With Andy Pettitte announcing his retirement, we can begin to wonder in earnest about his Hall of Fame chances.
Feb 3, 2011 - Now that we know Andy Pettitte is retiring, we can wonder: will he someday be elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame? Should he be?
Before we get into the complicated stuff, let's establish a baseline ...
What kind of pitcher was Pettitte? How does he stack up against other pitchers?
Thanks to the magical powers of Baseball-Reference.com's Play Index, I made a list of pitchers with between 220 and 260 wins - there are 27 of them since 1901 - and checked to see where Pettitte ranked among them in various categories.
With 240 wins, he's tied for 10th with Frank Tanana. Of the nine pitchers ahead of him, six are in the Hall of Fame; Jack Morris (254), spitballer Jack Quinn (247) and Dennis Martinez (245) are not.
With a .635 career winning percentage, he's third, behind only Whitey Ford and Three Finger Brown (both Hall of Famers). The three pitchers behind him are Hall of Famers, too. David Wells is the only pitcher (other than Pettitte) in the group with a .600 winning percentage (.604, actually) who's not in the Hall.
With a 116 ERA+ -- essentially ERA adjusted for league context and park effects - Pettitte ranks ninth. All eight pitchers ahead of him are in the Hall of Fame, but just behind him are Luis Tiant, Jim Bunning and Jack Quinn; only Bunning's in the Hall.
There's nobody exactly like Pettitte, so these comparisons can take us only so far. But I think it's fair to say that most of the pitchers who seem at least vaguely similar to Pettitte have been elected.
Granted, some of them had to wait an awful long time. Waite Hoyt - who won 237 games, 112 ERA+ -- last pitched in 1938, and was enshrined 31 years later.
On the other hand, Herb Pennock - who won 241 games, .598 winning percentage - was enshrined only 14 years after retiring in 1934.
I bring up those two because they had something in common with Pettitte: While both pitched for other teams, both gained most of their fame as New York Yankees during a period when the Yankees were the best baseball team on the planet. This helped them win games, and it helped make them famous.
Having pitched for the Yankees for so many years is going to help Pettitte, obviously. He won more games because he pitched for the Yankees, and he won more postseason games because he pitched for the Yankees. Does he deserve a bunch of bonus points for his postseason action? Not really. His postseason stats are almost identical to his regular-season stats. But some bonus points, yes.
Pettitte's fortunate that he kept his ERA below 4. Otherwise, it would be difficult to separate him from David Wells, who won 239 games with an outstanding winning percentage, and pitched for the Yankees (if not for nearly as long).
By the Hall of Fame's historical standards, Andy Pettitte is a marginal candidate who did everything well but nothing brilliantly, and would probably be enshrined after a moderately long wait.
But the historical standards can tell us only so much. The BBWAA's Hall of Fame ballot is going to be exceptionally crowded for many years, probably too crowded to allow for Pettitte's entry through that door (not to mention his status as a PED user). Historically, marginal candidates like Pettitte were elected (if they were) by the clubby and incestuous Veterans Committee. But the Veterans Committee - actually, it's Veterans Committees now - has gone through a great number of changes in just the last decade, and will probably go through more before Pettitte's eligible for consideration via that body. Without knowing what the process will look like in 20 years, it's almost impossible to guess what will happen to him.
Would I vote for him? That's a tough one. There are pitchers like Pettitte who aren't in the Hall, but there are probably more like Pettitte who are. I think I probably would vote for him, with those 19 postseason wins just pushing him over the bar.
Comments
Selection Bias
I will point out that there’s a selection bias at work here. Any one who reads Neyer is already unlikely to think of Andy Pettitte as a Hall of Famer. Count me in that group.
by talkendo on Feb 3, 2011 2:57 PM EST reply actions
Why?
by slamcactus on Feb 3, 2011 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Why What?
Selection Bias: If there’s ANYthing I’ve learned from reading Neyer, it’s that first glances are often deceiving. We’re going to see past 19 PostSeason Wins. We’re going to look and count.
As for why he shouldn’t be a HoFer? Rich Stowe covers it well, below.
As for why he eventually gets in (should and does are different. I can see both): Catfish Hunter + Jack Morris.
by talkendo on Feb 3, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
I think Andy falls just short – his WHIP is over 1.3, his ERA+ under 120, he gave up more hits than innings pitched.
