Kevin Garnett, Charlie Villanueva, And The Cancer That Plagues Our Perspective

LOS ANGELES, CA - JUNE 17: Kevin Garnett #5 of the Boston Celtics walks across the court in the first half against the Los Angeles Lakers in Game Seven of the 2010 NBA Finals at Staples Center on June 17, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

According to Charlie Villanueva, Kevin Garnett said that he looks like a "cancer patient" during last night's Pistons-Celtics game. And just like that, a torrent of debate surrounds Kevin Garnett. Should this affect his legacy?

Well, we touched on Kevin Garnett's unfortunate trash talk earlier in the day, but apparently, there are still voices out there determined to use their pulpits to issue a sermon on the evils of Kevin Garnett.

It's either unbelievable or entirely predictable depending on your familiarity with the media.

See, it would easier for me to stand here and call Kevin Garnett a terrible person and a malignant presence on the NBA landscape. A cancer, if you will. In 2010, people gravitate toward those messages. Issuing blame. Creating villains. Sparking deep resentment, hearkening back to simpler values of a bygone era. Election day was yesterday; look at how successful the tea party was.

So, it's tempting. It'd be very easy to make Kevin Garnett a target here. He made light of cancer, after all, and insulted a lesser player that just happens to suffer from a rare and tragic disease called alopecia. It wouldn't be hard to connect the dots and call his character into question. Pile on, and watch the hits pile up.

We could play on the emotions of readers that don't know the context of the NBA, and might read the story and say, "Look at that--another thug athlete going too far, disgracing himself." Then maybe they'd send it to a few friends, who would pass it on to friends of their own. A few of them would probably post it on Facebook, where even more people would see it. Welcome to 2010, they'd muse.

We could echo other writers, claiming "it’s stained his legacy." Warning us that "this one promises to chase him into retirement. Beyond that of an MVP and an NBA champion, Garnett has gone to inexplicable lengths to craft a parallel legacy: a vicious bully, a cold and cruel jerk."

That would be one way to go. The problem, of course, is that it completely neglects nuance. It sows fear and resentment where there's no need. It wastes your time. Wastes everyone's time. This is 2010, and there are real problems facing pro sports, America, and the fight against cancer.

And as boring as this sounds, Kevin Garnett isn't one of them.


I know you won't send this to your friends now, but at least you can take comfort in knowing the truth. If Kevin Garnett said that Charlie Villanueva looked like a "cancer patient," it was insensitive, ugly, and ignorant. So, just like the trash talk you'd hear in any sport, at any level past grade school. But it doesn't make Kevin Garnett a bad person, and it won't change how we remember him.

Rasheed Wallace once made fun of Ron Harper's stutter during an NBA game. "Shu-shu-shu-shut up" he said after Harper talked trash to him. Does that mean we forget about the coat drives Rasheed organizes for Philadelphia's homeless every winter? Gary Payton made himself infamous for a non-stop stream of filthy, intensely personal trash talk. Does that mean we forget everything that he did for the city of Seattle? That the same cockiness underpinning his trash talk was the inspiration for Confidence Counts, his children's book?

Kevin Garnett crossed a line in an arena where the lines of deceny are blurred to begin with. If you want to demonize him for it, then fine. But we can't pick and choose who's legacy is beyond reproach. This week, the basketball world has mourned the loss of Maurice Lucas, a character that resonated with us for years and years after he retired. But reading the loving tributes to Lucas, I have to wonder. In 2010, how many people could resist the temptation to call him a thug and a bully?

As David Halberstam wrote in Breaks of the Game, Lucas was no saint:

In the third quarter, with the game close, one of the refs, angry at Luke's performance, had called a technical foul on him. Luke had shouted back his disagreement and stormed towards the referee. The referee had reached for his whistle, about to call the second technical, which meant automatic ejection, just as Luke arrived. The whistle was poised there in the ref's mouth, ready for blowing. Luke's hand touched the chain. Luke shook his head, very gently. But his eyes were burning. "You don't want to do that," he said. Their eyes met. The referee was 5'10" and Luke was 6'9". Luke held the referee's eyes. The referee slowly took the whistle out of his mouth.

"Look at him there, towering over a cowering victim," we might say. "A true bully." An enforcer in 1978 is a thug today. But then, that's 2010 for you. Maybe we'll romanticize these characters tomorrow, but today, it's far more lucrative to moralize. Blame, resentment, fear--it's what sells. Put it on your Facebook wall and watch the social media engagement take hold.

But we won't do that with Kevin Garnett today. He made a mistake, and I'm sure he'll apologize within the hour. It doesn't take away from a brilliant career, and it doesn't make him any less of a loving father, devoted philanthropist, and proud torch bearer for the current NBA generation.

One day, we'll look back on Garnett and remember his trash talk lovingly. He was unique, we'll say. Cared more than any player we've ever seen. Cared too much, maybe. But that's why we loved him.

And that's the real problem with 2010. In life, it's not the heroes that we relate to, and it's not the villains that make life more enjoyable. The people in between are the ones we remember most fondly. They resonate in a more meaningful way. And turn people into villains for their mistakes, we forget: Imperfection isn't a weakness. It shouldn't ruin anyone's legacy. It's what makes us unique. Kevin Garnett's not Tim Duncan, and that's why we all rooted for him to win in Boston. He cared too much, and wasn't afraid to show it. That's what we'll remember, not some cancer quote.

It's simpler and easier to call someone a vicious bully and point fingers at an enemy we've created out of thin air, but just remember: When we look at things in black and white, it blinds us to the most colorful people in our midst. And against that landscape, if you don't look hard enough, the whole world can look black and impossible. That's how negativity wins in America.

Me? I'll opt for nostalgia, thanks. 

Latest News

In This Article

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.