The winners and losers in the 2012 SEC schedule. If Vandy is going to ever make a serious move, next year would be a pretty good time for it. Also: poor Auburn, Kentucky and Ole Miss.
Dec 29, 2011 - Georgia wins! South Carolina loses! Oh my God, Ole Miss is doomed! Most initial reactions to the release of the 2012 SEC football schedule followed the same lines; it makes sense, really, as those things all appear to be true. But what else can we learn about the 2012 slate? Using 2011 numbers, quite a bit.
One of the better ways to imagine the impact of the 2012 schedule is to look at the impact it would have had in 2011. Using F/+ numbers and actual 2011 results, we can come up with a loose set of projections. Some guidelines:
1. If the two teams really played, that result is used. Only, in almost every case, the home-road status of the game is flipped. In those instances, we will flip the score by approximately seven points in favor of the home team. That is a generally-accepted number for home-field advantage -- you lose about 3.5 points going from home field to a neutral site, and you lose about another 3.5 points going from neutral to road.
2. For games that did not take place (i.e. most Missouri and Texas A&M games, plus a few others), we will use F/+ projections as our guide (those results are in bold). These ratings will change slightly once bowl results are factored in, but this is still a solid place to start.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 30-Aug | South Carolina | Vanderbilt | South Carolina by 11 |
| 8-Sep | Auburn | Mississippi State | Mississippi State by 1 |
| 8-Sep | Florida | Texas A&M | Texas A&M by 8 |
| 8-Sep | Georgia | Missouri | Georgia by 3 |
The main problem with using F/+ projections: they don't really take Texas A&M's late-game collapses into account. Using every play and every drive of 2011, A&M was a pretty damn good team, ranking 18th overall. The timeliness of their poor plays and drives was staggering. Perhaps they would have indeed beaten Florida by eight, but who knows how the tendency toward collapse would have factored in. Meanwhile, No. 14 Georgia is able to edge out No. 33 Missouri.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 15-Sep | Alabama | Arkansas | Alabama by 17 |
| 15-Sep | Florida | Tennessee | Florida by 3 |
| 22-Sep | LSU | Auburn | LSU by 28 |
| 22-Sep | Kentucky | Florida | Florida by 45 |
| 22-Sep | Vanderbilt | Georgia | Georgia by 12 |
| 22-Sep | Missouri | South Carolina | South Carolina by 5 |
Home field carries South Carolina over Missouri in Columbia No. 1 (or is it Columbia No. 2?).
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 29-Sep | Ole Miss | Alabama | Alabama by 52 |
| 29-Sep | Arkansas | Texas A&M | Arkansas by 1 |
| 29-Sep | Tennessee | Georgia | Georgia by 15 |
| 29-Sep | South Carolina | Kentucky | South Carolina by 44 |
Arkansas beat Texas A&M by four points at Jerry World; a flip to College Station would be worth about three points.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 6-Oct | Mississippi State | Kentucky | Mississippi State by 12 |
| 6-Oct | Arkansas | Auburn | Arkansas by 17 |
| 6-Oct | LSU | Florida | LSU by 23 |
| 6-Oct | Georgia | South Carolina | South Carolina by 10 |
| 6-Oct | Texas A&M | Ole Miss | Texas A&M by 16 |
| 6-Oct | Vanderbilt | Missouri | Missouri by 6 |
Safe to say, the Collapse Factor would not have been enough to cost A&M against Ole Miss. Meanwhile, Missouri earns Win No. 1 at home over Vandy.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 13-Oct | Alabama | Missouri | Alabama by 16 |
| 13-Oct | Kentucky | Arkansas | Arkansas by 23 |
| 13-Oct | Auburn | Ole Miss | Auburn by 11 |
| 13-Oct | Florida | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt by 2 |
| 13-Oct | South Carolina | LSU | LSU by 29 |
| 13-Oct | Tennessee | Mississippi State | Mississippi State by 7 |
Drawing LSU certainly does South Carolina no favors, eh? Meanwhile, Bama slowly pulls away from Missouri just like they slowly pulled away from most SEC opponents. And flipping Florida-Vandy to Nashville flips the result, too. This will become a trend for the 'Dores.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 20-Oct | Alabama | Tennessee | Alabama by 24 |
| 20-Oct | Auburn | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt by 7 |
| 20-Oct | South Carolina | Florida | Florida by 2 |
| 20-Oct | Georgia | Kentucky | Georgia by 2 |
| 20-Oct | LSU | Texas A&M | LSU by 19 |
With S.C.-Florida taking place at the Swamp, the Gators steal a win, leaving South Carolina two games in the hole with the new slate.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 27-Oct | Ole Miss | Arkansas | Arkansas by 12 |
| 27-Oct | Texas A&M | Auburn | Texas A&M by 7 |
| 27-Oct | Florida | Georgia | Georgia by 4 |
| 27-Oct | Kentucky | Missouri | Missouri by 18 |
| 27-Oct | Tennessee | South Carolina | South Carolina by 18 |
| 27-Oct | Mississippi State | Alabama | Alabama by 24 |
Does A&M hold on in Auburn? Meanwhile, Homecoming No. 1 for Missouri goes swimmingly.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 3-Nov | Alabama | LSU | LSU by 10 |
| 3-Nov | Missouri | Florida | Florida by 3 |
| 3-Nov | Ole Miss | Georgia | Georgia by 21 |
| 3-Nov | Vanderbilt | Kentucky | Vanderbilt by 23 |
| 3-Nov | Texas A&M | Mississippi State | Texas A&M by 4 |
Missouri is done no favors by facing South Carolina and Florida on the road. Flip those two games and send them to Athens, and the Tigers go 2-1. As is, they go 0-3. Also: does A&M hold on in Starkville?
