Updated throughout the day with quick takes from staff.
by Jason Kirk • Dec 6, 2010 4:55 PM EST
The highest level of college football can't have a playoff because that would devalue the regular season. That's been the BCS advocate's go-to talking point for years, but one BCS ranking factor appears to have taken the line as a marching order.
CBS Sports' Jerry Palm discovered an error in Wes Colley's BCS rankings that incorrectly jumped the LSU Tigers to No. 10, ahead of the Boise St. Broncos. Colley's data set failed to include a FCS playoff game between Appalachian State and Western Illinois, which all the other BCS formulas accounted for.
How could that game possibly affect top-ten standings? LSU beat the Florida Gators, who beat Appalachian State. So removing the Mountaineers' win over Western Illinois from the equation messed with Florida's rankings in such a way that the ripple effect made LSU look better than it should.
The flub didn't affect either team's bowl placement, but it could've. And besides the fact that we're leaving championships and millions of dollars up to error-prone computers instead of just bias-prone humans, why should removing an Appalachian State postseason win make Florida look better? If the Gators beat a 10-2 FCS team instead of a 9-2 FCS team, especially with the win being a playoff win, how can that devalue LSU's Florida win?
The phantom game was a home game for App State, so maybe its inclusion hurt their, Florida's, and LSU's strength of schedule?
Either way, Bill Hancock has been warning us about those playoff games, and it looks like he was right.
1 comment
Jason Kirk:
Final BCS Standings Incorrectly Have LSU Ranked Ahead Of Boise State
The 5 biggest sports stories, hand-picked for your inbox. Show more info?
We’ve developed a unique newsletter that delivers the five most interesting sports stories fans are talking about, direct to your email three times a week. Each email is curated by an SB Nation editor who follows sports the way you do: as a fan. One email three times a week, with stories worth your time.
You can unsubscribe at anytime, and we'll never use your address for evil. Not interested? Make this bar go away forever. You can always sign up later.







Comments
somebody please explain
It seems to me that the Mountaineers win over Western Illinois would help out App State, making the Florida win over them (nominally) more impressive, thereby helping out Florida, which would make the LSU win over Florida more impressive (if you buy into the transitive theory of football victories, which I don’t)… I don’t see how a team that Florida (a team LSU beat on their own turf) beat winning a game over another team being left out of the equation makes LSU “look better than it should”… It seems like it should be the opposite, and I would like for somebody to please explain.
"I can tell you one thing: The grass in Tiger Stadium tastes best." - OUR damn strong football coach, Les Miles
by GTalmage on Dec 7, 2010 2:49 PM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed