Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Eden Hazard In London For Medical, According To Reports

Penn State, Sandusky, And A Doctor Who Walked In The Door

As the tragedy at Penn State proves yet again, evil comes in many forms, taking good people and turning them into accomplices by force, neglect, or denial.

Nov 11, 2011 - He was a doctor, or had been before he came to the United States. Let's call him Jacques. This is not his name, because he was a client, but Jacques will do for this story.

He was from a horrendous place in East Africa. Like most of my clients, he was a refugee, and came here after sitting in a camp for a few years wondering if he would or could ever leave. Unlike most of my clients, Jacques was urbane, upper-class, and something close to suave. Diminutive, he held conversations in slow but colloquial English. His shirts were always ironed to a geometric line. I can still remember his walk: deliberate but smooth, like someone holding the deed to every place he entered in his back pocket.

We met only a few times. We reviewed his plans to recertify as a physician in the United States. We talked briefly about his family. Paperwork was found, strange diplomas and certifications sent for from Africa. He glided in and out of the office promptly and by appointment, sliding in and leaving with the same eerie Nosferatu-on-rails gait. I remember him most for being on-time. Clients were never on time.


Follow @sbnation on Twitter | Like SB Nation on Facebook | Sign up for our Newsletter


Our last appointment was different. It wasn't an appointment at all. He showed up unannounced. His eyes were bloodshot. He stank of booze, and his clothing hung wrinkled and disheveled on his small frame. He said he really needed to speak with me immediately, something clients said all the time for various reasons. Sometimes they did this because they needed to report something to the police or had lost their job. Sometimes they did this because they wanted you to buy them a new car. Everything, sane or not, is urgent when you are a refugee.

I told him I was busy -- I was, for once -- and needed to talk to him another time unless it was a matter of life or death. He demurred, and walked out of the office. I went back to my work without thinking too much of it. Clients had odd requests all the time. I think I met with a few clients that day, and then worked on some report that probably only exists in an old Excel database somewhere deep in the bowels of the Georgia state archives. I went home and probably played some NCAA 2K1 on my old Dreamcast.

Jacques walked out of my office. Later that day, he walked into an apartment and strangled a teenage relative to death, possibly with a hairnet, and left her naked body in the bathtub for the Sheriff's deputies and her grandmother to find.

What the community at Penn State is dealing with right now is beyond comprehension, but there is a word for it: evil. After the uproar over Joe Paterno's firing -- and after the uproar over the uproar -- there will be a long, silent reckoning in the minds of those in the State College community. For years, they lived and worked with Jerry Sandusky, parking cars, sleeping in houses, and eating meals at the restaurants he frequented. For years they worked with someone whose actions fell into the unfathomable category of human taboos we call evil. The unpardonable and the unforgivable was not an abstraction. It lived next door.

I've seen evil's wake, but the closest I have ever been to it in person was the cold chill and wave of nausea the morning I woke up and watched my client's face appear on television in an orange jumpsuit. I didn't know anything, it turns out. His wife was not his legal wife and had refused to marry him. He had not practiced medicine, either, but had been forced out of medical school by a war. He had threatened to kill her if she ever left and allegedly beat her. She had left the common-law marriage with their children. That day in the office, while he pleaded for an appointment, she was getting settled in a battered women's shelter and preparing to move on with her life.

You never know these things at the time. Like many of those capable of the unthinkable, Sandusky was a pillar of the community: a football coach, a mentor, a father of six, and the founder of a charity that may have done great good in the community. Unsticking that figure from the community and replacing it with someone capable of real monstrosity will never, ever be complete. There will always be the memory of the former, the unsullied, the framework of the person not completely annihilated by the horror of the present. Not him, you'll think. Not Jerry.

In costume drama, the devil wears very large horns for a reason. Evil should be in theory recognizable, not cloaked in banality. It should be cartoonish, easily mocked, and thus dismissed. At no point should evil look like you, or your friends. Make it robots, or zombies. Some times I think the most horrifying video game in the world would be one where you had to fight off the denizens of a middle-American Starbucks bent on killing everyone for one hour a day, but who were trying to keep it as quiet as possible. The rest of the game, you would have to perform mundane tasks and act like nothing was happening, and you would never know exactly which hour would bring the evil side out.

This would be the worst video game in the world for a reason: it's too realistic, too contradictory. Evil is terrifyingly normal. When it walks through the door, its gait is only vampiric in the memory, edited by the brain to seem obvious and you less culpable in the remembrance. Jacques seems more evil in my memories because I cannot process the notion that I did not ask enough questions, or notice some obvious criminal physiognomy tipping him off as someone capable of a monstrous act.

I am sure this same process is currently flaring through the synapses of a thousand brains at Penn State. Maybe someone did notice something or simply get a bad feeling they ignored in favor of assuming the normal. Real, creeping evil works like that. On the surface it is indistinguishable from the every day, and its incomprehensibility lends itself to camouflage. You are obligated, on the one hand, to issue the general reminders of vigilance, and to trust your instincts.

You should also know that the cruelest trick evil plays on the world is its permanence. There is no dealing with it: only forgetting, moving on with the quotidian to get past the unthinkable, and coping with the constant pain of memory. There will be not closure, a word that should be obliterated from the human vocabulary. Evil breezes in through your front door and calls you a friend. It takes good people and turns them into accomplices by force, neglect, or denial. Penn State, the victims, and those who knew Sandusky as a father figure will have to deal with this for the rest of their existence.

They are not alone, however. They never will be, and that's both the only cold comfort and the worst part of all of this.

For more on the Nittany Lions, visit SB Nation's Penn State blog Black Shoe Diaries. For the latest news updates on the Jerry Sandusky investigation, follow our comprehensive StoryStream.

Do you like this post?

Spencer_medium

Spencer Hall

Featured Contributor

Spencer Hall is the editor of EDSBS.com and a contributor to SBNation.com. He focuses on college football and participatory pieces involving trying new sports. He does not excel in the latter and is... Read full bio


Comments

Display:

Sometimes the victim of abuse surprise you

Years ago I had a young co-worker who seemed to have it all going for her. She was bright, funny, articulate but something about her personality that no one could quite figure out. One Friday afternoon, when we were all sitting around waiting for the bell to ring, she just blurted out that she had been a victim of sexual abuse as a child. We were just stunned into silence. She left our organization s few years later (on good terms). I’ve always kind of wondered what happened to her, and her husband, whether she ever had any children of her own.

But just hearing someone say that can chill you to the bone.

West Virginia fans hate everybody. They remember every snub and joke and bit of snark. And they never forgive, and they never, ever forget. In other words, they're a lot like West Virginians in general.

by Kid Tenderloin on Nov 11, 2011 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

Nice work

Dictated, but not read.

http://atlanticcoastconfidential.wordpress.com/

by ezcuse on Nov 11, 2011 1:49 PM EST reply actions  

Spencer

Thank you very much for writing such a poignant piece of work. You have a gift for expressing complex emotions into communicable thoughts.

Community Manager at SB Nation
support@sbnation.com

by Cory Williams on Nov 11, 2011 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

This was amazing.

He said my colon was as pink as the Vatican marble.

by blanx73 on Nov 11, 2011 3:07 PM EST reply actions  

Ridiculously great writing...

Unfortunately the small number of comments means not enough people are reading this. In hindsight all monsters have horns and fangs.

Yo fumo español

by rahpsu92 on Nov 11, 2011 3:22 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Best I've read about this tragedy yet, Spencer.

Thank you.

"I have never been noticeably reticent about talking on subjects about which I know nothing." Prince Phillip

by Go Big Rev on Nov 11, 2011 4:29 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

We read Spencer's stuff...

…..every day. Tens of thousands of us. Playland is over at EDSBS. It’s more serious over on SBN, and when Spencer’s not playing, it’s hard to disagree. Amazing insight.

…..My opinion is that this sort of evil is not new, or uncommon. What’s unusual is that it’s surfaced in the football patriarch’s football program. Some don’t agree, but the cultural norm for discovery of such vileness has always been disbelief, and a hope that one was mistaken.

…..Most school administrators would rather worry about image, test scores, funding and tenure, than the children. The little ones are a given, with compulsory schooling.

......Drowning in cool elixir.

by Acid Reign on Nov 11, 2011 4:54 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

excellently done

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
GTHTSUN

by CoastalCowbell on Nov 11, 2011 5:26 PM EST reply actions  

Excellent, insightful piece

As usual from you, Spencer – I am always grateful for your writing whether you are composing biting satire or, as you do here, offer us thought-provoking, nuanced, deep and serious commentary. I served on a jury that convicted a couple of abusing and killing their own child. The father was annoying, sort of out there in his politics and philophy, so one may have seen him as odd (although probably not homicidal). It was the mother that struck me. She was totally banal. Boring. Had no personality, really. And when I looked at her as she was accused of killing her child, she seemed to have no response. Chilling.

by SusanB on Nov 11, 2011 5:34 PM EST reply actions  

The window you opened

is more than just a reflection on the human race, but a self reflection we all need to make concerning how to navigate and interpreted the world. You have written a valuable piece that, ironically, argues against the mentality that screams ‘get em’ when confronted with horrific allegations. If Evil is normal we need to systematically and rationally deal with it, not just react.

I thick we should use the same clairvoyance used in your essay to examine ourselves when condemning Joe Paterno. 2011 information is being used to damn Paterno in 1998. How can anyone expect him (Paterno) to assume such awful allegations are correct? Who goes through life assuming guilt of other people?

The most common critique of Paterno’s actions is not reporting the allegations made to him to the police instead of his superiors. Put yourself in the same situation- an intern comes to you and tells you he has witnessed your coworker commit a terrible crime. Armed with this information my actions would be the same as Paterno’s, I would take them to my boss. After being told the incident had been investigated why would I assume the guilt of my co-worker?

Too many people chastise Paterno for trusting his superiors would do the right thing. Does anybody honestly expect their employer to be amoral? If so why do you work there?

by tzubear on Nov 11, 2011 6:51 PM EST reply actions  

I have spent... too much time this week

defending Paterno’s failure to call the police initially. And I think my arguments have been pretty persuasive on that specific point, at least to those who are viewing this objectively rather than emotionally. (Core point: the process is in place for a reason, and it’s a standard process used in almost every organization — including elementary/secondary schools, hospitals, and youth organizations — with very few differences. It’s there to help the police and prosecution avoid giving defense attorneys ammunition to discredit witnesses.)

But what I have not defended Paterno on, and cannot until we have some explanation as to why, is his lack of action later. I can understand him not picking up the phone and calling the police when he received the report from McQueary. But I cannot understand why Jerry Sandusky was still freely roaming the Penn State campus nine years later. I recognize that there may be a perfectly valid explanation for this, and thus I don’t condemn him… but I cannot defend it, either.

In the end, he may well deserve condemnation from those who have hesitated; he may deserve apologies from those who have not. We’re just going to have to wait and see.

The Wiki (I Don't Have a Real Name Yet) -- The Blog (Those Other Guys) -- The Twitter
Contributor at Bring on the Cats, SBNation's Kansas State blog
EDSBS Censor Librorum Promulgatio Media

by jonfmorse on Nov 11, 2011 8:40 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Regrettably, that "wait and see" attitude is precisely what the JoePa apologists are hoping for...

…and will unfortunately receive.

The actions (or lack thereof) of Mr. McQueary aside, the fact that Joe Paterno allowed this creep to be anywhere near the athletic department after this was brought to his attention in 2002 is indication to me that Mr. Paterno treasured stability over safety, and was willing (at least implicitly, if not explicitly) to trade silence for money and power.

Uncle Ben Parker said it best – with great power comes great responsibility. Mr. Paterno had all the power to ban Jerry Sandusky from the campus, and to make sure he (Sandusky) did not hurt any more boys.

Instead, Coach Paterno chose expediency. For that, his legacy will be punished, and the only way it can be protected is for his defenders to play the “wait and see” card.

Some things should not be waited for, and some things once seen cannot be unseen.

"You take one step out that door and somebody’s gonna get fucked real bad" ... Elfboy

by SierraSpartan on Nov 11, 2011 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

It is the absolute height of arrogance and hubris on all our parts

to think that the ultimate fate of Joe Paterno’s legacy is something that we need to determine right here and right now — we who do not know everything yet.

For we, the public, to wait for everything to come out in the wash isn’t a method of defending anything. Indeed, it’s a method of getting at the truth — one which very may well just as easily condemn Paterno as it might exonerate him. (In fact, I admit that I think this will be the case; I do not expect that Paterno’s going to be able to offer an explanation, at such time when he’s able to offer one at all, that will be satisfactory. It’s not because I don’t think such an explanation is possible — I can think of multiple legitimate reasons why Paterno failed to do more, all of which are bound up in the fact that even filthy disgusting scumbags who deserve to burn in hell have legal protections until they’re actually indicted — it’s because I do not, in my heart, believe that Paterno’s thinking had much to do with those legitimate reasons. But what I believe and what I have to rationally consider are two different beasts.)

What I keep coming back to is this: if one has tried to maintain a measured approach to this and refuses to condemn the man, then if it turns out that he does in fact deserve condemnation so be it. Condemnation will come in due course. His “legacy” isn’t what we think about him today or tomorrow or next week or next year. It’s what we think about him 10, 20, 50 years from now. Nobody’s been harmed by waiting to rush to judgment of him, because waiting to condemn the man doesn’t allow atrocities to continue. The threat is over; the actual villain of the piece can no longer operate.

(That said, he shouldn’t be lionized on the basis that we don’t know yet, either. Simple decency and taste require that we not be having parades for the man, and I am terrified of the prospect of this week’s game turning into a tearful farewell to a martyr. That’s just as wrongheaded as condemning him at this point.)

If one condemns, however, and it turns out that there are justifiable reasons for Paterno’s actions… a harm has been done to him, for no purpose other than venting our (completely righteous and understandable) anger and outrage. There are two statements in your response, for example, which are nothing more than assumptions on your part. They’re reasonable assumptions to be sure, and ones I’m inclined to agree with, but assumptions no less.

And while I am most certainly cognizant of the fact that there’s almost no way any damage to Paterno’s reputation can ever be a greater wrong than the damage to these kids who’ve been victimized, I’m not in the business of handwaving potential wrongs just because they’re less wrong than others.

The Wiki (I Don't Have a Real Name Yet) -- The Blog (Those Other Guys) -- The Twitter
Contributor at Bring on the Cats, SBNation's Kansas State blog
EDSBS Censor Librorum Promulgatio Media

by jonfmorse on Nov 11, 2011 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Apologist?

No Sierra Spartan “Analyst”.

“The actions (or lack thereof) of Mr. McQueary aside”

I did not bring up McQueary’s lack of action because it is a different matter altogether.

by tzubear on Nov 11, 2011 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I would add that

not condemning him and asking others to hold thier condemnation until further evaluation is not that same as defending. So I think we are on the same page in that regard.

I am stil processing Paternos culpability in the years that followed McQuery’s report. If the only information Paterno had to go on was the initial allegation from McQuery then the amount of time Sandusky remained on site is irrelevent since an investigation was executed (at least this is what was allegedly reported to Paterno). However, mounting evidence and a school imposed ban on Sandusky’s involvement with children should have prompted Paterno to ‘put his foot down’ in the name of morality. How do we know he didn’t? Maybe it was Paterno’s ultimatum that prompted sancioning of Sandusky.

Ultimately, yes, Paterno probably should have done more. He should have been willing to lose his job in order to correct this mess, even if he only suspected. I still don’t think we can asses a time in which JoePa had anything more than secondary information that would have been the seed of a useful police investigation.

In the end though my arguements are even more fruitless than yours since I arrive late to the party. What scares me, what prompted me to stop lurking and post, is when this issue turned Swindle and other respected members of the ‘comentariat’ into torch and sword wielding vikings.

by tzubear on Nov 11, 2011 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Speak for others.

I said they should all lose their jobs. That happened. I said this is evil. It is. Written twice about it. If there’s a torch anywhere in there, it ain’t mine.

Because college football is too important to be left to the professionals.

by Spencer Hall on Nov 11, 2011 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

cmon Spencer

we all know it is evil, but blame should follow full disclosure. You were not alone, but you did call for everybodies head using a wide brush.

Seems like reaction instead of response to me.

by tzubear on Nov 12, 2011 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

And still think that's the appropriate response, not reaction.

That’s where we disagree.

Because college football is too important to be left to the professionals.

by Spencer Hall on Nov 12, 2011 7:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I said they should all lose their jobs

So that the University could move on? To telecast evil of this kind will not be tolerated? Or because a torch needed to clense all participants who’s participation is unclear.

I know it’s evil. I am just more comfortable understanding each individals part before I call for action.

by tzubear on Nov 11, 2011 11:31 PM EST reply actions  

Reading this, I thought of two quotes

One by Albert Speer, in “Inside the Third Reich” on his observations as one of Hitler’s inner circle.

"One seldom recognizes the devil when he has his hand on your shoulder."

The second quote is etched in my memory by countless recitations in Officer Candidate School, and constant reminders as a code of conduct in my duty as an officer. It is the epitome of what it means to wear the mantle of command in the armed services:

Worth’s Battalion Order

But an officer on duty knows no one — to be partial is to dishonor both himself and the object of his ill advised favor. What will be thought of him who exacts of his friends that which disgraces him? Look at him who winks at and overlooks offenses in one, which he causes to be punished in another, and contrast him with the inflexible soldier who does his duty faithfully, notwithstanding it occasionally wars with his private feelings. The conduct of one will be venerated and emulated, the other detested as a satire upon soldiership and honor.”

Brevet Major William J. Worth

This is what every level of supervision of the Penn State athletic program failed to do: consider the evidence in front of them with no regard to whom it applied. In their minds was the caveat “But it’s Jerry we’re talking about” and it colored their judgement. In the end, that detestation and satire of honor is what is happening now.

by sullivan013 on Nov 11, 2011 11:49 PM EST reply actions  

sadly

An excellent post. I say sadly because I wish this weren’t the way the world is, so full Dr. Jekylls and Mr. Hydes.

by HTown80 on Nov 12, 2011 12:42 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

219 updates with 736 comments

Like to see major updates on this story in Facebook.

145404080_extra_large_small

Celtics Stumble In Miami During East Finals Opener, 93-79

Jason "Mayhem" Miller / Esther Lin, MMA Fighting

Jason 'Mayhem' Miller Announces Retirement On The MMA Hour

ST. LOUIS - MAY 23: Starting pitcher Jared Weaver #36 of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim throws against the St. Louis Cardinals at Busch Stadium on May 23, 2010 in St. Louis, Missouri.  The Cardinals beat the Angels 6-5 in 10 innings.  (Photo by Dilip Vishwanat/Getty Images)

Jered Weaver Leaves Start After 12 Pitches With Lower-Back Injury