Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Following UFC 146 Loss, Jason 'Mayhem' Miller 'Done' in UFC

From Our Editors

Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.

Andy Pettitte and the Hall of Fame, Redux

Last week I ran some numbers and concluded that Andy Pettitte, while obviously a borderline Hall of Fame candidate, probably just clears the bar.

My friend Tim Marchman isn't having any of it:

I saw where Rob Neyer and Joe Sheehan both endorsed Andy Pettitte as a Hall of Famer, and while that does zero as far as making me reconsider my opinion, it does more than zero to make me think that laying out my reasoning might be worth a minute. So here are the basic arguments for Pettitte and the reasons why they are wrong.

First, I can't speak for Joe but my "endorsement" was pretty tepid. He's one of those Hall of Fame candidates who strike me differently depending on the day of the week. Or the year. I was for some time an advocate for Dale Murphy; today, not so much (though, as always, I'm willing to be convinced). I did argue that Pettitte, by the historical standards of the institution, is a pretty solid candidate. And yes, today I would be inclined to vote for him.

Anyway, after the jump you'll find Tim's list of arguments for Pettitte and their rebuttals, plus my tepid response ...

Star-divide

Argument: He pitched for the Yankees. Rebuttal: Who cares?

Argument: He pitched a lot in October. Rebuttal: So what?

Argument: He pitched in offense-heavy era. Rebuttal: Yes, and even after adjusting for that, his numbers aren't great.

Argument: There are more teams in this era, so there should be more Hall of Famers. Rebuttal: Sure, but there are plenty of great pitchers who deserve to be enshrined before Pettitte.

Argument: There are worse pitchers in the Hall of Fame. Rebuttal: Yes, and if you put in all the guys who are better than the worst Hall of Famers, they'll have to build an annex in Oneonta.

I've been paraphrasing, of course. But I can't help noticing that with the possible exception of No. 2, none of those are the actual arguments I made. What I said was that Pettitte's regular-season statistics -- granted, I focused mostly on wins and ERA+ -- place him in the middle of a bunch of good pitchers, some in the Hall of Fame and some not. And if you give him a dollop of extra credit for winning 18 postseason games, maybe he moves a little closer to the pitchers who are in.

Instead of looking at wins (as I did), Tim looks at innings pitched, which is fair because pitching for the Yankees gave Pettitte more chances for wins. But innings aren't perfect, either, because pitchers in the old days might go 300 or more innings in one season.

This still doesn't help Pettitte much. He pitched slightly more than 3,000 innings. Among pitchers with at least 2,750 innings since 1980, Pettitte's ERA+ ranks 12th, behind a bunch of future Hall of Famers but also behind Kevin Brown, Dave Stieb and David Cone. Granted, none of those pitchers have Pettitte's postseason record, but then he doesn't deserve a lot of credit for that because he wasn't a postseason standout. Basically, he did in October what he did in the previous six months.

Perhaps more damning than anything, none of the pitchers just behind Pettitte on the ERA+ list are serious Hall of Fame candidates, at all. It goes Pettitte, Chuck Finley, Frank Viola, Orel Hershiser, Dwight Gooden.

OK, I'm convinced. Pettitte falls just short.

Today, anyway.

Do you like this post?

Comments

Display:

Your arguments are the same as mine.

Mike Mussina has a much better Hall case than Pettitte, IMO, and I doubt he gets in, either.

Check out Chicago sports coverage at SB Nation Chicago

by Al Yellon on Feb 7, 2011 6:10 PM EST reply actions  

I am shocked that Sheehan supports Pettitte for the Hall

that’s a surprise.

Pettitte finished in top 5 in ERA/ERA+ exactly twice in his career. By my count he had 3 truly great seasons — 96, 97, 05 — plus a pretty good postseason record. Nice career but not a HoFer. Pettitte was the Ron Cey of pitchers.

by bowie_ on Feb 7, 2011 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

don't be silly

ERA of 3.88, WHIP of 1.36. It baffles me that same people having a cow about Jack Morris think Petitte’s case is borderline. Good pitcher, but not a #1, much less a HOFer.

by peter745 on Feb 7, 2011 7:46 PM EST reply actions  

Pettite just doesn't have enough

A few years ago, I used to think that if Pettitte lasts long enough to get 270 wins, he would be a shoe in, and even counting his 19 post season wins he just doesn’t have enough career to be a career candidate, doesn’t have enough peak to be a peak or prime candidate. There are just too many more deserving pitchers out there, and as has been pointed out plenty of times, there is no noticeable difference between Pettitte and Chuck Finley, when you factor in the quality of his teamates.

Pitchers clearly better than him during his career Maddux, Randy, Smoltz, Glavine, Pedro, Mussina, Schilling, Brown, Cone, and by the time the vote comes up, Santana, Halladay, Oswalt, Buehrle, should all have passed him(Halladay already has, but I’m putting him here due to innings pitched difference) and players arguably his equal include Chuck Finley, David Wells, Appier.

Pettitte might make it through the voters, but it would be a Dawson/Rice level of a mistake if it happened.

by cardsfanboy on Feb 7, 2011 8:05 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed

Egregious, Rice-esque mistake. Thus, he’ll probably get voted in.

by sportsczar on Feb 8, 2011 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Was he better than Jim Bunning?

 I think of Bunning as the de facto standard- on the ballot for 15 years, almost but not quite a (BBWAA) HOFer. I don’t think Andy was as good as Jim. Or to put it another way, if Andy got in, I’d be kind of mad if I were Luis TIant or Tommy John (or Lolich, or Kaat, or lots of other guys).

by peter745 on Feb 7, 2011 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

1 week later

After Pettitte retires and already two posts on his HOF candidacy. Can’t we PLEASE just wait the five years and get the perspective the HOF requires?

At the rate of 2 Pettitte HOF posts per week, we’re looking at examining the issue 520 times (just here) by the time voting comes around.

by AGuinness on Feb 8, 2011 12:52 PM EST reply actions  

One could only hope...

We only gain proper perspective by using the 5 years to fully discuss and peruse the issues involving his candidacy… pro and con. You don’t have to participate, that’s your choice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Feb 8, 2011 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I can also air my complaints

It’s only fair. Do we really NEED to discuss and peruse Andy Pettitte’s candidacy for five years?

It’s excessive and defeats the purpose of the waiting period to immediately churn out the arbitrary HOF column after a significant player retires.

Let’s gain our proper perspective when we can actually have a perspective. Right now, Pettitte’s career ended less than a week ago. Perspective is gained by time.

by AGuinness on Feb 8, 2011 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure we won't be discussing this for 5 years.

It’s fresh in everyone’s mind, it’s the offseason and he was a Yankee. Hence, the articles debating his candidacy ad nauseum. I’m sure that once camp opens, the debate will move towards who should be the Yankees fifth starter and the Pettitte arguments will be shelved. If nothing else, it will be interesting to look back at these archived articles five years from now and see how he’s viewed through the lens of history.

by xnumberoneson on Feb 9, 2011 1:39 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope so

I guess I’d rather just save the hall debate for a more appropriate time and use this time immediately after a significant player retires to get a little insight into some other aspect of his career. I thought Gammons did a pretty good job of it, while most other outlets chose the obligatory HOF debate.

Pettitte will be a an interesting case, when the time comes, as a number of others in the next few years. I’m looking forward to looking back and learning more about the candidates as they come up for election.

by AGuinness on Feb 9, 2011 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Just like the guy that hits a HR on opening day is gonna hit 162 dingers for the season?

by YankeeViking on Feb 9, 2011 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

I love that guy

He’ll be on my fantasy team, bank on it.

by AGuinness on Feb 9, 2011 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

That ERA+ list...

at the end… doesn’t invalidate Pettite as a Hall of Famer. Those are not bad pitchers at all… including Cy Young award winners and some of the more famous performances in their era. They all have reasons why they’re not Hall of Fame candidates… either injury problems, personal demons or no post-season track record, etc… but Pettite didn’t have those problems. I’m not making a Pettite Hall of Fame case, I’m just saying those names don’t make his case weaker.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field

by jameslcrockett on Feb 8, 2011 5:48 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed