Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
by Tom Ziller • Jan 27, 2011 9:46 AM EST
Forbes has released its 2010 NBA valuations, and the macro story is that 17 teams lost value last year, even though the collective league's value was boosted 1 percent. But perhaps the most interesting if inevitable story revolves around the relocation of LeBron James, and the impact The Decision had on the Cleveland Cavaliers and Miami Heat.
As it turns out, it had just the impact you would have expected! Forbes reports that the Heat's value shot up 17 percent to $425 million, while the Cavs' value sunk 26 percent to $355 million. Ouch.
Basically, the values of the franchises flip-flopped. Miami was valuable without LeBron; credit Dwyane Wade, a recent championship and location. Cleveland without LeBron? Sorry, but that's basically the Pacers in terms of franchise placement. The Cavs will likely sink even further in coming years, especially with the top of the draft board missing a media darling like John Wall, Kevin Durant or Derrick Rose. Cleveland could certainly improve through the draft, trades and free agency next season. But lacking star power in a market like Cleveland -- recently burnt by the NBA, distracted with football and baseball -- will be a problem until the next LeBron (yeesh) comes along.
The Knicks, meanwhile, took over the top spot in the league from the Lakers, thanks to a full sell-out of all season tickets and a fat new JPMorgan Chase sponsorship.
2 comments
Next Post: VIDEO: Alex Ovechkin Gets Hit In The Face With His Teammate's Stick
Previous Post: Jimmer Fredette's NBA Hopes Rely On Fit, Defense
Read More: LeBron James (F - MIA), Miami Heat, Cleveland Cavaliers
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.







Comments
Gilbert's woes
Just 26%?
I thought it would be more than that.
Do we still think Dan Gilbert’s comments were that of a scorned slave-owner or just a guy who knew he was about to lose a crap-load of money?
by sportschump.net on Jan 27, 2011 9:57 AM EST reply actions
Scorned slave owner is a bit strong. I would go with scorned buffoon.
And a 26% drop is about $125 million. Even in pro sports terms, that’s nothing to scoff at. Makes Lebron’s $15 million salary seem pretty reasonable. It should also make those that still insist that Lebron somehow owed the Cavs more than they owed him think twice (but it won’t).
by Charlieb on Jan 27, 2011 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed