PRESENTED BY 669248957_logo

The big 2014 Syracuse football preview: More excitement, less volatility

Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

Syracuse could be fun in 2014, with a high-paced, run-first offense and a TFLs-or-bust defense. But a more experienced roster will need to overcome the inconsistency that held the Orange back last fall.

SB Nation 2014 College Football Countdown

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. Which year is the blip?

It wasn't hard to see a dropoff coming for Syracuse in 2013.

In taking the Buffalo Bills job, Marrone left the Syracuse program earlier than expected. But the timing of his departure could be worse for both parties. For Marrone, his team was due a step backwards in 2013, replacing the quarterback, two best receivers, and two best linemen from a resurgent offense, not to mention a good chunk of the defensive line. Marrone was selling high before his stock ticked down a bit, at least temporarily.

One could argue that the departure came at a decent time for Syracuse, too, at least if Marrone had to leave at all. Recruiting was not really picking up, and as mentioned, the Orange were most likely due a rankings drop this fall. Marrone built an interesting team with an outstanding offensive line and an aggressive defense, and he certainly could have continued to slowly build upstate, but this wasn't the worst time in the world for a change to happen ... if his replacement, Scott Shafer, is up to the task, anyway. (Kind of an important detail there.)

For the first time since we began recording F/+ rankings (2005), Syracuse was a top-40 team in 2012. But the Orange pulled off that feat with a rather experienced (read: old) squad. There was too much youth for the 'Cuse to expect further improvement in the short term, but with only three top-40 teams on the 2013 schedule, the Orange were able to pull off a bit of a late-season rally and hit 7-6 while beating only one top-60 team. They reached their third bowl in four years after getting to only one in the previous seven.

All of this was good for program momentum even if Syracuse was in no way very good. The defense was decent, but the offense regressed dramatically, and ... again, the 'Cuse only beat one top-60 team.

There are five top-40 squads on the schedule this time around, and only two come to the Carrier Dome. Syracuse is going to have to improve to reach its fourth bowl in five years. Scott Shafer and the Orange have to prove that 2013 was the blip, not 2012.

But considering last year's youth, the Orange should improve. They return their starting quarterback, experience and explosiveness at running back, seven of last year's top eight passing targets (for better or worse), four starters on the offensive line, four of the top five defensive linemen, five of the top six linebackers, and four of the top five defensive backs. The team that won four of its final six returns most of the reasons why it won those games.

We still don't know about the long-term prognosis here. We don't know a ton about Scott Shafer's head coaching potential yet, and we still don't know a ton about what offensive coordinator George McDonald wants to do with the ball. But we know that the Orange made a bowl in an inevitable down year, and we know they've got some interesting pieces to play with this time around.

2013 Schedule & Results

Record: 7-6 | Adj. Record: 7-6 | Final F/+ Rk: 75
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L 5-gm Adj. Avg.
31-Aug vs. Penn State 61 17-23 L 8.9 - 19.4 L
7-Sep at Northwestern 59 27-48 L 31.1 - 42.8 L
14-Sep Wagner N/A 54-0 W 30.7 - 0.9 W
21-Sep Tulane 70 52-17 W 41.7 - 27.0 W
5-Oct Clemson 16 14-49 L 21.0 - 36.4 L 1.4
12-Oct at N.C. State 92 24-10 W 33.9 - 17.7 W 6.7
19-Oct at Georgia Tech 34 0-56 L 15.3 - 38.4 L 4.4
2-Nov Wake Forest 81 13-0 W 24.5 - 12.4 W 0.9
9-Nov at Maryland 63 20-3 W 26.8 - 16.2 W 0.1
16-Nov at Florida State 1 3-59 L 20.6 - 45.7 L -1.9
23-Nov Pittsburgh 54 16-17 L 18.2 - 17.9 W -5.0
30-Nov Boston College 65 34-31 W 31.9 - 35.0 L -1.0
27-Dec vs. Minnesota 55 21-17 W 29.4 - 25.6 W -2.7
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk Spec. Tms. Rk
F/+ -5.6% 83 -0.3% 63 -0.3% 77
Points Per Game 22.7 99 25.4 57
Adj. Points Per Game 25.7 90 25.8 47

2. A powerful personality

Say this much for Syracuse: the Orange dictated their wins and losses in 2013. When they played well, they played well enough to beat almost anybody, and when they played poorly, they were absolutely dreadful.

  • Adj. Points Per Game (Actual Wins): Syracuse 31.3, Opponent 19.3 (plus-12.0)
  • Adj. Points Per Game (Actual Losses): Opponent 33.4, Syracuse 19.2 (minus-14.2)

In their wins, the Orange had an above-average offense and a great defense. They averaged 5.7 yards per play against a stout Tulane defense and 7.2 against NC State. They rushed for 362 yards against NC State, 242 against Maryland, and 208 against Minnesota, and they threw for 270 against Boston College and 359 against Wagner.

Defensively, the highs were even higher. They allowed fewer than 5.0 yards per play in five of seven wins, including 3.8 against Maryland, 3.7 against NC State, 3.0 against Wake Forest, and 1.7 against poor Wagner.

And then there were the losses. Northwestern averaged 7.2 yards per play, Clemson 8.1, and Florida State (gulp) 11.6. Georgia Tech held the Orange to 3.8 yards per play, Penn State 3.5, and FSU 3.2. In 33 fewer plays, FSU outgained Syracuse by 276 yards. You didn't control Syracuse; either you dominated the Orange, or the Orange dominated you.

In a lot of ways, these are the characteristics of a young, reasonably high-upside team. But Syracuse took those characteristics to the extremes, and when the team was bad, it was so bad that "upside" didn't really come into the conversation.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.07 99 IsoPPP+ 94.1 92
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 39.2% 92 Succ. Rt. + 99.4 66
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 30.0 69 Def. FP+ 99.4 66
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.0 80 Redzone S&P+ 111.0 24
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 19.4 ACTUAL 22 +2.6
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 86 69 67 69
RUSHING 37 33 41 26
PASSING 104 94 89 105
Standard Downs 42 33 78
Passing Downs 102 106 75
Q1 Rk 85 1st Down Rk 64
Q2 Rk 66 2nd Down Rk 78
Q3 Rk 44 3rd Down Rk 53
Q4 Rk 79

3. Picking up the pace

Taking the amount of rushing into account, Syracuse played at a faster pace than the national average in 2013. If George McDonald gets his way this fall, the Orange could move even faster. And in theory, this could work out pretty well. Syracuse was reasonably efficient in Terrel Hunt's first year behind center; the big senior wasn't incredibly explosive, but in his 93 non-sack carries, nearly 60 percent of them gained at least five yards.

Hunt brought efficiency to the table while running backs Jerome Smith, Prince-Tyson Gulley, and Devante McFarlane brought explosiveness. (George Morris II brought neither, but he's got time to improve.) A parry-and-thrust running game can work pretty well, and if you're moving the chains frequently enough, you can have your opponents gassed by the second and fourth quarters.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2014 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Terrel Hunt 6'3, 233 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 167 273 1632 10 8 61.2% 14 4.9% 5.4
Drew Allen 68 122 666 2 9 55.7% 4 3.2% 5.0
Charley Loeb 4 6 24 0 0 66.7% 0 0.0% 4.0
Austin Wilson 6'3, 211 So. 3 stars (5.5)
Mitch Kimble 6'3, 201 So. 2 stars (5.4)
Alin Edouard 6'1, 180 Fr. 3 stars (5.6)
A.J. Long 6'0, 184 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Carry
Opp.
Rate
Jerome Smith RB 200 914 12 4.6 5.6 30.5%
Terrel Hunt QB 6'3, 233 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 93 577 7 6.2 3.9 58.1%
Prince-Tyson Gulley RB 5'9, 195 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 83 462 4 5.6 8.5 34.9%
George Morris II RB 6'0, 201 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 79 334 1 4.2 3.8 30.4%
Devante McFarlane RB 6'0, 197 So. 3 stars (5.5) 48 292 1 6.1 7.3 39.6%
Drew Allen QB 11 34 0 3.1 2.2 27.3%
Adonis Ameen-Moore RB 5'11, 260 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 5 26 0 5.2 3.5 40.0%
Brisly Estime WR 5'9, 172 So. 3 stars (5.5) 4 11 0 2.8 2.3 50.0%

4. An efficient, explosive running game

After rushing for 2,085 yards in two years, Smith left early for the pros and was picked up by the Falcons as an undrafted free agent. He was good in the open field but wasn't great at finding open field, and that resulted in a hit-or-miss junior season. He rushed for a combined 265 yards (7.2 per carry) against Clemson and NC State and a combined 106 yards (3.2 per carry) against Georgia Tech, Wake Forest, and Florida State. He was both reliable and replaceable.

Prince-Tyson Gulley received an extra year of eligibility thanks to injuries suffered in 2011; he's not necessarily the most durable back in the world, but he's even better in the open field than Smith, and he'll be complemented by big Adonis Ameen-Moore and Devante McFarlane, who thrived in a reserve role. He carried 16 times for 176 yards against Clemson and FSU.

This group will be running behind four-fifths of a line that ranked 27th in Adj. Line yards (fourth in Power Success Rate) last fall. All-conference center Macky MacPherson is gone, but the other four starters have combined for 78 career starts. This is a line that far exceeded its recruiting rankings last year and should do so again, especially with Hunt helping out from an efficiency standpoint.

Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Ashton Broyld WR 6'3, 223 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 74 52 452 70.3% 19.9% 53.2% 6.1 -151 6.1 47.3
Christopher Clark WR 50 36 365 72.0% 13.4% 52.5% 7.3 -48 6.7 38.2
Jarrod West WR 6'2, 209 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 50 26 397 52.0% 13.4% 30.0% 7.9 44 7.3 41.6
Brisly Estime WR 5'9, 172 So. 3 stars (5.5) 37 28 257 75.7% 9.9% 44.8% 6.9 -57 6.5 26.9
Jeremiah Kobena WR 6'0, 188 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 30 16 206 53.3% 8.1% 52.6% 6.9 -8 8.2 21.6
Prince-Tyson Gulley RB 5'9, 195 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 22 15 59 68.2% 5.9% 58.8% 2.7 -118 3.4 6.2
Alvin Cornelius WR 6'1, 191 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 17 9 134 52.9% 4.6% 29.4% 7.9 13 6.4 14.0
Josh Parris TE 6'2, 252 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 17 13 90 76.5% 4.6% 61.5% 5.3 -55 5.6 9.4
Beckett Wales TE 14 10 72 71.4% 3.8% 36.4% 5.1 -43 6.6 7.5
Jerome Smith RB 6'0, 226 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 13 8 74 61.5% 3.5% 61.5% 5.7 -25 5.2 7.7
Kendall Moore TE 6'5, 248 So. 3 stars (5.6) 12 6 65 50.0% 3.2% 100.0% 5.4 -18 2.0 6.8
Adrian Flemming WR 6'3, 195 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 5 2 18 40.0% 1.3% 0.0% 3.6 -14 1.6 1.9
Quinta Funderburk WR 6'3, 209 Sr. 3 stars (5.7) 5 3 50 60.0% 1.3% 0.0% 10.0 12 12.4 5.2
Corey Winfield HB 6'1, 182 So. 3 stars (5.5)
Tyler Provo TE 6'3, 238 So. 3 stars (5.5)
K.J. Williams WR 6'2, 188 Fr. 4 stars (5.8)
Steve Ishmael WR 6'2, 175 Fr. 3 stars (5.7)
Corey Cooper WR 6'0, 198 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)

5. An inefficient, non-explosive passing game

The problem in 2013 was that once Syracuse fell behind schedule, the drive was ending rather quickly. And without some early help from an exciting batch of youngsters, the passing game could trip the Orange up again this fall. And as we've said many times throughout this preview series, pace backfires if you're going three-and-out in record time.

Syracuse ranked 42nd in Standard Downs S&P+ but 102nd in Passing Downs S&P+. Hunt completed a decent 61 percent of his passes with a decent five percent sack rate, but his receiving corps, rebuilt after featuring Marcus Sales and Alec Lemon in 2012, couldn't get open downfield. His top four targets combined to average only 10.4 yards per catch, and while seven of the top eight targets return, none of them averaged even 8.0 yards per target.

There's hope in the incoming freshman class. Knowing an upgrade was needed, Shafer signed five receivers in his 2014 class, including four-star wideout K.J. Williams and high-three-star Steve Ishmael. Throw in sophomore slot receiver Brisly Estime, and you've got some interesting potential here. But potential might not become production until 2015 or later.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 110.3 3.03 2.62 36.8% 81.0% 17.9% 136.1 2.6% 6.4%
Rank 27 51 113 93 4 47 32 15 57
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals Career Starts Honors/Notes
Macky MacPherson C 38 2nd All-ACC
Sean Hickey LT 6'5, 300 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 26
Rob Trudo RG 6'3, 292 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 22
Ivan Foy RT 6'4, 318 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 17
Nick Robinson RG 6'5, 281 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 13
Daniel Anyaegbunam RG 0
Kyle Knapp RG 0
John Miller C 6'2, 305 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0
Omari Palmer LG 6'2, 316 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0
Jason Emerich C 6'3, 282 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0
Michael Lasker RT 6'3, 320 Jr. NR 0
Alex Hayes LG 6'2, 315 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0
Jon Burton RT 6'6, 325 So. 2 stars (5.3) 0
Jamar McGloster LT 6'5, 311 So. NR 0
Denzel Ward OL 6'8, 320 Fr. 3 stars (5.6)
Aaron Roberts OL 6'4, 285 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.15 65 IsoPPP+ 98.2 68
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 41.2% 50 Succ. Rt. + 99.7 54
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 30.8 53 Off. FP+ 100.5 55
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.4 81 Redzone S&P+ 94.8 77
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 21.3 ACTUAL 24.0 +2.7
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 34 55 54 68
RUSHING 26 56 51 54
PASSING 63 59 68 86
Standard Downs 66 67 68
Passing Downs 58 46 80
Q1 Rk 92 1st Down Rk 43
Q2 Rk 39 2nd Down Rk 81
Q3 Rk 74 3rd Down Rk 48
Q4 Rk 18

6. Almost perfectly mediocre

In 2012, when Shafer was wearing the defensive coordinator hat, Syracuse attacked and attacked and attacked. The Orange had six players in the front seven with at least 8.5 tackles for loss; only two of the six returned in 2013, however, so there was reason to fear a dropoff.

The drop was minimal; Syracuse fell only from fourth in the country in tackles for loss in 2012 to 17th in 2013. The Orange spread the love, with nine players recording at least 4.5 TFLs, and seven of those nine return this fall.

The mindset of the Orange defense is clear, and typically an aggressive defense like this ends up ranking pretty high in the efficiency rankings while suffering breakdowns and ranking lower in the explosiveness rankings. Syracuse, though, was almost perfectly mediocre across the board, just as it was in 2012. The Orange ranked between 50th and 70th in a vast majority of the rankings above. It's difficult to be bland and exciting at the same time, but in a way Syracuse pulled it off.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs
LY/carry
Pass.
Downs
LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs
Sack Rt.
Team 109 2.69 2.79 40.6% 62.5% 22.8% 87.5 7.7% 5.2%
Rank 32 34 22 82 36 21 86 7 97
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jay Bromley DT 13 36.0 5.3% 13.5 9.0 0 0 3 0
Robert Welsh DE 6'3, 248 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 13 29.0 4.3% 7.0 4.0 1 4 0 0
Eric Crume DT 6'0, 296 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 13 20.0 2.9% 5.0 2.0 0 0 0 0
Micah Robinson DE 6'4, 270 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 13 18.0 2.6% 5.5 1.0 0 1 0 0
Ron Thompson DE 6'4, 250 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 13 15.5 2.3% 4.5 2.0 0 1 0 0
Zian Jones DT 13 12.0 1.8% 3.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
John Raymon DT 6'5, 325 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 7 6.5 1.0% 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0
Isaiah Johnson DE 6'4, 276 So. 2 stars (5.4) 10 4.0 0.6% 1.5 1.5 1 1 0 0
Marcus Coleman DT 6'1, 286 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 5 2.5 0.4% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Ryan Sloan DT 6'2, 320 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 5 1.5 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Donnie Simmons DE 6'2, 251 Sr. 2 stars (5.3)
Wayne Williams DT 6'4, 330 Jr. 3 stars (5.5)
Chris Slayton DE 6'5, 250 Fr. 3 stars (5.6)

7. The line did its job (against the run)

Syracuse racked up a lovely TFLs total despite a rather sketchy pass rush. A lot of this had to do with the Orange's ability to attack the run. Syracuse ranked 21st in Stuff Rate and 36th in Power Success Rate, stunting like crazy and attacking gaps with machetes. The best pass rusher was a tackle (Jay Bromley), but the line did quite well against the run.

Can the Orange maintain this play in 2014? The loss of Bromley and Zian Jones could hurt, and it appears that John Raymon might not be ready to play this fall after suffering a brutal knee injury against Georgia Tech last year. That leaves tenuous depth in the middle, and it means there's a lot of pressure on incoming JUCO tackle Wayne Williams to thrive quickly.

If tackle isn't a weakness, the end position could make this a great line. Again, the pass rushing here isn't great, but Robert Welsh has his moments, and the ends as a whole were big enough to shoot gaps and make a lot of plays on standard downs.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Cameron Lynch OLB 5'11, 226 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 13 61.0 9.0% 12.0 4.0 2 4 1 1
Marquis Spruill MLB 13 57.5 8.4% 14.5 5.5 0 0 0 0
Dyshawn Davis OLB 6'2, 221 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 12 40.0 5.9% 7.0 2.5 0 2 0 0
Josh Kirkland OLB 6'2, 201 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 9 23.5 3.5% 5.5 0.5 0 2 0 0
Marqez Hodge MLB 6'1, 216 So. 3 stars (5.5) 8 22.5 3.3% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Luke Arciniega MLB 6'2, 251 Sr. 3 stars (5.7) 13 16.5 2.4% 2.0 1.0 1 0 0 0
Lewellyn Coker LB 13 13.5 2.0% 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 0
Oliver Vigille MLB 6'2, 224 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 12 4.0 0.6% 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
Alryk Perry OLB 6'1, 211 So. NR
PJ Batten OLB 6'3, 227 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5)
Zaire Franklin LB 6'0, 215 Fr. 3 stars (5.7)
Jonathan Thomas LB 6'3, 210 Fr. 3 stars (5.6)
Colton Moskal LB 6'1, 215 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Rivals GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Durell Eskridge FS 6'3, 203 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 12 65.0 9.6% 4 0.5 4 1 1 0
Darius Kelly FS 5'11, 195 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 13 38.0 5.6% 0 0 0 3 0 0
Ritchy Desir SS 5'11, 185 Sr. 3 stars (5.7) 13 37.5 5.5% 2 0 1 2 1 0
Jeremi Wilkes SS 13 31.0 4.6% 1.5 0 1 0 0 0
Brandon Reddish CB 5'11, 178 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 12 31.0 4.6% 0 0 0 4 1 1
Ri'Shard Anderson CB 13 24.5 3.6% 2 0 1 1 0 0
Wayne Morgan CB 5'10, 199 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 13 18.5 2.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Keon Lyn CB 5 15.0 2.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julian Whigham CB 6'1, 182 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 10 10.0 1.5% 1 0 3 3 0 0
Jaston George SS 5'10, 175 Sr. 2 stars (5.3)
Joe Nassib CB 5'9, 180 Sr. NR
Eric Jackson CB 5'7, 171 Jr. NR
Chauncey Scissum FS 6'1, 205 So. 2 stars (5.3)
Joe Stanard CB 5'9, 189 So. NR
Eric Anthony FS 6'0, 198 So. NR
Cordell Hudson CB 6'0, 165 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)
Naesean Howard DB 5'11, 190 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)
Treevon Prater DB 6'0, 180 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)
Juwan Dowels DB 5'10, 165 Fr. 3 stars (5.5)

8. Depth issues at cornerback?

Hey, we finally joined Facebook!

Losing middle linebacker Marquis Spruill and safety Jeremi Wilkes isn't optimal, but Syracuse still returns quite a few exciting options in the linebacking corps and secondary. Cameron Lynch is a dual-threat at OLB -- he's strong against run (eight non-sack tackles for loss) and pass (four sacks, six passes defensed) -- and free safety Durell Eskridge pulled off a rare combination in 2013 (four tackles for loss, four interceptions).

If there's a concern in the back seven, it probably comes at cornerback. Syracuse didn't allow a ton of big plays in 2013, but the ones the Orange allowed were a) probably through the air, and b) enormous. Syracuse allowed only 37 passes of 20+ yards (36th in the country), 13 of them went for 40+ (107th). And that was with starters Keon Lyn and Ri'Shard Anderson in the rotation.

Lyn got hurt five games into the season, and both are now gone, leaving senior Brandon Reddish and juniors Wayne Morgan and Julian Whigham to man the islands on the outside. Reddish is experienced, and Whigham is actually quite intriguing (he made only 10.0 tackles while defensing six passes, which means either he batted away everything that came near him or just missed a ton of tackles). But they were hit-or-miss last fall, and if any of these three get hurt, defensive coordinator Chuck Bullough will have to dip into a pool of walk-ons and freshmen.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Riley Dixon 6'5, 219 Sr. 75 42.1 6 29 21 66.7%
Jonathan Fisher 8 39.1 0 3 2 62.5%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Ryan Norton 5'11, 183 Jr. 56 57.3 12 2 21.4%
Riley Dixon 6'5, 219 Sr. 6 56.8 0 0 0.0%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2014
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Ryan Norton 5'11, 183 Jr. 27-29 7-9 77.8% 2-5 40.0%
Ross Krautman 5'7, 157 Sr. 4-5 1-1 100.0% 0-1 0.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2014
Year
Returns Avg. TD
George Morris II KR 6'0, 202 Jr. 15 19.6 0
Devante McFarlane KR 6'0, 197 Jr. 10 18.4 0
Ritchy Desir PR 5'11, 185 Sr. 27 4.1 0
Brisly Estime PR 5'9, 172 So. 4 31.5 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 77
Field Goal Efficiency 105
Punt Return Efficiency 12
Kick Return Efficiency 99
Punt Efficiency 67
Kickoff Efficiency 65
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 92

9. Hit-or-miss on special teams

Brisly Estime's four punt returns went a really long way, while basically every other return, kick or punt, did not. Punter Riley Dixon had a strong leg, and kick and punt coverage were decent, but place-kicking was shaky (three missed PATs, 2-for-6 on long field goals). Special teams were neither a strength nor weakness last fall, though with everybody back, including Estime, there's certainly potential for improvement.

2014 Schedule & Projection Factors

2014 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. Rk
29-Aug Villanova NR
13-Sep at Central Michigan 109
20-Sep Maryland 51
27-Sep vs. Notre Dame 25
3-Oct Louisville 16
11-Oct Florida State 1
18-Oct at Wake Forest 83
25-Oct at Clemson 5
1-Nov N.C. State 66
8-Nov Duke 56
22-Nov at Pittsburgh 39
29-Nov at Boston College 69
Five-Year F/+ Rk -2.4% (64)
Two-Year Recruiting Rk 61
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* 2 / 1.9
TO Luck/Game +0.0
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 15 (8, 7)

10. Survive the middle

Syracuse has enough experience and potential that, while a return to the top 40 is probably too much to ask for, improvement isn't. And if the Orange can move up into the 50-60 range, another bowl is probably in the cards. That would put them in position to beat the four home opponents projected below 50th, along with CMU and Wake Forest.

The margin for error with this schedule isn't huge, however, and October will pose quite the challenge. Syracuse hosts Louisville and FSU in back-to-back weeks and, after a trip to Wake Forest, visits Clemson. Survive a likely 1-3 stretch in the middle, and there are wins to be found in November.

We'll begin to learn a lot more about Syracuse's ceiling under Shafer this year. There is potential for entertainment here, especially if McDonald gets an efficient offense moving at a breakneck pace and the defense racks up the big plays while suffering fewer breakdowns. But if it's the same story as last year, with great performances getting overshadowed by horrendous ones (and the great-to-horrendous ratio still breaking slightly toward horrendous), then there might be reasons to wonder what kind of consistency a Shafer program will have to offer.

More from SBNation.com

In This Article

Teams
Players
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.