The big 2014 Navy football preview: No team commits to its identity better

Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports

Navy has a theme (triple option offense, bend-don't-break defense), a hell of an option quarterback, and a rather cakey schedule in 2014. Ken Niumatalolo's team should expect to win at least nine games for the sixth time in 13 years.

SB Nation 2014 College Football Countdown

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. Good hires and commitment

Make really good hires, back those hires up with good support in terms of facilities, salaries, etc., and voila. Any program can succeed.

I spent a good portion of my Army and Air Force previews talking about how difficult service academy jobs are in modern college football. Recruiting has all sorts of obvious limitations. Athletic budgets are not exactly expansive. Admissions and fitness requirements are both necessary and a hindrance. That FBS football still has a place for the service academies is unique and fantastic, but it's pretty much impossible for these teams to play at an elite level.

That hasn't stopped Navy from being damn decent for most of the last decade and change. The Midshipmen have been to 11 bowls in the last 12 years and have won at least nine games five times in that stretch. They have ranked 67th or better in the F/+ rankings seven times since 2005. Air Force and Army in those same spans of time: two nine-win seasons and seven bowls in 12 years, four top-67 rankings (none since 2010). In 2013: Air Force and Army 5-19, Navy 9-4.

Navy has more money to work with in its athletic department, and the Midshipmen are able to maintain larger bodies in the trenches (to a degree). The commitment appears to be there for the most part. But really, Navy has just made two straight good hires, first replacing Charlie Weatherbie with Paul Johnson in 2002, then replacing Johnson with Ken Niumatalolo when Johnson left for Georgia Tech in 2008. That's hard to do, and it will make just about any program good.

Niumatalolo has had to overcome in recent years. Following the loss of quarterback Ricky Dobbs and some high-impact defensive players, his program regressed a bit, from 37th in the F/+ rankings in 2009, to 51st, 73rd, and 97th, in consecutive years. His 2012 squad was lucky to finish 8-5 but figured out ways to win close games with a freshman at quarterback. And the experience the Midshipmen gained in scuffling through 2012 paid off in 2013. Navy surged to 58th and 9-4 last fall and did so with complete program improvement -- the Middies' rankings improved from 87th to 32nd in Off. F/+, 107th to 97th in Def. F/+, and 43rd to 11th in special teams.

Navy's 2014 squad will certainly have some question marks, but there's enough experience here to expect the Middies to maintain last year's levels. This team has committed to its identity -- flexbone triple option on offense, bend-don't-break 3-4 on defense -- better than almost any program in the country, and it paid off in 2013. It should again this year. And quarterback Keenan Reynolds looked awfully Dobbsian in 2013.

Really, it takes good hires, commitment, and a quarterback. I guess I should have added that to the header.

2013 Schedule & Results

Record: 9-4 | Adj. Record: 6-7 | Final F/+ Rk: 58
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L 5-gm Adj. Avg.
7-Sep at Indiana 56 41-35 W 33.6 - 31.7 W
14-Sep Delaware N/A 51-7 W 37.5 - 40.3 L
28-Sep at Western Kentucky 77 7-19 L 14.4 - 22.9 L
5-Oct Air Force 113 28-10 W 20.1 - 21.8 L
12-Oct at Duke 41 7-35 L 27.0 - 30.4 L -2.9
19-Oct at Toledo 62 44-45 L 26.7 - 31.7 L -4.3
26-Oct Pittsburgh 54 24-21 W 31.9 - 28.9 W -3.1
2-Nov at Notre Dame 26 34-38 L 37.3 - 54.6 L -4.9
9-Nov Hawaii 82 42-28 W 34.9 - 40.5 L -5.6
16-Nov South Alabama 68 42-14 W 45.5 - 20.3 W 0.1
22-Nov at San Jose State 74 58-52 W 39.3 - 33.9 W 2.1
14-Dec vs. Army 100 34-7 W 22.6 - 13.1 W 3.4
30-Dec vs. Middle Tennessee 85 24-6 W 33.5 - 26.3 W 8.3
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk Spec. Tms. Rk
F/+ +8.2% 32 -8.8% 97 +2.9% 11
Points Per Game 33.5 35 24.4 40
Adj. Points Per Game 31.1 45 30.5 89

2. Don't you love it when a plan comes together...

Navy's 2013 season played out in three acts, and two of them weren't very impressive. The defense wasn't good enough against Duke or Toledo (and almost wasn't good enough against Indiana), and the offense wasn't good enough against Western Kentucky or Duke. Knocking off Indiana and feasting on pretty bad Delaware and Air Force teams kept the record at .500, but midway through the season Navy wasn't really looking any better than it had the year before. But the offense figured things out starting with the Pittsburgh game, and the defense got up to speed a couple of weeks later.

Adj. Points Per Game (first 4 games): Opponent 29.2, Navy 26.4 (minus-2.8)
Adj. Points Per Game (next 5 games): Opponent 37.2, Navy 31.6 (minus-5.6)
Adj. Points Per Game (last 4 games): Navy 35.2, Opponent 23.4 (plus-11.8)

The same offense that averaged only 3.2 yards per play against WKU and 4.9 against Toledo turned things up dramatically. The Midshipmen averaged 5.2 per play against Pitt and Notre Dame, then erupted: 6.4 against Hawaii, 7.0 against SJSU, 7.6 against a pretty good South Alabama defense. The pace slowed down in the final two games, but the defense was ready to pick up the slack, allowing only 13 points and 4.4 yards per play to Army and MTSU.

By the end of this season, Navy was a damn strong team. Let's see if that pace is sustained in 2014.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.00 118 IsoPPP+ 91.8 104
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 50.2% 8 Succ. Rt. + 101.3 54
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 27.5 23 Def. FP+ 101.4 41
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 5.0 9 Redzone S&P+ 107.4 33
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 11.9 ACTUAL 10 -1.9
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 62 64 55 95
RUSHING 2 41 57 12
PASSING 124 100 110 125
Standard Downs 48 39 79
Passing Downs 110 118 96
Q1 Rk 88 1st Down Rk 34
Q2 Rk 52 2nd Down Rk 93
Q3 Rk 86 3rd Down Rk 81
Q4 Rk 45

3. Staying on schedule

Most college offenses need to pass the one-sentence test. As in, you need to be able to describe your offensive identity in one sentence. If you don't really know what you want to do with the ball, or you don't have the personnel to adequately execute what's intended, you probably aren't going to move the ball very well.

Case in point: Michigan, which had a solid quarterback, a great receiver, and an eventual first-round pick at tackle (plus all sorts of former blue-chip recruits scattered throughout the two-deep), but couldn't run the ball to save its life and fell from 16th in Off. F/+ in 2012 to 40th in 2013.

Pure, undistilled talent raises your baseline; as bad as Michigan seemed at times in 2013, the Wolverines still ranked 40th, after all. But you can make up for lack of talent with identity and execution. The service academies have long since decided that the triple option, with its cut blocks and sleight of hand, is the best way to account for a lack of size and/or blue-chip talent, and after some struggles and inexperience in 2012, Navy once again mastered the option in 2013.

With identity comes sacrifice, however. When you've got limited resources and talent, you're probably accepting that strength comes with a built-in weakness. For Navy, the trade-off is obvious; the Midshipmen can absolutely gash you ... but if they fall behind schedule, they're toast. They ranked 41st in Rushing S&P+, generating all sorts of big plays and third-down conversions, but they ranked just 100th in Passing S&P+ with almost no big plays whatsoever.

Keenan Reynolds scored 31 times rushing in 2013 but completed only 68 passes, and while you don't need to pass a ton, you still need to be able to pass. That was a bit of a problem for Navy and will probably be one again this fall. But that will only matter if you stop the Midshipmen from getting four yards on first down and another four on second.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2014 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Keenan Reynolds 5'11, 185 Jr. NR 68 128 1057 8 2 53.1% 17 11.7% 6.5
John Hendrick 6'1, 198 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 6 15 60 0 2 40.0% 2 11.8% 2.0
Tago Smith 5'10, 190 So. NR
Will Worth 6'1, 210 So. NR

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
Opp.
Rate
Keenan Reynolds QB 5'11, 185 Jr. NR 283 1466 31 5.2 4.9 39.6%
Chris Swain FB 5'11, 232 Jr. NR 107 420 4 3.9 1.7 31.8%
Noah Copeland FB 5'10, 214 Sr. NR 69 339 2 4.9 3.6 39.1%
Quinton Singleton FB 6'0, 204 Sr. NR 65 361 2 5.6 4.0 41.5%
Geoffrey Whiteside SB 5'10, 171 Sr. NR 49 363 3 7.4 4.0 65.3%
Darius Staten SB 42 412 3 9.8 5.8 71.4%
DeBrandon Sanders SB 5'7, 160 Jr. NR 42 340 1 8.1 4.9 66.7%
Marcus Thomas SB 26 263 0 10.1 7.3 69.2%
Demond Brown SB 5'9, 191 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 23 220 1 9.6 6.6 73.9%
John Hendrick QB 6'1, 198 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 12 65 1 5.4 4.7 41.7%
Ed Royds SB 5'10, 197 Jr. NR
Dishan Romine SB 5'11, 185 So. 2 stars (5.2)
Ryan Williams-Jenkins SB 5'8, 170 Sr. 2 stars (5.2)
Toneo Gulley SB 5'8, 190 So. 2 stars (5.2)

4. Nick, nick, nick, gash

Even with the collapse of the 2012 offense, Navy has ranked 33rd or better in Off. F/+ in six of the last seven seasons. Again, the Midshipmen are one-dimensional in terms of run vs. pass, but they have succeeded to such a degree because the run itself isn't one-dimensional. Navy has been so consistently strong at pecking away at the middle of a defense with the quarterback and fullbacks; the style of offense is conducive to converting third-and-2 with ease, and Navy will endlessly pound away at you with the fullbacks until you adjust. And when you adjust, the slotback gets to the corner of the defense with ease.

You don't get one without the other. At first glance, the ball distribution above doesn't make a lot of sense. The top three fullbacks averaged only 4.6 yards per carry but got almost 20 carries per game! Reynolds himself only averaged 5.2 yards per (non-sack) carry but had almost 22 carries per game! Meanwhile, the top four slotbacks averaged 8.7 per carry but only got 12 per game! They should get more touches! But the slotbacks' success is the punishment for defenses having to keep their eyes on the fullbacks. And Navy pulls off this balance well.

Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
DeBrandon Sanders SB 5'7, 160 Jr. NR 21 13 223 61.9% 16.0% 78.9% 10.6 62 10.0 28.6
Casey Bolena WR 20 13 164 65.0% 15.3% 47.4% 8.2 7 7.7 21.1
Shawn Lynch WR 15 6 79 40.0% 11.5% 46.7% 5.3 -16 5.8 10.1
Matt Aiken WR 13 8 150 61.5% 9.9% 69.2% 11.5 51 12.8 19.3
Brendan Dudeck WR 6'0, 202 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 11 5 48 45.5% 8.4% 60.0% 4.4 -25 4.8 6.2
Marcus Thomas SB 11 5 94 45.5% 8.4% 45.5% 8.5 21 9.6 12.1
Geoffrey Whiteside SB 5'10, 171 Sr. NR 10 7 158 70.0% 7.6% 75.0% 15.8 77 11.7 20.3
Darius Staten SB 9 6 68 66.7% 6.9% 75.0% 7.6 -3 7.6 8.7
Jamir Tillman WR 6'3, 190 So. 3 stars (5.5) 5 2 12 40.0% 3.8% 0.0% 2.4 -20 1.3 1.5
Noah Copeland FB 5'10, 214 Sr. NR 5 3 43 60.0% 3.8% 40.0% 8.6 5 9.0 5.5
Ryan Williams-Jenkins SB 5'8, 170 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 5 2 24 40.0% 3.8% 25.0% 4.8 -8 12.9 3.1
Demond Brown SB 5'9, 191 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 3 2 45 66.7% 2.3% 100.0% 15.0 21 8.3 5.8
Quinton Singleton FB 6'0, 204 Sr. NR 2 1 5 50.0% 1.5% 100.0% 2.5 -9 2.8 0.6
Marc Meier WR 5'10, 180 Jr. 2 stars (5.3)
Thomas Wilson WR 6'0, 192 Jr. NR
Derek Mann WR 5'11, 180 So. NR
Calvin Cass Jr. WR 5'10, 200 So. NR
Julian Turner WR 6'2, 190 So. NR

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 111.3 3.76 3.74 46.0% 76.2% 10.1% 51.8 10.6% 14.9%
Rank 25 3 22 10 18 1 122 122 123
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Career Starts Honors/Notes
Jake Zuzek RG 6'0, 310 Sr. NR 26
Graham Vickers RT 18
Bradyn Heap LT 6'3, 288 Sr. NR 15
Tanner Fleming C 6'2, 276 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 12
E.K. Binns LG 6'3, 287 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 10
Brandon Greene LT 6'3, 257 Jr. NR 7
Thomas Stone LG 4
Joey Gaston RT 6'5, 281 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 3
Blaze Ryder C 5'11, 265 Jr. NR 1
Nathaniel Otto LG 6'2, 260 Sr. NR 0
Eric Mahler RG 0
Matthew Van Halanger RT 0
Ben Tamburello LG 6'2, 275 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0
Maurice Morris C 6'2, 310 So. 2 stars (5.3) 0
Patrick Hoffman LT 6'4, 265 So. 2 stars (5.2) 0
Blake Copeland RT 6'4, 258 So. NR 0

5. Being good at what you need to be good at

However you want to divvy out blame, Reynolds and the offensive line combined to form a pretty awful sack avoidance unit. But Reynolds only attempted about 11 passes per game.

In terms of allocation of resources, Navy's line was very good at precisely what it needed to be good at in 2013 -- keeping defenders out of the backfield against the run, converting short-yardage, and creating holes on standard downs. The line succeeded despite some juggling of personnel, and that juggling could pay off in 2014.

The line returns seven players with starting experience (74 career starts), including two-year starting guard Jake Zuzek. Navy's line has more size than one would expect -- only two of these seven experienced players carry fewer than 276 pounds, and the starting guards average 6'2, 299 -- and when you combine decent size with all of the annoying cut blocks that Navy is so good at, you've got a hell of a unit.

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 0.93 1 IsoPPP+ 121.6 2
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 50.6% 121 Succ. Rt. + 87.6 104
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 33.3 8 Off. FP+ 103.5 23
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.3 75 Redzone S&P+ 84.2 108
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 16.6 ACTUAL 22.0 +5.4
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 58 81 104 42
RUSHING 80 64 89 47
PASSING 37 94 116 44
Standard Downs 62 98 4
Passing Downs 96 111 14
Q1 Rk 44 1st Down Rk 64
Q2 Rk 95 2nd Down Rk 96
Q3 Rk 90 3rd Down Rk 84
Q4 Rk 72

6. Committing to your identity

The bend-don't-break approach to defense is rather common in college football, and for pretty obvious reasons. Not every defense has the athletes to dominate at the line of scrimmage; not every defense has cornerbacks who can consistently win one-on-one battles on the outside. If you can't dominate from an athletic standpoint, you try the next best thing: containment. Sacrifice some smaller gains to prevent the really big ones and hope that, with your help, the opposing offense makes a mistake before it crosses the goal line.

Again, there is power in being honest with yourself. Navy all but trademarked the bend-don't-break approach in 2013; the Midshipmen ranked 104th in Success Rate+ (bending) and second in IsoPPP+ (breaking). They were less efficient than most FBS defenses and more capable at preventing big plays than almost anybody. And it paid off. Less disciplined offenses either struggled to move the ball at all or struggled to finish the opportunities they generated. WKU averaged 5.6 yards per play but scored just 19 points; MTSU averaged 5.2 and scored just six.

Having two senior inside linebackers and a great rover in Wave Ryder helped Navy to perfect the art of defensive flexibility. Losing those three will hurt, but there is still enough experience here to assume a maintained identity.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 94.1 3.34 3.79 45.4% 78.4% 14.4% 51.1 1.7% 3.7%
Rank 87 110 111 116 111 118 123 124 116
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Will Anthony DE 6'1, 238 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 13 20.0 2.6% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Evan Palelei DE 13 19.5 2.5% 2.0 1.0 0 0 1 0
Travis Bridges NG 13 19.0 2.5% 0.0 0.0 0 0 1 0
Paul Quessenberry DE 6'2, 251 Sr. NR 12 18.5 2.4% 3.0 1.0 0 0 0 0
Bernard Sarra NG 6'1, 303 Jr. 2 stars (5.1) 10 17.0 2.2% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Aaron Davis DE 6'0, 251 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 11 5.0 0.7% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Barry Dabney NG 12 3.5 0.5% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
A.K. Akpunku DE 6'3, 238 Jr. 2 stars (5.3)
Sean Reaver DE 6'4, 255 Jr. 2 stars (5.2)
Amos Mason DE 6'1, 250 So. NR
Patrick Forrestal NG 6'4, 305 So. NR
Cam Henson NG 6'3, 281 So. NR






Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Cody Peterson ILB 13 118.0 15.4% 5.5 1.0 0 1 0 0
DJ Sargenti ILB 13 90.5 11.8% 7.0 1.0 2 2 1 0
Chris Johnson OLB 6'1, 207 Sr. 3 stars (5.7) 13 67.5 8.8% 3.0 0.0 3 3 0 0
Jordan Drake ILB 6'4, 220 Sr. NR 13 32.0 4.2% 3.0 3.0 0 0 1 0
William Tuider OLB 6'2, 205 So. 2 stars (5.2) 13 25.5 3.3% 4.0 2.0 0 1 1 0
Obi Uzoma OLB 6'3, 231 Sr. NR 13 14.0 1.8% 2.0 2.0 0 0 0 0
Don Pearson ILB 6'3, 224 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 11 7.5 1.0% 1.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
James Britton ILB 6'2, 223 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 12 4.0 0.5% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Tyler Goble ILB 6'1, 228 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 7 3.5 0.5% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Maika Polamalu ILB 6'0, 218 Sr. 3 stars (5.5)
Josiah Powell OLB 6'3, 200 So. NR
Nick Martinez OLB 6'2, 222 Jr. NR
Ted Colburn OLB 6'2, 225 So. NR
Daniel Gonzales ILB 6'2, 220 So. NR






7. Expect more bending

Again, Navy boasts size that other service academies cannot. The three nose guards listed above average 6'3, 296; perhaps that isn't quite opimtal for a 3-4, but it's damn close. So maybe the Midshipmen should be doing a little bit better up front when it comes to preventing rushing opportunities. But they didn't, and they probably won't this fall, either.

Navy's approach is to tackle well and wait for you to make a mistake, and while most of the potential play-makers on the edge return -- skinny OLBs Chris Johnson and William Tulder, end Paul Quessenberry -- Navy isn't really going to be spending much time in the backfield. This defense's success will again hinge on its ability to prevent big plays, and it might not be as well-built for such a thing this time around.

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Parrish Gaines FS 6'2, 196 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 13 54.0 7.0% 2 0 3 2 0 0
Wave Ryder ROV 13 47.0 6.1% 0.5 0 1 2 0 0
Brendon Clements CB 5'10, 185 So. 2 stars (5.3) 13 44.0 5.7% 2.5 0 3 4 2 0
Kwazel Bertrand CB 5'10, 186 Jr. NR 9 36.0 4.7% 2 0 0 2 0 0
Chris Ferguson FS 7 26.5 3.5% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Lonnie Richardson ROV 5'11, 188 Sr. NR 13 18.5 2.4% 0.5 0 0 0 2 0
Myer Krah CB 5'11, 203 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 12 18.0 2.3% 0 0 0 2 1 0
Quincy Adams CB 5'11, 195 Jr. NR 13 9.0 1.2% 0 0 0 0 1 0
George Jamison FS 6'0, 197 Sr. NR 13 7.5 1.0% 0 0 1 0 0 0
Shakir Robinson FS 5'10, 197 Sr. 2 stars (5.2)
Shelley White CB 5'10, 190 Jr. 2 stars (5.3)
Lorentez Barbour ROV 6'1, 194 Jr. NR
Kyle Battle CB 6'1, 190 So. 2 stars (5.3)
Daiquan Thomasson ROV 6'0, 190 So. NR
Chandler Hawkins DB 5'11, 180 Fr. 3 stars (5.6)






8. Expect more breaking?

Generally speaking, Navy returns a solid amount of experience in the back eight: seven of the top nine at linebacker, every cornerback, and three of the top five safeties.

But Navy's margin for error on defense was minimal, and without wonderfully named Wave Ryder and ILBs Cody Peterson and D.J. Sargenti, we'll see if the Midshipmen can prevent big plays with the same panache as last year. Anything less could force the offense to win quite a few shootouts.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Pablo Beltran 6'2, 225 Sr. 40 41.4 5 10 12 55.0%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Austin Grebe 6'0, 192 Jr. 76 61.1 16 2 21.1%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Nick Sloan 6'0, 190 Jr. 51-55 10-13 76.9% 1-1 100.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Marcus Thomas KR 24 23.5 0
Demond Brown KR 5'9, 191 Jr. 5 22.2 0
Shawn Lynch PR 10 7.4 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 11
Field Goal Efficiency 80
Punt Return Efficiency 20
Kick Return Efficiency 33
Punt Efficiency 31
Kickoff Efficiency 21
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 28

9. Shore up the place-kicking

Granted, the Navy offense was really good at finishing drives in the end zone (another plus with the triple option: you never have to adjust your play-calling), so field goal kicking wasn't as big a deal as it could have been; still, Nick Sloan missed four PATs and was a little worse than you would prefer on field goals under 40 yards. I mention this because it was basically Navy's only special teams weakness. The return game takes a hit with the loss of Marcus Thomas and Shawn Lynch, but Pablo Beltran's punting is solid, and the coverage units are excellent. Navy should once again be pretty good at the field position battle.

2014 Schedule & Projection Factors

2014 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
30-Aug vs. Ohio State 4
6-Sep at Temple 95
13-Sep at Texas State 113
20-Sep Rutgers 78
27-Sep Western Kentucky 92
4-Oct at Air Force 102
11-Oct VMI NR
25-Oct San Jose State 88
1-Nov vs. Notre Dame 25
15-Nov Georgia Southern 125
28-Nov at South Alabama 87
13-Dec vs. Army 110
Five-Year F/+ Rk -1.1% (59)
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 106
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* 12 / 4.6
TO Luck/Game +2.8
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 13 (7, 6)

10. Another fun schedule

I mentioned yesterday that I really enjoyed Army's schedule, with a lot of battles against Northeastern programs and smart-kid schools and games at Yale and Yankee Stadium.

I like Navy's as well. In their final season before joining the AAC, the Midshipmen play Ohio State and Army in Baltimore and Notre Dame in Landover, meaning they get five home games and three others nearby. They play Temple in Philadelphia, they get another military school in VMI, and they battle Georgia Southern in mid-November in what could be a very fun, very run-heavy contest.

There's a nice mix of intriguing games and built-in wins. Navy plays only two teams projected better than 78th, and if the defense is able to remain flexible (without becoming too flexible), the Midshipmen could find themselves with another nine-win (or more) season. Considering where I thought this program might be headed a year ago, that's a really nice turnaround. Niumatalolo has not only found his next great option quarterback, but he's got an experienced, disciplined team with one of the strongest identities in the country.

Navy should easily be, once again, the best football team among the service academies.

More from SBNation.com

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.