Jim Tressel Asks For, Receives Five Game Suspension From Ohio State

Jim Tressel did receive a self-requested three game extension of his existing two game suspension for lying to NCAA investigators, bringing the total games to be served up to the five games Terrelle Pryor and three other players will sit out for their role in an improper benefits case. The NCAA did uphold the existing five game suspensions of the players involved, and the Ohio State University did issue a statement describing all this. Superficially, this did all resolve itself last night, and technically speaking, the matter of “Tatgate” is done in the eyes of the institutions involved.

There is one loose thread, however: Tressel’s three game extension, which he requested, was likely a concession to the NCAA stalling future action concerning Tressel’s violation of NCAA bylaw 10.1, the one barring “unethical conduct.” This is the point where things get squirrelly, because we are talking about the NCAA and rule enforcement, and that is a mysterious matter at best in the year 2011.

If Tressel’s suspension was made with the tacit approval of the NCAA, that would mean that Ohio State would face no further action in the case. This kind of communication during the self-imposed penalty phase is not uncommon in these cases. When Cecil Newton admitted to shopping his son Cam Newton’s services in the fall of 2010, Auburn University consulted with the NCAA in order to create a solution they found satisfactory. (That solution was ultimately to declare Cam Newton ineligible for a day, and then reinstate him based on the player’s lack of knowledge of the situation.)

This discreet approval of Ohio State’s actions by the NCAA could be one scenario. The other is that this is a bone thrown in the direction of an organization that could could in theory still punish Ohio State further for Tressel’s lies to investigators. Tressel claims an overlapping confidentiality conflict with a federal drug investigation caused some confusion over what he could say to the NCAA, but technically that conflict caused a violation of 10.1. As you will hear several hundred times when reading about this case, 12 coaches have violated rule 10.1. Eleven of those were fired as a result.

This all hinges on the NCAA acting in a predictable and consistent manner, and that may be the biggest wild card in this entire case.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.