Though most employees at a certain network will argue otherwise, Kentucky vs. Louisville is college basketball's best - and most heated - rivalry.
Dec 30, 2011 - For all the (mostly deserved) flack the network gets, the 21st century sports fan is still forever indebted to ESPN for everything it's done over the past 30 years. The world wide leader is the driving force behind the modern fan: the man or woman who can gleefully devote any given weekend to watching 48 hours of coverage pertaining to their sport of choice.
But when any person, idea or organization grows so large and powerful, people are bound to find fault with it. I, like most, have developed numerous issues with the four letter network over the years, but none greater than its uncanny ability to somehow convince the vast majority of the country that what it says is as much a fact as 1+1=2, or Washington was the first President, or Johnny Weir pulls chicks.
Each winter you've got every ESPN personality with an ACC degree subtly mentioning 37 times a week that Duke/North Carolina is the best rivalry in college basketball. You've got the Devils and the Heels right alongside the Yankees and Red Sox and Ali/Frazier in a four-times-a-year SportsNation poll question asking "which is the best rivalry in sports." You've got Dick Vitale belittling anyone with a reasonable opinion that differs from his own by boasting time after time that there is "absolutely no doubt" that UNC/Duke is "far and away" the best rivalry in college athletics.
What choice do us voiceless pawns ("the little bald bitches on the chessboard") watching from home have but to lay back and accept this? ESPN is like the NASA of sports. This is what they do. Someone has researched this. There's a formula. It's right. It has to be right.
It's not right.
Louisville vs. Kentucky is the best this sport has to offer.
The game might not get the "full circle" treatment, it might not garner a week of over-hyped advertising, and it may not feature a man on the television screaming like the fate of the Middle East is at stake, but it simply means vastly more than its top rivalry competition. It means more to the players involved, it means more to the coaches involved, it means more to the fans involved and it means more to the state involved.
Barring a meeting in the NCAA Tournament, the Cards and the Cats get just one crack at each other every year. Forty minutes for 12-months of bragging rights. Forty minutes to avoid embarrassment and harassment at work, in school, or in your own bedroom for 365 days.
If Duke drops the first of the minimum two meetings with North Carolina, then the Cameron Crazies can retreat to their dorms, talk about how they'll get 'em in a few weeks or in the ACC tournament, pop in season one of BattleStar Galactica (I know, nerd joke) and call it a night.
When the final horn blows in the Battle for the Bluegrass, an entire fan base is instantly forced to come to grips with the terrible truth that they will now be heckled unmercifully for an entire year by friends, co-workers, family, teachers, etc. whom they would undoubtedly stab in an exposed appendage if it weren't so frowned upon.
Don't get it twisted, there is no intended exaggeration or hyperbole in this post (except maybe the stabbing part...maybe). There are Kentucky fans who will still discuss the "shame" involved in the 1998 Wildcats falling - in Lexington - to a U of L team that would go on to finish the regular season 12-19. While the national championship > no postseason argument would seem like an effective retort to the uneducated outsider, being able to claim victory in this rivalry is like a one-year unlimited get out-of-jail free card.
The use of "hate" is excessive in almost any context, but this rivalry brings the utilization of the word closer to the cusp of appropriateness than any other.
Without delving too much into the issues, there is a definite disconnect between the city of Louisville and the state of Kentucky.
Though relatively insignificant in the eyes of the rest of the country, Kentuckians outside of Louisville view the Derby City the same way someone from upstate Vermont views New York City: prostitutes parading around the KFC Yum! Center, muggers behind the doors of every store in the local mall and gang-bangers residing in each and every high-rent neighborhood home.
The differences between the two might be best exemplified through the basketball rivalry.
A conversation about Louisville with a Kentucky fan that doesn't include the use of the words "class," "trash," and "thugs," is one that never took place. And Cardinal fans are just as quick to toss "redneck" and "racist" around when the other side is brought up.
Louisville's heroes are the "Doctors of Dunk" (led of course by Darrell "Dr. Dunkenstein" Griffith), whose electrifying style of play set the standard for "Phi Slamma Jamma" and the "Fab Five." The high-flying 1979-1980 national champion Cardinals are also credited with either creating or popularizing (depending on who you talk to) the high-five.
Kentucky's heroes are still the small, gritty likes of Richie Farmer, Jeff Sheppard and Cameron Mills. John Calipari coaching in the Ivy League is more likely than the banner dedicated to The Unforgettables coming down.
If you want to get a Wildcat fan worked into a tizzy, simply state that Adolph Rupp being a racist is indisputable. Whether it's fair or not, there is no question that race was at one point a defining issue between the two programs. Thanks to Glory Road, just about everyone knows that the 1965-66 Texas Western team was the first to start five African-Americans and make it to the Final Four. Less known is that Louisville was the second program to achieve the feat.
The issue - at least as it was then - is well laid out in Rick Pitino's chapter of Eddie Einhorn's fantastic compilation How March Became Madness:
People don't like what they can't understand, and these two sides certainly don't seem to understand each other.
The result is cultural warfare in the form of a 40-minute college basketball game.
Of course the greatest rivalry in the sport has to have a defining moment, and I challenge any other collegiate feud to come up with an event that can compete with the 1983 "Dream Game" from a significance standpoint.
The two teams hadn't played since 1959 when Peck Hickman's unranked Cardinals knocked off Adolph Rupp's second-ranked Wildcats 76-61 in the Mideast Regional semifinals. The victory paved the way for U of L's first trip to the Final Four. Since then the Cardinals had won a national championship and become a major player on the national scene, and Louisville fans craved a shot at "big brother" that Rupp and subsequently Joe B. Hall refused to allow.
But the game finally happened in '83 when the teams were paired in the same region and met in the Mideast Regional championship on March 26 in Knoxville. Despite a buzzer-beating shot by Jim Master to send the game into overtime, the Cardinals ran off 14 straight points in the extra period and prevailed 80-68.
The U of L community erupted and quickly the governor, legislators and even the boards of trustees at both universities began to talk about a series between the two. Shortly thereafter, the announcement was made that Louisville and Kentucky would begin playing each other annually.
One game played an awfully large role in making this what it is today. If Louisville loses we may never have had the showdowns of the '80s, the upset in '98, Patrick Sparks' late-game heroics or the saga Rick Pitino's betrayal. But here we are. A mere day away from the Cardinals and the Wildcats going at it with each boasting a top five ranking for the first time in series history.
The contentious nature of the modern rivalry is being spearheaded by the main faces of each program. Rick Pitino and John Calipari both claim no bad blood, but the words sound every bit as hollow as the ones both utter following a bad loss.
Calipari has taken pot shot after pot shot at Pitino and Louisville over the past year, most notably referring to Kentucky as "the only real program in the state." This was the comment that finally drew a response from Pitino.
"Four things I've learned in my 59 years about people," Pitino said. "I ignore the jealous, I ignore the malicious, I ignore the ignorant and I ignore the paranoid."
"If the shoe fits anyone," he added. "Wear it."
But the rivalry between the head coaches is far deeper than the recent words go. Calipari has beaten Pitino handily in each of their two head-to-head meetings as head coaches of the Commonwealth's major programs. He has brought in the No. 1 recruiting class in America three straight times, and on Saturday will start a freshman point guard whom Pitino had made a top priority recruit for three years.
Still, it's Pitino who has what Calipari wants: a national championship.
A pair of strong and ostentatious personalities in a power struggle for control of a state. It's sexy, and you can't blame the media for honing in on it. But the fact of the matter is that if Calipari and Pitino were both suspended for tomorrow's game, the win would be no less satisfying for anyone supporting the winning side. Whether the parties in question realize it or not, this is much bigger than either one of them.
The fans have spent a healthy amount of time taking the easy and expected shots at the other coach's off-the-court issues, but it's only a means to get under the skin of the enemy. All either really wants is a victory...and for the taste of defeat to crush the souls of the other side.
There are no moral victories in a Kentucky/Louisville game and there is no next time, there's only a euphoric winner and an inconsolable loser.
It absolutely means more than any game should to a group of human beings, but I suppose that's what you'd expect from a sport's top rivalry.
Comments
by cards84 on Dec 30, 2011 9:29 AM EST reply actions
Well done, as usual.
The problem with quotations on the internet is, you don't know whether they're accurate. - Abraham Lincoln
by Anything but Gatorade on Dec 30, 2011 9:53 AM EST reply actions
I can give you three reasons ESPN doesn't hype this game
1. C
2. B
3. S
Just like the NHL, anything that doesn’t happen on the WWL automatically takes a hit in coverage.
by JohnTongEchoesinmyhead on Dec 30, 2011 9:58 AM EST reply actions
Been thinking this.
Would be a completely different story if ESPN broadcast this game every year.
by CardinalDude on Dec 30, 2011 10:00 AM EST up reply actions
Great Observation!
I love the name too. John Tong echoes in my head too, especially when time is out on the floor.
by Card-in-Lex on Dec 30, 2011 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
So now rivalries have rivalries?
Does this really matter? All of these fan bases hate each other, and the games are always fun and heated.
I went to Carolina, and I can attest that I hate Duke. A lot. And the two game format actually lends to the rivalry – We don’t have to wait a year for revenge. This past season, the Dean Dome was a crazy place for the Duke game – we wanted to revenge our collapse at Cameron 1 month earlier.
But I’m not going to sit here and say our rivalry is superior to Louisville-Kentucky. All rivalries are fun, whether it’s Amherst v. Williams or Carolina v. Duke.
¡go heels!
by mgparker on Dec 30, 2011 10:09 AM EST reply actions
I hate the Amherst v. Williams rivalry.
by Justin Gingey Smith on Dec 30, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
Admittedly, that was a poor choice on my part.
Those fools are bunch of pansies.
¡go heels!
by mgparker on Dec 30, 2011 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
Haha.
In all seriousness, I believe one game/year lends strength to the venom that comes with a loss. You have to wait approximately 365 for your next shot at bragging rights.
by Justin Gingey Smith on Dec 30, 2011 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
Are you nuts??
Can I say homer? UNC vs Duke. And I’m from Montana! Ha!
just win, baby
Thank you Kris Draper and Chris Osgood for all the memories.
Millen shall be Mi**en on Pride of Detriot. New, official, unwritten law.
by Bballkid-22 on Dec 30, 2011 11:56 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Why's that? Cause you hear about it more?
by Justin Gingey Smith on Dec 30, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions
Cuz there's more history
all you guys are giving me is 1983. Duke and North Carolina have been consistenly good every year
just win, baby
Thank you Kris Draper and Chris Osgood for all the memories.
Millen shall be Mi**en on Pride of Detriot. New, official, unwritten law.
by Bballkid-22 on Dec 31, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
Good response!
(sarcasm)
Yes, that is Spike Lee.
by TheRealSlimShady on Dec 30, 2011 3:46 PM EST up reply actions
Mizzou-KU
Three words: Civil War
Big 12 Hoops - An SB Nation blog dedicated to Big 12 conference men's basketball | Twitter
by Evan Pfaff on Dec 30, 2011 12:11 PM EST reply actions
That rivalry is as weak as your counting skills
by sarasota-card on Dec 30, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
You don't have to live and work with the other side
for the most part.
by HendoCard on Dec 30, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
You do if you live in KC
Big 12 Hoops - An SB Nation blog dedicated to Big 12 conference men's basketball | Twitter
by Evan Pfaff on Dec 30, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
Rutgers vs. Seton Hall
At least according to Pat Forde.
by jimmiejones on Dec 30, 2011 12:24 PM EST reply actions
IU/Purdue
Is heated, but it’s been pretty irrelevant for awhile.
Do Louisville fans care about the long history of UK cheating? Does anyone?
by patrickdolan on Dec 30, 2011 2:15 PM EST reply actions
Great article Mike
Slightly more disturbing than Brian Brohm's sleeveless shirt.
by noobmaster on Dec 30, 2011 2:42 PM EST reply actions
Well done
And why is it everytime I like something I read on the Cardchronicle it turns out you are the author?
The first time I remember the feelings turning really bad towards UL was with the “rumor” that Unseld decided not to go to UK because the people at UL told him that he would not be safe playing at UK. It was viewed as being beyond the pale.
Good writing, keep it up.
Al (Cat Fan in Canada)
by blenheim bard on Dec 30, 2011 3:17 PM EST reply actions
Fantastic post
Best read on college hoops I’ve seen anywhere in a good while.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
by Peter Bean on Dec 30, 2011 3:39 PM EST reply actions
Thanks, Peter
by Mike Rutherford on Dec 30, 2011 5:29 PM EST up reply actions
Great history behind UK/UL. Horrific reasoning why it's a better rivalry than UNC/Duke.
Just because you only play one game and both fanbases happen to hate each other doesn’t make it the best rivalry in CBB. At all.
by SuperJew on Dec 30, 2011 6:17 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
No.
by Get_In_My_BELLY_ on Dec 30, 2011 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
Good stuff
I grew up in ACC country before Coach K came to Duke. I don’t recall Duke-UNC being that heated until the Duke program became elite. In my perceptions, both fan bases are similar, so I can’t see where there would be too much real hatred. One would have to nitpick to find real differences. If the rivalry is limited to on court implications, I think an argument can be made that it is the best rivalry in CBB. National title implications are always there.
But Mike’s depiction of the cultural differences between UL-UK are dead on. I have family in Louisville, and have spent time there. The stereotypes of each fan base are held to some degree by the opposition. It adds a venom to the rivalry that really can’t be matched by Duke/UNC, unless privileged Southern kids at UNC resent privileged Northeast kids coming down south to Duke. I don’t recall of reading about such animosity.
by BonesCrosby on Dec 31, 2011 11:51 AM EST reply actions
TheFacts
I am a Kentucky graduate and wil tell you that the Louisville/Kentucky rivalry has only become a real rivalry since Pitino came to Louisville. Pitino loved UK and admitted he made a mistake by leaving “Camelot” for his wife who wanted to move back to the Norheast and his ridiculous offer from the greatest NBA franchise in history. Pitino loved living in Kentucky and has a great passion for horses and loose blondes.His wife still lives above the Mason Dixon line by the way. Uk fans appreciate what Pitino accomplished at UK but will never forgive him for taking the UofL job. He should have taken the Michigan job and has done some good things at Loserville but will never duplicate what he did at UK. Kentucky fans have always considered UofL a pest that was able to recruit Black players in the 60’s and early 70’s that were too afraid to play in the deep south at that time. Rupp coached black players in high school and attempted to recruit Wes Unseld and others in the mid sixties but told those recruits that traveling to Alabama, Mississippi, and Mississippi State would be a tough situation for them. Ole Miss and Mississippi would not play against schools who played black players and refused NCAA invitations when they were invited. In 1969 UK was able to recruit its first black player for basketball and was the first school in the SEC to recruit and Start a black football player. In the famous 1966 UK vs. Texas Western game people forget that Duke was all white in the Final Four. Rupp can be accused of either trying to protect his players, not wanting to be the first to cross the racial divide, being a sore loser and calling all of his players “boys” but he never recruited players hard period and expected them to come to him. The ACC at the time was a very dangerous place for black players as well and UNC’s Al Mcquire had to deal with a lot of headaches with his first black recruit in 66 as well. UNC/Duke is a better TV rivalry because they can face each other on ESPN and up to three times a year but UK/UofL only happens once a year. Right now the UK game means more because we hate Pitino and ULofL
by Jimmy Wayne on Jan 1, 2012 12:38 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed