2013 Pittsburgh football's 10 things to know: Holding steady in an awesome city

Justin K. Aller

Pitt has mastered the art of overachieving in unimpressive fashion, but has weathered a series of awkward coaching changes. Can that continue after quite a bit of turnover and roster issues? For more Panthers, visit Cardiac Hill.

Confused? Check out the glossary here.

1. The city of Pittsburgh is awesome

I've been attached to the city of Pittsburgh since I randomly (and foolishly) adopted the Pirates in the late-1980s because I loved the Bonds-Van Slyke-Bonilla outfield. I discovered the wonder that is Primanti Bros. sandwiches (and, as part of Pittsburgh initiation, got lost in the ridiculous downtown system of highways) in 1999, attended my first (and last) Pirates game at Three Rivers Stadium in 2000, knocked out trips to eight Strip District bars (and Primanti's) in about 12 hours during a one-day visit in 2001, and attended my first Pirates game at PNC Park in 2002. The city is staid and scenic, innovative (in ways that Detroit is not) and awash in tradition. It is one of America's most underrated cities, and to top it off, the University of Pittsburgh's football program just scored some major points with me by naming its practice fields after the late Beano Cook. (Side note: I also love Beano Cook.)

In other words, I am sentimental toward the city and most things associated with it. But I promise you, I haven't put a pro-Pittsburgh add-on in my numbers. There is no "If school's name starts with 'Pit,' add 10 percent to all of their totals" qualifier. That Pitt ranked 15th in the F/+ rankings in 2008, 12th in 2009, and 24th in 2010, and that the Panthers are projected a healthy 35th and 8-4 in the Football Outsiders Almanac 2013 have nothing to do with how beautiful PNC Park is, I promise.

2. Continuity is stronger than it probably should be

Despite two straight 6-7 records, Pittsburgh's five-year ratings are strong, powered in part by an underrated 2008-10 run but also by the fact that the Panthers, while not great, were not that bad in 2011-12, clocking in at 47th and 51st, respectively. Considering the turmoil on the sidelines, that's impressive.

  • Dave Wannstedt -- who, himself, may have been a bit underrated at Pitt considering he engineered three straight top-25 performances (according to F/+) and two of only three nine-win seasons at the school in the last three decades -- was let go at the end of 2010. Phil Bennett was the interim coach in the 2010 BBVA Compass Bowl.
  • Miami (Ohio)'s Mike Haywood was hired in December 2010, then fired two weeks later after a domestic violence arrest. (The charges were later dismissed.)
  • Tulsa's Todd Graham took over in 2011, then left for Arizona State after a single 6-6 season. Keith Patterson was the interim coach in the 2011 BBVA Compass Bowl.
  • Wisconsin offensive coordinator Paul Chryst then took over. Including interims, he was the sixth person to hold the position of "Pittsburgh head coach" over a span of 16 games. And he was still the head coach in the 2012 BBVA Compass Bowl!

Pitt now moves to the ACC perhaps in better shape than we think. Perceptions were already less positive than reality before Wannstedt left. At 9-4, Pitt indeed ranked 15th in F/+ in 2008, ahead of 10-3 Oregon and 10-3 Georgia. At 10-3, Pitt indeed ranked 12th in F/+ in 2009, ahead of 10-3 Oregon, 10-3 Wisconsin, and a 12-1 Cincinnati team that barely beat the Panthers in a late-season classic. And in 2010, when Wannstedt was let go, Pitt still ranked 24th in F/+, ahead of 11-2 Michigan State and 13-1 Nevada. The Panthers fell victim to a 1-3 record in one-possession games that year but were still competitive and interesting (well, maybe not aesthetically, but you know what I mean) overall. And at the very least, the Panthers maintained a top-50 level recently.

Heading into the first Year 2 of a Pitt coach's tenure since 2006, Pitt might once again be in better shape than we thought. An experienced defense could offset a step backwards on offense, and while 35th is indeed a little aggressive for my tastes, anything below about 50th is probably too conservative.

2012 Schedule & Results

Record: 6-7 | Adj. Record: 9-4 | Final F/+ Rk: 51
Date Opponent Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L
1-Sep Youngstown State 17-31 L 31.0 - 36.4 L
6-Sep at Cincinnati 10-34 L 30.2 - 30.0 W
15-Sep Virginia Tech 35-17 W 44.8 - 32.2 W
22-Sep Gardner-Webb 55-10 W 35.2 - 17.5 W
5-Oct at Syracuse 13-14 L 22.3 - 22.2 W
13-Oct Louisville 35-45 L 33.6 - 39.6 L
20-Oct at Buffalo 20-6 W 23.4 - 21.2 W
27-Oct Temple 47-17 W 42.1 - 24.0 W
3-Nov at Notre Dame 26-29 L 24.7 - 25.4 L
9-Nov at Connecticut 17-24 L 39.1 - 36.1 W
24-Nov Rutgers 27-6 W 35.9 - 14.4 W
1-Dec at South Florida 27-3 W 24.6 - 4.1 W
5-Jan vs. Ole Miss 17-38 L 15.1 - 24.1 L
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
Points Per Game 26.6 77 21.1 23
Adj. Points Per Game 30.9 44 25.2 40

3. And then the defense clicked

One reason for optimism in 2013: This defense that will have to pick up the slack for the offense this fall, already got used to doing so over the last couple of months of the season. After allowing an unacceptable 5.4 yards per play to Youngstown State in the shocking season opener, then allowing 7.9 to Cincinnati and 5.7 to Virginia Tech (almost as bad as allowing 5.4 to YSU), the defense began to figure things out, only twice playing at a below average level after September 15.

Adj. Points Per Game (first 3 games): Pitt 35.3, Opponent 32.9 (plus-2.4)
Adj. Points Per Game (next 10 games): Pitt 29.6, Opponent 22.9 (plus-6.7)

The Panthers held mostly steady against decent offenses (Notre Dame averaged 5.0 per play) and dominated some lesser ones (Rutgers averaged 3.3, USF 2.4); the defense even did its job in the bowl loss versus Ole Miss, holding the Rebels to just 4.5. When Pitt struggled late, it was usually because of an offense that is getting a forced makeover this fall.

Offense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 71 49 47 50
RUSHING 94 66 76 61
PASSING 46 41 33 46
Standard Downs 62 59 65
Passing Downs 29 26 30
Redzone 43 37 54
Q1 Rk 30 1st Down Rk 41
Q2 Rk 37 2nd Down Rk 46
Q3 Rk 71 3rd Down Rk 29
Q4 Rk 14

4. Not exactly run-first

Both Paul Chryst and offensive coordinator Joe Rudolph were Wisconsin employees before the move to Western Pennsylvania. Hell, quarterbacks coach Brooks Bollinger is a former Wisconsin quarterback. And while Pitt produced both Dan Marino and Larry Fitzgerald, it's known as much or more for running than passing. With Ray Graham and Rushel Shell in the backfield, signs pointed to a run-first attack in 2012. But the running game was only mediocre, and either by design or necessity, the Panthers actually hovered pretty close to the national averages, running 64 percent of the time on standard downs (four percent above the national average) but passing 29 percent on passing downs (nearly five percent below the average). And when there was magic (not really a frequent occurrence), it was just as likely to happen on second- or third-and-long as on run-friendly downs.

With Graham and Shell, quarterback Tino Sunseri, and three of the top four from the receiving corps gone, Pitt will have no choice but to go for a clean start and an opportunity to install whatever identity it these coaches want to install; what is that?

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2013 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards Comp
Rate
TD INT Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Tino Sunseri 256 393 3,288 65.1% 21 3 38 8.8% 7.0
Trey Anderson 6'0, 195 Jr. ** (5.1) 2 2 53 100.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 26.5
Tom Savage
(2010 Rutgers)
6'5, 230 Sr. **** (5.9) 43 83 521 51.8% 2 3 14 14.4% 4.4
Chad Voytik 6'1, 210 RSFr. **** (5.9)






Tra'Von Chapman 6'2, 200 Fr. **** (5.8)






5. Tino Sunseri got hit a lot

Tino Sunseri was the perfect exemplification of Pitt as a whole: more skilled than you probably think, with very obvious, blatant flaws. In 2012, Sunseri completed almost two-thirds of his passes and threw seven times more touchdowns than interceptions. That's fantastic by any standard, and it came despite all of the system changes that he endured in his sophomore and junior seasons.

