The big 2014 CMU football preview: Reversing an unhappy trend

Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sp

The Dan Enos era will not be one of mystery for much longer. The Chippewas return about as many starters as any team in the country, including a star at wide receiver. Can they take advantage and crack .500 again?

SB Nation 2014 College Football Countdown

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. This is not a happy trend

Last January, following Central Michigan's first bowl bid in three years, the school gave head coach Dan Enos a contract extension. This is obviously common practice, but it followed a season in which CMU was basically of the same quality as the Chippewa teams that went 3-9 in 2010 and 2011. They went 3-0 in one-possession games to reach 7-6 and knocked off Western Kentucky in the Little Caesars Bowl, but the program as a whole didn't seem to be improving all that much.

Then, in 2013, the Chippewas were tasked with total rebuilds in the trenches and injuries in the backfield and played terribly for the first half of the season. There was improvement late, and CMU went from 1-4 to 6-6, but for the season as a whole the Chippewas ranked below 100th in the F/+ rankings for the first time since F/+ rankings began in 2005.

2. If a turnaround is coming, it begins in 2014

Enos came to Mount Pleasant following the departure of all-forever quarterback Dan LeFevour, and some regression was expected. Indeed, CMU fell from 38th in 2009 to 94th, 98th, and 95th in 2010-12. But instead of beginning to improve in 2013 as I thought they might, they got worse, especially early. Injuries played a role, and again the lines were devastated by graduation and attrition. But Enos ended up playing an incredibly young team last fall, younger than originally intended, and took his lumps.

This year, there is enough experience that improvement is all but guaranteed. But does "improvement" mean jumping back to that No. 90-100 range? Is there enough talent here for Enos to build something a little greater than that? It's hard to say, but the Chippewas' quarterback is interesting, there is some explosiveness at the skill positions, and at the very least the defense is experienced.

Whatever CMU is capable of becoming under Enos, we'll start to see it in 2014.

2013 Schedule & Results

Record: 6-6 | Adj. Record: 1-11 | Final F/+ Rk: 111
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L 5-gm Adj. Avg.
31-Aug at Michigan 37 9-59 L 14.5 - 44.0 L
7-Sep New Hampshire N/A 24-21 W 21.5 - 38.9 L
14-Sep at UNLV 96 21-31 L 23.9 - 29.8 L
21-Sep Toledo 62 17-38 L 30.6 - 27.8 W
28-Sep at N.C. State 92 14-48 L 12.1 - 36.7 L -14.9
5-Oct at Miami (Ohio) 123 21-9 W 18.7 - 36.7 L -12.7
12-Oct at Ohio 104 26-23 W 29.0 - 38.8 L -11.1
19-Oct Northern Illinois 60 17-38 L 28.5 - 31.4 L -10.5
6-Nov at Ball State 57 24-44 L 33.6 - 35.2 L -11.4
16-Nov at Western Michigan 117 27-22 W 25.3 - 28.8 L -7.2
23-Nov Massachusetts 118 37-0 W 15.9 - 19.0 L -4.2
29-Nov Eastern Michigan 124 42-10 W 29.1 - 31.9 L -2.8
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk Spec. Tms. Rk
F/+ -11.8% 106 -13.5% 115 +0.1% 64
Points Per Game 23.3 95 28.6 74
Adj. Points Per Game 23.6 102 33.3 104

3. An atrocious first half

Among all the reasons for encouragement in 2014, one of the most prominent is simple: CMU's full-season numbers don't tell the tale of where the Chippewas were at the end of the season.

Over the first six games of 2013, there might not have been a worse team in the country than CMU. (Okay, that's not quite true, but CMU was certainly among the bottom 10.) The offense lost running back Zurlon Tipton early on and averaged better than 4.9 yards per play just twice in six games -- 6.7 against FCS New Hampshire and 5.7 against Toledo. In games No. 3-6, redshirt freshman Cooper Rush completed just 50 percent of his passes with three touchdowns to eight interceptions and a sub-100 passer rating. The running game was hit or miss. And the defense, a serious liability in 2013, wasn't really any better in 2014. This was a bad, bad team.

But it improved.