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 10-Nov | Texas A&M | Alabama | Alabama by 19 |
| 10-Nov | Arkansas | South Carolina | Arkansas by 9 |
| 10-Nov | Georgia | Auburn | Georgia by 31 |
| 10-Nov | Mississippi State | LSU | LSU by 20 |
| 10-Nov | Vanderbilt | Ole Miss | Vanderbilt by 16 |
| 10-Nov | Missouri | Tennessee | Missouri by 3 |
Home-road status makes no difference on the Tigers' first trip to Knoxville.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 17-Nov | Arkansas | Mississippi State | Arkansas by 20 |
| 17-Nov | Ole Miss | LSU | LSU by 56 |
| 17-Nov | Tennessee | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt by 1 |
Flipping Tennessee-Vandy to Nashville swings the game in Vandy's favor, and ... poor Ole Miss. These margins are horrendous.
| Date | Away | Home | Winner |
| 24-Nov | Auburn | Alabama | Alabama by 35 |
| 24-Nov | LSU | Arkansas | LSU by 17 |
| 24-Nov | Kentucky | Tennessee | Tennessee by 4 |
| 24-Nov | Mississippi State | Ole Miss | Mississippi State by 21 |
| 24-Nov | Missouri | Texas A&M | Missouri by 7 |
All is right with the world: Tennessee beats Kentucky in Knoxville. And Missouri still wins at College Station. (Fun note: they will have the chance to win in College Station for the third consecutive year next fall. An odd scheduling quirk.)
| East | Conf. Rec. | Record | Diff |
| Georgia | 7-1 | 10-2 | |
| South Carolina | 5-3 | 9-3 | -1 Win |
| Vanderbilt | 5-3 | 9-3 | +3 Wins |
| Florida | 4-4 | 7-5 | +1 Win |
| Missouri | 4-4 | 7-5 | |
| Tennessee | 1-7 | 5-7 | |
| Kentucky | 0-8 | 3-9 | -2 Wins |
Your big winner: Vanderbilt. They draw Auburn (at home) instead of Arkansas, and sending Florida and Tennessee to Nashville flips those tight results. (This assumes, of course, that Vandy has the same homefield advantage as other SEC schools. Everybody got the same seven-point flip in this exercise.) This does suggest that, if James Franklin's Commodores are going to make a move, next year would be a pretty good time.
Meanwhile, even if Missouri loses to Arizona State, they finish with the same overall record thanks to the addition of an extra cupcake opponent. And yes, South Carolina is done no favors here, even if they don't suffer as much as others.
| West | Conf. Rec. | Record | Diff |
| LSU | 8-0 | 12-0 | |
| Alabama | 7-1 | 11-1 | |
| Arkansas | 6-2 | 10-2 | |
| Mississippi State | 4-4 | 8-4 | +2 Wins |
| Texas A&M | 4-4 | 8-4 | +2 Wins |
| Auburn | 1-7 | 4-8 | -3 Wins |
| Ole Miss | 0-8 | 2-10 |
Obviously things at the top of the West were not going to change much. Your three most impacted teams are Mississippi State, Texas A&M and Auburn, though A&M's collapsibility (that's a word now) could have resulted in no change at all for them. Auburn is hurt the worst in this new arrangement, while Mississippi State, in drawing Tennessee at home and getting Auburn in Starkville, benefits quite a bit.
Comments
LSU by 56
But remember it could be worse for Ole Miss. LSU went to the kneel down at the OM 1 yard line rather than add an extra TD.
by bkarbour on Dec 29, 2011 9:18 AM EST reply actions
Pretty sure no one forgot about that.
The problem with quotations on the internet is, you don't know whether they're accurate. - Abraham Lincoln
by Anything but Gatorade on Dec 29, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions
Where's UGA's 2nd loss coming from?
Given your method, your have UGA with only one SEC loss. Are you predicting UGA will lose to Georgia Tech? Based on what possible reason? Your method gives the home team 7 points. We beat GT handily on the road last year. Thus, wouldn’t we win again?
They are not losing to FAU, Buffalo, or Georgia Southern…
GATA!
by Jman781 on Dec 29, 2011 10:59 AM EST reply actions
I was thinking the same thing
I agree with Bill that the Dawgs look like more of a 10-2 or even 9-3 team on paper, but with that schedule 11-1 seems very reasonable.
by sperren on Dec 29, 2011 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
Boise State.
I kind of cross the streams between 2011 and 2012 here, but I was using the 2012 schedule to play 2011 results, therefore Georgia still lost to Boise State.
Follow me at @SBN_BillC!
SB Nation
Rock M Nation
Football Outsiders
Football Study Hall
by Bill Connelly on Dec 29, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
Got it.
You’re using 2011 data and teams and “playing” the 2012 SEC schedule (since UGA doesn’t play BSU in 2012), not necessarily projecting how each team will fare next season with different squads, coaches, etc.
Thus, Ole Miss still has a chance!
GATA!
by Jman781 on Dec 29, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
Bill do you ever do a
“revisit how the numbers panned out for the season” piece? For example, at the end of next year it will be interesting to see how the actual outcomes stack up to these statistical predictions. Is that piece forthcoming vs the predictions I have already forgotten from the beginning of the year?
Never forget Wolf Island, or pie! #AHAMF, it's vaguely sordid.
by Spider_Monkey on Dec 30, 2011 1:14 AM EST reply actions
As he says above
this isn’t really a prediction, but rather a benchmark to see how the new schedule helps and harms certain teams relative to this year’s schedule. To pick the most salient example, Vandy’s getting games that were close this season at home next year, so they’re getting the most “mileage” out of their schedule.
Rammer Jammer Yellow Hammer Give 'Em HELL Alabama!
by RoscoeOfAlabama on Jan 3, 2012 12:38 AM EST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed