PALO ALTO, CA - OCTOBER 09: USC Trojans head coach Lane Kiffin speaks with side judge Mike Weseloh during their loss to the Stanford Cardinal at Stanford Stadium on October 9, 2010 in Palo Alto, California. (Photo by Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)

Lane Kiffin Escapes Punishment In Tennessee NCAA Investigation

USC head coach Lane Kiffin was not punished by the NCAA for his involvement in alleged violations that occurred while he was coaching at Tennessee.

  • Live
11 Total Updates since February 2, 2011
  • Important 2
  • Updates 11
  • All Updates 11

Will Tennessee Football Take The Fall For Lane Kiffin's Actions? Maybe Not.

Everybody noticed the liberal use of "former coaching staff" this and "former head coach" that in the NCAA report on Tennessee's alleged football recruiting violations, right? That language may hold the key to any future sanctions levied against the Volunteer football program.

The fact that the basketball program is being hit with allegations at the same time provides a convenient way to contrast the charges leveled at the two teams. (Banner day for Tennessee here, in case you hadn't noticed.) In the document detailing the NCAA allegations against the football program (available on Tennessee's athletics website), you'll note that the charges of "failure to monitor" and "failure to promote an atmosphere for compliance" are directed at the Vols' former head coach and his staff, while the university itself is named in a failure to monitor charge regarding basketball recruiting.

There's been almost a wholesale turnover of assistant coaches since Kiffin's departure to USC, though one staffer named specifically in the findings, recruiting intern Steve Rubio, remains at Tennessee. And though standard NCAA operating procedure is to punish the institution for transgressions committed by players, coaches, and boosters, and though schools have been brought low before by the actions of since-departed figures, a precedent for sanctioning a departed coach does exist: Stewart Mandel reminds us that Rick Neuheisel was banned from off-campus recruiting for a year at Washington based on the NCAA's sentencing of Colorado.

What's really interesting is the next step in the process between the university and the NCAA's Committee on Infractions, wherein the school will be compelled to report whether Kiffin did, in fact, facilitate an environment of compliance at Tennessee. There's already one indication (that we know about) that he didn't: The very first charge leveled against "former members of the institution's football coaching staff," involving improper phone calls to recruits during the January 2010 dead period:

These calls were placed subsequent to the football staff's receipt of information in December 2009 from the institution's compliance staff that such telephone calls were impermissible.

Can the University of Tennessee exact some Appalachian justice on the coach who so publicly jilted them? We won't know for ages, but look forward to three months of spiteful speculation.

For more Tennessee Volunteers athletics news and chatter, visit SB Nation's Rocky Top Talk.


Lane Kiffin Is Primary Target Of NCAA Investigation Into Tennessee Football

As speculated everywhere yesterday, the University of Tennessee has received the long-awaited report from the NCAA's Committee On Infractions, concerning allegations of recruiting improprieties by the Volunteer football program under Lane Kiffin (as well as the basketball program under Bruce Pearl). The school released the documents Wednesday morning. You can read the full notice of allegations from the NCAA, as well as statements of response from the Tennessee chancellor and athletic director, at the above link, but here's the pertinent part.

The notice contains the following allegations of violation of NCAA rules against the football program:

• By former members of the football coaching staff: impermissible telephone contact (16 total calls) with prospective student-athletes from Jan. 3-9, 2010.
• By a former assistant football coach: allegations relating to impermissible contacts with prospective student-athletes.
• By a former head football coach: failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance within the football program and failure to monitor the activities regarding compliance of several assistant coaches have also been made against a former head football coach, and permitting a football recruiting intern to make impermissible contact with high school staff during a recruiting visit.

Boy howdy, that's a lot of "former" coaches. And now for the technicalities: The university has 90 days to respond to the NCAA's notice; if they take the full time to do so, they'll likely end up in front of the COI for the committee's June meetings in Indianapolis. For more on Tennessee's latest ill-conceived brush with justice, visit SB Nation's Rocky Top Talk.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.