Adj. Points Per Game (first 6 games): Opponent 35.7, CMU 20.2 (minus-15.5)
Adj. Points Per Game (next 6 games): Opponent 30.9, CMU 26.9 (minus-4.0)

Freshman Maurice Shoemaker-Gilmore added a burst of explosiveness to the run game, Saylor Lavallii went off, Tipton returned, Rush got steadier, and CMU averaged at least 5.6 yards per play in four of its six final games. Meanwhile, the defense was still below average, allowing 7.1 yards per play to NIU and 7.5 to Ball State, but it got a better grip on the lesser offenses. CMU creeped by WMU, then pummeled UMass and EMU to reach 6-6.

As I've written many times through the years, improvement over the second half of a season can be sustainable if the reasons for the improvement return. Well ... CMU returns 18 starters, and Rush is no longer a redshirt freshman learning on the job. Good signs all around.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.15 62 IsoPPP+ 97.8 76
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 42.2% 70 Succ. Rt. + 84.9 112
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 30.0 73 Def. FP+ 98.4 76
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 3.7 107 Redzone S&P+ 78.0 115
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 22.0 ACTUAL 27 +5.0
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 110 113 113 119
RUSHING 100 120 118 119
PASSING 86 91 84 98
Standard Downs 121 117 124
Passing Downs 69 69 8
Q1 Rk 104 1st Down Rk 125
Q2 Rk 121 2nd Down Rk 87
Q3 Rk 108 3rd Down Rk 83
Q4 Rk 99

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2014 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards Comp
Rate
TD INT Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Cooper Rush 6'3, 216 So. 2 stars (5.4) 177 312 2349 15 15 56.7% 26 7.7% 6.4
Alex Niznak


13 27 138 0 2 48.1% 5 15.6% 3.6
Cody Kater 6'3, 220 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 2 6 13 0 0 33.3% 0 0.0% 2.2
Ryan Lamb 6'4, 215 Jr. 2 stars (5.4)








4. Head-first into the deep end

CMU's season-opener against Michigan was damaging in all sorts of ways. The Chippewas lost by 50, Tipton broke his ankle, and starting quarterback Cody Kater broke his collar bone. Backup QB Alex Niznak didn't fare very well, and a week later, Cooper Rush was given the job. Instead of a junior and a senior in the backfield, CMU went with a redshirt freshman (Rush) and a sophomore (Saylor Lavallii). If you're wondering why CMU's offense was so awful over the first half of the season, that's a pretty good place to start.

Rush went through plenty of growing pains, as one would expect of a youngster who went from third-string to first-string in a short amount of time; he was sacked once every 13 pass attempts, and he threw interceptions once every 20 passes. But he was also responsible for some huge gains on passing downs, and the composure and play-making ability it takes to rank eighth in Passing Downs PPP+ (even while ranking 124th in Standard Downs PPP+) is intriguing for a redshirt freshman.

Rush is in no way assured of the starting job in 2014. Kater is back and healthy, and Enos brought in JUCO transfer Ryan Lamb for competition as well. But his development could be interesting to watch over the next three years. With little to no run help and constant second- and third-and-longs (downs in which Rush was constantly asked to make plays with his arm with little help from draw plays and other runs), Rush made some things happen. That could say good things about 2015 and 2016, even if his development is still ongoing in 2014.

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
Opp.
Rate
Saylor Lavallii RB 5'9, 213 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 182 807 5 4.4 5.3 30.2%
Zurlon Tipton RB 74 398 8 5.4 6.5 36.5%
Maurice Shoemaker-Gilmore RB 5'11, 204 So. NR 50 261 2 5.2 7.0 32.0%
Anthony Garland RB 6'1, 218 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 32 159 0 5.0 3.4 46.9%
Cooper Rush QB 6'3, 216 So. 2 stars (5.4) 12 94 1 7.8 4.4 66.7%
Martez Walker RB 5'8, 193 So. 2 stars (5.2) 9 8 0 0.9 N/A 0.0%
Titus Davis WR 6'2, 190 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 7 74 0 10.6 10.0 57.1%
Alex Niznak QB 6'3, 227 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 4 15 0 3.8 7.1 25.0%
Amari Coleman RB 5'11, 180 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)
Trent Grimes RB 6'1, 200 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)




Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Titus Davis WR-Z 6'2, 190 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 102 61 1109 59.8% 32.2% 44.9% 10.9 342 9.8 157.2
Courtney Williams WR-X 6'1, 212 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 50 23 251 46.0% 15.8% 53.2% 5.0 -84 5.2 35.6
Andrew Flory WR-Z 6'0, 182 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 48 31 377 64.6% 15.1% 51.3% 7.9 2 7.3 53.4
Connor Odykirk TE 23 11 148 47.8% 7.3% 68.4% 6.4 -8 8.5 21.0
Saylor Lavallii RB 5'9, 213 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 17 12 62 70.6% 5.4% 33.3% 3.6 -77 4.1 8.8
Ben McCord TE 6'4, 243 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 14 7 62 50.0% 4.4% 58.3% 4.4 -35 5.3 8.8
Deon Butler TE 6'3, 238 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 11 10 94 90.9% 3.5% 42.9% 8.5 -9 10.3 13.3
Adam Fenton FB 10 8 76 80.0% 3.2% 66.7% 7.6 -11 8.8 10.8
Anthony Rice WR 6'0, 178 So. 2 stars (5.2) 10 8 67 80.0% 3.2% 22.2% 6.7 -20 8.1 9.5
Jerry Harris WR-X 9 3 28 33.3% 2.8% 33.3% 3.1 -25 6.4 4.0
Jesse Kroll WR 6'3, 214 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 6 5 85 83.3% 1.9% 0.0% 14.2 31 7.5 12.1
Mike Kinville TE 6'3, 255 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 4 3 35 75.0% 1.3% 66.7% 8.8 1 13.1 5.0
Defarrel Davis WR-Z 3 1 36 33.3% 0.9% 0.0% 12.0 18 8.0 5.1
Maurice Shoemaker-Gilmore RB 5'11, 204 So. NR 3 2 25 66.7% 0.9% 0.0% 8.3 1 5.6 3.5
Corey Willis WR 5'10, 170 RSFr. 3 stars (5.6)









Mark Chapman WR-Z 6'0, 180 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)









Zach Crouch TE 6'5, 230 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)









Eric Cooper WR 5'11, 177 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)









5. Big plays at the skill positions

Tipton has graduated, but in Lavallii and Maurice Shoemaker-Gilmore, CMU has two running backs with solid big-play ability and more experience than they were expected to have heading into 2014. (Bill's Go-To Saying No. 14: Injuries hurt in the present tense and help in the future tense.) They need to improve between the tackles, but this position has potential.

Meanwhile, there isn't just potential at wideout -- there's proven production. Titus Davis has caught 144 passes for 2,720 yards and 24 touchdowns in three seasons at CMU; he is potentially the best big-play receiver in the mid-major ranks, and "Just throw it up to Titus" was a rather effective gambit on passing downs.

Where CMU needs to improve, however, is in the mundane. The tight end position was utilized relatively frequently on standard downs but didn't actually accomplish much. X-receiver Courtney Williams combined a poor 10.9 yards per catch with an even poorer 46-percent catch rate. The quarterback of choice will need to find some reliable underneath options, be they seniors or redshirt freshmen. If CMU can get better closer to the line of scrimmage, the Chippewas could reap the benefits of having guys who can go deep. We'll see how new offensive coordinator Morris Watts, promoted after Mike Cummins left for UConn, handles the run-or-pass situations.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 79.1 2.76 3.17 33.8% 58.8% 22.4% 73.5 2.1% 11.7%
Rank 123 89 75 113 105 112 104 9 117
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Career Starts Honors/Notes
Andy Phillips LG 6'3, 306 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 30 2nd All-MAC
Jake Olson LT 28
Nick Beamish C 6'3, 310 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 25
Kevin Henry RT 6'4, 306 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 16
Ramadan Ahmeti LT 6'7, 300 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 10
Connor Collins RG 6'3, 300 So. 2 stars (5.2) 9
Cody Pettit LG 3
Austin Doan C 6'4, 296 So. 2 stars (5.3) 0
Kevin D'Arcy RG 6'4, 300 So. 2 stars (5.2) 0
Kenny Rogers RT 6'6, 304 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 0
Derek Edwards OL 6'5, 282 RSFr. 3 stars (5.6)

Jack Ford OL 6'7, 301 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5)

Alex Coty OL 6'4, 305 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)

J.P. Quinn OL 6'4, 280 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)

Shakir Carr OL 6'4, 290 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)

Brandon Keen OL 6'6, 290 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)

6. So how's the line?

CMU produced the No. 1 player in the 2013 NFL Draft; tackle Eric Fisher anchored a line that ranked 76th in Adj. Line Yards and 34th in Adj. Sack Rate. Not only did he depart after 2012, but so did three other multi-year starters on the line. The line was forced to start over, and as you see from the rankings above, it didn't fare well.

From a recruiting standpoint, CMU has done well in the trenches; tackle Kevin Henry is a former three-star signee, a pair of well-touted redshirt freshmen (Derek Edwards and Jack Ford) could join the rotation this year, and another three-star true freshman (Shakir Carr) joins the team as well. The ceiling here is potentially high, especially when you consider that there's quite a bit of experience here (90 career starts). But how long will it take to reach that ceiling? Last year's line needed to help out its young quarterback and running backs and couldn't.

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.08 36 IsoPPP+ 98.5 67
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 47.8% 108 Succ. Rt. + 81.0 120
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 30.4 64 Off. FP+ 96.5 96
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.1 59 Redzone S&P+ 84.0 110
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 20.7 ACTUAL 22.0 +1.3
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 67 114 120 103
RUSHING 98 122 124 116
PASSING 20 103 104 69
Standard Downs 111 120 84
Passing Downs 104 117 48
Q1 Rk 88 1st Down Rk 103
Q2 Rk 113 2nd Down Rk 114
Q3 Rk 121 3rd Down Rk 120
Q4 Rk 97

7. Explosive vs. mundane

As mentioned, the CMU offense was good at big plays but failed at the mundane plays in 2013. The defense was in the same boat; the Chippewas were perfectly decent in terms of bringing players down in open space and preventing major damage from big plays. But for the life of them, they couldn't prevent opponents from gaining six yards at any point. CMU was 124th, third-from-last, in terms of rushing efficiency, and 104th in passing efficiency. The defense actually pulled off a nice combination on passing downs -- good sack rate and minimal big gains. That can be very useful, but only if you actually create passing downs in the first place. They were few and far between in 2013.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 84.3 3.58 3.03 41.5% 71.4% 17.8% 91.2 2.4% 8.6%
Rank 121 125 37 88 90 83 79 113 29
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jeremy Gainer DE 12 31.5 4.5% 5.5 2.0 0 2 1 0
Louis Palmer DE 6'2, 265 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 12 24.5 3.5% 6.0 2.0 0 0 1 0
Leterrius Walton NT 6'5, 323 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 11 24.5 3.5% 9.5 1.0 0 0 1 0
Blake Serpa DE 6'3, 255 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 11 23.0 3.3% 7.0 3.0 0 1 1 0
Jabari Dean (2012) DT 6'2, 295 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 12 17.0 2.3% 1.5 1.0 0 0 1 1
Shafer Johnson NT 6'1, 300 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 10 14.5 2.1% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Joe Ostman DE 6'3, 235 So. 2 stars (5.3) 11 14.5 2.1% 1.5 1.0 0 2 0 0
Kelby Latta DT 6'4, 312 So. 3 stars (5.5) 9 9.5 1.4% 2.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Alex Smith DE 9 8.0 1.1% 2.0 1.0 0 0 0 0
Kenny McClendon DE 7 5.0 0.7% 1.5 0.5 0 0 0 0
Matt Losiniecki DL 6'3, 290 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 5 5.0 0.7% 1.0 0.5 0 0 0 0
Jabari Dean DL 6'2, 295 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 2 3.0 0.4% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Donny Kyre DE 6'2, 255 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)
Mitch Stanitzek DE 6'4, 230 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)
Nate Brisson-Fast DE 6'5, 245 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)






8. Again, how's the line?

In middle linebacker Justin Cherocci, end Blake Serpa, and on occasion, safety Avery Cunningham, CMU was indeed able to get relatively creative and aggressive in passing downs pass rush. But again, that only matters if you leverage teams into passing downs, and a line that had pretty decent size got pushed around far too much. Linebackers Cherocci and Shamari Benton combined for 20 tackles for loss (14 of the non-sack variety), and monstrous nose tackle Leterrius Walton added another 9.5, and CMU still ranked 121st in Adj. Line Yards.

Walton, Serpa, and almost everybody else returns up front. We'll see if that's a good thing.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Justin Cherocci MLB 6'0, 231 Sr. NR 12 84.0 12.0% 9.5 4.0 1 0 2 0
Shamari Benton SAM 12 80.0 11.4% 10.5 2.0 1 2 1 0
Cody Lopez MLB 6'1, 225 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 10 13.5 1.9% 1.0 0.0 0 0 1 0
Joe Bacci LB 6'1, 243 So. 2 stars (5.2) 6 4.5 0.6% 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0
Nathan Ricketts SAM 6'3, 230 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 5 4.5 0.6% 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
Tim Hamilton SAM 6'1, 233 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 4 3.5 0.5% 1.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Kyle Zelinsky MLB 3 2.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Malik Fountain LB 6'2, 228 Fr. 2 stars (5.4)





9. An attacking MLB

Benton and Cunningham are gone, but in Cherocci, CMU returns a senior leader who appears to be both steady and exciting. Middle linebackers don't frequently lead the team in sacks, and it's not necessarily a good thing when they do (it could say quite a bit about the quality of the edge rushers), but Cherocci did just that. There is almost no proven depth at linebacker, but Cherocci is a proven entity.

If experience on the line turns out to be a good thing, then Cherocci and a secondary that returns almost everybody (including four players who defensed at least five passes each) could assure that CMU not only makes some plays but does just as well in preventing them in 2014. It's all up to the line.

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Avery Cunningham S 12 62.5 8.9% 4 2 1 4 0 0
Kavon Frazier S 6'0, 213 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 11 51.5 7.3% 0 0 3 5 1 1
Jason Wilson CB 6'0, 185 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 12 46.5 6.6% 1.5 0 3 5 1 0
Brandon Greer CB 6'1, 203 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 12 40.0 5.7% 0 0 2 5 0 0
Jarret Chapman S 6'0, 194 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 12 39.5 5.6% 1.5 0 1 4 0 0
Kevin King S 5'10, 190 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 6 24.5 3.5% 4 2 0 0 1 0
Tony Annese S 6'1, 205 So. 2 stars (5.4) 11 23.0 3.3% 0.5 0 2 1 0 0
Dennis Nalor CB 6'0, 178 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 6 11.5 1.6% 0.5 0 0 1 1 0
Denzel Wimberly S 5'10, 201 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 4 4.5 0.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stefon Armstead CB 5'10, 175 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 2 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Winslow Chapman DB 6'0, 193 So. 2 stars (5.4) 3 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Colton Odykirk DB 6'2, 200 Jr. NR 2 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jordan Fields DB 5'11, 180 So. 3 stars (5.6)
Josh Cox DB 5'11, 195 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4)






Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Richie Hogan

51 43.9 4 8 17 49.0%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Connor Gagnon

57 60.9 14 1 24.6%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Ron Coluzzi

33-35 11-15 73.3% 1-2 50.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Jerry Harris KR

28 21.5 0
Defarrel Davis KR

5 21.4 0
Titus Davis PR 6'2, 190 Sr. 18 6.6 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 64
Field Goal Efficiency 103
Punt Return Efficiency 46
Kick Return Efficiency 25
Punt Efficiency 104
Kickoff Efficiency 29
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 84

2014 Schedule & Projection Factors

2014 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
28-Aug Chattanooga NR
6-Sep at Purdue 104
13-Sep Syracuse 66
20-Sep at Kansas 97
27-Sep at Toledo 53
4-Oct Ohio 108
11-Oct at Northern Illinois 51
18-Oct Ball State 81
25-Oct at Buffalo 107
1-Nov at Eastern Michigan 122
15-Nov Miami (Ohio) 121
22-Nov Western Michigan 113
Five-Year F/+ Rk -11.9% (94)
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 95
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* -5 / -1.3
TO Luck/Game -1.6
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 18 (10, 8)

10. 18 starters is a lot

CMU returns quite a bit in 2014. Granted, it's quite a bit from a team that nearly drowned over the first half of 2013, but the Chippewas did survive that rough patch and finish reasonably strong. Titus Davis is a true star, and players who were too inexperienced and raw to play consistently well in 2013 (Cooper Rush, Saylor Lavallii, Maurice Shoemaker-Gilmore, receiver Andrew Flory, Justin Cherocci, Leterrius Walton, Blake Serpa, most of the secondary) could improve quite a bit this fall.

I've been pretty down on Enos' tenure overall, even as he was engineering a bowl bid in 2012, but his 2014 squad will have more experience and play-making ability than any other he's had. Throw in a cakey November slate, and there's certainly potential for another hot finish and bowl bid.

In the end, however, if CMU is going to make anything of the first two months of the season, and therefore give itself a ceiling higher than 6-6, it's going to depend on improvement on the line. The offensive line needs to begin living up to recruiting hype, and the defensive line needs to prevent the same kind of gashing it suffered last year, even while making some plays here and there.

Again, whatever Enos is going to create out of this program, we're going to see it developing quite a bit in 2014. I don't know if that's an encouraging or discouraging statement.

More from SBNation.com

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.