FOXBORO MA - OCTOBER 31: Randy Moss #84 of the Minnesota Vikings runs onto the field before a game against the New England Patriots at Gillette Stadium on October 31 2010 in Foxboro Massachusetts. (Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

Randy Moss Fallout Continues, Reportedly Told Vikings Owner That Brad Childress Should Be Fired

Before he was released by the Vikings, WR Randy Moss told ownership Brad Childress should be fired.

  • Live
23 Total Updates since November 1, 2010
  • Important 2
  • Updates 23
  • All Updates 23

Brad Childress: Acquiring Randy Moss Was 'Poor Decision'

Brad Childress’ season is probably going to be defined by two things. How the Vikings finish and his handling of The Randy Moss Fiasco. That fiasco came to an end Wednesday when the Tennessee Titans acquired Moss off waivers.

The Minnesota coach who awkwardly handled Moss’ dismissal from the Vikings spoke Wednesday about how acquiring him in the first place was a bad idea from the get-go.

“It was a poor decision,” Childress said, referring to the Oct. 6 deal in which the Vikings sent a third-round draft choice to the Patriots for Moss. “I’ve got to stand up and I have to make it right. When it’s not right, you need to make it right.”

“I have to answer for my decisions,” Childress said. “In the long run with ownership, obviously, my name is affixed to wins and losses in this program here. So, it’s not an attempt to deceive, it’s just a matter of letting the people know that need to know. And when we came out with the statement, that’s when all that had been done.”

Moss may be gone but Childress still has the Minnesota brass, players and fans to answer to. If the Vikings don’t win a lot more games, he won’t have much of a chance.


Field Gulls: Should The Seahawks Claim Randy Moss Off Waivers?

The Seattle Seahawks are one of the teams surely interested in the services of Randy Moss, once the Vikings officially put him on waivers Tuesday. Seattle blog Field Gulls weighs the pros and cons of signing Moss to determine whether or not it’s a worthy endeavor:


Moss is a superstar wide receiver.

Moss is 33 and nearing 34, and his years as the best wide receiver in the NFL are probably over, but he is still one of the very best wide receivers in football. His speed, frame, ability to get away with offensive pass interference, ball skills and leaping ability force safety help deep. Anything but the very best corners in football are a liability matched one-on-one against Moss, and that ability to shift coverage schemes opens up underneath passing routes and the run game.


Seattle, as currently constructed, probably can not take advantage of Moss’s ability.

Any one of Deon Butler, Mike Williams and Golden Tate could be a deep threat, but none have proven capable of stretching the field in this offense. Adding a player like Moss may be adding another capable receiver to an offense that needs everything but.


Signing Moss is playing with fire…but signing Moss also has clear value, if Seattle can be sure Moss can succeed in this offense as constructed. Or, potentially, if the Seahawks think a shakeup of some sort, the return of Russell Okung or the substitution of Charlie Whitehurst for Matt Hasselbeck, can be enough for Moss to succeed in Seattle. In that scenario, Moss is both very valuable and very inexpensive for the 2010 Seahawks, and, potentially, the future of the Seahawks whether he’s re-signed or not.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.


You must be a member of to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.