Mar 22 2:56p by Tom Ziller
In an interview with ESPN.com's Henry Abbott, NBA Players Association head Billy Hunter rejected the league's claim that all but a few franchises are losing significant amounts of money, necessitating a fundamental restructuring of the NBA's revenue and salary system. Commissioner David Stern had previously claimed teams were losing a collective $300 million a year.
Hunter says instead that only a few teams are in the red, and that the problem could be solved with greater revenue sharing between the high-revenue and low-revenue teams.
"Our belief," Hunter said, "is that a small number of teams are suffering, and their problems can be addressed through revenue sharing."
The NBA continues to deny the union's position, with a league spokesman claiming that financial reports submitted to the players' association prove the owners' veritas.
"The NBA has shared with the players' union audited financial reports for all 30 teams which unequivocally demonstrate why Mr. Hunter favors the expiring agreement and why it does not work for us," spokesman Tim Frank said.
If the two sides can't even agree on how much money the teams are or are not losing, there's precious little hope they can agree on how to fix the real or invented problem. This episode perfectly illustrates why so many are so pessimistic about the NBA as we careen toward a lockout.
1 comment
NBA Players Union Combats League Claims Of Massive Losses
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.






Comments
Revenue sharing does no good
if team payrolls are very different from the team with the lowest to highest collective salary.
In the MLB, their local revenue sharing doesn’t do much because there is no salary cap per se and the luxury tax level is so high that only one team (the Yankees) are paying it, so it’s a joke.
In the NFL, all games are on national TV, and they have a hard cap which allows for it to work very well for the teams. Small cities like Green Bay can compete due to this system, and most NFL teams have a somewhat feasible chance of making the Super Bowl if they roll on all cylinders and most teams have a shot to make the playoffs.
The NBA does have revenue sharing to some degree with merchandise and national TV. It’s the local broadcasts and ticket receipts that aren’t shared at all.
by thewiz06 on Mar 26, 2011 1:19 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed