch. Because, you know, that's what Alabama needed: an overachiever.

Cooper is just awesome. His fundamentals are fantastic, especially for such a young player, and he's got all the high-end speed one needs. And he's got a lovely corps of receivers to complement him, including last year's No. 2-5 receivers and yet another incoming class of stud freshmen. SB Nation's research and analytics intern, Chris A. Brown, followed Alabama closely this spring and came away very impressed with true freshman tight end O.J. Howard, projecting him as a potential 500-yard receiver. Because, you know, that's what Alabama needs: a stud tight end to go with its stud receivers.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 137.8 3.59 4.29 49.5% 72.5% 12.6% 115.9 6.7% 2.8%
Rank 1 1 2 2 36 2 46 97 14
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Career Starts/Honors/Notes
Barrett Jones C 50 career starts; 2012 1st All-American
Chance Warmack LG 40 career starts; 2012 1st All-American
D.J. Fluker RT 36 career starts; 2012 2nd All-American
Anthony Steen RG 6'3, 309 Sr. *** (5.7) 25 career starts
Cyrus Kouandjio LT 6'6, 310 Jr. ***** (6.1) 14 career starts
Kellen Williams LT 6'3, 302 Sr. *** (5.7)
Austin Shepherd RT 6'5, 315 Jr. *** (5.7)
Chad Lindsay C 6'2, 302 Jr. *** (5.7)
Ryan Kelly C 6'5, 290 So. *** (5.7)
Arie Kouandjio LG 6'5, 315 So. **** (5.9)
Issac Luatua RG 6'2, 313 So. *** (5.7)
Brandon Greene LT 6'5, 307 RSFr. **** (5.8)
Alphonse Taylor LG 6'5, 335 RSFr. *** (5.7)
Leon Brown RT 6'6, 313 Jr. *** (5.6)
Grant Hill OL 6'6, 301 Fr. **** (6.0)

6. We probably shouldn't just assume the line will be amazing again

There's a chance you might be able to follow the stop-the-run script a bit easier in 2013. (Not easy, mind you, but easier.) Leading rusher Eddie Lacy is gone, as are three All-American linemen.

Yes, the new starters are potentially going to be just fine -- especially sophomore back T.J. Yeldon (hold onto the ball, T.J.) -- but the line was historically strong last year, and there's no guarantee it will be as good. Alabama has a new offensive line coach (former FIU head coach Mario Cristobal), and as strange as it sounds, Alabama hasn't recruited at quite as high a level at OL as it has in other units. Yes, former all-world recruit Cyrus Kouandjio is still in the mix, and yes, All-American Chance Warmack was, like a few of this year's probable starters, only a three-star recruit.

Still, if you're looking for cracks in Alabama's armor, it is at least feasible that the offensive line will be a little bit glitchy after its near-perfection last year. Lacy and Yeldon were almost never touched in the backfield and didn't have to make their first move until past the line of scrimmage. Those are luxuries Yeldon and company won't always have this time around.

T.J. Yeldon. Matthew Emmons, USA Today.

Defense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 1 1 2 1
RUSHING 1 1 1 1
PASSING 7 4 8 1
Standard Downs 1 2 1
Passing Downs 3 6 2
Redzone 7 18 2
Q1 Rk 1 1st Down Rk 1
Q2 Rk 1 2nd Down Rk 12
Q3 Rk 6 3rd Down Rk 2
Q4 Rk 13


Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 131.9 2.34 2.15 27.4% 59.5% 20.2% 135.6 6.5% 10.9%
Rank 3 5 7 1 17 48 17 16 9
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Ed Stinson DE 6'4, 292 Sr. **** (5.8) 14 25.0 3.7% 8.5 3 0 0 0 0
Damion Square DE 14 22.0 3.3% 4 3.5 0 1 0 1
Jesse Williams NG 13 22.0 3.3% 2.5 1 0 2 0 0
Jeoffrey Pagan DE 6'4, 290 Jr. **** (6.0) 14 16.5 2.5% 4 1.5 0 0 1 0
Quinton Dial DE 13 16.0 2.4% 5 1.5 0 0 0 0
Brandon Ivory NG 6'4, 310 Jr. *** (5.6) 13 14.5 2.2% 1 0 0 0 0 1
D.J. Pettway DL 13 5.5 0.8% 4 2.5 0 0 0 0
LaMichael Fanning DE 6'7, 270 So. **** (5.8) 8 3.5 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Darren Lake NG 6'3, 324 So. *** (5.6) 8 2.0 0.3% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Wilson Love NG 6'3, 286 So. *** (5.6)
Dalvin Tomlinson DE 6'2, 287 RSFr. **** (5.8)
Korren Kirven DE 6'5, 281 RSFr. **** (5.8)
Jonathan Allen DE 6'3, 263 Fr. ***** (6.1)

A'Shawn Robinson NG 6'4, 320 Fr. ***** (6.1)
Dee Liner DE 6'3, 281 Fr. **** (6.0)

Tim Williams DE 6'3, 235 Fr. **** (5.9)

Darius Paige NG 6'4, 314 Fr. **** (5.8)




Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
C.J. Mosley WILL 6'2, 232 Sr. **** (5.9) 14 86.5 12.9% 8 4 2 2 1 1
Trey Depriest MIKE 6'2, 245 So. **** (5.8) 14 44.5 6.6% 4 0 0 2 0 0
Nico Johnson WILL 14 39.0 5.8% 2 0 0 1 2 0
Adrian Hubbard SAM 6'6, 252 Jr. **** (5.8) 14 32.5 4.8% 11 7 0 1 3 0
Xzavier Dickson JACK 6'3, 265 Jr. **** (5.9) 14 22.5 3.3% 5 3.5 0 1 0 1
Denzel Devall JACK 6'2, 250 So. **** (5.8) 14 12.5 1.9% 3 2 0 0 0 1
Tyler Hayes LB 13 12.0 1.8% 0 0 0 1 0 0
Tana Patrick WILL 6'3, 238 Sr. **** (6.0) 14 11.0 1.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reggie Ragland MIKE 6'2, 259 So. **** (6.0) 11 6.5 1.0% 0 0 0 0 1 0
Dillon Lee LB 6'4, 242 So. **** (5.9) 8 1.0 0.1% 0 0 1 0 0 0
Ryan Anderson SAM 6'2, 255 RSFr. **** (5.9)

Reuben Foster LB 6'1, 244 Fr. ***** (6.1)






7. I'll say it again:

When you need only a couple out of a large handful of star freshmen to thrive, odds are on your side. Alabama's defensive line got thinned out pretty well by graduation; the defense suffered a bit when nose guard Jesse Williams was banged up, and now he and three others among last year's top seven linemen are gone. When you throw in the loss of weakside linebacker Nico Johnson, you see a front seven in need of at least a little replenishing.

You also see a front seven that welcomes nine four- and five-star freshmen and redshirt freshmen into the potential mix. The depth at tackle is still a little bit questionable, but I can't even pretend to worry about this front seven, especially not with Ed Stinson, C.J. Mosley, Trey Depriest, Adrian Hubbard, and Xzavier Dickson returning.

(Side note: It really feels like Mosley's been there about 11 years, doesn't it?)

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Vinnie Sunseri S 6'0, 210 Jr. *** (5.6) 14 44.5 6.6% 6 1.5 2 3 0 2
Dee Milliner CB 13 44.0 6.5% 4 1.5 2 20 1 1
Robert Lester S 14 36.0 5.3% 3.5 1.5 4 3 0 1
Deion Belue CB 5'11, 183 Sr. *** (5.6) 14 34.0 5.1% 6.5 0 2 7 1 1
Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix S 6'1, 208 Jr. ***** (6.1) 14 30.0 4.5% 0.5 0 5 4 1 0
Nick Perry S 6'1, 212 Sr. **** (5.8) 14 28.0 4.2% 2 1 0 2 0 1
John Fulton CB 6'0, 186 Sr. **** (5.9) 12 13.5 2.0% 0 0 0 5 0 0
Landon Collins S 6'0, 215 So. ***** (6.1) 14 12.5 1.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Geno Smith CB 6'0, 186 So. **** (5.9) 13 6.5 1.0% 0.5 0 0 2 0 0
Bradley Sylve DB 5'11, 180 So. **** (5.8) 12 5.0 0.7% 0 0 0 2 0 0
Jabriel Washington DB 5'11, 185 So. *** (5.7) 8 1.0 0.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maurice Smith DB 6'0, 180 Fr. **** (5.9)






8. One pressure point

I will say this, however: Cornerback is a bit of a concern. The front seven is so consistently strong at leveraging plays toward the middle of the field and gang-tackling. It is ridiculously difficult to run the ball on the Tide, and with the speed of their linebackers, they swallow whole most short passes, too.

But this system puts a lot of trust in its corners and isolates them downfield quite often. Plus, while Kirby Smart's blitzes are consistently well-timed, the standard four-man pass rush is typically only good, not great. (As Chris A. Brown put it, there isn't a "passionate pass-rusher" up front this year, just as there really hasn't been in previous years. That's not really how the system is designed.) So there's a chance that, at times, quarterbacks will have some time to look downfield.

And when they do, will a corner unit of Deion Belue (the new No. 1, taking over for Dee Milliner, one of the best play-making corners in the country last year) and either Geno Smith, John Fulton, or a newbie be able to handle what are some pretty strong No. 2 receivers in the SEC (LSU's Odell Beckham, et al)? And against more spread-out attacks like A&M's or Ole Miss', will the defensive backfield be deep enough with strong cover men?

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Cody Mandell 6'4, 213 Sr. 50 44.3 6 13 19 64.0%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB TB%
Cade Foster 6'1, 224 Sr. 99 63.5 46 46.5%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Jeremy Shelley 69-69 11-11 100.0% 0-0 N/A
Cade Foster 6'1, 224 Sr. 0-0 0-0 N/a 4-9 44.4%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Cyrus Jones KR 5'10, 196 So. 10 25.0 0
Christion Jones KR 5'11, 185 Jr. 8 26.6 1
Christion Jones PR 5'11, 185 Jr. 21 10.1 0
Cyrus Jones PR 5'10, 196 So. 8 7.6 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 28
Net Punting 18
Net Kickoffs 22
Touchback Pct 27
Field Goal Pct 45
Kick Returns Avg 23
Punt Returns Avg 46

2013 Schedule & Projection Factors

2013 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
31-Aug vs. Virginia Tech 23
14-Sep at Texas A&M 13
21-Sep Colorado State 117
28-Sep Ole Miss 29
5-Oct Georgia State 125
12-Oct at Kentucky 90
19-Oct Arkansas 37
26-Oct Tennessee 44
9-Nov LSU 3
16-Nov at Mississippi State 51
23-Nov Chattanooga NR
30-Nov at Auburn 59
Five-Year F/+ Rk 1
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 1
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* +14 / +13.6
TO Luck/Game 0.1
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 12 (6, 6)
Yds/Pt Margin** -11.4

9. I mean … are you going to pick against them?

Alabama will need some luck again, I'm sure, to reel in a fourth title in five years. And the Tide will certainly have to prove themselves all over again at offensive line and cornerback. And at kicker, too, for that matter. And yes, if you're betting on Alabama versus the field, the smarter bet is probably on the field.

That said, are you really going to pick against the Tide? If they make the BCS title game again (and really, that's the toughest part), do you really think that, as things stand on paper in early June, Ohio State is a good bet to take down the Tide? Oregon with its new head coach? Stanford? Notre Dame? Louisville?

Our contrarian urges make us want to pick somebody different. But at this stage, before random injuries and bounces of a pointy-ball effect, Alabama is an easy No. 1, one of the easiest No. 1s I can remember.

10. SEC balance of power

This marks the end of our SEC previews. As has been done for each conference, let's wrap things up with a look at how I perceive the conference's balance of power at this point in the offseason:

Tier 1
1. Alabama

Tier 2
2. LSU
3. Texas A&M
4. Georgia
5. South Carolina
6. Florida

Tier 3
7. Ole Miss
8. Vanderbilt
9. Missouri
10. Mississippi State
11. Arkansas
12. Tennessee
13. Auburn

Tier 4
14. Kentucky

More from SB Nation:

Spencer Hall interviews Baylor head coach Art Briles

A word with Kevin Sumlin on recruiting and video games

LSU will be … way better than we think?

What’s the point of playing Texas?

National recruiting coverage

Today’s college football news headlines

In This Article

Teams
Players
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.