Dec 01 1:13p by Spencer Hall
The NCAA deemed Auburn QB Cam Newton eligible to play in the SEC Championship game, according to a statement released Wednesday by the NCAA student-athlete reinstatement staff.
The timeline of events here works like this:
The statement today does not mean that this case is closed by any stretch of the imagination. The final portion of the statement is as follows:
Reinstatement decisions are independent of the NCAA enforcement process and typically are made once the facts of the student-athlete’s involvement are determined. The reinstatement process is likely to conclude prior to the close of an investigation. It is NCAA policy not to comment on current, pending or potential investigations.
That is a lawyerly way of saying that given what is known now, Auburn is free and clear to play Newton in 2010, but that the investigation may or may not be still open toward further investigation down the road. So something for everyone, in other words: Auburn fans may rejoice at getting Newton for the championship game and the potential for a national title shot, and those convinced of fishy doings here may read the final paragraph and assume the story isn't done.
11 comments
Cam Newton Investigation: Auburn QB Ruled Eligible For SEC Championship Game
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.






Comments
OK.....Now where in the Wide Wide World Of Sports did this ruling come from???
And Enes Kanter is “Permanently Ineligible”?
I am now and forever shall be The Cat In The Hat....The Artist formerly known as ABC!
by Greg Alan Edwards on Dec 1, 2010 1:27 PM EST reply actions
The "investigation" may stay open
But it won’t have anything to do with Newton and Auburn. It will revolve around Kenny Rogers.
by chizwhiz on Dec 1, 2010 1:37 PM EST reply actions
Here's why this matters
It opens the doors for sleezy parents to shop their kids – with or without (wink wink) the kid knowing. If a parent can shop a kid, and nothing aside from about 4 hours of ineligibility is the penalty, what’s to stop them?
by Tony Ridinger on Dec 1, 2010 1:59 PM EST reply actions
It is the institutions responsibility to maintain integrity
You can’t control all the sleaze balls in the world BUT you can control what member institutions engage in. Let the parents ask for Maseratis and houses in Malibu…..its only a problem if the university hands them out. Someone has to be the adult and all to often the parents of these kids aren’t. Besides how in the world would you police such a rule and what would be considered soliciting a benefit.
Wouldn’t asking for guaranteed playing time be a benefit?? Where do you draw the line??
Col.Angus may be rough, Col.Angus may not smell like a bed of roses, but deep down Col.Angus is very sweet. If I overstay my welcome, just tap me on the head!!
by Col.Angus on Dec 1, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
that's even more rediculous
you have to rely on schools to report such things so the ncaa can rule and be the iron hammer of justice. tell that to MSU.
by Tony Ridinger on Dec 1, 2010 5:30 PM EST up reply actions
dan wetzel of yahoo sports
outlines why this is the biggest mistake in a ruling the ncaa has ever made. instead of making an example of the situation to deter further cases, the ncaa just made it EASIER to shop a player.
read his article: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=dw-newtonturn120110
by Tony Ridinger on Dec 1, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
I don't get
what Wetzel is bent out of shape about. Someone shopped the kid, right, but the schools didn’t actually pay anyone. This doesn’t allow anything further to happen because the violation occurs if the school (or the kid) provides extra benefits.
I congratulate Wetzel on his grandstanding, however. He’s very good at that.
Full disclosure – I hate Auburn and have no reason to defend them.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Dec 1, 2010 7:09 PM EST up reply actions
Well said
by Sbayer on Dec 1, 2010 3:19 PM EST reply actions
This is just sad.
’95: Damon Stoudamire suspended by NCAA for a game despite not knowing dad allegedly took benefits
Link: http://bit.ly/h6gy2G
Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!
by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Dec 1, 2010 5:07 PM EST reply actions
this rule may change
because what would stop someone from sending the kid to the room when a school came to visit while they talked about money and so the kid knew nothing.
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
Follow me on twitter!
by Jeremy Mauss on Dec 1, 2010 6:45 PM EST reply actions
Cam newton
Money rules all decisions
Check out Bronamethsports.com to see how the South east feels
by bronameth on Dec 2, 2010 10:52 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed