2013 Georgia Tech's 10 things to know: Where's the Wreck headed under Johnson?

Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

After showing extra promise in his first two seasons, Paul Johnson has basically settled into a Chan Gailey groove, averaging right around seven wins per season. Can a new defensive coordinator improve a unit that held back another fun, successful Flexbone offense? For more Jackets, visit From the Rumble Seat.

Confused? Check out the glossary here.

1. So where's this thing going?

So let's summarize every piece you've probably read about Georgia Tech over the last nine months:

  1. They still run the option.
  2. The defense stunk last year (and the defensive coordinator got fired, then insulted his former boss).
  3. Tech is not lighting the recruiting world afire.
  4. The Yellow Jackets beat USC, which was pretty cool.

All of these things are true, of course. Tech will always run the option under Paul Johnson, Al Groh did fire some shots after his firing, the Yellow Jackets do rank 69th in two-year recruiting, and they did indeed beat USC because of some combination of quality defense, wind, and actually wanting to be there. But how much are these quick-hit story lines associated with the long-term?

When Paul Johnson took over for Chan Gailey in Atlanta, Tech had won seven games in five of the previous six seasons. Since a 1-10 abomination in 1994, the Ramblin' Wreck were consistently good but rarely a national threat. The end of the George O'Leary era was exciting -- Tech spent parts of four straight seasons (1998-01) ranked in the top 15, but Gailey firmly entrenched himself in Glen Mason Territory, to the point where a seven-win season for anybody should just be called a Gailey.

Johnson took over, and things got interesting. Tech won nine games in 2008, then won 11 games and the ACC in 2009. Tech's No. 13 finish that year was its highest since 1994 and third-highest since 1966, Bobby Dodd's final season. He was proving that the Flexbone could be a winning approach at the BCS level, which was fun.

But since then, Johnson has pulled some Gaileys. Tech won six games in 2010, eight in 2011, and seven in 2012. Tech has been a top-50 team the last two years, but that's actually sub-Gailey. Is the Johnson era leading to something bigger, or is the status quo a fun, mostly successful offense that can't play from behind and a sketchy defense that leads to a few deficits?

2012 Schedule & Results

Record: 7-7 | Adj. Record: 8-6 | Final F/+ Rk: 49
Date Opponent Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L
3-Sep at Virginia Tech 17-20 L 26.5 - 24.2 W
8-Sep Presbyterian 59-3 W 40.7 - 20.5 W
15-Sep Virginia 56-20 W 61.3 - 23.9 W
22-Sep Miami 36-42 L 28.3 - 34.5 L
29-Sep Middle Tennessee 28-49 L 28.1 - 41.3 L
6-Oct at Clemson 31-47 L 47.7 - 30.2 W
20-Oct Boston College 37-17 W 32.6 - 37.5 L
27-Oct BYU 17-41 L 20.8 - 31.5 L
3-Nov at Maryland 33-13 W 48.2 - 30.3 W
10-Nov at North Carolina 68-50 W 48.4 - 33.5 W
17-Nov Duke 42-24 W 26.3 - 26.8 L
24-Nov at Georgia 10-42 L 29.1 - 37.2 L
1-Dec vs. Florida State 15-21 L 40.6 - 22.9 W
31-Dec vs. USC 21-7 W 27.3 - 6.5 W
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
Points Per Game 33.6 34 28.3 65
Adj. Points Per Game 36.1 13 28.6 68

2. Start well, finish well (and let's just ignore the in-between)

The Yellow Jackets began the season with a competitive loss at Virginia Tech and solid thrashings of two inferior opponents, Presbyterian and Virginia. And they finished with a competitive loss in the conference title game and a bowl win over the preseason No. 1 team.

Everything about that sounds pretty decent. All we have to do is forget the other nine games, in which Tech's defense fell apart and the offense couldn't pick up all of the slack.

Adj. Points Per Game (first 3 games): Georgia Tech 42.8, Opponent 22.9 (plus-19.9)
Adj. Points Per Game (next 9 games): Georgia Tech 34.4, Opponent 33.6 (plus-0.8)
Adj. Points Per Game (postseason): Georgia Tech 34.0, Opponent 14.7 (plus-19.3)

Tech unlocked odd achievements like "lose by 21 points to a Sun Belt school but still win your division" (well, they won the division because Miami was banned from the postseason) and "allow 50 points and win by more than two touchdowns," so there was certainly some fun scattered throughout the midsection of the season while the Yellow Jackets were losing six of 10.

Following three straight below-average showings to bad defensive performances against Miami, MTSU, and Clemson, defensive coordinator Al Groh was let go, and the defense didn't improve much in his absence, at least until the postseason, in which Tech hung tight with Florida State before knocking off a flustered USC.

Offense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 35 15 5 23
RUSHING 4 7 5 13
PASSING 119 13 43 7
Standard Downs 12 3 23
Passing Downs 30 31 29
Redzone 7 1 35
Q1 Rk 20 1st Down Rk 13
Q2 Rk 8 2nd Down Rk 13
Q3 Rk 24 3rd Down Rk 18
Q4 Rk 15

3. The offense still works

For all the talk about poor recruiting, and for all the talk about consistently below-par defenses, let's not forget one simple thing: the offense works.

Tech's offense briefly tumbled in 2010 following the loss of stars like Jonathan Dwyer and Demaryius Thomas from the 2009 conference title team. But the Yellow Jackets' No. 49 ranking in Off. F/+ that season was the exception to the rule; Tech has ranked between sixth and 29th in the category in Paul Johnson's other four seasons. His stuff works, and it's fun to have it around at the BCS level.

The Flexbone requires a load of running backs, at least two quarterbacks, at least one play-action weapon lined up wide, and a potentially smaller, more agile line adept at cut blocking and taking advantage of bigger opponents' leverage up front. Without rockstar recruiting rankings, Johnson has been able to consistently put that together.

And nothing should change in 2013. There are some question marks at receiver, simply because of inexperience, but I don't see why Tech would rank any lower than about 25th in Off. F/+ this fall.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2013 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards Comp
Rate
TD INT Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Tevin Washington 75 133 1,222 56.4% 8 4 9 6.3% 8.3
Vad Lee 6'1, 215 So. *** (5.6) 27 56 596 48.2% 4 3 5 8.2% 9.3
Tim Byerly 6'0, 212 So. ** (5.4)






Justin Thomas 5'11, 179 RSFr. **** (5.8)






Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
TD Adj.
POE
Tevin Washington QB 168 731 4.4 6.8 20 -5.4
David Sims BB 6'0, 225 Sr. *** (5.7) 135 612 4.5 2.0 4 +0.9
Zach Laskey BB 6'1, 214 Jr. ** (5.4) 133 697 5.2 3.4 1 +4.2
Vad Lee QB 6'1, 215 So. *** (5.6) 91 574 6.3 8.0 9 +14.5
Orwin Smith AB 79 682 8.6 8.9 5 +27.6
Robert Godhigh AB 5'7, 190 Sr. NR 54 429 7.9 5.5 4 +16.1
B.J. Bostic AB 5'11, 173 Jr. **** (5.8) 34 212 6.2 3.3 0 +3.9
Tony Zenon AB 5'8, 175 Jr. ** (5.4) 31 193 6.2 6.6 1 +2.6
Synjyn Days AB 6'2, 221 Jr. *** (5.7) 23 142 6.2 5.5 1 +3.6
Broderick Snoddy BB 5'9, 190 So. *** (5.6) 13 50 3.8 4.4 0 -2.1
Matt Connors BB 6'0, 200 Jr. NR 7 51 7.3 12.8 2 +1.9
Deon Hill AB 6'0, 202 Jr. *** (5.6) 6 40 6.7 3.6 0 +1.1
Dennis Andrews AB 6'0, 190 RSFr. *** (5.6)
Travis Custis RB 6'0, 215 Fr. *** (5.7)
Donovan Wilson AB 6'0, 215 Fr. *** (5.6)

4. As good a backfield as ever

"A load of running backs": check. Johnson likes having a couple of big B-backs pounding away between the tackles, and while David Sims and Zach Laskey are completely lacking in explosiveness, they perform their roles perfectly. Tech will continue to soften you up with these two until you take your eyes off of the corner. And when you do, the Yellow Jacets will run the option wide with quarterback Vad Lee and A-backs Robert Godhigh, B.J. Bostic, and Tony Zenon. Orwin Smith, the perfect A-back is gone, which hurts; but Godhigh is super-agile, Bostic is a former star recruit, Zenon has made the most of his opportunities, and redshirt freshman Dennis Andrews has evidently been turning heads behind the scenes.

"At least two quarterbacks": check. Last year, Tevin Washington was the starter for most of the year, but Vad Lee outperformed him on a per-pass and per-carry basis. Washington had a higher floor than Lee, completing a few more passes, taking fewer sacks, and better avoiding turnovers. But Lee's 22.1 yards per completion were useful, to put it lightly, and he was a redshirt freshman. His decision-making should improve to at least Washingtonian levels in the next year or two. He seems to have a nice toolbox for this offense, and if he doesn't, or if he gets hurt, then Middle Tennessee transfer Tim Byerly or four-star redshirt freshman Justin Thomas could take over with reasonable success.

"At least one play-action weapon lined up wide": Not sure. We'll get to that below.

"A potentially smaller, more agile line adept at cut blocking, etc.": check. Tech had sack issues in 2012, but that's going to happen in an offense not built to pass the ball much. Six players with starting experience return (104 career starts), including three two-year starters. This is one of the country's more experienced offensive lines, one that ranked in the top 25 in Adj. Line Yards, opportunity rate (getting runners to the second level of the defense), power success rate (power success rate), and stuff rate (avoiding negative plays on the ground). All-conference guard Omoregie Uzzi was good, but his is the only major absence. This is going to be a stellar line.

Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Yds/
Target
Target
Rate
%SD Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Jeff Greene WR 30 18 284 60.0% 9.5 17.8% 50.0% 10.5 37.9
Orwin Smith AB 28 18 288 64.3% 10.3 16.6% 64.3% 10.2 38.4
Robert Godhigh AB 5'7, 190 Sr. NR 21 15 227 71.4% 10.8 12.4% 42.9% 11.7 30.3
Jeremy Moore WR 19 10 194 52.6% 10.2 11.2% 57.9% 10.2 25.9
Darren Waller WR 6'5, 225 So. *** (5.5) 16 8 162 50.0% 10.1 9.5% 50.0% 11.0 21.6
B.J. Bostic AB 5'11, 173 Jr. **** (5.8) 14 7 139 50.0% 9.9 8.3% 28.6% 6.4 18.5
Zach Laskey BB 6'1, 214 Jr. ** (5.4) 10 6 122 60.0% 12.2 5.9% 50.0% 13.1 16.3
Tony Zenon AB 5'8, 175 Jr. ** (5.4) 8 7 195 87.5% 24.4 4.7% 62.5% 23.9 26.0
Anthony Autry WR 6'2, 175 So. *** (5.5) 8 3 117 37.5% 14.6 4.7% 75.0% 13.6 15.6
Chris Jackson WR 5 2 42 40.0% 8.4 3.0% 80.0% 6.3 5.6
Deon Hill AB 6'0, 202 Jr. *** (5.5) 5 4 20 80.0% 4.0 3.0% 40.0% 3.0 2.7
Broderick Snoddy BB 5'9, 190 So. *** (5.6) 2 1 11 50.0% 5.5 1.2% 100.0% 3.3 1.5
Corey Dennis WR 6'2, 201 Jr. *** (5.5)








Travin Henry WR 6'3, 210 RSFr. *** (5.5)








Micheal Summers WR 6'1, 190 RSFr. *** (5.6)








Ricky Jeune WR 6'3, 205 Fr. *** (5.6)








5. Small sample sizes

In 2012, Tech had to replace Stephen Hill and Tyler Melton and didn't have just a ton of returning experience at receiver. But wideouts Jeff Greene, Jeremy Moore, and Darren Waller (who had combined for zero catches the year before) did their jobs, catching 55 percent of their passes at 18 yards per catch. And A-backs Smith and Godhigh contributed nicely to the passing games as well.

Greene and Moore are gone, leaving another relative experience void. Only Waller and Anthony Autry caught passes from the wideout position last year, but these two averaged 11.6 yards per target, and there are other options -- converted DB Corey Dennis and a load of freshmen. The 2010 season proved that Tech isn't guaranteed to have a good play-action game, and Lee did complete under 50 percent of his passes last year, but I can't make myself worry about this unit.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 115.1 3.39 3.35 42.8% 75.6% 15.0% 73.0 7.8% 7.8%
Rank 12 7 54 25 23 9 103 110 83
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals Career Starts/Honors/Notes
Omoregie Uzzi RG 38 career starts; 2012 1st All-ACC
Will Jackson LG 6'3, 295 Sr. *** (5.7) 29 career starts
Jay Finch C 6'3, 285 Sr. *** (5.5) 28 career starts
Ray Beno LT 6'2, 295 Sr. *** (5.6) 26 career starts
Shaquille Mason RG 6'1, 305 Jr. *** (5.6) 13 career starts
Morgan Bailey RT 6'4, 297 Jr. *** (5.6) 7 career starts
Tyler Kidney RT 7 career starts
Nick McRae C 2 career starts
Bryan Chamberlain RT 6'4, 290 So. *** (5.6) 1 career start
Trey Braun LG 6'5, 292 So. *** (5.6)
Catlin Alford C
Errin Joe RG 6'3, 307 So. *** (5.7)
Thomas O'Reilly RG 6'3, 308 So. *** (5.6)
Chase Roberts LT 6'3, 280 RSFr. *** (5.5)
Freddie Burden OL 6'3, 290 RSFr. *** (5.5)
Shamire DeVine OL 6'7, 355 Fr. *** (5.7)

Defense

Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 43 44 61 34
RUSHING 44 76 95 63
PASSING 58 23 30 20
Standard Downs 50 68 41
Passing Downs 32 53 29
Redzone 111 106 106
Q1 Rk 49 1st Down Rk 57
Q2 Rk 50 2nd Down Rk 65
Q3 Rk 66 3rd Down Rk 58
Q4 Rk 73

6. 4-3 compatibility grade: B

Because of the start and finish, Georgia Tech's defense actually graded out alright in 2012. "Alright," as in "almost perfectly mediocre, but not terrible." The Yellow Jackets were quite solid against the pass (even when not facing USC's backup quarterback in swirling wind) but got consistently gashed by the run and folded in the red zone. A quality passing downs offense only matters if you can force passing downs, and Tech just wasn't consistent enough with that.

After riding Charles Kelly as a mid-season replacement for Groh, Johnson opted to bring in Ted Roof in the offseason. Roof's Penn State defense in 2012 had the opposite problem as Tech: outstanding on standard downs, unable to get off the field on passing downs.

The Roof defense typically lines up in 4-3, and it appears the personnel on hand might be able to adjust relatively quickly. Tech wasn't loaded with nose tackle-sized nose tackles in the 3-4, and having a pair of 270- to 280-pound tackles lining up between ends like Jeremiah Attaochu and Emmanuel Dieke makes a lot more sense. And if a couple of redshirt freshmen -- perhaps tackles Francis Kallon and/or Patrick Gamble -- were to seize a spot in the rotation, a weakness from last year could become something approaching a strength.

Attaochu is easily the most accomplished member of the defense, having racked up 27.5 tackles for loss and 19.0 sacks in his career. At 6'3, 242, he isn't exactly enormous for his new position (he was an OLB in the 3-4), but his role will basically be the same: get after the passer.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 94.1 3.01 3.34 40.6% 62.8% 18.7% 105.0 4.8% 5.7%
Rank 82 80 73 81 33 74 53 58 77
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jeremiah Attaochu DE 6'3, 242 Sr. *** (5.5) 13 56.5 7.6% 12 10 0 1 1 1
Izaan Cross DE 13 20.5 2.8% 3 1.5 1 2 0 1
T.J. Barnes DT 14 20.0 2.7% 5 1.5 0 3 0 0
Emmanuel Dieke DE 6'6, 270 Sr. *** (5.7) 14 19.5 2.6% 2.5 2 0 3 1 1
Euclid Cummings DT 6'4, 275 Sr. *** (5.5) 14 19.0 2.6% 4 3 0 1 0 0
Shawn Green NT 6'0, 280 Jr. *** (5.7) 14 17.5 2.4% 3 0 1 0 1 0
Anthony Williams DE 6'4, 237 Jr. **** (5.8) 14 6.0 0.8% 0 0 0 0 1 0
Nick Menocal DE 6'3, 248 Jr. *** (5.6) 14 4.5 0.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christopher Crenshaw DE 6'3, 258 Sr. *** (5.6) 13 4.5 0.6% 1 1 0 1 0 0
Adam Gotsis NT 6'5, 277 So. ** (5.4) 12 4.0 0.5% 1.5 1 0 1 0 0
Jimmie Kitchen NT 6'3, 279 So. ** (5.2) 3 2.0 0.3% 1 1 0 0 0 0
Francis Kallon DT 6'5, 303 RSFr. **** (5.8)

Patrick Gamble DT 6'5, 271 RSFr. *** (5.7)


Tyler Stargel DE 6'3, 251 RSFr. *** (5.6)
Roderick Rook-Chungong DE 6'3, 263 RSFr. *** (5.6)

Justin Akins DE 6'4, 240 Fr. *** (5.6)

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jabari Hunt-Days MLB 6'3, 247 So. **** (5.8) 14 65.5 8.8% 4.5 0 1 4 1 1
Quayshawn Nealy OLB 6'1, 232 Jr. *** (5.6) 13 63.0 8.5% 3.5 2 2 1 0 0
Brandon Watts OLB 6'2, 235 Sr. *** (5.6) 14 60.5 8.2% 8.5 2 0 1 2 0
Daniel Drummond MLB 6'3, 245 Sr. *** (5.5) 10 26.5 3.6% 0 0 1 0 0 0
Anthony Harrell MLB 6'2, 230 So. *** (5.6) 14 19.5 2.6% 2 0 0 0 1 0
Malcolm Munroe OLB 7 7.0 0.9% 2 0 0 0 0 2
Kyle Travis MLB 6'3, 225 Jr. ** (5.4) 9 3.5 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tremayne McNair OLB 6'2, 230 Jr. *** (5.7)
Marcus Allen LB 6'2, 205 RSFr. *** (5.7)

Beau Hankins OLB 6'1, 232 RSFr. *** (5.6)
Kevin Robbins LB 6'4, 230 Fr. *** (5.6)






7. Living up to your recruiting rankings

The move to a 4-3 also helps to plump up a reasonably thin linebacking corps, at least in the sense that you now only need six players to fill out a two-deep. Sophomore Jabari Hunt-Days was at least decent for a redshirt freshman, and Brandon Watts was a nice presence on the outside. If young players like Hunt-Days, Kallon, and those on the upper tier of the three-star designation (Gamble, linebacker Marcus Allen) can live up to their recruiting rankings over the next couple of years, the front seven as a whole could be both deeper and better than last year's. If.

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jemea Thomas CB 5'10, 195 Sr. *** (5.7) 14 73.5 9.9% 3 0 4 6 0 0
Isaiah Johnson S 6'2, 210 Sr. ** (5.1) 13 70.0 9.4% 4.5 1 1 1 1 1
Rod Sweeting CB 14 50.0 6.7% 6 1 1 7 0 1
Louis Young CB 6'1, 196 Sr. **** (5.8) 12 26.5 3.6% 0 0 1 2 0 1
Jamal Golden S 6'0, 189 Jr. *** (5.5) 14 18.5 2.5% 0 0 3 3 1 0
Chris Milton S 5'11, 185 So. *** (5.7) 14 18.5 2.5% 0 0 0 2 1 0
Demond Smith S 6'0, 185 So. *** (5.5) 14 11.5 1.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.J. White CB 5'11, 184 So. *** (5.7) 10 5.0 0.7% 0 0 0 0 1 0
Domonique Noble CB 6'2, 204 So. *** (5.7) 13 3.5 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coray Carlson S 6'0, 180 Jr. NR 4 3.0 0.4% 1 1 0 0 0 0
Fred Holton S 6'1, 210 Jr. *** (5.7)
Lynn Griffin S 6'0, 195 RSFr. *** (5.6)
Zach Allen CB 5'9, 175 RSFr. NR






8. The secondary is the least of Tech's worries

Tech basically had a one-man pass rush last year; Attaochu alone accounted for more than one-third of the Yellow Jackets' sacks, and only one other defender had more than two sacks (Euclid Cummings). To an extent, that was alright -- Attaochu's damn good, and Tech still eked out a top-60 ranking in Adj. Sack Rate with him leading the way. Roof wasn't very successful in sack situations at Penn State last year, and I'm curious to see how much he dials up the blitzes this year. Will he elect to mostly just send Attaochu and drop linebackers into coverage?

Regardless, the simple fact that a top-60 pass rush begat a top-25 pass defense tells you good things about a secondary that returns mostly intact. Corner Rod Sweeting was strong, but he's the only departure. Seniors Jemea Thomas and Louis Young have proven capable of making plays both near and far from the line of scrimmage, safety Isaiah Johnson is decent, and a load of interesting sophomores will keep trying to chip away at the seniors' playing time.

If the front seven improves to a reasonable degree -- I'm confident it will improve, but I don't know how much -- the secondary will get the chance to prove itself one of the better units in the ACC.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Sean Poole 6'1, 160 Sr. 33 39.7 4 1 8 27.3%
Ryan Rodwell 6'2, 198 So. 13 39.7 0 3 2 38.5%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB TB%
David Scully 6'2, 205 Sr. 67 61.6 21 31.3%
Chris Tanner 15 57.1 1 6.7%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2013
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
David Scully 6'2, 205 Sr. 37-39 3-6 50.0% 1-2 50.0%
Chris Tanner 18-18 5-6 83.3% 0-0 N/A
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2013
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Jamal Golden KR 6'0, 189 Jr. 23 28.3 2
Orwin Smith KR 14 19.1 0
Tony Zenon KR 5'8, 175 Jr. 3 17.3 0
Jamal Golden PR 6'0, 189 Jr. 17 14.6 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 112
Net Punting 102
Net Kickoffs 108
Touchback Pct 98
Field Goal Pct 103
Kick Returns Avg 27
Punt Returns Avg 17

9. Finding legs

The return game is in good hands. Jamal Golden could play a larger role at safety this year (and he could be a quality play-maker, having defensed six passes to only 18.5 tackles last year), but he's already a star returner who scored two touchdowns and got Tech in the top-30 for both kick returns and punt returns. The problem is, he was the only good member of the special teams unit last year. David Scully was sketchy from both a place-kicking and kickoffs perspective, and punter Sean Poole was not able to produce either decent height or depth. In Golden, Tech has a star; now it needs to find some legs.

2013 Schedule & Projection Factors

2013 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
31-Aug Elon NR
14-Sep at Duke 88
21-Sep North Carolina 29
26-Sep Virginia Tech 23
5-Oct at Miami 25
12-Oct at BYU 34
19-Oct Syracuse 54
26-Oct at Virginia 71
2-Nov Pittsburgh 35
14-Nov at Clemson 20
23-Nov Alabama A&M NR
30-Nov Georgia 9
Five-Year F/+ Rk 39
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 69
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* +4 / -1.9
TO Luck/Game 2.1
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 16 (8, 8)
Yds/Pt Margin** -0.1

10. A top-30 team could go 9-3 versus this schedule

And a top-45 team could go 6-6.

It's quite obvious that defense and special teams held this team back quite a bit and distracted from the fact that the offense was just about as good as ever. If Roof can connect with this defense, and if some youngsters provide front seven depth that the Yellow Jackets just didn't have last year, then the defense could at least turn into a top-40 or 50 unit. And if they can win their first three games -- Elon, a potentially tricky trip to Duke, and a visit from North Carolina -- there could be a lot more wins for the Ramblin' Wreck this fall. But with six opponents projected between 20th and 35th, this season could turn out in any number of ways.

And yes, despite my creeping bullishness, knowing recent history, another Gailey is probably a pretty safe bet.

More from SB Nation:

The developing Johnny Manziel autographs scandal

NCAA admits jersey-sale store was a bad idea

Official Coaches Poll Top 25 is out, led by Alabama and the SEC

Bill Connelly’s Big Ten preview series is complete

Projecting every 2013 college football conference race

Today’s college football news headlines

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.