Being on the Yankees was a huge benefit to his win total and winning %. As for his postseason stats – very similar to his regular season stats (not like say Schilling’s whose postseason stats are unreal compared to regular season). In the postseason, the one game Andy pitched against Smoltz (the 1-0 game) seems to cloud people’s memories for how good he was.
Andy was a great Yankee pitcher, one of their all-time greats, but he belongs in the Hall of Very Good, not the Hall of Fame
Rich Stowe
Writer - Sports Nickel
by Rich Stowe on Feb 3, 2011 2:59 PM EST reply actions
Can we know his FIP? Do we know it?
Pettitte is an interesting case. I voted yes up above, but the point made below about WaR is pretty significant- he’s just didn’t hit that threshold that you want from a Hall of Fame pitcher. The most interesting debate in the next ten years is gonna be the Andruw Jones one when he retires, especially if he gets to certain key numbers.
The twitter
Anfield Asylum, sbnation's very own open zoo for the most dangerous game: Liverpool fans
"Voetbal is pas totaal als je wint"- Coach Adun
"The greatest sin is to spurn the gift"- Coach Alistair
by Londonjoe on Feb 3, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
The HOF pitchers you quote as most similar to Pettitte are also among the most marginal. Using the ‘as good as x’ argument just continues to lower the bar. Talkendo’s right; you taught us better than that :). And that’s speaking as someone who was a rabid Yankees fan from the dark days of the early ’70s until I defected due to an attack of Steinbrenneritis in the late ’80s (with a brief reconciliation in the late ’90s).
by jbg2772 on Feb 3, 2011 3:10 PM EST reply actions
I'd like to see comparison between Pettitte and David Cone
I would think they’re somewhat similar and Cone can’t even get a sniff
I’ve been overwhelmed and I’ve been underwhelmed. Can I ever just be whelmed?
by closetasfan on Feb 3, 2011 3:16 PM EST reply actions
Really great point
Cone: 2898.2 IP, 121 ERA+, 56 CG, 22 SHO, 2.35 K/BB
Pettitte: 3055.1 IP, 117 ERA+, 25 CG, 4 SHO, 2.34 K/BB
And postseason?
Cone: 8-3, 3.80 ERA
Pettitte: 19-10, 3.83 ERA
Unfortunately, Cone only has 194 wins to Pettitte’s 240, so he had no shot at the HoF.
Roto Hardball | @CajoleJuice
by CajoleJuice on Feb 3, 2011 4:08 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
Here’s some more numbers to ponder:
K/9
Pettitte: 6.63
Cone: 8.28
Mussina: 7.11
BB/9
Pettitte: 2.83
Cone: 3.53
Mussina: 1.98
FIP
Pettitte: 3.82
Cone: 3.57
Mussina: 3.57
Writer at Beyond the Box Score and tortured Mets fan (is there any other kind?)
by Bill Petti on Feb 3, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions
One last thing
Pettitte: 25 CG, 4 SHO
Cone: 56 CG, 22 SHO
Mussina: 57 CG, 23 SHO
Roto Hardball | @CajoleJuice
by CajoleJuice on Feb 3, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions
Pettite is not a HoFer in my eyes
And it’s not particularly close. I think both Mussina (74.8 rWAR) and Kevin Brown (64.8) have significantly better cases than Pettite (50.2). I think Brown is a borderline candidate, even if he’s often glossed over (I’d probably lean no on him), and I think Moose is a surefire yes.
Interestingly enough, Rivera (52.9) has more rWAR than Pettite.
Rays/Cubs - AnotherCubsBlog.net - @Manu_P_Mishra on Twitter
by Mish on Feb 3, 2011 3:19 PM EST reply actions
Pettitte held runners brilliantly
But that was probably the only aspect of his game that I would classify as brilliant.
He’s out in my eyes, and it’s not even that close.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
by J-Doug on Feb 3, 2011 3:26 PM EST reply actions
Why don't postseason stats count?
I’ve always wondered why post-season stats are ignored(or at least are supposed to be ignored) while choosing Hall of Famers. Does it come from the practice of discounting (and rightly so) post-season stats for yearly awards like MVP and Cy Young? I see no reason why they shouldn’t count for assessing the career stats.
by pezzonovante on Feb 3, 2011 3:26 PM EST reply actions
Throw in his postseason stats, and I still don't think mine (or many) minds change
Other than the above-average level of competition, postseason stats are usually limited and not comparable across all players, mostly due to timing. While Andy’s postseason numbers are nice, they are basically the same as his career numbers.
Rays/Cubs - AnotherCubsBlog.net - @Manu_P_Mishra on Twitter
by Mish on Feb 3, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
And he amassed the counting stats simply by being a Yankee (and astro, I guess)
Rays/Cubs - AnotherCubsBlog.net - @Manu_P_Mishra on Twitter
by Mish on Feb 3, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
Pettite counting stats
That’s what makes sense to me too… postseason should count for rates and maybe a few special memories, but counting stats seem like they’d mislead you.
"The two worst things in football are: 1) They think that a 30-year old professional athlete has to be locked up in a hotel room, with a curfew, the night before a qame; and 2) They're right."
- Cowboy safety Cliff Harris
by achiappanza on Feb 6, 2011 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Not a HOF
Would we be having this conversation if Pettite weren’t a Yankee, even if he somehow racked up the same number of wins? I don’t think so. I think Pettite gets credit he doesn’t deserve because the media has bought into the notion that playing for the Yankees requires some kind of extra magical ability.
As has been previously mentioned, there are better (recent) pitchers who didn’t come close to the HOF. Pettite may get in, but he doesn’t deserve it.
by chapman_123 on Feb 3, 2011 3:27 PM EST reply actions
Nope
Andy is a good pitcher, but he is certainly not Hall of Fame material at least not unless a ballot comes up with basically no other potential candidates. He was good for a number of years, but never great. 0 Cy Youngs or other rewards of note (1 ALCS). 2 20+ win seasons separated by 6 years. Perhaps his best season was 05 for the Astros with 17 wins. That is probably a 22 win season if he was with New York. In an era that is seeing increasing use of sabremetrics, the most basic of these, WHIP, is not in his favor at all. A 1.3 career average certainly is good, but not Hall worthy. And it isn’t like that number ballooned thanks to late career slumps as he was always remarably consistent in that area except for, again, his 05 season with a 1.03. So i guess if you are a Yanks fan or someone who enjoys seeing the HoF watered down with players that you would never consider top tier in the sport while they were actually playing, then sure, Pettite is Hall material. But his lack of career, non-team related, achievements and mediocre non-win related stats makes me feel like he isn’t worth of the Hall.
Not to mention the whole PED stuff. If the voters could ever get past that there are certainly a number of players in line ahead of him for the Hall.
by daileysc on Feb 3, 2011 3:30 PM EST reply actions
Pettitte v. Brown
Via FanGraphs:
Pettitte: 16 seasons, 66.9 WAR
Brown: 19 seasons: 77.2 WAR
Seasons over five WAR:
Pettitte: 4
Brown: 7
Does Pettitte belong in the Hall of Fame? Certainly not before Kevin Brown, and I don’t even like Brown.
by ldd233 on Feb 3, 2011 3:35 PM EST reply actions
Brown was criminally undervoted
I’m not saying he was a slam dunk by any stretch, but getting booted off the ballot after just one year isn’t giving his career justice. But that oversight shouldn’t prevent the induction of other worthy candidates, even if they are slightly less worthy.
I think the problem with Pettite is the competition. He competed against four historically great pitchers: Maddux, Johnson, Clemens, and Pedro. PEDs not withstanding they’re all in, easily. Glavine should also gain induction without too much difficulty. After that, Pettite still has to battle Schilling, Mussina, Smoltz, and Brown (well, not anymore). I think you can make a reasonable case for any of these guys. But I have a hard time seeing the writers/VC elect this many pitchers from one generation, especially after giving such short shrift to the pitchers of the 1980s.
by ken on Feb 3, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
Pretty much agree. I was pretty shocked by Brown’s early departure, but he does not make my personal cut, and Pettitte is well behind him in my book.
They are a great example of the power of rhetoric.
by ldd233 on Feb 3, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions
I've Always Thought that HOFers
should be the best, or among the best at their position during their time. there’s a number of guys who were better than he was in the 90s and earlier part of this decade: Maddux, Wells, Mussina, Brown, the Unit, Pedro, Schilling, Halladay (only started 3 seasons later than Pettite), Clemens etc. all deserve entry before he does. That doesn’t mean he never makes it, but certainly not anytime soon.
by stevesaxaphone on Feb 3, 2011 3:55 PM EST reply actions
If you want to make LHP comparisons
Tom Glavine started more games, but was very similar in WHIP (1.314 vs 1.357), ERA+ (118 vs 117), Winning percentage (.600 vs .635), and both had the fortune of playing for very good teams. The differences, of course would be the 5 times that Glavine led the NL in wins, the 2 Cy Youngs, the WS MVP, and actually playing enough to get to 300 wins. And Glavine also has a much worse k/bb than Pettitte, and the Mets and Phillies were not at their peak for much of Glavine’s time with the Braves.
Let’s include RHP too. Try Jim Palmer. 268 W, .638 win %, less favorable strikeout totals and rates, but then you see that Palmer’s ERA was 2.86 lifetime with a 126 ERA+ and 3 cy youngs. Jim Bunning is an easier comp, but he got in by the veterans committee, during his 5th Congressional term (though to be fair, Wikipedia never lists him as being on the Government Reform Committee).
What kills Pettitte is the Raw ERA of 3.88. Nobody in the hall has an ERA that high, and since 1972, nobody has been induced with an ERA higher than Eck’s 3.50. I also wonder how baseball writers will consider his postseason strengths considering that he played as many games as he did because the Yankees got really good again right when division play started.
But, since we know that Hall voters are going to on average vote for 6 guys, Pettitte will probably not be one of them, not when he’ll have to run against guys like Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Schilling, Clemens, Johnson, etc, and those are just the pitchers.
I wouldn’t vote for him, and I can’t think of anyone worse than him I would vote for.
by StolenMonkey86 on Feb 3, 2011 4:11 PM EST reply actions
Tom Glavine was a compiler
Glavine was better at his peak. But he hung around way after he should have been pitching to get to 300. That’s why his career stats mirror Andy’s. If Andy pitched until he was 43 like Glavine their career numbers would cease to look so close. Kudos to Pettitte for doing what most can’t and walking away as a productive player. But he’s still probably not a HOF and the HGH thing isn’t going to help him any (although because of the way he handled it, his candidacy will be least affected by it).
by Pflood83 on Feb 3, 2011 5:16 PM EST up reply actions
WAR
I’m not sure Pettitte’s a HOFer, but his and Glavine’s WAR are roughly equal (68.5 to 66.9) and Pettitte pitched 1400 fewer innings. While the lack of innings is sometimes counted against him, when comparing him to shoe-in HOF candidate Glavine, it makes Pettitte look better, right?
by knuckleballer on Feb 3, 2011 7:41 PM EST up reply actions
Glavine consistently outpitched his FIPs.
Glavine rWAR: 67.0
Pettitte rWAR: 50.2
Kicking knowledge in the face.
by BlackOps on Feb 5, 2011 5:14 AM EST up reply actions
no pettitte discussion until mussina is in HoF.
i think it’s premature to discuss pettitte getting into the HoF not because he won’t even appear on the ballot for 5 years. but because mussina is/was the HoF pitcher from those yankee teams. he was the better pitcher over his career plain and simple. unfortunately mr. almost will probably also almost get into the HoF, but just miss.
by sdajr76 on Feb 3, 2011 4:23 PM EST reply actions
Andy Pettitte is so much like
Jack Morris. He’s got excellent traditional stats, like wins and world series rings. Yet at a more than superficial glance they both only have the careers of very good players. They get bumps from playing with good teams and wouldn’t even get looked at if they spent the majority of their career average teams.
by TJ92 on Feb 3, 2011 4:29 PM EST reply actions
You missed one
117-105 in ERA+. That’s not even particularly close.
by usuo mojinga on Feb 3, 2011 6:06 PM EST up reply actions
Pettitte/HOF
If a player doesn’t hit the magical stat markers, even if they modified for the period 275 is likely going to become the new 300 unless pitchers start refusing to leave games again, then they need to have been dominate and memorable during their period in the game.
For pitchers I personally need to feel like they weren’t just a product of the team they were on. Pettitte had only two years where he had a ERA under 3.00 and most of the time he was near 4.00
To me that says he was a middle of the rotation arm that got a lot of wins because of the teams he was on.
If he were with the Pirates during that same period he’d likely be a near .500 pitcher and somewhat forgettable.
The other thing I would use is if he’d pass the must watch test. I think he fails this miserably for the majority of his time in the league.