But wow, did he take sacks. He got better -- he took an incredible 60 sacks in 2011 with a sack rate of 13.5 percent -- but he still hung in the pocket to a fault, patient to a degree of insanity. But the good outweighed the bad in the Pitt passing game; the Panthers ranked a respectable 41st in Passing S&P+, and on passing downs that patience paid off. There was method behind Sunseri's mannequin-esque qualities, and he will be more difficult to replace than we might assume.

That said, Pitt has some intriguing candidates, don't they? Rutgers transfer Tom Savage was good enough to play as a true freshman in New Jersey, though he struggled over time, playing poorly as a sophomore in 2010 and losing his job in 2011. But he had a strong pedigree at one point, and he appears to be holding off four-star redshirt freshman Chad Voytik for nowIf Tra'von Chapman remains with the team after some recent issues, he could be an interesting candidate in the future.

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
TD Adj.
POE
Ray Graham RB 222 1,042 4.7 5.6 11 +5.9
Rushel Shell RB 141 641 4.5 4.4 4 -3.9
Tino Sunseri QB 30 96 3.2 2.1 1 -3.4
Isaac Bennett RB 5'11, 205 Jr. ** (5.4) 29 141 4.9 3.9 3 +0.0
Malcolm Crockett RB 5'10, 205 So. *** (5.5) 12 50 4.2 2.8 0 -2.2
James Conner RB 6'2, 230 Fr. *** (5.7)





Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Yds/
Target
Target
Rate
%SD Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Devin Street WR 6'4, 195 Sr. ** (5.4) 101 73 975 72.3% 9.7 26.4% 63.4% 9.7 138.7
Mike Shanahan WR 86 62 983 72.1% 11.4 22.5% 54.7% 11.4 139.9
Ray Graham RB 49 36 340 73.5% 6.9 12.8% 46.9% 6.6 48.4
Cameron Saddler WR 27 16 229 59.3% 8.5 7.1% 40.7% 8.8 32.6
Drew Carswell TE 23 13 163 56.5% 7.1 6.0% 56.5% 7.1 23.2
Rushel Shell RB 17 9 103 52.9% 6.1 4.5% 29.4% 4.0 14.7
J.P. Holtz TE 6'4, 245 So. *** (5.6) 16 13 173 81.3% 10.8 4.2% 87.5% 14.6 24.6
Isaac Bennett RB 5'11, 205 Jr. ** (5.4) 15 8 78 53.3% 5.2 3.9% 46.7% 4.9 11.1
Ed Tinker WR 6'2, 195 Sr. ** (5.4) 12 5 68 41.7% 5.7 3.1% 33.3% 5.3 9.7
Ronald Jones WR 5'8, 170 Jr. ** (5.4) 12 7 66 58.3% 5.5 3.1% 75.0% 4.7 9.4
Hubie Graham TE 9 7 61 77.8% 6.8 2.4% 55.6% 6.5 8.7
Manasseh Garner
(2011 Wisconsin)
TE 6'2, 230 Jr. *** (5.5) 2 2 45 100.0% 22.5 0.6% 0.0% 0.0 0.0
Kevin Weatherspoon WR 5'10, 175 Jr. *** (5.6)








Chris Wuestner WR 6'2, 205 RSFr. NR








Tyler Boyd WR 6'2, 185 Fr. **** (5.9)







Scott Orndoff TE 6'5, 255 Fr. *** (5.7)








6. The fleecing of the skill positions

I can talk all I want about how Pitt has perhaps been better than you thought over the past few years, but it's hard to get too excited about the offensive two-deep this time around. There are a lot of new pieces playing major roles. The Panthers do still have Devin Street, and that's a very good thing -- he caught a combined 21 passes for 241 yards against Syracuse and Louisville, then caught six for 140 against Temple. He is a legitimately solid No. 1 receiver who averaged nearly 10.0 yards per target last season.

The problem comes in everything after Street. The No. 2 and No. 3 wideouts are gone, as is tight end Drew Carswell. Sophomore tight end J.P. Holtz was excellent in limited opportunities last year, and junior tight end and Wisconsin transfer Manasseh Garner joins the team as well, so that's something. But returning wide receivers not named Street combined to catch just 12 of 24 passes for 134 yards (fewer than Street had vs. Temple) last year. There is potential in players like true freshman Tyler Boyd, but you'd like to have a few more proven quantities heading into the fall.

And of course, this says nothing of a running game that must replace 28 carries per game in the backfield and an all-Big East center up front. Ray Graham graduated, and star freshman Rushel Shell transferred, changed his mind, and ended up at a (former) rival school anyway. Shell was a four-star recruit, and he was certainly fine last year, but he was hardly irreplaceable. Isaac Bennett and Malcolm Crockett have both had their moments in camp, but again, they have proven almost nothing on the field. They'll be running behind a line that does return four players with starting experience (54 career starts) but was only average last year and loses center Ryan Turnley.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 101.6 2.66 3.20 34.8% 59.5% 19.5% 68.5 9.2% 9.3%
Rank 66 101 62 107 100 73 109 117 101
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Career Starts/Honors/Notes
Ryan Turnley C 26 career starts; 2012 2nd All-Big East
Cory King LG 6'6, 325 Sr. *** (5.5) 18 career starts
Ryan Schlieper RG 6'5, 310 Sr. *** (5.5) 16 career starts
Chris Jacobson LG 13 career starts
Matt Rotheram RG 6'6, 340 Jr. *** (5.7) 13 career starts
Juantez Hollins LT 6'5, 330 Sr. *** (5.5) 7 career starts
Arthur Doakes RG 5 career starts
Zenel Demhasaj RT
Shane Johnson LG 6'5, 330 Jr. *** (5.6)
T.J. Clemmings RT 6'6, 305 Jr. **** (5.8)
Artie Rowell C 6'2, 305 So. *** (5.5)
Adam Bisnowaty LT 6'6, 300 RSFr. **** (5.8)
Gabe Roberts C 6'5, 305 RSFr. ** (5.4)
John Guy RT 6'7, 285 RSFr. ** (5.4)
Dorian Johnson OL 6'5, 290 Fr. ***** (6.1)

Defense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 17 60 73 53
RUSHING 32 75 82 77
PASSING 20 46 73 38
Standard Downs 74 98 63
Passing Downs 38 41 38
Redzone 47 65 38
Q1 Rk 95 1st Down Rk 45
Q2 Rk 31 2nd Down Rk 24
Q3 Rk 40 3rd Down Rk 90
Q4 Rk 63

7. Bend … bend … bend…

Pitt's defense was nothing if not flexible last year. After the aforementioned early struggles, the Panthers rounded into shape as a bend-don't-break outfit, minimizing big plays and closing out drives well on passing downs despite a mediocre pass rush. They were good at taking advantage of opponent mistakes, and in college football, offenses tend to make a few mistakes.

Depending on the status of its leading returning linebacker, Pitt should return enough talent to sustain most of its second-half gains from last year. The secondary probably won't be nearly as lucky in the hands department (Jason Hendricks and K'Waun Williams picked off 10 of 15 defensed passes, with is unsustainably high) but should remain interesting and aggressive. And the Panthers still have a star at tackle.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 98.9 2.80 2.48 36.2% 68.3% 20.8% 95.7 5.2% 6.0%
Rank 65 41 14 34 64 42 69 44 71
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Aaron Donald DT 6'0, 285 Sr. *** (5.7) 12 53.0 7.6% 18.5 5.5 0 2 1 0
Shayne Hale DE 10 29.5 4.2% 9.5 3 0 0 1 2
Tyrone Ezell NT 6'4, 305 Sr. *** (5.7) 12 28.0 4.0% 7 3.5 0 1 0 0
Bryan Murphy DE 6'3, 255 Jr. **** (5.8) 13 21.0 3.0% 4.5 2 0 1 0 0
T.J. Clemmings DE 8 16.5 2.4% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Devin Cook DE 6'4, 255 So. *** (5.5) 13 12.5 1.8% 8 1 0 0 2 0
Khaynin Mosley-Smith NT 6'0, 305 Jr. **** (5.8) 13 6.5 0.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jack Lippert DE 6'4, 260 Sr. **** (5.8) 2 4.0 0.6% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Darryl Render DT 6'2, 285 So. *** (5.7) 11 4.0 0.6% 1.5 0 0 1 0 0
LaQuentin Smith DE 6'2, 275 Jr. *** (5.5) 7 2.5 0.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
David Durham DE 6'1, 255 Jr. *** (5.6)

Luke Maclean DE 6'3, 250 Fr. *** (5.7)
Justin Moody DE 6'3, 265 Fr. *** (5.6)
Shakir Soto DE 6'3, 255 Fr. *** (5.5)
Tyrique Jarrett NT 6'3, 340 Fr. *** (5.5)






8. Aaron Donald is still here

I'm not sure how Aaron Donald still has eligibility remaining; he is the prototypical "16th year senior" in my mind, even though he didn't really begin to make an impact until his sophomore season. Regardless, he has recorded 16.5 sacks and 34.5 tackles for loss in the last two years, an incredible total. And his 53.0 tackles were third on the team, more than were recorded by the leading linebacker. You can build around a weapon like that.

At 6'0, 285, Donald is quick if perhaps a bit undersized; while Pitt's line stats suggest the linebackers pretty culpable for a good portion of the Panthers' poor rushing defense, it's probably safe to assume that Pitt could still stand up to blocks a bit better, especially in short-yardage situations. Having play-makers like Donald, senior nose Tyrone Ezell, and exciting sophomore end Devin Cook is great; but it's better if you're not also a sieve when not making plays in the backfield.

Pitt's run defense needs help all around, especially if linebacker Todd Thomas doesn't get things straightened out. Thomas briefly quit at the beginning of fall camp, and his status is unclear at the moment. If nothing else, however, the pass defense should remain solid, especially if Cook becomes more of a force in the pass rush.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Todd Thomas WLB 6'2, 230 Jr. **** (5.9) 9 49.5 7.1% 1.5 1.5 1 5 0 0
Eric Williams SLB 13 40.5 5.8% 4.5 1 1 2 0 2
Shane Gordon MLB 6'1, 230 Sr. *** (5.6) 10 38.5 5.5% 6 1.5 0 6 0 0
Joe Trebitz MLB 11 22.0 3.2% 0 0 0 0 0 1
Ejuan Price (2011) WLB 6'0, 230 So. *** (5.5) 13 22.0 3.1% 6.5 4 0 0 0 0
Nicholas Grigsby WLB 6'1, 220 So. **** (5.8) 12 21.5 3.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dan Mason LB 5 20.0 2.9% 3.5 1.5 0 1 0 0
Manny Williams LB 6 18.0 2.6% 1 0 0 3 0 0
Anthony Gonzalez SLB 6'3, 225 Jr. *** (5.7) 9 9.0 1.3% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Emanuel Rackard LB 6'0, 235 Sr. NR 9 2.5 0.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bam Bradley SLB 6'2, 230 RSFr. *** (5.6)
Mike Caprara MLB 6'0, 215 RSFr. ** (5.4)

Matt Galambos LB 6'2, 215 Fr. *** (5.6)






Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jason Hendricks SS 6'0, 190 Sr. ** (5.3) 13 74.5 10.7% 3.5 0 6 4 0 0
Jarred Holley SS 13 59.0 8.5% 1 0 2 4 0 1
K'Waun Williams CB 5'10, 195 Sr. *** (5.5) 12 41.0 5.9% 2.5 0 4 1 0 0
Andrew Taglianetti SS 13 32.0 4.6% 0 0 0 2 1 0
Lafayette Pitts CB 5'11, 195 So. *** (5.7) 13 29.5 4.2% 0 0 1 9 1 1
Cullen Christian CB 6'0, 195 Jr. **** (5.9) 12 12.5 1.8% 0 1.5 0 1 0 0
Ray Vinopal FS 5'10, 200 Jr. ** (5.4) 13 11.0 1.6% 1.5 1 0 0 0 0
Jahmahl Pardner CB 5'11, 175 RSFr. *** (5.5) 3 2.5 0.4% 1 1 0 0 1 0
E.J. Banks DB 5'11, 190 Sr. *** (5.7) 5 1.0 0.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trenton Coles CB 6'3, 175 RSFr. *** (5.5)
Ryan Lewis S 6'0, 195 RSFr. *** (5.5)






9. Ball skills galore

Pitt defensed 58 passes last year; the Panthers ranked only 59th in the category, but considering pace and the fact that opponents didn't feel the need to pass with any particularly high frequency, that's a pretty healthy total. And while two starters are gone in the secondary, the return of Hendricks, Williams, and corner Lafayette Pitts should ensure another solid level of activity. Pitts held his own as a freshman, defensing 10 passes to 29.5 overall tackles (a ratio that, as I always say, suggests either strong aggressiveness or poor tackling), though he was quite a bit less lucky, snagging only one of his 10 PDs for a pick.

Michigan transfers Cullen Christian and Ray Vinopal were only bit players as sophomores, but the depth here is pretty good. And at the linebacker position, Shane Gordon and Thomas were both pretty solid in pass defense (and shaky against the run). Seal up some of the leaky run defense, and the overall product improves pretty quickly.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Matt Yoklic 6'4, 220 Sr. 61 41.8 6 10 19 47.5%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB TB%
Kevin Harper 70 58.5 12 17.1%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Kevin Harper 40-40 13-16 81.3% 7-11 63.6%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Lafayette Pitts KR 5'11, 195 So. 30 24.3 0
Cameron Saddler KR 6 19.7 0
Cameron Saddler PR 17 7.4 0
Ronald Jones PR 5'8, 170 Jr. 4 14.8 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 51
Net Punting 103
Net Kickoffs 107
Touchback Pct 110
Field Goal Pct 54
Kick Returns Avg 43
Punt Returns Avg 39

2013 Schedule & Projection Factors

2013 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
2-Sep Florida State 19
14-Sep New Mexico 121
21-Sep at Duke 88
28-Sep Virginia 71
12-Oct at Virginia Tech 23
19-Oct Old Dominion NR
26-Oct at Navy 87
2-Nov at Georgia Tech 32
9-Nov Notre Dame 13
16-Nov North Carolina 29
23-Nov at Syracuse 54
29-Nov Miami 25
Five-Year F/+ Rk 23
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 41
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* +12 / +11.1
TO Luck/Game 0.4
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 12 (5, 7)
Yds/Pt Margin** -1.0

10. A nice schedule if you're good enough

Pretend for a moment that Pittsburgh is indeed a top-30 or top-35 team in 2013. With so much change on the offense, that might be too ambitious, but if the Panthers reach that level, this schedule sets up nicely. Of five projected top-30 opponents, four visit Heinz Field; this is a lovely "Welcome to the ACC" schedule, though it will be accompanied by a pretty rough slate next season.

I'm not completely ruling out the thought of Pitt upsetting Florida State on the season's opening Monday night, but even if/when that doesn't happen, the Panthers should return to bowl eligibility by holding serve against decent teams and beating bad ones on the road.

Considering all of the recent turnover and turmoil -- drama which, with Shell's transfer, Thomas' quitting and non-quitting, and Chapman's arrest, hasn't completely abated yet -- simply maintaining top-50 form in Paul Chryst's second season (and Pitt's first in a new league) should probably be considered a bit of a victory. Pitt has mastered the art of overachieving in unimpressive fashion, and while the bar will eventually be raised, one more year of treading water wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.

More from SB Nation:

The developing Johnny Manziel autographs scandal

Bill Connelly’s ACC preview series is underway

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww look at Tulsa’s new golden retriever

Official Coaches Poll Top 25 is out, led by Alabama and the SEC

Projecting every 2013 college football conference race

Today’s college football news headlines

In This Article

Teams
Players
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.