5 MLB free agents still looking for work

Eric P. Mull-US PRESSWIRE

As spring training gets underway, five big name free agents are still looking for contracts. Why are they still on the market and where might they end up?

As spring training gets underway, It's not a coincidence that the five major free agents left on the market were all recipients of a qualifying offer after the 2013 season. Nelson Cruz, Kendrys Morales, Stephen Drew, Ervin Santana, and Ubaldo Jimenez are all dangerously close to being without on Valentine's Day, but the nature of each's unemployment varies.

Their previous organizations extended them all one-year, $14 million deals and all five players turned them down. By virtue of receiving the qualifying offer, these players have had their markets limited by the fact that whichever team signs them has to surrender their first, unprotected pick in this June's draft. So far, teams have been unwilling to do so given the current contract requests of the players in question, but all for somewhat different reasons.

Nelson Cruz, OF/DH

Nelson Cruz hits for power. It's his trademark tool. He entered the market coming off five consecutive seasons of 20 or more homeruns and he has slugged over .500 in four of the last five years. Even when you adjust for the hitter-friendly Ballpark in Arlington, Cruz's power remains. The problem is that he doesn't bring much else to the table and was suspended for 50 games in 2013 for his connection to Biogensis.

Year PA OBP SLG wRC+ fWAR
2011 513 .312 .509 116 1.3
2012 642 .319 .460 106 1.1
2013 456 .327 .506 122 1.5

Since 2011, Cruz has gotten on base at something close to an average rate, but average on base skills and good power only lead to big free agent dollars when they're mixed with other useful attributes. Cruz, unfortunately, has been a poor baserunner and below average defender over each of the last three seasons and he hasn't had a full season of above average production since 2010.

Early reports indicated he was looking for a deal worth around $75 million, but at this point in the calendar there's almost no chance of that happening. The problem for Cruz is that he wants to get paid like a very good player, but he hasn't been a very good player for several years and teams aren't going to pay him that handsomely while also surrendering a pick. Cruz could help a couple of teams, but those teams probably aren't going to be interested at his current asking price.

Would make sense for: Mariners, Orioles

Kendrys Morales 1B/DH

Morales fits into the same mold as Cruz, although he's a touch younger and trades a little power for on-base ability while also hitting from both sides of the plate. He doesn't have anything to offer on the bases or in the field, but he's also very much aware of that and didn't start with the same kind of demands as Cruz.

Year PA OBP SLG wRC+ fWAR
2010 211 .346 .487 128 1.2
2012 522 .320 .467 118 1.7
2013 657 .336 .449 116 1.2

The problem for Morales is that he's a DH who can occasionally play first base, while Cruz is still capable of playing a position, even if he isn't great at it. This leaves Morales with very limited options as only a couple of American League teams need a boost at DH and that's before you get to his injury history and qualifying offer. The Orioles are the obvious fit, but he could also make sense in Texas if the Rangers decide to flip Moreland.

Would make sense for: Orioles, Twins, Rangers

Stephen Drew, SS

Drew is a very clear instance of the qualifying offer sapping a player's value. Drew comes with question marks, specifically relating to the long-term health of his ankle, but he has a nice glove at short and an above average bat for the position.

Year PA OBP SLG wRC+ fWAR
2011 354 .317 .396 92 1.7
2012 327 .309 .348 80 -0.3
2013 501 .333 .443 109 3.4

Drew's problem is that he would be a nice addition for many teams, but that might require a position change and a pay cut given the qualifying offer and the number of teams who have established shortstops. The Mets and Drew have seemed like obvious partners over the last several weeks, but the Mets have balked at a deal despite a much lower draft pick cost than the one facing most teams because of their protected first-round pick and earlier signing of Curtis Granderson. But if you ignore the draft pick for a moment, the Pirates, Yankees, Orioles, and Blue Jays would all get better by acquiring Drew if both sides were comfortable with some positional changes.

Would make sense for: Mets, Pirates, Yankees, Orioles, Blue Jays

Ervin Santana, SP

Santana is a pitcher with a lot of lukewarm suitors at the moment. He's been tremendously inconsistent during his career but has also flashed the ability to be a star. The most reasonable estimate probably centers around league average going forward, but a league average starter is a very valuable thing. Perhaps only the Tigers, Nationals and Red Sox could honestly say that Ervin Santana wouldn't make them better.

Year IP ERA FIP
2011 228.2 3.38 3.93
2012 178 5.16 4.48
2013 211 3.24 3.69

Santana remains unsigned because he's trying to maximize his return. Unlike Cruz and Morales, plenty of teams are interested; they just aren't interested enough to make a significant commitment at this point in time. If Santana was happy with the Matt Garza contract, he'd be reporting to camp this week. The problem for Santana is that some of the teams that need him the most are teams that can't afford him. When he feels the pressure of his stock falling, he'll agree to a deal and is hoping that an established starter goes down with an injury before that happens.

Would make sense for: Mariners, Blue Jays, Royals, Indians, Diamondbacks, Orioles

Ubaldo Jimenez, SP

If free agent negotiations were like a college class that let you drop your worst exam when computing your final grade, Ubaldo Jimenez would have already signed a very lucrative contract. If 2012 hadn't happened, he'd probably have been looking at a $100 million deal. Unfortunately for Jimenez, the free agent market doesn't work like that and he's likely to get something closer to $30 million or $40 million.

Year IP ERA FIP
2011 188.1 4.68 3.71
2012 176.2 5.40 4.98
2013 182.2 3.30 3.62

Jimenez had excellent numbers during his time with the Rockies but struggled mightily during his first year and a half in Cleveland before finishing strong in 2013. The team that signs Jimenez is betting on the down year being the blip and the bounce back being the reality, but the uncertainty surrounding that dichotomy is keeping teams at bay. A lot of teams could use Jimenez in his 2013 capacity, but everyone would be wise to avoid him if he's planning on returning to 2012 form.

Would make sense for: Mariners, Blue Jays, Royals, Indians, Diamondbacks, Orioles, Pirates, Yankees

While there has been talk that some of these free agents might be well served to wait until their draft pick compensation expires in June, they're all good enough players that spring training injuries and struggles will move teams to increase their offers. It's not a matter of if, it's just a matter of which team feels the pressure first.

More from SB Nation MLB:

Derek Jeter announces 2014 will be his final season | Inside his gift basket

The greatest shortstop in Yankees history | Most memorable moments

Baseball is rollin' in cash, slashin' pensions

Angels fishing for Trout extension | Orioles, Suk-min Yoon agree to terms

Brisbee: Baseball teams and the windows that define them

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.