PRESENTED BY 669248957_logo

The big 2014 Ohio football preview: Bobcats freshening up

Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Under Frank Solich, Ohio has established a higher level of play than at any time in its FBS history, but with frustrating November collapses in each of the last two years. We'll see if the Bobcats can find traction in 2014, or if this season's main purpose is to build toward 2015.

SB Nation 2014 College Football Countdown

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. Time for some new blood

Sometimes relationships just grow stale.

It only felt like quarterback Tyler Tettleton and running back Beau Blankenship were Ohio starters for a full decade. Tettleton began his residence in the Ohio backfield in 2009, redshirted, and took over for good in 2011. After originally signing with Iowa State out of high school (the same Norman, Okla., high school as Tettleton, by the way), Blankenship followed the same path.

In three years, the Ohio team led by Tettleton and Blankenship (among others) won 26 games and very nearly won the MAC in 2011. Of the six bowls Ohio has attended in the last 40 years, three occurred with these two in the backfield, including both bowl wins in school history.

Things happened with these two leading the way, in other words. But things stopped happening at quite the same rate over the last year and a half. Ohio finished the 2012 season 1-4 before crushing ULM in the Independence Bowl. And after a 5-2 start in 2013, the Bobcats lost three games by a combined 123-16, rallied to beat an awful UMass team, then faded late in a 17-point Beef O'Brady's Bowl loss to East Carolina.

Tettleton's toughness was impressive, but his flaws were obvious and never really got ironed out. And Blankenship wasn't exactly the world's greatest when it came to hitting holes with quickness. The duo helped to lead Ohio to sustained heights; they also contributed to a pretty clear ceiling. After a three-year run that led to unprecedented success for a program that hadn't experienced much of it before head coach Frank Solich arrived in 2005, a new start is probably a good thing.

2013 Schedule & Results

Record: 7-6 | Adj. Record: 6-7 | Final F/+ Rk: 104
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L 5-gm Adj. Avg.
1-Sep at Louisville 12 7-49 L 30.1 - 36.9 L
7-Sep North Texas 51 27-21 W 37.8 - 18.9 W
14-Sep Marshall 52 34-31 W 27.0 - 29.1 L
21-Sep Austin Peay N/A 38-0 W 29.5 - 28.2 W
5-Oct at Akron 108 43-3 W 30.7 - 6.4 W 7.1
12-Oct Central Michigan 111 23-26 L 34.8 - 29.9 W 9.4
19-Oct at Eastern Michigan 124 56-28 W 30.1 - 40.1 L 3.7
26-Oct Miami (Ohio) 123 41-16 W 31.6 - 24.0 W 5.6
5-Nov at Buffalo 80 3-30 L 8.8 - 38.6 L -0.6
12-Nov at Bowling Green 47 0-49 L 10.6 - 36.0 L -10.6
19-Nov Kent State 106 13-44 L 7.7 - 36.7 L -17.3
29-Nov Massachusetts 118 51-23 W 32.4 - 24.4 W -13.7
23-Dec vs. East Carolina 40 20-37 L 28.4 - 31.0 L -15.8
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk Spec. Tms. Rk
F/+ -9.7% 101 -12.8% 110 +2.3% 20
Points Per Game 27.4 73 27.5 72
Adj. Points Per Game 26.1 85 29.3 78

2. Zero sum

If you've been reading all of these MAC previews (and of course you have!), you know that quite a few MAC teams followed a similar "stink early, improve late" path -- Kent State and Central Michigan, to name two. Well, if some teams are moving up, someone has to be moving down. That's where Ohio comes in.

Despite a shaky season-opening performance against Louisville, the Bobcats were legitimately strong through the first week of October, taking down two strong mid-majors (North Texas and Marshall) and crushing an Akron team not far removed from a near-upset of Michigan. Turnovers doomed the Bobcats in a Homecoming loss to Central Michigan (Ohio lost two of three fumbles, and Tettleton threw a pair of interceptions while also completing 24 of 33 for 319 yards), but they continued to play reasonably well in moving to 6-2 heading into November.

But for the second straight season, November was a nightmare for the Bobcats.

Adj. Points Per Game (first 5 games): Ohio 31.0, Opponent 23.9 (plus-7.1)
Adj. Points Per Game (next 3 games): Ohio 32.2, Opponent 31.3 (plus-0.9)
Adj. Points Per Game (last 5 games): Opponent 33.3, Ohio 17.6 (minus-15.7)

Call it the curse of the phantom safety. Trailing 7-3 early in the third quarter against Buffalo, a Tettleton throwaway from about the three-yard line was somehow deemed intentional grounding in the end zone. Over the next six quarters, the Bobcats were outscored, 72-0. They gained just 405 total yards against Buffalo and Bowling Green, then put up a 204-yard stinker against a still-pretty-bad Kent State squad.

The offense rallied, gaining 996 yards and scoring 71 points in Tettleton's final two games behind center, but it crumbled again late in the bowl game, and Ohio's second consecutive late-season collapse was complete.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.26 14 IsoPPP+ 109.0 24
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 39.6% 87 Succ. Rt. + 87.4 106
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 28.9 51 Def. FP+ 100.4 55
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 3.9 92 Redzone S&P+ 91.5 92
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 23.6 ACTUAL 24 +0.4
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 84 84 107 88
RUSHING 99 118 124 111
PASSING 53 39 50 38
Standard Downs 72 107 12
Passing Downs 96 89 99
Q1 Rk 90 1st Down Rk 53
Q2 Rk 97 2nd Down Rk 119
Q3 Rk 77 3rd Down Rk 84
Q4 Rk 81

3. The big plays were really big

Dreadful inefficiency did Ohio in at times; the running game suffered from both tentative running from Blankenship and sketchy blocking from a line that was getting shuffled every game. And I do mean every game: Ohio started a different combination of offensive linemen for each of the first eight games of the season. (Strangely, the offense collapsed as the line finally stabilized a bit.)

Frank Solich has too much Tom Osborne in him to give up on the run entirely, but it just wasn't working in 2013. It resulted in far too many second-and-nines and third-and-sevens. The big plays Ohio did manage were quite big -- despite sketchy offensive numbers overall, the Bobcats managed 15 gains of 40+ yards, 47th in the country -- and with some of the offense's biggest home run hitters returning (running back Daz'mond Patterson and receiver Chase Cochran, to name two), the explosiveness might be there again in 2014. But that won't matter unless this offense figures out how to avoid digging itself immediate holes in the ground.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2014 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards Comp
Rate
TD INT Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Tyler Tettleton 230 371 2851 21 12 62.0% 14 3.6% 7.1
Derrius Vick 6'1, 200 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 21 45 277 1 1 46.7% 5 10.0% 4.8
J.D. Sprague 6'1, 190 So. NR 5 6 62 0 0 83.3% 0 0.0% 10.3
Greg Windham 6'1, 210 So. 2 stars (5.4)








Joey Duckworth 6'3, 210 Fr. 3 stars (5.6)








4. Either a four-way battle or a one-way battle

If you remember one good Ohio play from the bowl game, it probably isn't one that came from Tettleton.

Derrius Vick, manning the quarterback position for a drive early in the second quarter, stepped out of a fake run and threw an 80-yard touchdown to Donte Foster to tie the game at 14-14 20 minutes in. It was a play that hinted at what an offense built around Vick could resemble. For two years, Vick was Tettleton's understudy, an option threat who can add a dimension to the run game and a player with an arm just good enough to make things work. Whereas Tettleton attempted 778 passes to 123 rushes in the last two years (86 percent pass), Vick attempted 81 to 41 (66 percent pass). We know the run game might need help, and Vick could provide it.

At the same time, however, we don't yet know whether Vick is actually a good quarterback. Take that 80-yard bomb away, and Vick's other 49 pass attempts in 2013 (44 passes, five sacks) netted a dreadful 160 yards. In two years, he's completed 40 of 75 passes (53 percent) for 526 yards with six sacks, and most of his damage was done in a 2012 spot start against lowly Norfolk State. And not including sacks, he has rushed 41 times for 183 yards; that's decent, but it doesn't scream "Run threat!!!"

Vick is the presumed favorite for the starting job as 2014 spring practice begins, and if he plays well, there is no quarterback battle to speak of in Athens. But if he struggles, there are plenty of other candidates who could take his place, namely former walk-on J.D. Sprague, who also got a little backup time in 2013, and incoming star freshman Joey Duckworth, the highest-rated member of a pretty exciting recruiting class. It's Vick's job to lose, but there's a chance he loses it.

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
Opp.
Rate
Beau Blankenship RB 204 910 5 4.5 5.6 28.4%
Ryan Boykin RB 103 399 7 3.9 2.2 36.9%
Daz'mond Patterson RB 5'7, 185 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 38 211 2 5.6 5.6 39.5%
Tim Edmond RB 5'11, 240 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 31 108 0 3.5 2.0 38.7%
Tyler Tettleton QB 29 135 0 4.7 4.5 51.7%
Derrius Vick QB 6'1, 200 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 25 106 1 4.2 4.4 40.0%
J.D. Sprague QB 6'1, 190 So. NR 5 33 1 6.6 4.5 60.0%
Dorian Brown RB 5'11, 196 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)
Papi White RB 5'9, 166 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)




Maleek Irons RB 6'0, 211 Fr. 2 stars (5.2)




Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Donte Foster WR-X 110 69 1021 62.7% 27.2% 46.9% 9.3 174 9.8 141.0
Chase Cochran WR-Z 6'2, 192 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 53 37 689 69.8% 13.1% 75.0% 13.0 259 11.7 95.1
Matt Waters WR 50 32 446 64.0% 12.3% 37.5% 8.9 57 10.5 61.6
Troy Hill TE 27 20 257 74.1% 6.7% 47.8% 9.5 31 9.5 35.5
Beau Blankenship RB 24 15 62 62.5% 5.9% 40.0% 2.6 -122 2.0 8.6
Mario Dovell WR-Z 24 15 139 62.5% 5.9% 50.0% 5.8 -45 7.4 19.2
Sebastian Smith WR-X 6'3, 190 So. 3 stars (5.7) 23 12 82 52.2% 5.7% 66.7% 3.6 -80 4.1 11.3
Daz'mond Patterson RB 5'7, 185 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 19 13 120 68.4% 4.7% 70.6% 6.3 -33 5.5 16.6
Landon Smith WR-F 6'0, 185 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 19 10 112 52.6% 4.7% 41.7% 5.9 -23 6.4 15.5
Ryan Boykin RB 15 9 59 60.0% 3.7% 38.5% 3.9 -54 4.5 8.1
Anthony Talbert TE 14 6 94 42.9% 3.5% 45.5% 6.7 3 9.0 13.0
Jordan Reid WR-F 6'3, 200 So. 2 stars (5.2) 10 6 61 60.0% 2.5% 42.9% 6.1 -14 4.0 8.4
Ian Dixon WR 5'7, 170 Jr. NR 8 5 21 62.5% 2.0% 50.0% 2.6 -40 1.3 2.9
Troy Mangen TE 6'5, 252 So. 2 stars (5.2) 5 4 12 80.0% 1.2% 100.0% 2.4 -32 1.1 1.7
Mason Morgan TE 6'6, 259 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)









Justin Wyatt WR 6'1, 186 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)









Brendan Cope WR 6'2, 189 RSFr. 2 stars (5.3)









Brennan Boland TE 6'5, 250 Jr. 2 stars (5.2)









Robbie Walker WR 5'9, 175 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)









Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 84.8 2.8 2.5 34.6% 52.8% 18.7% 143.8 4.0% 4.0%
Rank 114 83 117 109 119 58 22 46 21
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Career Starts Honors/Notes
Jon Lechner RG 33
Ryan McGrath RT 25
John Prior LT 22
Mike Lucas LG 6'4, 311 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 12
Lucas Powell C 6'3, 295 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 12
Mike McQueen LT 6'6, 300 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 8
Troy Watson RT 6'6, 290 So. 2 stars (5.2) 4
Durrell Wood RG 6'3, 344 So. 2 stars (5.4) 3
Sam Johnson RG 1
Nick Gibbons RG 6'5, 308 So. 3 stars (5.5) 1
Seth Everhart LG 6'4, 311 Jr. NR 0
Mark Smith C


0
Zack Murdock OL 6'6, 291 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5) 0
Jared McCray OL 6'5, 320 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0
Joe Lowery OL 6'6, 285 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0

5. Stability, please

New blood can be a good thing, but it's not guaranteed to be a good thing. For example, though leading rushers Blankenship and Ryan Boykin averaged a paltry 4.3 yards per carry in 2013, it's not automatically assured that Daz Patterson, Tim Edmond, and some young guys will fare better*. Meanwhile, it's not guaranteed that the next crop of Ohio wideouts will be able to match what Donte Foster, Matt Waters, etc., did last fall. Ohio's top three receivers averaged a strong 10.1 yards per target in 2013, and Cochran is the only of the top six targets to return.

If you've got uncertainty at quarterback, running back, and receiver, you at least need to know you've got stability up front. And at the very least, the Ohio line will have more of that than it did a year ago.

Ten Bobcat linemen finished 2013 with starting experience; three were freshmen and three were sophomores. That is a recipe for disaster, and sure enough, the run blocking was far from strong. But it does mean that six seasoned players return for 2014, and none of them are seniors. The line should improve, and then it should improve again in 2015. There appears to be a strong base of talent for new offensive co-coordinator Scott Isphording and new offensive line coach Dave Johnson.

* My assumption is that Patterson and company will indeed fare better. Edmond should be able to play the short-yardage role with reasonable success, and as long as one of three young, exciting prospects -- redshirt freshman Dorian Brown and true freshmen Papi White and Maleek Irons -- is ready to play a backup role, things should be fine, especially with a mobile quarterback and the extra dimension he provides.

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.18 82 IsoPPP+ 88.1 116
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 41.7% 52 Succ. Rt. + 95.0 75
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 31.6 32 Off. FP+ 101.5 44
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.7 110 Redzone S&P+ 75.7 122
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 22.5 ACTUAL 22.0 -0.5
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 68 104 75 100
RUSHING 85 112 82 112
PASSING 43 95 73 73
Standard Downs 96 64 114
Passing Downs 114 99 94
Q1 Rk 96 1st Down Rk 94
Q2 Rk 80 2nd Down Rk 99
Q3 Rk 102 3rd Down Rk 89
Q4 Rk 96

6. The big plays were really big

One of the Ohio offense's few strengths (the magnitude of big plays) was one of the defense's weaknesses. The Bobcats were semi-efficient in leveraging offenses into passing downs, but when they sprang a leak, it was a gusher. Ohio allowed 34 plays of at least 30 yards, 104th in the country. Between three-and-outs and a good punt returner (Travis Carrie, now graduated), the Bobcats did pretty well in the field position game. But big plays and a complete lack of red zone defense did quite a bit of damage.

The front seven had a rather drastic freshman and sophomore presence, which led to breakdowns, but to the extent that youth was a problem, it probably won't be one in 2014. The top seven linemen return (including three sophomores and a junior), as do the top two linebackers (both juniors).

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 80.2 3.06 4.22 38.2% 80.0% 15.2% 111 5.8% 8.0%
Rank 124 79 125 49 115 110 39 33 38
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Antwan Crutcher NG 6'2, 304 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 13 34.0 4.5% 6.0 1.5 0 0 1 0
Kurt Laseak DE 6'4, 236 So. 2 stars (5.2) 13 30.5 4.0% 1.5 0.5 0 1 0 0
Cameron McLeod DT 6'5, 282 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 12 26.5 3.5% 4.5 2.0 0 1 0 0
Tarell Basham DE 6'4, 250 So. 2 stars (5.4) 13 23.0 3.0% 8.5 7.5 0 1 1 0
Casey Sayles DE 6'3, 268 So. 2 stars (5.4) 11 23.0 3.0% 5.5 3.5 0 0 0 0
Brandon Purdum DT 6'3, 270 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 13 20.5 2.7% 6.0 2.0 0 2 0 0
Kendric Smith DE 6'3, 244 Sr. NR 11 15.0 2.0% 2.5 2.0 0 0 0 0
Ty Branz DE 6 14.5 1.9% 6.0 5.5 0 0 0 0
Watson Tautuiaki NG 6'2, 304 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 11 10.0 1.3% 1.5 1.0 0 0 0 0
Nic Barber DL 11 9.5 1.3% 2.0 1.0 0 0 0 0
Tony Davis DT 6'3, 280 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 9 7.5 1.0% 1.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
Trent Smart DE 6'3, 249 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)
Tony Porter DT 6'1, 289 RSFr. 2 stars (5.3)
Kent Berger DE 6'4, 249 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)
Kyle Kuhar DT 6'5, 272 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)






7. An undersized line that wasn't undersized

When you look at Ohio's line stats, you rather quickly form a mental image of a team that got pushed around (124th in Adj. Line Yards) but was able to get to the passer in passing situations (39th in Adj. Sack Rate). That suggests a quickness-over-size approach. But while the linebackers are a bit on the undersized side, the line is not. The top four returning ends average 250 pounds (not huge, but not small for a MAC program), and the top four returning tackles average 290.

Ohio's problems appeared to be as much because of overpursuit and inexperience as anything else. If this is the case, the woes could be cured to some degree this fall.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Ben Russell MLB 6'1, 230 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 12 64.5 8.5% 8.5 3.0 0 1 0 0
Jovon Johnson SLB 6'0, 215 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 13 48.0 6.3% 3.0 0.5 1 2 0 0
Keith Moore WLB 10 39.0 5.2% 3.0 1.5 0 1 0 0
Brandon Atwell WLB


13 21.5 2.8% 1.5 0.5 0 1 1 0
Nieco Teipel SLB 12 17.0 2.2% 1.5 1.0 0 0 0 0
Blair Brown MLB 6'0, 220 So. NR 7 13.0 1.7% 1.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
William Johnson LB 6'2, 215 So. NR 9 5.0 0.7% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
A.J. Grady, Jr. LB


3 2.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Jake Schany LB 6'3, 225 So. 3 stars (5.5)
Jarred Brumfield LB 6'3, 219 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)








Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Josh Kristoff SS 6'0, 200 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 13 54.0 7.1% 1.5 0 0 5 2 0
Xavier Hughes SS 13 49.0 6.5% 0.5 0 4 5 1 0
Thad Ingol FS 6'0, 215 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 12 38.0 5.0% 2 1 3 2 0 1
Travis Carrie CB 13 36.5 4.8% 1.5 1 4 8 0 0
Nathan Carpenter NB 5'9, 200 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 13 34.5 4.6% 1 0 0 3 1 0
Devin Bass CB 5'9, 185 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 12 33.5 4.4% 1.5 0 2 15 0 0
Ian Wells CB 5'11, 195 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 8 13.5 1.8% 0 0 0 3 0 0
Aaron Macer SS 6'0, 195 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 10 5.5 0.7% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Dyquan Stewart CB 5'10, 182 So. 2 stars (5.2) 6 4.5 0.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Devin Jones CB 6'1, 208 Jr. NR 10 4.5 0.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Toran Davis FS 6'0, 210 So. 2 stars (5.2) 9 4.0 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
James Ray S 5'10, 188 Sr. NR 4 4.0 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mike Terpin CB 5'10, 170 Jr. NR 5 3.0 0.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Calvin Holloway S 6'1, 203 So. NR 4 2.5 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Blake Scipio DB 5'11, 190 Jr. NR 2 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Corey Quallen S 6'1, 209 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)








Brett Layton CB 5'11, 195 Jr. 2 stars (5.4)







8. A base of talent

Devin Bass defensed 17 passes while making only 33.5 tackles; as I always say in examples like this, that means he's either one hell of a cornerback or one hell of a poor tackler. Regardless, he's an upperclassman now, as are five other defensive backs who made at least five tackles las fall. Despite the loss of safety Xavier Hughes and corner Travis Carrie, there is experience in the back, just as there is experience everywhere else.

Ohio returns eight defensive starters and most of last year's second string. Last year's defense was easily the Bobcats' worst in the F/+ era (2005-13), but it should bounce back in 2014. And since a lot of the most exciting players on the defense -- sophomore end Tarell Basham (7.5 sacks in 2013), junior linebacker Ben Russell (8.5 tackles for loss), Bass -- are not seniors, then like the offensive line, the defense should improve this fall, then improve even more.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Grant Venham 6'3, 210 Jr. 50 37.8 4 15 14 58.0%
Matt Green 6'2, 225 Jr. 14 42.1 0 2 6 57.1%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Josiah Yazdani 5'10, 200 Jr. 70 58.1 9 0 12.9%
Matt Green 6'2, 225 Jr. 3 63.0 0 0 0.0%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Josiah Yazdani 5'10, 200 Jr. 30-30 11-11 100.0% 3-4 75.0%
Matt Green 6'2, 225 Jr. 10-10 4-5 80.0% 0-4 0.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Devin Bass KR 5'9, 185 Jr. 19 22.1 0
Nathan Carpenter KR 5'9, 200 Sr. 14 23.3 0
Travis Carrie PR 21 12.7 0
Devin Bass PR 5'9, 185 Jr. 8 0.8 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 20
Field Goal Efficiency 61
Punt Return Efficiency 36
Kick Return Efficiency 49
Punt Efficiency 57
Kickoff Efficiency 4
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 35

9. Special teams will again be strong

The special teams unit was the saving grace for a team that ranked worse than 100th in both Off. F/+ and Def. F/+. Travis Carrie is gone, which means regression should be expected in punt returns, but Ohio's punt and kick coverage units were excellent (the Bobcats seem to have mastered the art of kicking high and short and minimizing returns, and I'm not sure why more teams don't do the same), kicker Josiah Yazdani was automatic under 40 yards, and Devin Bass and Nathan Carpenter were at least decent in kick returns.

2014 Schedule & Projection Factors

2014 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
30-Aug at Kent State 102
6-Sep at Kentucky 76
13-Sep at Marshall 59
20-Sep Idaho 120
27-Sep Eastern Illinois NR
4-Oct at Central Michigan 106
11-Oct Bowling Green 60
18-Oct Akron 118
25-Oct at Western Michigan 113
5-Nov Buffalo 107
18-Nov Northern Illinois 51
25-Nov at Miami (Ohio) 121
Five-Year F/+ Rk -7.7% (82)
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 107
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* -2 / -1.2
TO Luck/Game -0.3
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 11 (3, 8)

10. Careful what you wish for

The offense needed a boost and could get it in the form of new skill position players and a couple of new assistant coaches. The Ohio offense should expect to improve in the run game, and the passing game could remain reasonably explosive.

Or, a new quarterback could be far too inefficient to take heat off of the run game, and the offense could play an entire season like it did last November.

For the first time in a while, there is offensive change in Athens. It's easy to get excited about the potential explosiveness of the new batch of starters, but there's no guarantee that Ohio will replace eight offensive starters without a year of a dropoff. The schedule will help ease the growing pains -- Ohio plays eight teams projected 102nd or worse -- but with an offense figuring things out and a defense trying to recover from a bad year, 2014 could quite possibly see a step or two backwards.

Solich's Ohio program is on pretty sturdy ground overall. The Bobcats have been to five consecutive bowls and have won at least seven games six times in the nine-year Solich era (they had done so only five times before Solich), and most of the key 2014 players are underclassmen, from the quarterback to the running backs to the offensive line to most of the defense. Ohio could be outstanding in 2015, but 2014 is uncertain. I'm setting the bar at a schedule-aided six wins.

More from SBNation.com

Latest News

In This Article

Teams
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.