Remember When We Had To Pretend Nate Adcock Was Good?
Remember when we had to pretend that Nate Adcock was a great find who was helping the Royals? I don't mean to be too negative here. He was a Rule 5 (in the...
| Year | Team | G | GS | W | L | SV | CG | SHO | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | ERA | WHIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.1 | 33 | 21 | 13 | 1 | 16 | 31 | 3.31 | 1.39 | |
| 2007 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.1 | 20 | 26 | 18 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 8.84 | 2.29 | |
| 2008 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.1 | 81 | 45 | 32 | 3 | 29 | 82 | 3.72 | 1.42 | |
| 2009 | 21 | 19 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 102 | 103 | 72 | 60 | 10 | 54 | 71 | 5.29 | 1.54 | |
| 2010 | 27 | 26 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141.1 | 131 | 66 | 53 | 8 | 38 | 113 | 3.38 | 1.20 | |
| 2011 | Royals | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 60.1 | 63 | 34 | 31 | 5 | 26 | 36 | 4.62 | 1.48 |
| 2012 | Royals | 12 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.2 | 37 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 22 | 2.34 | 1.44 |
| 2012 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.1 | 116 | 67 | 61 | 5 | 30 | 60 | 5.53 | 1.47 | |
| Career Total | 36 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 100 | 47 | 40 | 9 | 39 | 58 | 3.79 | 1.46 | |
Show Full Career Stats
Remember when we had to pretend that Nate Adcock was a great find who was helping the Royals? I don't mean to be too negative here. He was a Rule 5 (in the...
He hasn't looked impressive, but he's been effective. Is Nate Adcock actually good?
The Kansas City Star reports that the Royals are trying to move Rule 5 pick Nathan Adcock into higher-leverage situations in order to have more "flexibility" with their bullpen: Going forward, it...
Nathan Adcock has made the Royals, so the Pirates won't be getting the Rule 5 draft pick back just yet. Too bad. Even though I think the Pirates will get Adcock back, it still isn't good to have...