There are more worthy players that have fallen off the ballot, such as Kevin Brown. With 240 wins and a near 4.00 career ERA and no sign of real dominance over a long period Pettitte just isn’t worthy of a spot in the Hall of Fame.
by schellis on Feb 3, 2011 4:31 PM EST reply actions
How about
…if Pettitte had pitched his entire career in the NL and had an ERA of 3.20, would you feel better about him?
by LordD99 on Feb 3, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
No evidence that 300 wins is out of the question
There is no evidence to honestly suggest that pitchers won’t continue to get to 300 wins. Pitchers have longer careers now than they did in the day and are stil getting to the high innings pitched total of the other career guys who finally reached 300 wins. There is no reason to think that there is a barrier preventing 300 wins from happening as frequently as it’s happened in the past 80 years.
as to raw era, era matters, I don’t even look at raw era anymore, era+ is the first metric I would look at for a pitcher, a good season is 130, a Cy contending season is 160+, Pettitte career high was 177, and second best was 156. Not enough of a peak to be a real contender for the hof. As mentioned there are just too many better pitchers in his era that aren’t going to get consideration, that giving him consideration is an insult to better guys.
by cardsfanboy on Feb 6, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
From 1994 ro 2008 we had four active pitchers who had or would ultimately have 300 wins.
From 1893 to 1965 it was higher in only one season [and the average in those 72 years, was 2.45 per year]. Some time in those 72 years, I suppose you could have argued that 300 game winners were pretty much going extinct as well…
by erosen on Feb 7, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
100%
great big game pitcher.
In Lax We Trust -
Offical Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
SBNationBoston Contributer
by Marisa Ingemi on Feb 3, 2011 4:48 PM EST reply actions
Seems like we always end up disagreeing about these things Mar
Pettitte was very good for a long time, but he was never brilliant. Especially when you consider the era he played in, I think you can only let in the best of the best of the best. That means Randy Johnson, Pedro, Maddux, Smoltz and their ilk. Pettitte was good, but he wasn’t even close to that level.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
by TheLoneDavid on Feb 3, 2011 6:02 PM EST up reply actions
That's true.
Yet Randy Johnson, Pedro, Maddux and Smoltz are hardly the standard for players being elected to the HOF. Plenty below that level are in.
by LordD99 on Feb 3, 2011 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
Most postsseason wins ever.
In Lax We Trust -
Offical Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
SBNationBoston Contributer
by Marisa Ingemi on Feb 3, 2011 11:11 PM EST up reply actions
Wildcard era.
Kicking knowledge in the face.
by BlackOps on Feb 5, 2011 5:16 AM EST up reply actions
Will that still be the case?
Will that still be the case when he comes up for voting? Cliff Lee has 7 wins in two post seasons(2009/20010) . Sabathia has 7 and plays for the Yankees a team that will be in the post season almost every year. A world series run or two by the Phillies or Yankees could get someone to pretty easily catch up to Pettitte in that category.
by cardsfanboy on Feb 6, 2011 2:26 PM EST up reply actions
HGH
EVERYBODY has seem to have forgotten that he was caught cheating. I’m sorry but if Mark McGwire can’t get a pass, what makes you think ANdy Pettite can?
"Dan Johnson did it"
by Oaklanda12 on Feb 3, 2011 4:51 PM EST reply actions
I might have voted for McGwire if I had a HOF vote. But, in any event, I view HGH as a different category than anabolic steroids. The scientific evidence doesn’t indicate that HGH has a performance enhancing effect. Most players who used HGH thought that it would improve their recovery from injury, but the evidence that HGH provides an advantage in speeding up injury recovery is weak too.
For what it’s worth, my recollection is that Pettitte’s injury was in 2004, and HGH was not on MLB’s banned list until a couple of years later.
by clack on Feb 3, 2011 7:45 PM EST up reply actions
Best part about the HOF
Is that the debate takes place 5 years after retirement. Lets just put this in the vault until 2015 and let the man have his press conference (and possible return to the Yankees) first.
by AGuinness on Feb 3, 2011 4:55 PM EST reply actions
Pettitte was my favorite baseball player
Pettitte was my favorite baseball player ever since I saw him pitch when I was 14. But he’s not a HOFer.
I think Smoltz and Morris are, however.
by btdome on Feb 3, 2011 5:04 PM EST reply actions
I understand, but...
Pettitte is better than Morris.
by LordD99 on Feb 3, 2011 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
Close, but...
I think Andy Pettitte falls short, although I was hoping he’d pitch for a couple more seasons to really make the choice difficult. He was a very good pitcher for a long time, and that is special unto itself, but he was never really a great pitcher, and I do like HOFers to have at least touched greatness for a bit.
Yet his 117 ERA+ is not exactly something to ignore. I think for years, because he was on the Yankees and because he was blessed with good teams behind him, the reaction in the sabermetric community was to try and talk down Pettitte’s accomplishments. As time has gone on, I have done a 180, and I usually find myself talking up Petttitte’s accomplishments. He was born into MLB in the AL, right as the American League because the dominant league. He did his pitching right at the start of the steroid era, in the DH league and in the AL East. His higher ERA doesn’t bother me because of all that. Even his postseason record gets talked down because it’s used as an example that he’s not a big-game pitcher, simply putting up the same ERA in the postseason as he does during the regular season. Yet that to me is an accomplishment, since he’s doing that against a much higher level of competition. His postseason ERA is much better than his regular season when looked at in context. Yet, just as in the regular season he falls short of greatness, he falls just short also in the postseason, not approaching the Gibson or Schilling level of total dominance.
I wish Pettitte had pitched a few more seasons, got up into the 270 win range, which coupled with his postseason wins, he’d pass by the 300 total win mark. It would make the choice much more difficult, and if elected, he would have removed the nonsense that many BBWAA members have of never voting for a known PED user. Pettitte’s the type of person who could crack through that mental barrier.
Pettitte’s 38. I remember reading quotes from a few scouts last year who said he could easily see Pettitte remaining effective into his 40s, similar to a Moyer. If so, we can’t really assume that Pettitte won’t get tired of being at home and make a comeback next year. He certainly wouldn’t be the first professional athlete who realizes his whole self-worth and identity is built around being an athlete. As as much fun as being around the kids sounds, they can also drive a man crazy! I don’t think it’s likely he’ll come back, but I wouldn’t be surprised. I’m sure someone will ask that very question during tomorrow’s press conference.
by LordD99 on Feb 3, 2011 5:05 PM EST reply actions
Nope
Pettitte is definitely NOT worthy of the HoF IMHO. The only reason we’re having this discussion is because he had the benefit of pitching for outstanding NYY teams. Take away that caveat and Andy is a slightly better than average pitcher. I believe the HoF should be reserved for players who were without debate one of the very, very best at their position during their years playing and I wouldn’t put Andy in that dominating class. Played with great teams plus an admitted PED user – Nope.
by Half Fast on Feb 3, 2011 5:23 PM EST reply actions
Baseball's rich man's Robert Horry
No disrespect to Andy Pettite, but being a very good pitcher who came through a ton in the playoffs (given extraordinary opportunity to do so) doesn’t make him a hall of famer. Terrific player. Memorable player. Player who did a ton to earn his rings. Still not at that level, even if he’s better than a couple of guys in the Hall.
by aap212 on Feb 3, 2011 7:05 PM EST reply actions
Hall of very good?
Andy was a very good pitcher, and at times great, but a level or two away from HOF calibre. He wont make the Hall of Fame, but maybe the www.notinhalloffame.com baseball list when he is eligible. That is likely as good as it well get for Pettitte.
by Kirk Buchner on Feb 3, 2011 7:11 PM EST reply actions
No, he was asteroid user
case closed
by keb on Feb 3, 2011 7:47 PM EST reply actions
Increase your knowledge.
Please understand what steroids are before you accuse someone of taking steriods.
by LordD99 on Feb 4, 2011 1:09 AM EST up reply actions
I apologize, Keb
I just realized you said he was an asteroid user. Anyone using space rocks is clearly doing something illegal.
by LordD99 on Feb 4, 2011 1:17 AM EST up reply actions
borderline Hall of Famer...
I’m not sure whether I would put him in the Hall of Fame, but he is close enough that he should be kept on the ballot for awhile. Someone mentioned Kevin Brown, and I think he is similar to Pettitte as a borderline Hall of Fame candidate. I think Brown didn’t get enough votes to stay on the ballot because he was not particularly well liked by the media— due to personality rather than performance reasons. Pettitte, on the other hand, is loved by the press.
To some degree, I discount the WHIP and K-rate issues for Pettitte. He is a groundball pitcher, and that tends to increase contact and result in more base runners. However, it also reduces the HR rate. The fact that Pettitte, a lefthander, could pitch as well as he did at Minute Maid Park, which has a 315 LF wall, is a testament to his ability to induce groundballs in the direction Adam Everett and Morgan Ensberg. Pettitte’s 2005 season with the Astros was one of his best ever (2.39 ERA).
The interesting thing is that Pettitte likely would have had a much lower ERA if he had pitched with the 2004-2006 Astros infield defense behind him throughout his career, but he would have won fewer games. For Hall of Fame purposes, the wins and Yankee connection probably are more helpful than lowering the ERA.
by clack on Feb 3, 2011 8:01 PM EST reply actions
GASP! As opposed to having the great St. Derek Jeter fielding behind him all those years?
/sarcasm
@davidyoungtbla - The commenter formerly known as El Lay Dave.
by David Young on Feb 3, 2011 9:30 PM EST up reply actions
His ERA
He’s also have a substantially lower ERA is he played his career in the NL, forget about Yankees infield “defense.” His career started as the AL became the dominant league, he pitched in the AL East, he pitched against the DH, and he pitched against he steroid hitters. I only bring it up when people note he’d have one of the highest ERA’s if he was elected to the Hall, and while that’s true, it lacks context. That’s why ERA+ tells a better story.
That all said, I still think he falls short.
by LordD99 on Feb 4, 2011 1:12 AM EST up reply actions
As I said ...
He’s definitely borderline, which means I actually go back and forth. Maybe I just shouldn’t vote for a guy I’m not sure about. I do think it’s manifestly true that Pettitte was better than Jack Morris. ERA+ don’t lie, brothers.
by Rob Neyer on Feb 3, 2011 8:17 PM EST reply actions
Can we clarify the ERA+?
You (and a number of others) credit him with a 116 ERA+ while Baseball Reference has him at 117. Is there another source you are using for this statistic?
by usuo mojinga on Feb 4, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
A bunch of deaf, dumb and blind Yankee haters
This man deserves the honor of being in the Hall of Fame. Yeah, he played on some great teams, but on all those teams, he was one of the best
by The Last Shall Become First on Feb 3, 2011 10:27 PM EST reply actions
I see that Rob Neyer has brought his ESPN East Coast bias with him to SB Nation.
Bummer. Andy was a good pitcher, not great. Good pitchers deserve to be remembered, but great ones deserve the Hall of Fame. Andy is nowhere near deserving of a spot in the HOF.
His win totals were inflated because his owner went and bought championships, he admitted to cheating and using steroids and he has a career ERA closing in on 4.
"You play for Cleveland? I didn't know they still had a team." - Claire Holloway
"Yup, we've got uniforms and everything, it's really great!" - Jake Taylor
by Halowood on Feb 3, 2011 10:44 PM EST reply actions
Talk about bias.
Your post is the poster child!
by LordD99 on Feb 4, 2011 1:15 AM EST up reply actions
just to be clear (and I don’t mean “The Clear”), Pettitte admitted to using HGH, not steroids.
by clack on Feb 4, 2011 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
I think yes
because he’s been one of the top 10 pitchers in the history of baseball’s most successful franchise. The Yankees have always leaned more extensively on hitting, and Pettitte is almost certainly one of the top 10 most successful pitchers with 5 rings, 1800 Ks, and over 200 wins for the franchise.
by cgouds77 on Feb 3, 2011 11:18 PM EST reply actions
Nope
At least not through the BBWAA voting. Petitte’s in the same boat as Posada and Bernie Williams. They’ll get some support, stay on the ballot, but never come particularly close to election. No shame in this.
by peter745 on Feb 4, 2011 10:11 AM EST reply actions
Pettitte will probably get in
but he doesn’t deserve it.
Would that be jack cheese? ~RWShow
by e-gus on Feb 4, 2011 10:39 AM EST reply actions
Nope.
No way. Again, we’re back to the HoRG (Hall of Really Good). He is behind Kevin Brown, David Cone and Mike Mussina, and I am not sure any of them should be in.
1.36 career WHIP = HoF?
Only three seasons with a WAR >5
No way. Or did I already say that?
by sportsczar on Feb 4, 2011 11:48 AM EST reply actions
Only three seasons with a WAR >4!!
K. I’m done.
by sportsczar on Feb 4, 2011 11:50 AM EST reply actions
No
But I’d rather him than Jack Morris. If he ever gets in, it’s time to torch the place.
by kcbottom9th on Feb 4, 2011 1:32 PM EST reply actions
AL East
Have to remember in looking at pitchers like Pettitte or Mussina, the effect of spending so much time in the AL East. It has to be close to 1.00 in ERA looking at Pedro and Randy Johnson. Pettitte himself had an ERA 0.50 lower in Houston, and that coincided with with such severe elbow trouble he needed surgery. Knock 0.50-1.00 in ERA off those guys’ records, and they look pretty darn good. Moose definitely should go in. Andy’s on the bubble.
by DukeCT on Feb 4, 2011 4:40 PM EST reply actions
Or...
not. A full run better than the rest of baseball? Wow, you’d think that no other divisions matter. Or we could just look at his WAR and realize, again, he belongs in the Hall of Really Good pitchers.
One might forget that the 3 of the last 6, 4 of the last 8, and 5 of the last 10 World Series winners have come from the NL. Under what conditions is Andy Pettitte a Hall of Famer? He won a LOT of games for a really good team, some great teams during his tenure. Hopefully, he’ll go the way of Bernie Williams, Don Mattingly, et al.
LordD99 makes some fair observations, but he reaches the same conclusion. Surely, Rob, you’ll eventually agree.
Glad you are here. Nice to read you regularly away from the WWL.
by sportsczar on Feb 4, 2011 4:58 PM EST reply actions
AL East 2 not "Or..."
Randy Johnson
ERA
’04 AZ 2.60
’05 NYY 3.79
’06 NYY 5.00
’07 AZ 3.81
Pedro
’04 BOS 3.90
’05 NYM 2.82
sportsczar – find me the pitchers that did big innings elsewhere and did better in the ALEast
by DukeCT on Feb 4, 2011 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
AL East 3
I forgot every Yankees fan would like me to include:
ERA
Javier Vasquez
‘09 ATL 2.87 Cy Young candidate
’10 NYY 5.32 Sayonara candidate
by DukeCT on Feb 4, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions
Seriously, Duke?? THAT is your argument?
Pedro –
2003 Boston – ERA 2.22 (I picked one of his LESS stellar seasons for you)
2006 Mets – ERA 4.48
Curt Schilling
2004 Boston – ERA 3.26 (Runner-Up CYA)
2002 Arizona – ERA 3.23 (Runner-UP CYA)
Kevin Brown
1994 Texas – ERA 4.82
1995 Baltimore – ERA 3.60
CC Sabathia
2007 Cleveland – ERA 3.21 (CYA Winner)
2010 New York – ERA 3.18 (CYA – 3rd Place)
David Cone
1993 Kansas City -ERA 3.33
1994 Kansas City – ERA 2.94 (CYA Winner)
1997 NYY – ERA 2.82 (CYA – 4th Place)
Shall I go on, or do you see the ridiculousness of your argument? I’m not saying it’s not possible that it is loaded with better hitters…and the DH of course. I’m just saying half a run to a run of ERA from Pettitte, using your logic, is NUCKING FUTS.
I didn’t run out of examples to refute your argument, I ran out of care, it was too easy to pull examples off the top of my head.
Ugh, I’m just getting started!! With those awful ERAs in his age 41, and 42 seasons, The Unit still won 17 games both seasons for the Yanks. To what do you attribute that?
It takes a special pitcher to do well in New York, an even better one to sustain a great career in the AL East over the last 15 years. Pettitte was special. He was NOT and is NOT a Hall of Fame pitcher.
by sportsczar on Feb 4, 2011 10:32 PM EST up reply actions
AL East
Most of your examples are 3 years apart. Have you ever looked at the team won-loss records? What about intra-league play? Sure there are other good teams, but It’s hard to believe someone who follows the sport with any attention doesn’t know the AL East teams are stronger than other divisions, especially offensively, and have been throughout the career of pitchers such as Mussina and Pettitte. Your using Pedro’s injuries to make a case – weak argument. Want to know why the Big Unit won 17 games? Weakest argument of all since we know teams affect wins, and, apparently this is a surprise to you – the Yankees have had a decent offense.
It’s common knowledge that AL to NL is 0.50 in ERA, and it can only be higher in the AL East.
sportsczar – enjoy your
by DukeCT on Feb 5, 2011 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
Seems like Pettitte understands his candidacy pretty well
when asked about the HOF, he actually pointed out that his postseason and regular season numbers were essentially the same, his numbers added up nicely because he played with a lot of great teams, and he didn’t feel like the game was as easy for him as for guys he feels are sure HOFers. In ten years, I don’t think he’ll be one of those guys with borderline cases whining about how he hasn’t been inducted into the HOF yet. No question in my mind he definitely had a better career than Jack Morris though.
by swing and a miss on Feb 4, 2011 6:01 PM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed